A precise extraction of the induced polarization in 4 He(e,e’p) 3 H from E03-104 Simona Malace University of South Carolina Outline.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hall A Collaboration Meeting, December 13-14, 2007 E03-104: Probing the Limits of the Standard Model of Nuclear Physics with the 4 He(e,ep) 3 H Reaction.
Advertisements

Exclusive   and  electro-production at high Q 2 in the resonance region Mark Jones Jefferson Lab TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual.
1 First Measurement of the Structure Function b 1 on Tensor Polarized Deuteron Target at HERMES A.Nagaitsev Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna.
Experimental Status of Deuteron F L Structure Function and Extractions of the Deuteron and Non-Singlet Moments Ibrahim H. Albayrak Hampton University.
Measurements of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T on Deuterium and Nuclei in the Nucleon Resonance Region Ya Li November 3, 2009 Jlab E02-109/E (Jan05)
Machine induced background in ALFA The ALFA detector elastic scattering and luminosity background generation, rejection and subtraction impact on luminosity.
BONUS (Barely Off-Shell Nucleon Structure) Experiment Update Thia Keppel CTEQ Meeting November 2007.
The Physics Potential of the PHENIX VTX and FVTX Detectors Eric J. Mannel WWND 13-Apr-2012.
Proton polarization measurements in π° photo-production --On behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III and GEp-2γ collaboration Wei Luo Lanzhou University.
E08-005: A y 0 in Quasi-Elastic 3 He(e,e’n) Scattering Elena Long Hall A Collaboration Meeting December 17 th, /17/2013Hall A Collaboration MeetingElena.
Lecture 5: Electron Scattering, continued... 18/9/2003 1
Proton Form Factor ratio GEp/GMp with polarization method --on behalf of Jefferson lab GEp3 collaboration Wei Luo Lanzhou University, China April
Proton polarization measurements in π° photo- production --on behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III and GEp-2 γ collaboration 2010 Annual Fall Meeting.
Proton Recoil Polarization in the 4 He(e,e’p) 3 H, 2 H(e,e’p)n, and 1 H(e,e’p) Reactions SHMS Commissioning Session, Hall C Workshop. August 20, 2011.
Measurements of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T on Deuteron and Nuclei in the Nucleon Resonance Region Ya Li January 31, 2009 Jlab E02-109/E (Jan05)
Spin Asymmetries of the Nucleon Experiment ( E07-003) Anusha Liyanage Hall C Users Meeting January 23, 2010 Measurement Of the Proton Form Factor Ratio.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
25/07/2002G.Unal, ICHEP02 Amsterdam1 Final measurement of  ’/  by NA48 Direct CP violation in neutral kaon decays History of the  ’/  measurement by.
The Muon Neutrino Quasi-Elastic Cross Section Measurement on Plastic Scintillator Tammy Walton December 4, 2013 Hampton University Physics Group Meeting.
Calibration of the ZEUS calorimeter for electrons Alex Tapper Imperial College, London for the ZEUS Collaboration Workshop on Energy Calibration of the.
 4 He(e,e'p)X, April 13 and April 14, 2011, 16 hours Measured P miss at to 1.0 GeV/c, x b = 1.24, Q 2 = 2 (GeV/c) 2 Extension of SRC 2 body data.
Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology Spokespeople: J.-P. Chen, A. Deur, F. Garibaldi Hall A Collaboration Meeting December 10 th, 2012.
Simona Malace, Hall A Collaboration Meeting – June 12-14, 2008, Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA E03-104: Experiment Status Report Michael Paolone (GS),
Precision Measurement of R L and R T of Quasi-Elastic Electron Scattering In the Momentum Transfer Range 0.55GeV/c≤|q|≤1.0GeV/c* Yan Xinhu Department of.
EINN 2005, Milos, GreeceShalev Gilad - MIT Nuclear Structure and Dynamics in the 3 He(e,e’p)d and 3 He(e,e’p)pn Reactions Two high resolution spectrometers.
Measurement of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T in Nuclei at Low Q 2 Phase I Ya Li Hampton University January 18, 2008.
Nucleon Form Factors and the BLAST Experiment at MIT-Bates
G E p -2γ experiment and the new JLab Hall-C Focal Plane Polarimeter Mehdi Meziane The College of William & Mary - APS Meeting April 14, On behalf.
Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade Drift Chamber Review Jefferson Lab March 6- 8, 2007 CLAS12 Drift Chambers Simulation and Event Reconstruction.
Λ and Σ photoproduction on the neutron Pawel Nadel-Turonski The George Washington University for the CLAS Collaboration.
A Measurement of Two-Photon Exchange in Unpolarized Elastic Electron-Proton Scattering John Arrington and James Johnson Northwestern University & Argonne.
Lecture 9: Inelastic Scattering and Excited States 2/10/2003 Inelastic scattering refers to the process in which energy is transferred to the target,
Proton Charge Form Factor Measurement E. Cisbani INFN Rome – Sanità Group and Italian National Institute of Health 113/Oct/2011E. Cisbani / Proton FF.
Oct 6, 2008Amaresh Datta (UMass) 1 Double-Longitudinal Spin Asymmetry in Non-identified Charged Hadron Production at pp Collision at √s = 62.4 GeV at Amaresh.
Measurement of photons via conversion pairs with PHENIX at RHIC - Torsten Dahms - Stony Brook University HotQuarks 2006 – May 18, 2006.
Model independent extraction of neutron structure functions from deuterium data. Svyatoslav Tkachenko University of South Carolina.
GEp-III in Hall C Andrew Puckett, MIT On behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III Collaboration April 15, 2008.
Recoil Polarimetery in Meson Photoproduction Mark Sikora, Derek Glazier, Dan Watts I. Beam time summary II. Experimental Technique IV. Analysis -event.
E97-110: Small Angle GDH Experimental Status Report E97-110: Small Angle GDH Experimental Status Report Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Jan. 18, 2008 Hall C Meeting L. Yuan/Hampton U.. Outline HKS experimental goals HKS experimental setup Issues on spectrometer system calibration Calibration.
L/T separation in the 3 He(e,e’p) reaction at parallel kinematics Freija Descamps Supervisors: Ron Gilman Eric Voutier Co-supervisor: Jean Mougey.
October 2011 David Toback, Texas A&M University Research Topics Seminar1 David Toback Texas A&M University For the CDF Collaboration CIPANP, June 2012.
 0 life time analysis updates, preliminary results from Primex experiment 08/13/2007 I.Larin, Hall-B meeting.
Highest Q 2 Polarized Measurement of the Electric Form Factor of the Neutron – E Presented by Jonathan Miller For the Hall A E Collaboration.
Absolute Polarization Measurement at RHIC in the Coulomb Nuclear Interference Region September 30, 2006 RHIC Spin Collaboration Meeting RIKEN, Wako, Japan.
Deuteron polarimetry from 1.0 to 1.5 GeV/c Ed Stephenson, IUCF EDM discussion April 14, 2006 Based on work from: France:POMME B. Bonin et al. Nucl. Inst.
E97-110: Small Angle GDH Experimental Status Report E97-110: Small Angle GDH Experimental Status Report Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Measurement of photons via conversion pairs with the PHENIX experiment at RHIC - Torsten Dahms - Master of Arts – Thesis Defense Stony Brook University.
Hall C Summer Workshop August 6, 2009 W. Luo Lanzhou University, China Analysis of GEp-III&2γ Inelastic Data --on behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III.
Study of Charged Hadrons in Au-Au Collisions at with the PHENIX Time Expansion Chamber Dmitri Kotchetkov for the PHENIX Collaboration Department of Physics,
Comparison of GENIE with Garino Data Xin Qian BNL In collaboration with Steve Dytman 1.
High p T hadron production and its quantitative constraint to model parameters Takao Sakaguchi Brookhaven National Laboratory For the PHENIX Collaboration.
Hall A Collaboration Meeting Slide 0 Measurements of Target Single-Spin Asymmetries in QE 3 He ↑ (e, e’) Update of QE A y (E05-015) experiment.
Understanding the 3 He Nuclei: Asymmetry Measurements in Quasi- Elastic Ge Jin University of Virginia For the E Collaboration.
1 Proton Structure Functions and HERA QCD Fit HERA+Experiments F 2 Charged Current+xF 3 HERA QCD Fit for the H1 and ZEUS Collaborations Andrew Mehta (Liverpool.
Possible Ambiguities of Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering in Quasi-elastic Region K. S. Kim School of Liberal Arts and Science, Korea Aerospace University, Korea.
First data from TOTEM experiment at LHC
Possible Ambiguities of Neutrino-Nucleus
Cross section of the process
THE NEW FOCAL PLANE POLARIMETER
Quarkonium production in ALICE
Precision Measurement of η Radiative Decay Width via Primakoff Effect
Compton Data Analysis Jing Feng China Atomic Institute Liping Gan
A Precision Measurement of GEp/GMp with BLAST
Katarzyna Kowalik (LBNL) For the STAR Collaboration
Wei Luo Lanzhou University 2011 Hall C User Meeting January 14, 2011
Duality in 12 GeV Era: Projected Results from E
GEp/GMp Group Meeting Chris Crawford May 12, 2005
for the A1 collaboration
GEp-2γ experiment (E04-019) UPDATE
Presentation transcript:

A precise extraction of the induced polarization in 4 He(e,e’p) 3 H from E Simona Malace University of South Carolina Outline

E in Hall A at JLab lalalalalalala A precise extraction of…  Quasielstic scattering off 4 He using the polarization transfer technique - elastic => P’ x /P’ z ~ G E /G M - quasielastic => P’ x /P’ z sensitive to G E /G M - P y measure of final-state interactions (FSI)  (P’ x /P’ z ) in-medium / (P’ x /P’ z ) free well described by conventional + unconventional (Madrid) OR conventional only nuclear medium effects (Schiavilla et al.)  Quantitatively, the two models predict different results for P y

Nuclear Medium Effects: Madrid vs Schiavilla et al. A precise extraction of… RDWIA + QMC: - Relativistic treatment to: initial bound/final outgoing proton WF, current operator; MEC not included - FSI: relativistic optical potentials (central + spin dependent ) - Nuclear density-dependent proton form factors via QMC model J. Udias et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5451 (1999) Schiavilla et al.: -Variational wave functions for the bound three- and four-nucleon systems + nonrelativistic MEC additional charge-exchange term (largely unconstrained) - FSI via optical potentials with an additional charge-exchange term (largely unconstrained) - Free proton form factors R. Schiavilla et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, (2005) -Relativistic treatment +FSI: reduction by ~ 4 % -Density dependent form factors: reduction by ~ 6% - FSI, no CH-EX: reduction by ~ 0.5 % - FSI + CH-EX: reduction by ~ 5.5 % - MEC: reduction by ~ 4%

Extraction of the induced polarization from E  Instrumental asymmetries complicate the extraction of induced polarization and are typically caused by: - detector inefficiencies - detector misalignments - limited acceptance of the detector Make sure the detector is equally efficient throughout the acceptance Use straight-through events (no graphite block in FPP ) to determine the misalignment coefficients Use a “cone test” : the “basis of the cone” has to fit within the active area of the FPP chambers  E03-104: data on both 4 He and H (uniform coverage) => in 4 He – H some false asymmetries cancel => use P y in H to estimate the size of false asymmetries A precise extraction of…

Detector Inefficiencies standard relaxed u (cm) Fourier Coefficient relaxed  FPP chambers inefficiencies Problem: dead wires in some planes => no track reconstructed by standard tracking algorithm Solution: relax the algorithm by requiring less hits for track reconstruction u v Relaxed tracking: at least 1 hit in CH3 or CH4 - if 1 hit in each chamber => track - if 1 hit just in one of the chambers => hit + pC vertex = track Standard tracking: - at least 1 hit in CH3/CH4 & at least 3 hits in total - tries to resolve the left-right ambiguities A precise extraction of…

Detector Misalignments  FPP chambers misalignments: standard alignment Problem: physical misalignments of FRONT and REAR FPP chambers => FRONT and REAR track misalignment and incorrect reconstruction of FPP and  FPP Solution: use straight-through events to align the FRONT and REAR Standard alignment Relaxed tracking + Standard alignment + Cone test Strong asymmetries for H across the acceptance => false asymmetries  To minimize false asymmetries we thought of a revised method for alignment A precise extraction of…

Alignment Method: Revised  FPP chambers misalignments: comparison standard-revised alignment Standard Alignment: plane dependent correction Align tracks in x, y: VDC-FRONT & FRONT-REAR Revised Alignment: plane and wire dependent correction Align tracks in u, v: VDC-FRONT & FRONT-REAR Revised Alignment: Procedure 1)Select a “clean” sample of events and determine 1)Align VDC-FRONT & FRONT-REAR tracks in u and v A precise extraction of…

Alignment Method: Revised  Select a “clean” sample of events and determine this is used for alignment … before correction after correction A precise extraction of…

 Align tracks in u and v Alignment Method: Revised No alignment Plane alignment Plane + track alignment VDC-FRONT alignment A precise extraction of…

 Align tracks in u and v Alignment Method: Revised FRONT-REAR alignment No alignment Plane alignment Plane + track alignment A precise extraction of…

Cone Test and Cone-Test Cuts  Cuts to delimit the region where alignment coefficients are constrained  Elliptical cut to select the safe active region to be used A precise extraction of…

Fourier Coefficients  After new alignment and news cone test cuts: reduction of false asymmetries  Not perfect so we still rely on subtraction of P y (H) from P y (He) to cancel some of the remaining false asymmetries reduction by factor of 4 A precise extraction of…

P y : Systematic Checks A precise extraction of…

P y : Preliminary Results  Greatly reduced systematic uncertainties for latest data: preliminary upper limit for systematic uncertainty 0.005, 4 times smaller than for E  Neither calculation agrees presently to the latest, more precise data A precise extraction of… blanlablablabal

Summary  To extract the induced polarization with great accuracy: - revised the tracking algorithm to serve our needs - revised the alignment method (with appropriate cuts to eliminate background) for a more precise alignment  Greatly reduced systematic uncertainties for E data: preliminary upper limit for systematic uncertainty 0.005, 4 times smaller than for E  Neither calculation agrees presently to the latest, more precise data Draft of the P y paper no later than March 2010

“What if” slides

Coulomb distortion off-shell effects many-body currents PAPA P  A-1 P   final state interactions Medium modifications of the nucleon form factor  Nuclear corrections beyond the impulse approximation: conventional and unconventional  Difficult to disentangle: need exhaustive knowledge of the conventional effects to reliably find signature of unconventional effects A precise extraction of… Nuclear Medium Effects

Alignment Method: Revised u plane v plane x y z  Determine Polynomial(wire) for each plane Project VDC track to each palne of FRONT chamber and fit position difference: VDC(track)-FRONT(wire) Project FRONT track to each palne of REAR chamber and fit position difference: FRONT(track)-REAR(wire)  position_u(v)_new = position_u(v)_old + Polynomial(wire)

E in Hall A at JLab Proton arm Electro n arm Polarized Electron Beam Target Chamber: 1 H and 4 He targets m( 3 H) Missing Mass (GeV) 3-body break- up region E , 1.0, , 1.3E Q 2 (GeV 2 ) Focal Plane Polarimeter (FPP) Extract with greater accuracy (P’ x /P’ z ) He / (P’ x /P’ z ) H and P y