Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, 2003-10. All Rights Reserved. EES Staff v9.0 Comparison 1 EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY v9.0-

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project L.O.F.T. Report May 2007 through October 2007 Creating a design to meet stakeholder desires and dissolve our current set of interacting problems.
Advertisements

Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Site-Based Decision Making Campus Planning. Restructuring A process through which a district or school alters the pattern of its structures (vision, rules,
Ohio Valley Educational Service Center CIP expanded for Agency Improvement Planning September 8-9, 2011 CIP expanded for Agency Improvement Planning September.
Parents as Partners in Education
Click here to add text Click here to add text. Local Control, Accountability, and Transforming How We Finance Our Schools Elk Grove Unified School District.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Tracy Unified School District Leadership Institute – “Leading the Transformation” Breakout Session Authentic Data Driven Decision Making July/August 2014.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Session Materials  Wiki
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. 1 EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY - STUDENT v2.0.
January 31, 2014 Data Use Information and Guide. Copyright © 2014 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved. What is “TELL Oregon” ? TELL Oregon is an anonymous.
EES-Student v3.0 (Student Engagement Edition) Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS.
PARENT COORDINATOR INFORMATION SESSION PARENT ACCOUNTABILITY Wednesday, July 20, 2011 Madelene Chan, Supt. D24 Danielle DiMango, Supt. D25.
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
EES Student v2.1 Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY TM Student Edition.
EES Parent v2.1 Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY TM Parent Edition.
EES Staff v10.0 Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY TM Staff Survey 3-Way.
Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. 1 EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY - PARENT v2.2.
The Challenge We must realize that the system is the cause of weak execution due to lack of clarity, commitment, collaboration and accountability resulting.
Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY - STUDENT v2.0.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Anderson County Schools. 1. Providing technology to support instruction and to assist with stakeholder communication. 2. Identifying and providing new.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. STAFF EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY v9.0.
You can replace this text with art Goal Setting Process for the Verona Public Schools Board of Education Facilitated by: Charlene Peterson, NJSBA Field.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
EVAL Self Assessment (Adapted from LaConner School Improvement Presentation) Your Name Your District Your Date.
High Performance Leaders in Irving Independent School District (IISD) Administrator’s Leadership Conference August 3, 2010 Leadership 1.
1 Using the Instruction and Learning Appraisal (ILA) to Strengthen the Secondary Instructional Program WVDE Composite Results November.
District Leadership Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the District Leadership Module PowerPoint. The actual Overview PowerPoint is 73.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Amy Alexander. Analyzing Effectiveness Participants’ Reactions Participants’ Learning Organization Support and Change Participants’ Use of New Knowledge.
Connecticut Accountability for Learning Initiative District and School Capacity Building Leadership No Child Left Behind Partnerships & Professional Learning.
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
9 Common Characteristics of Successful Schools From: What we know about successful school leadership (2003). - American Education Research Association.
Office of Service Quality
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
Champaign Unit 4 Parent Advocacy Committee Update Cheryl Camacho & Tony Howard April 22, 2013.
Florin High School Professional Learning Communities Rationale Flexibility Effectiveness Sustainability.
Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EES Parent 2-way Comparison 1 EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY - PARENT.
Continuous School Improvement Planning: Developing a School Improvement Plan October 24, 2011 Intermediate Unit 1 Instructional Support Services.
Leading Learning Standards of Practice for School Library Learning Commons in Canada Canadian Library Association (2014)
Superintendent Formative Evaluation April 26, 2015.
School Improvement Needs Assessment – © Iowa Association of School Boards Assessment Conducted by the Iowa Association of School Boards.
Working With Parents as Partners To Improve Student Achievement Taylor County Schools August 2013.
Leading Learning Standards of Practice for School Library Learning Commons in Canada Canadian Library Association (2014) Full PDF document and bibliography.
Cross State Analyses of Results TELL Survey. New Teacher Center (NTC) worked collaboratively with 11 state coalitions—including governors,
Long Range Technology Plan, Student Device Standards Secondary Device Recommendation.
External Review Report Westminster Public Schools April 24-27, 2016.
Doc Data Do’s and Don’ts *Developed by the New Teacher Center.
Effective Professional Learning Communities (PLC) Where do we begin at Myers Middle School? (Adapted from Professional Learning Communities at Work Robert.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
EES Parent v2.1 Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY TM Parent Edition.
EES Staff V10.1 © Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 1 EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY™ Staff edition V Characteristics.
EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEYTM
COLlaboration time survey
EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEYTM
EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY - STUDENT v2.0
Presentation transcript:

Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EES Staff v9.0 Comparison 1 EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY v9.0- Staff Edition Comparison Report

Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EES Staff v9.0 Comparison 2 The Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc. The Center for Educational Effectiveness (CEE) is a service, consulting, and research organization dedicated to the mission of partnering with K-12 schools to improve student learning. NOTICE The Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc. (CEE) makes substantial effort to ensure the accurate scoring, analysis, and reporting of the results of the Educational Effectiveness Survey. However, CEE makes no warranty of any kind with regard to this material, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. CEE shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for incidental or consequential damages in connection with the furnishing, performance, or use of this material. Published by: The Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc nd Ave. NE. Redmond WA Copyright © Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc Printed in the U.S.A. Contact Information: Phone: Fax: Reproduction rights granted for non-commercial use-- including all school and district improvement activities.

Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EES Staff v9.0 Comparison 3 Comparison: Overall Summary This is a radar-graph – providing a comparison between two groups. The further out on the radar- graph, the more positive the perception of that characteristic. Each point on this graph is an aggregate of all the questions/items for that characteristic. A radar-graph can also be used to display longitudinal progress or differences between 2 different administrations of the EES.

Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EES Staff v9.0 Comparison While most schools focus on the outcomes they are reaching for, truly successful schools focus on organizational effectiveness and the programs and systems that drive and sustain improvement in the outcomes. The Educational Effectiveness Survey (EES), was developed to assist schools in continuous, sustainable improvement by helping schools understand their strengths and challenges in the areas known to impact the effectiveness of a school. While there is no single solution for all schools, research on effective schools has identified common characteristics of high performing schools (Marzano, 2003). Successful schools and schools engaged in improvement focus on these characteristics to create and improve the system(s) that drive the outcomes. To help schools identify and leverage these drivers and focus on what makes a school successful, the EES quantifies these characteristics. This results report contains a summary of the information your school staff provided on the EES survey form. CHARACTERISTICS OF HIGH PERFORMING SCHOOLS: Clear and Shared Focus High Standards and Expectations Effective School Leadership Supportive Learning Environment High Levels of Community and Parent Involvement High Levels of Collaboration and Communication Frequent Monitoring of Teaching and Learning Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Aligned with Standards Focused Professional Development While these characteristics represent a solid basis for looking at the culture of a school, continuing research has indicated that there are several other dynamics that are critical to the conversations, interactions and decisions leading to sustainable transformation. The EES V9.0 is based upon 20 years of research and critical learning on organizational culture, relational trust, the transformation process and the characteristics of high performing schools and districts. School and district transformation is a complex and highly worthwhile process. There are no quick- fixes or pieces of technology that will magically transform your school or district into a high performing system. Your dedication, hard work, and conversations built upon the formative use of data can be critical elements in building strength around leadership, the “instructional core”, and organizational effectiveness. Only as a professional learning community will you make progress toward sustainable, systemic improvement.

Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EES Staff v9.0 Comparison 5 Comparison: Summary (Continued on next page)

Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EES Staff v9.0 Comparison 6 Comparison: Summary (Continued from previous page)