SXC meeting SRON, July 19-20, 2007. 2 SXC meeting 19-20/07/2007 Alignment Positioning of mirror with respect to detector (internal). Positioning of total.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
30-meter cabin refurbishment for a large Field Of View: status of on-going study S.Leclercq 28/04/2008.
Advertisements

MCAO Laser Launch Telescope and Periscope Celine d’Orgeville and Jim Catone.
Thomas Stalcup June 15, 2006 Laser Guidestar System Status.
Surveying I. Lecture 2..
Telescope Tear-Down Anatomy of a 114mm f/8 Newtonian Reflector.
Pore Detection in Small Diameter Bores The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor NSF Engineering Research Center for Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems.
FLAO Alignment Procedures G. Brusa, S. Esposito FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
S.H.H.S Building Construction
Test Cryostat, OGSE and MGSE PACS IHDR: MPE 12/13 Nov 2003 AIV1 PACS Test Cryostat, OGSE and MGSE Gerd Jakob MPE.
Optical Flow Methods 2007/8/9.
Initial Calibration and Stability Results from the LiCAS RTRS FSI System John Dale for the LiCAS Collaboration IWAA February 2008.
Yurii Levashov Undula t or fiducialization test Oct. 14, 2004 Undulator Fiducialization Test Results Fiducialization Tolerances.
Use of a commercial laser tracker for optical alignment James H. Burge, Peng Su, Chunyu Zhao, Tom Zobrist College of Optical Sciences Steward Observatory.
CS485/685 Computer Vision Prof. George Bebis
WFS Preliminary design phase report I V. Velur, J. Bell, A. Moore, C. Neyman Design Meeting (Team meeting #10) Sept 17 th, 2007.
NGAO Alignment Plan See KAON 719 P. Wizinowich. 2 Introduction KAON 719 is intended to define & describe the alignments that will need to be performed.
Theory of Elasticity Theory of elasticity governs response – Symmetric stress & strain components Governing equations – Equilibrium equations (3) – Strain-displacement.
PLATO kick-off meeting 09-Nov-2010 PLATO Payload overall architecture.
Camera parameters Extrinisic parameters define location and orientation of camera reference frame with respect to world frame Intrinsic parameters define.
1 NGAO Science Instrument Reuse Part 1: NIRC2 NGAO IWG December 12, 2006.
 Design  Manufacturing  Recent X-Ray tests  Status Vadim Burwitz, Peter Friedrich on behalf of the eROSITA team.
Modern Optics Lab Lab 5 Part 1: Experiments involving Light Polarization  Measuring light transmission through a dichroic material (“polarizer sheet”)
Year 4 University of Birmingham Presentation Applications of Piezo Actuators for Space Instrument Optical Alignment Michelle Louise Antonik Supervisor:
Integration and Alignment of Optical Subsystem Roy W. Esplin Dave McLain.
8 September Observational Astronomy TELESCOPES, Active and adaptive optics Kitchin pp
1 Mirror subsystem: telescope structure Functions: Functions: Support mirrors subsystem to S/C Support mirrors subsystem to S/C Accommodate cryostat Accommodate.
Effective lens aperture Deff
SALT Technology Development Lisa Crause India-South Africa Astronomy Workshop – SAAO 6 August 2012.
HESSI Imaging Capability Pre Environmental Review Brian R. Dennis GSFC Tuesday, February 29, 2000.
COLD FRONT END Stephen Muchovej Caltech. CONSIDERATIONS RF System Itself Physical Considerations Packaging Mounting.
Oct 17, 2001SALT PFIS Preliminary Design Review Optical Integration and Test Plan 1 Southern African Large Telescope Prime Focus Imaging Spectrograph Optical.
Course 12 Calibration. 1.Introduction In theoretic discussions, we have assumed: Camera is located at the origin of coordinate system of scene.
PACS IIDR 01/02 Mar 2001 FPFPU Alignment1 D. Kampf KAYSER-THREDE.
1 of 28 A design study of a Cryogenic High Accurate Derotator.
Brewer Ozone Spectrophotometer Pointing and Levelling C.T. McElroy York University Canada.
Herschel Space ObservatoryPACS Science Verification ReviewMPE 22/23 June 2006 GJ / MPE 1 PACS Test Facility Capabilities – Cryogenics and OGSE Gerd Jakob.
DL – IFU (Prieto/Taylor) Slicer: –25mas sampling … 0.9mm slices ~f/250 (assuming no anamorphism) Detector = 2k array of 18um pixels –Slit subtends 1-pixel.
MARS Design Review PP-1 Requirements Definition Performance: –Tip/Tilt error < 0.06″ rms mirror coordinates 0.12″ rms image coodinates 0.28″ fwhm image.
FLAO system test plan in solar tower S. Esposito, G. Brusa, L. Busoni FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
NIRSpec Operations Concept Michael Regan(STScI), Jeff Valenti (STScI) Wolfram Freduling(ECF), Harald Kuntschner(ECF), Robert Fosbury (ECF)
PACS SVR 22/23 June 2006 PACS FPU Subunits1 FM FPU Subunits A. Poglitsch.
NORDFORSK Summer School, La Palma, June-July 2006 NOT: Telescope and Instrumentation Michal I. Andersen & Heidi Korhonen Astrophysikalisches Institut Potsdam.
Stabilization of Focus at ATF2 David Urner University of Oxford.
Freiburg 7/07/20001 laser beam lens CCD (long arm) screen + grid CCD (short arm) glass plates at  45° STAMP : Saclay Telescope for the Alignment of Many.
January 25, 2005GRETINA 2004 Review1 GRETINA 2004 Annual Review Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Mechanical System.
Apr 17-22, NAOJ SOT optical performance Focus stability in orbit Y. Katsukawa (NAOJ) and SOT team.
How to startpage 1. How to start How to specify the task How to get a good image.
Alignment Bars Requirements Strategy Layout Length Prediction Shape Prediction Readout Scheme Model to predict bar shape in the experiment Calibration.
First Reconstruction Results on the Alignment of Muon Endcap Chambers in the CMS Experiment at CERN S. Guragain, G. Baksay, M. Hohlmann Florida Tech 74.
Apr 17-22, NAOJ External alignment with X-Ray Telescope (XRT) and EUV Imaging Spectrometer (EIS) Y. Katsukawa (NAOJ) and SOT team.
MICROSCOPE DESIGN. beam expander and objective Why do we need a beam expander? What facts about the laser do we need to know? How much expansion do we.
N A S A G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R I n t e g r a t e d D e s i g n C a p a b i l i t y / I n s t r u m e n t S y n t h e s i s & A.
Survey, Alignment and Metrology Fiducials Requirements Fabien Rey ESS Survey, Alignment and Metrology Group ACCELERATOR TECHNICAL BOARD 23/09/2015.
Survey, Alignment and Metrology Fabien Rey Pawel Garsztka ESS Survey, Alignment and Metrology Group.
IFS prototype – PM3 LAM, 13/06/2003 Prototype testing at CRAL Tests at room temperature in the visible.
PACS IBDR MPE 27/28 Feb 2002 AIV 1 PACS IBDR Test Cryostat and OGSE Gerd Jakob MPE.
N A S A G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R I n s t r u m e n t S y n t h e s i s a n d A n a l y s i s L a b o r a t o r y APS Formation Sensor.
Optomechanics Lab Presentation OPTI 521L, Fall 2015 Daniel Millstone Kerry Nierenberg.
Physics Requirements Sensitivity to Manufacturing Imperfections Strategy  where to map field  measure deviation from ideal model  fit to error tables.
NCSLI 2007 In House Capability of an Optical CMM Calibration for any Company Shawn Mason Boston Scientific.
Integral Field Spectrograph Opto-mechanical concepts PIERRE KARST, JEAN-LUC GIMENEZ CPPM(CNRS),FRANCE.
Alignment Using a Beam Triangle
Lab 2 Alignment.
Visit for more Learning Resources
NIRSpec pipeline concept Guido De Marchi, Tracy Beck, Torsten Böker
Testing and Calibration at IHEP for eXTP (current plans and needed facilities) YuSa Wang
HPS Collaboration meeting, JLAB, Nov 16, 2016
Intra-pixel Sensitivity Testing Preliminary Design Review
Leveling By : Parveen Kumar.
the steering mirror control
Presentation transcript:

SXC meeting SRON, July 19-20, 2007

2 SXC meeting 19-20/07/2007 Alignment Positioning of mirror with respect to detector (internal). Positioning of total instrument on spacecraft (with respect to eRosita) (external) Degrees of freedom: translation (x,y,z), rotation (x,y) z-telescope axis x,y perpendicular to telescope Take mirror as single unit, properly aligned internally. Assume a perfect lens - Mirror translation in x,y translates to image translation x,y on detector - Mirror translation in z will cause defocus - Mirror rotation has no effect for small rotations (within field size 40 arcminutes) Alignment constraints: - Keep tolerances within 0.5 pixel = 0.4 mm (0.85 arcminutes) ( 1 pixel -> 815 µm (?) )

3 SXC meeting 19-20/07/2007 Translation (x,y) - Internal stability should be within 0.5 pixel (0.4 mm (in x,y)) - Absolute alignment -> within central field of eRosita (total field 40 arcmin) -> 10 arcminutes (?) -> 5 mm tolerance (in x,y) ( Total error budget: internal SXC + spacecraft mounting + eRosita ) Translation (z) - Defocus (broadening of PSF) of 0.5 pixel (0.4 mm) -> 1.8 mm tolerance (in z) Tolerances - If we can keep total mechanical tolerances within 1 mm, there is no need for adjustment mechanisms for alignment. - Total error budget: - detector/dewar coordinate system + tolerances (?) - mirror coordinate system + tolerances (?) - telescope tube + mounting (?) - stability (temperature range) (?) - spacecraft mounting (?) + eRosita (?) (need for total error budget)

4 SXC meeting 19-20/07/2007 Effects of temperature Focus: If telescope tube is made of aluminium 1 m tube, 10 K temperature range -> 0.4 mm z-translation -> 0.1 mm PSF broadening -> Make telescope tube for predefined operational temperature (?) within 10 K temperature range -> adds 0.4 mm to error budget (In case of carbon fibres, thermal expansion can be designed to be zero. In that case there are no constraints on temperature) (Needs same sort of data for dewar/detector) Temperature gradient over mirror shell: measurements: 1 K gradient -> 0.05 mm PSF broadening -> 1/16 pixel if linearly with temperature -> 4 K gradient over mirror shells is ok

5 SXC meeting 19-20/07/2007 Focus Do we want exact focus (PSF is 1/40 of pixel) or proper sampling on sky?. To have better sampling (PSF at least more than 1 pixel) we need to defocus (at least about 5 mm). Proper (Nyquist) sampling requires PSF of 2 pixels. Do we want this ?? Other solution single pixel PSF and dithering on the sky (is that possible ??) What is the pointing stability and pointing reconstruction accuracy ??

6 SXC meeting 19-20/07/2007 Alignment Plan - No adjustment mechanisms (mechanical tolerances < 1 mm) need coordinate system definitions (alignment cubes/corner cubes) on different components (dewar, mirror, mounting) - Optical verification (alignment cubes/corner cubes) - X-ray verification on long beam facility - verification at spacecraft level (?) (SXC internal; versus eRosita) alignment cubes

7 SXC meeting 19-20/07/2007 Alignment verification Verification in long beam facility. - Source at finite distance -> focus position at different distance. (e.g cm off at Panter) - At nominal focus position (infinite source distance) there will be a defocused image of the mirror shells. - Check defocused image size and position to verify alignment - To verify proper position of defocused image with respect to focus distance, mirror has to be partially blocked.

8 SXC meeting 19-20/07/2007 Blocking X-ray sky background Sky outside mirror can potentially add to X-ray background. need 1.2 mm of aluminium in line of sight, to block sky background sufficiently visible to sky detector mirror support ring telescope base plate (or filter container) dewar

9 SXC meeting 19-20/07/2007 fortunately, natural support structure of mirror combined with diaphragm in base plate, appears to block the sky sufficiently. detector mirror base-plate diaphragm base- plate diaphr agm base-plate diaphragm must be 1 mm larger than beam ( 1 mm tolerance) diaphragm in base plate or filter container ? Distance to detector ? mirror support ring 30 cm 30 cm

10 SXC meeting 19-20/07/2007