Material supported by a SERC research activity February 2013 1 Helix Investigating the DNA of the Systems Engineering Workforce This material is based.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
This workforce solution was funded by a grant awarded under Workforce Innovation in Regional Economic Development (WIRED) as implemented by the U.S. Department.
Advertisements

1 The Systems Engineering Research Center UARC Dr. Dinesh Verma Executive Director January 13,
Stevens Institute of Technology
ALAMEDA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Superintendent Search.
THIS WORKSHOP WILL ADDRESS WHY THE FOLLOWING ARE IMPORTANT: 1. A comprehensive rationale for funding; 2. Measurable objectives and performance indicators/performance.
RESEARCH IT Presentation for the Faculty Senate February 2013 Loretta Early, CIO.
FDA Research: Clearance Requirements and Implications Steven L. Bradbard, Ph.D. Team Leader, Consumer Studies CFSAN/ORPSS.
Please check, just in case…. Announcements Next week is our last “regular” class session – guest speaker. Make an appointment to see me about the final.
Systems Engineering in a System of Systems Context
S-STEM Program Evaluation S-STEM PI Meeting Arlington, VA October 2012.
IT Governance Portfolio and Project Management in State Government Chris Cruz, Chief Information Officer, California Department of Food and Agriculture.
SERC Achievements and Program Direction Art Pyster Deputy Executive Director November, Note by R Peak 12/7/2010: This presentation.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation Lecture 10 – Maximizing the Use of Evaluation Results.
Putting It all Together Facilitating Learning and Project Groups.
1 Perform Assess Policy and Guidance Acquisition Program Improvement Model Acquisition Programs Acquisition Workforce Human Capital Strategic Planning.
Recent Trends in DoD Systems and Software Engineering Processes Bruce Amato Acting Deputy Director, Software Engineering and Systems Assurance Office of.
Pre-Project Planning Lessons from the Construction Industry Institute Construction Industry Institute Michael Davis, P. Eng, PMP Ontario Power Generation.
1 Sustaining Technical Programs The NSF’s Advanced Technological Education Program and American Competitiveness Mike Lesiecki, MATEC A Member of the Academic.
I am ready! A look at how career classes are preparing students for career success Katy Hinz, Program Coordinator, Office for Student Engagement. Career.
Data Integration Project. MoSTEMWINS Data Projects Strategy 1 -- Develop and Implement a statewide data system in support of tracking student performance.
ASSESSMENT  Are you having an impact?  How do you know?  Are the programs and services you work on getting better?  How do you know?
1 International Workshop 26 – 29 Jan 2013 Jacksonville, FL USA COMPETENCY WORKING GROUP Chairs / Co-Chairs: Eileen Arnold / Mimi Heisey / Don Gelosh INCOSE.
First 5 Kings County Evaluation Services Request for Application Bidders Teleconference – February 22, 2012 Evaluation Services Request for Application.
1 Involving Data Users in the Planning Process Who are your data users? Why do you meet with your data users? When do you meet with your data users? What.
California Needs Assessment of Workforce Issues for Energy Efficiency, Demand-Side Management, Renewable Energy and the Green Economy Conducted by the.
JOBTALKS Job and Internship Search Strategies Indiana University Kelley School of Business C. Randall Powell, Ph.D Contents used in this presentation are.
HELPING AMERICA’S HEROES “OUR VETERANS” Building Sustainable Partnerships for addressing Veterans Needs September 15, 2009 Leonard McPherson, OT/L, ATP.
Globe University Minnesota School of Business Collaborating with Workforce Centers.
People First … Mission Always Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI ® ) Millee Sapp 2 Dec 08 Warner Robins Air Logistics Center.
Developing Administrative and Educational Support Outcomes and Methods of Assessment Lisa Garza Director, University Planning and Assessment Beth Wuest.
Clean, Green, and on the Same Team! How Economic and Workforce Development are Partnering to Serve an Emerging Regional Industry.
Successful Contract Training: A Grounded Theory for a Sustainable Business Model presented at the National Council for Workforce Education Conference by.
December 14, 2011/Office of the NIH CIO Operational Analysis – What Does It Mean To The Project Manager? NIH Project Management Community of Excellence.
© 2008 Eventure Events. All rights reserved. Mitigating Business Risks with Strategic Workforce Planning Lina Doucet Bruce Power.
1 PROJECT EVALUATION IT’S ALL ABOUT STUDENTS. 2 In partnership, we help America’s students stay in school and graduate by: Reducing gaps in college access.
California Needs Assessment of Workforce Issues for Energy Efficiency, Demand-Side Management, Renewable Energy and the Green Economy Conducted by the.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Systems Engineering In Aerospace Theodora Saunders February AUTOMATION IN MANUFACTURING Leading-Edge Technologies and Application Fairfield University.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT OF COLLABORATIVE PLANNING Carol Mizelle Northeast Leadership Academy Cohort 1 Spring 2012, NCSU.
EE & CSE Program Educational Objectives Review EECS Industrial Advisory Board Meeting May 1 st, 2009 by G. Serpen, PhD Sources ABET website: abet.org Gloria.
PRIMARY MARKET RESEARCH Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center on Technology Transfer Training Module #4.
Mapping New Strategies: National Science Foundation J. HicksNew York Academy of Sciences4 April 2006 Examples from our daily life at NSF Vision Opportunities.
Presents: Information for participants: Your microphone will be muted for the formal presentation. If your audio portion the presentation is not working,
Goal Setting and Continuous Improvement.  What will be the goals you set that make a difference for your customers?  What role will you play?  With.
Joe Campbell, PhD Research Associate School of Environment and Natural Resources Adapting to Shale-Based Development through a Countywide Approach: Lessons.
Evaluation of the Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program 2010 NSF Noyce Conference Abt Associates Inc. July 9, 2010.
PSO Overview for (name of organization’s) PSES Workgroup (Presenter) (Date) 1 **For internal use by Center for Patient Safety PSO Participants. May not.
Industry Advisory Board (IAB) Purpose & Mission and Past Activities.
The National Alliance to End Homelessness presents The HEARTH Academy Training and tools to help your community achieve the goals of the HEARTH Act.
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Best Practices for Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems Identifying Workforce and Employment Outcomes.
Self-Directed Job Search Strategies Discussion Workshop Mark Brostoff, Associate Director Kelley School of Business Undergraduate Career Services.
Succession Planning Program Design. Meeting Purpose 2 Introduce the Leadership Academy class to the succession planning process Describe succession planning.
September 21, 2011 OVRD Director’s Report Occupational Information Development Advisory Panel Quarterly Meeting.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Arlington, VA March 31, 2004 Presentation for the Advisory Committee for Business & Operations Effective Practices Research Overview For Merit Review This.
Annual SERC Research Review, October 5-6, The Body of Knowledge and Curriculum to Advance Systems Engineering By Art Pyster Deputy Executive Director,
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Planning a Statistical Project Section B 1.
Request for Information & Capability Statements Richland Acquisitions Post-FY 2018 November 17-19, 2015.
Efforts to Gauge Culture of Assessment by the Academic Assessment Committee at UF
Today’s Topic: Characteristics of non-positivist research.
Strategic Planning for State Energy Workforce Consortia Day 2.
February 2, PM ET. Since the Summit… WE LISTENED…. Here’s what’s happening….. Curriculum Working Group is hard at work …… Why we are having these.
Logistics Community Competency Initiative Update November 20, 2006 Mark Tregar, CNAC Judith Bayliss, DAU “The Total Force must continue to adapt to different.
Managing Enterprise Architecture
Human-Model Interaction Heuristics
NH Computing Education Landscape Report
HELPING AMERICA’S HEROES
FAA Center of Excellence for Technical Training and Human Performance
Presentation transcript:

Material supported by a SERC research activity February Helix Investigating the DNA of the Systems Engineering Workforce This material is based upon work supported, in whole or in part, by the U.S. Department of Defense through the Systems Engineering Research Center (SERC) under Contract H D The SERC is a federally funded University Affiliated Research Center (UARC) managed by Stevens Institute of Technology consisting of a collaborative network of over 20 universities. More information is available at Presentation to the NDIA Systems Engineering Division Art Pyster February 13, 2013

Material supported by a SERC research activity February Helix Project Motivation Strong forces are buffeting the US defense SE workforce: ―Near-term retirement of many senior-most engineers ―Attrition early in careers ―Rapid changes in defense system technology and mission requirements ―Revamping of processes used to develop defense systems ―Harsh new fiscal reality ―How best to prepare for next generation DoD and NDIA-SED want to understand the impact of those forces in order to refine efforts to improve today’s systems engineers and develop tomorrow’s. ―Who the “real” systems engineers are? ―What do they do? ―How they are deployed? ―How effective are they? ―What forces (competency? education? experiences? …) most impact their effectiveness? They want to understand how the SE workforce is changing over time.

Material supported by a SERC research activity February The Response DoD and NDIA-SED are sponsoring the SERC’s Helix Project, which is developing a baseline of SE workforce characteristics, including effectiveness, for both the DoD and NDIA-SED organizations and will regularly refresh that baseline over time. That workforce baseline will support benchmarking of organizations with respect to segments of industry and DoD. Helix will publish reports on a regular schedule – initially planned to be quarterly after startup. (Note: Publication will aggregate/anonymous results.) Helix will recommend changes in current and planned DoD and NDIA-SED organizations’ efforts to increase the effectiveness of those initiatives.

Material supported by a SERC research activity February Helix Research Approach Helix has defined three research questions about the SE workforce it will initially seek to answer: ―WHO ARE THE SYSTEMS ENGINEERS? ―HOW EFFECTIVE ARE THEY AND WHY? ―WHAT ARE EMPLOYERS DOING TO IMPROVE EFFECTIVENESS? Helix will collect data primarily through interviews (not surveys) and from institutional documents and databases. Helix will slice data in multiple ways; e.g., to distinguish between characteristics of the SE population in NDIA-SED organizations and the DoD. Helix has an advisory panel of representatives from DoD and NDIA-SED companies to help validate the project approach and to help the project access needed data.

Material supported by a SERC research activity February Research Questions 1.WHO ARE THE SYSTEMS ENGINEERS? What are the various definitions and characteristics of a “systems engineer” in DoD and NDIA-SED organizations and how do they differ? What are the activities they actually perform? 2.HOW EFFECTIVE ARE THEY AND WHY? How can the effectiveness of systems engineers (not systems engineering) be measured in DoD and NDIA-SED organizations and which forces, such as competencies, attrition, education, culture, environment, expectations and experiences, have the greatest impact on the effectiveness of systems engineers? 3.WHAT ARE EMPLOYERS DOING TO IMPROVE EFFECTIVENESS? What efforts do DoD and NDIA-SED organizations currently employ to maintain and improve the effectiveness of their SE workforce and how aligned are those efforts with the forces that have the greatest impact on effectiveness?

Material supported by a SERC research activity February Benchmarking Axes are for illustration. Real axes will emerge from collected data.

Material supported by a SERC research activity February Research Method Steps 1-5 are a research cycle that is repeated periodically, beginning with pilot in spring 2013: 1.Prepare for cycle (grounded theory) 2.Collect data (interviews and institutional) 3.Analyze data (search for repeated patterns) 4.Answer research questions 5.Publish results

Material supported by a SERC research activity February Key Term: Effectiveness Effectiveness ―An individual systems engineer is effective when the outcomes for which he is individually responsible are achieved as a result of the systems engineering activities he performs. ―An organization’s systems engineering workforce is effective when the outcomes for which they are collectively responsible are achieved as a result of the systems engineering activities they perform.

Material supported by a SERC research activity February Participation Requested NDIA-SED companies are invited to participate in both the pilot and the full study Please contact me directly at