Systematic on Rear Leakage correction Observation : Different behaviour between Data & MC.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

FCal TB2003 Shower profiles: G4/MC - Test beam DATA comparison A.Artamonov and ITEP group /afs/cern.ch/user/g/gorbunov/public/prof_note.pdf.

Advertisements

1 6 th September 2007 C.P. Ward Sensitivity of ZZ→llνν to Anomalous Couplings Pat Ward University of Cambridge Neutral Triple Gauge Couplings Fit Procedure.

Beam profile vs time Analyzed Vx vs Vy distributions vs time for –Run 72 (13:26:02 – 28:25) –Run 73 (13:36:10 – 13:37:30) –Run 74 (43:12 – 44:21) Binned.

Bill Atwood, SCIPP/UCSC, August, 2005 GLAST 1 Energy Method Selections Data Set: All Gamma (GR-HEAD1.615) Parametric Tracker Last Layer Profile 4 Methods.

Longitudinal shower profile of the DESY and CERN testbeam data in the electromagnetic calorimeter Valeria Bartsch (UCL) & Nigel Watson (Birmingham)

New MC set summary Old MC set summary 400k events generated for each set in STARlight Radius adjusted for matching exponential slope of t-spectrum Fully.

Cross Section meeting, 5 Nov 1999 Maria Girone1 Preliminary results on the WW fully leptonic cross section for the LEPC Maria Girone Imperial College.

FMS review, Sep FPD/FMS: calibrations and offline reconstruction Measurements of inclusive  0 production Reconstruction algorithm - clustering.

Resonances in decay for 400fb -1 DC Meeting April 10th, 2006 J.Brodzicka, H.Palka INP Kraków J.Brodzicka, H.Palka INP Kraków B +  D 0 D 0 K + B +  D.

Heavy charged gauge boson, W’, search at Hadron Colliders YuChul Yang (Kyungpook National University) (PPP9, NCU, Taiwan, June 04, 2011) June04, 2011,

Summary of Calorimetry/Muon Sessions Burak Bilki University of Iowa Argonne National Laboratory.

Theoretical and Experimental Probability Today you will learn to: calculate the theoretical and experimental probabilities of an event. M07.D-S.3.1.1:

Analysis of E852 Data at Indiana University Ryan Mitchell PWA Workshop Pittsburgh, PA February 2006.

CDF Workshop 2003 University of Toronto April Shabnaz Pashapour University of Toronto Under supervision of Professor Pekka K. Sinervo Towards a.

Ratio of Three over Two Jet Cross Sections: Update 36 pb -1 P.Kokkas, I.Papadopoulos, C.Fountas University of Ioannina, Greece QCD High p T Meeting 17.

20 Jan 2009SiD Benchmark Meeting1 Chargino / Neutralino Analysis Update Yiming Li University of Oxford.

Detection of electromagnetic showers along muon tracks Salvatore Mangano (IFIC)

FSI and Mw(qqqq) 1 FSI and Mw(qqqq) Marie Legendre, Djamel Boumediene, Patrice Perez, Oliver Buchmüller … an alternative approach … PFCUT and PCUT update.

Recent Results on  (3770) Physics at BES Ming-gang Zhao (For BES Collaboration) The 44 th Rencontres de Moriond, QCD and High Energy Interactions March.

Optimization of  exclusion cut for the  + and  (1520) analysis Takashi Nakano Based on Draft version of Technical Note 42.

Study of pair-produced doubly charged Higgs bosons with a four muon final state at the CMS detector (CMS NOTE 2006/081, Authors : T.Rommerskirchen and.

SANE Asymmetries Hovhannes Baghdasaryan. Measurement We are measuring Assumption is that background asymmetry is small Then Measured asymmetry is the.

Current Analysis Activity/Results (Only brief overview) Sunil Bansal (Panjab University, Chandigarh) Approved results marked.

Andrey Korytov, University of Florida ICHEP2004 August 15-22, 2004, Beijing 1 Quark and Gluon Jet Fragmentation Differences Abstracts covered in this talk.

BESIII Cell-type EMC Photon Position Measurement Zhe Wang Mar

Longitudinal shower profile - CERN electron runs Valeria Bartsch University College London.

Itzhak Tserruya Initial Conditions at RHIC: an Experimental Perspective RHIC-INT Workshop LBNL, May31 – June 2, 2001 Itzhak Tserruya Weizmann.

1 The comparisons between with and without JES uncertainty. jet with pt > 30 GeV, |eta| 40. Jet Y is calculated by 0.5*log[(E+pz)/(E-pz)] CMS Data.

ORCA from ANTARES modules J. Brunner 06/10/2012. Detector Hexagonal layout a la IceCube 37 lines, distance 20m 25 ANTARES storeys  z = 4.5m Equipped.

Π 0 and η meson production in pp collisions at 0.9, 2.76 and 7 TeV measured with ALICE LHC on the march November 2011 Boris Polishchuk (IHEP, Protvino),

Inclusive charm cross-section and charm hadrons production fractions F. Di Capua.

Z’ analysis status M.Levchenko 1PNPI M.Levchenko.

Kinematics of Top Decays in the Dilepton and the Lepton + Jets channels: Probing the Top Mass University of Athens - Physics Department Section of Nuclear.

Tomas Hreus, Pascal Vanlaer Study of Strangeness Production in Underlying Event at 7 TeV 1QCD low pT meeting, 18/03/2011.

Measuring Oscillation Parameters Four different Hadron Production models  Four predicted Far  CC spectrum.

Responsibles: Jon Butterworth (UCL), Claire Gwenlan (Oxford), Daniela Rebuzzi (Pavia, INFN) ATLAS MC Validation Meeting, 24 May 2011 HERWIG validation.

1 Studies on Exclusion Limits N.Andari, L. Fayard, M.Kado, F.Polci LAL- Orsay LAL meeting 23/07/2009.

Update on Diffractive Dijet Production Search Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 23/07/2012.

ECAL Alignment with e and π data D. BOUMEDIENE LPC Clermont-Ferrand CALICE meeting – Argonne 19/03/2008.

Matteo Volpi, Luca Fiorini Timing study with Muons at 90º from first beam PRELIMINARY STUDY (Barcelona) 1 Tile Timing Group meeting 17 September 2008.

Measurement of the CR light component primary spectrum B. Panico on behalf of ARGO-YBJ collaboration University Rome Tor Vergata INFN, Rome Tor Vergata.

Status of NLOjet++ for dijet angular distributions

Erik Devetak Oxford University 18/09/2008

Material in front of the calorimeter: Analysis from the data using the sub-detectors response L.Basara, A.Fiasson, C.Goy, M.Paniccia, S.Rosier.

Parameterization for ATLAS EMEC

Tips Need to Consider When Organizing a College Event

Unfolding atmospheric neutrino spectrum with IC9 data (second update)

Update on TB 2007 Xtal Irradiation Studies at H4

Explanatory Note 5 parameter fit 6 parameter fit Two MC Sample Sets

ماجستير إدارة المعارض من بريطانيا

Fake Jet Rejection: Sum Jt

EM Linearity using calibration constants from Geant4

Fluxes of atmosperic leptons

longitudinal shower profile

Let A = {image} and B = {image} . Compare A and B.

R Value measurement from to GeV

Predicting What is it? Making a forecast (educated guess) of what will happen in the future based on past experiences or evidences.

Status of NLOjet++ for dijet angular distributions

Unit 3 Review (Calculator)

Hycal response function study

L*(1520) Photoproduction in gppK+K- from the g11 data set

Hycal response function study

Theoretical systematics Integrating efficiency fitting

Calculate 9 x 81 = x 3 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x =

Draw Scatter Plots and Best-Fitting Lines

Outline Physics Motivation Technique Results

Reading Between the Lines!

Heavy Quarkonium production in p-Pb collisions at LHCb

Presentation transcript:

Systematic on Rear Leakage correction Observation : Different behaviour between Data & MC

Data TB 2007 / TB 2010 C_leak = A(E) – Slope * F2 Slope : no dependance with E in first approximation

F2 Erec/Ebeam With Approximate option

MC : 20 – 300 GeV Example of fits F2 Erec/Etrue

Comparison TB/MC Compatible with flat for MC -Trend to drop with E with TB data -Flat or increasing for MC E_TB / Etrue (GeV)

TB2010 : A Fit with /without : Approximate option A currently calculated on event by event basis - Reflect the tendancy - Point at 300 GeV ? Current approximation of A(E) event per event

ISS Data Approximate Etrue with the energy of the integrated profile. Black/Red : 4 month data Grey/Orange : profile H Green : current guess of A per event

TB2010 : slope Etrue (GeV)

Systematics on Cleak A : - 2% Difference observed at 300 GeV (TB) Slope : + 15 % Change of slope in MC >> 300 GeV 1 TeV

MC : Fit of “0.025”