Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Other Historic Preservation Statutes: Archaeology
Advertisements

NAGPRA: introductions
Association on American Indian Affairs The Federal Trust Relationship, Tribal Sovereignty, and Self-Determination Prepared by Jack F. Trope, Executive.
Geothermal Projects and Indian Tribes: Dealing with Cultural Resources Issues Michael P. O’Connell Stoel Rives LLP O R.
Part 3: Selecting the Colors Historical, Legal and Political Perspectives.
PRESENTATION TO THE COMMITTEE ON STATE GOVERNMENT FINANCE MARCH 15, 2011 MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTION The Minnesota Indian Affairs Council.
The Legal Series: Employment Law I. Objectives Upon the completion of training, you will be able to: Understand the implications of Title VI Know what.
Archaeological Resources Protection Act Steve Perry Chief of Refuge Law Enforcement Region 7
“Student Due Process” School Administrators of South Dakota April 7, 2015.
Executive Director, National Commission on Indigenous Peoples
ICWA The Tribe as the “Third Parent”. Why ICWA? Wabanaki people are indigenous to the land that is now the State of Maine. In 15 th century there were.
Heritage Resources Management and the Wildland Fire Suppression Undertaking.
NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT of 1966 as amended Garry J. Cantley Regional Archeologist Bureau of Indian Affairs.
Archaeological Ethics Two big issues we haven’t covered in this concept course: The Status of Archaeological Practice today, and this includes Culture.
Cultural Resources Management in the USFWS. Overview of Laws & Regulations 1906 – Present.
What’s the Deal with Treaties. What does Equality mean to you? Does Equality mean treating everyone the same?
2/16/2010 The Family Educational Records and Privacy Act.
Indigenous Peoples & the U. N
Castan Centre for Human Rights Law Symposium on Australia’s Implementation of the UN Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
Local and Tribal Intergovernmental Consultation Senate Bill 18: Law, Definitions, Process Protection of Traditional Tribal Cultural Places.
An introduction to for Caregivers. The Alliance for Child Welfare Excellence is Washington’s first comprehensive statewide training partnership dedicated.
Part 1.3 Mineral Rights & Leasing. Objectives After reading the chapter and reviewing the materials presented the students will be able to: Understand.
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
Chapter 17 Caring for America’s Cultural Heritage.
Key points: Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) language and intent incorporates an indigenous perspective in determining cultural.
ICWA: Purposes, Procedures & Practice Implications Prepared by: Jerry R. Foxhoven, Executive Director, Drake Legal Clinic Director, Middleton Center for.
A skeletal framework Lecture 2 The legal foundations of scientific archaeology as practiced in in the United States.
Cultural Resource Management An Introduction to Federal Heritage Preservation and the Law.
Environmental Planning CULTURAL RESOURCES CH 5 - HO # 13
What is the purpose of the Class I Redesignation Guidance? Provides guidance for tribes who are considering redesignating their areas as Class I areas.
NATIONAL NAGPRA What is The National NAGPRA Program?
Productive SB 18 Consultation Michelle LaPena, Esq. LaPena Law Corporation 2001 N Street, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA (916)
1 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING CULTURAL RESOURCES LAWS AND REGULATIONS CH 5 CH 5 HO # 13, 13a, 13b
NAGPRA Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act The Law and Ethics of the Kennewick Man Controversy Presented by: Graham Sowa.
CULTURAL RESOURCES PRESERVATION
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
Cultural Resource Management Preservation and Conservation.
NAGPRA: THE BASICS By Lee Rains Clauss 1 st NAGPRA Community Meeting Sherwood Valley Rancheria of Pomo Willits, CA March 1, This meeting is supported.
Association on American Indian Affairs History and Importance of Government to Government in ICW Proceedings Jack F. Trope Executive Director.
1 Sacred places in the Treaty Relationship Senwung Luk As Long As The Rivers Flow Conference.
By Rachel Coleman.  “ The head of any federal agency having direct or indirect jurisdiction over a proposed federal or federally assisted undertaking.
RIGHTS OF ABORIGINAL PEOPLES IN CANADA. Social and Economic Conditions Approximately 1.2 million aboriginal people Different groups –Status and non-status.
NAGPRA GRANT COMMUNITY MEETING SHERWOOD VALLEY RANCHERIA OF POMO MARCH 1, 2014 This meeting is supported by a grant from the Department of the Interior,
Understanding Applicable Laws in Child Protection and Child Welfare Cases: Presentation at TCAP Tribal Courts Conference – Minneapolis August 20, 2015.
Lumbee Federal Recognition Termination Policy of the 1950s In the 1950s, the U.S. government decided that the best way to deal with all Indian tribes.
By: Dean Suagee Director First Nations Environmental Law Program Vermont Law School PROTECTING SACRED LANDS AND TRADITIONAL CULTURAL PLACES WITH CULTURAL.
Who Owns the Dead? Native American Grave Protection and Repatriation Act Luis Salas.
How Tribes Can Influence State Title V Permits Virgil Frazier Southern Ute Indian Tribe Virgil Frazier Southern Ute Indian Tribe.
Politics and Native American History Reconstructing the Past.
NATIONAL NAGPRA What is The National NAGPRA program?
Dr. Rafael González Ballar July, The San Salvador Protocol on Economic and Social Rights (1999) contains a clear standard, objective and important.
Welcome to the Public Comment Hearing on the Proposed Regulatory Update to the California Environmental Quality Act AB 52, Gatto (2014) Heather Baugh Assistant.
Anth January 2012.
Dorothy Alther, Executive Director California Indian Legal Services
Sacred places in the Treaty Relationship
Deepwater Horizon (MC 252) Oil Spill: Section 106 Compliance
International Repatriation Update
Working with and benefitting from NAGPRA
Cultural Resources Management in the USFWS
Pedestrian Survey.
Midterm Review Public Archaeology.
Decolonizing Museums and Anthropology
Overview of 2019 Non-BIA Federal Register Notice
Ethics, Laws and Sacred Objects
The Role of the SHPO John Pouley, Assistant State Archaeologist
Overview of 2020 Non-BIA Federal Register Notice
5/1/2019 3:12 AM SHARED STEWARDSHIP STABILITY, TRANSPARENCY AND PREDICTABILITY IN ALLOCATION November 26, 2010 Vancouver.
National Historic Preservation Act
National Historic Preservation Act
Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA)
Presentation transcript:

Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) Jack F. Trope, Executive Director, Association on American Indian Affairs

NAGPRA Applies in three contexts – (1) repatriation of human remains and cultural items from museums and federal agencies, (2) protection of burial sites and cultural items located on federal and tribal land, and (3) trafficking in Native American human remains and cultural items.

NAGPRA – Legislative History Human rights legislation Based upon trust relationship Compromise between museum, scientific, Indian communities

NAGPRA – Who has rights Lineal descendants Indian tribes Native Hawaiian organizations

NAGPRA – Definitions Associated funerary objects – Objects made exclusively for burial purposes or that are associated with specific human remains in the custody of the agency or museum Unassociated funerary objects – Objects removed from a burial site where the human remains are not in the custody of the agency or museum

NAGPRA – Definitions (cont.) Sacred objects – Ceremonial objects needed for the practice of traditional Native American religions by present day religious leaders Objects of cultural patrimony – Object having ongoing historical, traditional or cultural importance central to the tribe/culture and which was inalienable at the time it was separated from the tribe

NAGPRA – Who Has Responsibilities Museums – federally funded Federal agencies (excluding the Smithsonian which is covered by its own law)

NAGPRA - Responsibilities Item by item inventory of human remains and associated funerary objects Summaries of unassociated funerary objects, sacred objects and cultural patrimony

NAGPRA - Repatriation Human remains and associated funerary objects must be repatriated to direct descendants and culturally affiliated tribes Cultural affiliation – relationship of shared group identity which can be reasonably traced between a present day tribe and an identifiable earlier group

NAGPRA - Repatriation Cultural affiliation determined through inventory/summary or based on evidence submitted by a tribe/NHO Types of evidence may include geographical, kinship, biological, archaeological, anthropological, linguistic, folkloric, oral traditional and historical evidence

NAGPRA - Repatriation Recent regulations govern repatriation of human remains whose cultural affiliation cannot be determined. Museum or federal agency must offer to return “culturally unaffiliated” remains if removed from tribal land or tribal aboriginal territory Culturally affiliated tribes that are not federally recognized may repatriate if no federally recognized tribe who could make a claim objects

NAGPRA - Repatriation Repatriation of unassociated funerary objects, sacred objects and cultural patrimony – a 4 step process 1. Show that the item meets the definition for one of the categories 2. Show cultural affiliation or (in case of sacred objects and cultural patrimony) that the item was previously owned or controlled by the tribe or a member of the tribe (lineal descendants may seek return of sacred objects)

NAGPRA - Repatriation 3. Present prima facie evidence that the museum or agency did not have right of possession, i.e., did not obtain the items with the consent of an individual or group that had the right to transfer title. 4. If prima facie case made, then burden shifts to museum or agency to prove it has the right of possession.

NAGPRA – What types of sites are covered Sites that contain human remains or Native cultural items Cultural items include funerary objects (associated and unassociated), sacred objects, and cultural patrimony

NAGPRA – Lands Covered Federal lands Tribal lands – defined to include all lands within reservation boundaries regardless of land ownership, all dependent Indian communities and lands administered for Native Hawaiians. State land in one circumstance – land transferred to South Dakota in the Water Resources Act

NAGPRA – Intentional Excavations Tribal land – tribal consent required Federal land – notice and consultation with tribe Party must obtain an ARPA permit

NAGPRA – Inadvertent discovery Person who discovered the items must cease activity for 30 days, make reasonable efforts to protect the items discovered, and notify the federal agency (if federal land) or the tribe/Native Hawaiian organization (if tribal land) When federal agency receives notice, it must notify appropriate tribe/NHO

NAGPRA – Consultation procedures – federal lands Notice must be sent to known lineal descendants, tribes/NHOs that are likely to be culturally related to the items at the site and tribes that aboriginally occupied the land; notice shall propose a time and place for meeting and include relevant information Agencies should also seek to identify traditional religious leaders

NAGPRA – Possible outcomes Commentary to the regulations states that “in situ” preservation of sites should be considered wherever possible But NAGPRA does not prevent excavation. If excavation, ownership and control of the items can pass to descendants or tribe/NHO if legal criteria met; it not, becomes property of the United States

NAGPRA – Action Plans Where excavation is to occur, agencies must develop written action plans that include (1) information about kinds of objects considered cultural items, and (2) how custody will be determined and items disposed of, (3) how cultural items will be handled and analyzed and recorded (if applicable), and (4) how tribes will be consulted.

NAGPRA – Ownership/Control Rules for Remains/Objects Unearthed on Federal/Tribal lands Human remains and associated funerary objects: Lineal descendents Unassociated funerary objects, sacred objects and cultural patrimony (or if no lineal descendents determined):

NAGPRA – Ownership/Control Rules for Remains/Objects Unearthed on Federal/Tribal lands (cont.) Tribe or NHO with the closest cultural affiliation, The tribe/NHO on whose land the object or remains were found Tribe that obtained an Indian Claims Commission or Court of Claims judgment recognizing the land on which the object or remains were found as its aboriginal land, unless there is another tribe with a closer cultural relationship.

NAGPRA – Ancient human remains Bonnischen v. United States, 367 F.3d 864 (9th Cir. 2004) Interpreted statute to apply only to human remains and cultural items that “bear a significant relationship to a presently existing tribe, people or culture” Not adopted by any other Circuit to date

NAGPRA – Trafficking Prohibits trafficking in human remains without consent of the next of kin, tribe or NHO Prohibits trafficking in cultural items if obtained in violation of the Act

NAGPRA – Review Committee 7 member committee, 3 Native American (at least 2 traditional Native American religious leaders), 3 from museum and scientific community, 1 chosen by list compiled by the other 6. Makes recommendations to Secretary on regulations, monitors inventory process, makes recommendations to parties in disputed cases, submits report to Congress.

International Repatriation Increased focus on issue by tribes Right to repatriation recognized by the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples