Injector Optimization for Simultaneous Operation with Different Bunch Charges Yauhen Kot BD Meeting 23.04.2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measurements of adiabatic dual rf capture in the SIS 18 O. Chorniy.
Advertisements

1 Bates XFEL Linac and Bunch Compressor Dynamics 1. Linac Layout and General Beam Parameter 2. Bunch Compressor –System Details (RF, Magnet Chicane) –Linear.
First operation of the TTF2 injector with beam Jean-Paul Carneiro DESY Hamburg TESLA COLLABORATION MEETING DESY Hamburg, 16 Sept 2003.
Reduced Gun Simulations 1. Comparison 60MV/m Gun vs 50MV/m Gun, Flat Top Laser Pulse 2. Comparison for the worst case: Gun50+Gauss Laser Pulse 3. Summary.
Low beam intensity (MERIT beam spot size – part II) Goran Skoro 30 June 2008.
Could CKOV1 become RICH? 1. Characteristics of Cherenkov light at low momenta (180 < p < 280 MeV/c) 2. Layout and characterization of the neutron beam.
1 OPTICS OF STAGE III Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 6 October 2004.
1 Linear Programming Using the software that comes with the book.
PI laser jitter measurements Data taken on 11 th April 2013.
LCLS-II Transverse Tolerances Tor Raubenheimer May 29, 2013.
AGS pp Status Feb. 20, 2015 RSC Meeting Haixin Huang.
W. KozaneckiMCC AP meeting, 29 July 04  Goal: measure the luminosity degradation associated with  parasitic crossings  horizontal crossing angle  Principle.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Photocathode 1.5 (1, 3.5) cell superconducting RF gun with electric and magnetic RF focusing Transversal normalized rms emittance (no thermal emittance)
#3205 Summary Studying beam instabilities along bunch train 3 observables – INJ-BPM-01 fast bunch electronics – INJ FCUP-01 – Laser pulse power. Laser.
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
ASTRA Injector Setup 2012 Julian McKenzie 17/02/2012.
Yauhen Kot Current Status of XFEL Simulations.
Short Tutorial on Causes of Position Differences… …and what we can do about them (most slides stolen from Cates PAVI ’04 talk)
Recent Experiments at PITZ ICFA Future Light Sources Sub-Panel Mini Workshop on Start-to-End Simulations of X-RAY FELs August 18-22, 2003 at DESY-Zeuthen,
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Sensitivity Analysis Consider the CrossChek hockey stick production problem: Management believes that CrossChek might only receive $120 profit from the.
FLASH II. The results from FLASH II tests Sven Ackermann FEL seminar Hamburg, April 23 th, 2013.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Optimization of Compact X-ray Free-electron Lasers Sven Reiche May 27 th 2011.
Machine development - results and plans – critical results, what’s to be done? R. Assmann 15/07/2011 R. Assmann for the LHC MD coordination team (R. Assmann,
Cooperative Layered Wireless Video Multicast Ozgu Alay, Thanasis Korakis, Yao Wang, Elza Erkip, Shivendra Panwar.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Flat-beam IR optics José L. Abelleira, PhD candidate EPFL, CERN BE-ABP Supervised by F. Zimmermann, CERN Beams dep. Thanks to: O.Domínguez. S Russenchuck,
Interpretation of beam current experimental results in HoBiCaT Gun0 Vladimir Volkov.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Extended ALICE Injector J.W. McKenzie, B.D. Muratori, Y.M. Saveliev STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
R&D opportunities for photoinjectors Renkai Li 10/12/2015 FACET-II Science Opportunities Workshops October, 2015 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
K. Floettmann WSHQE, OCT. 5, 2006 WSHQE Oct. 5, 2006 Klaus Floettmann Photo cathode requirements for the European XFEL.
ILC EXTRACTION LINE TRACKING Y. Nosochkov, E. Marin September 10, 2013.
#3205 Summary 6 th Nov 2012 Studying beam instabilities along bunch train 3 observables – INJ-BPM-01 fast bunch electronics – INJ FCUP-01 – Laser pulse.
D. Lipka, V. Vogel, DESY Hamburg, Germany, Oct Optimization cathode design with gun5 D. Lipka, V. Vogel, DESY Hamburg, Germany.
#3205 Summary Studying beam instabilities along bunch train 3 observables – INJ-BPM-01 fast bunch electronics – INJ FCUP-01 – Laser pulse power. Laser.
Status of the Simulations on Photo Injector Optimization for Low Charges Yauhen Kot BD Meeting,
Michael Röhrs On-crest slice emittance measurements Michael Roehrs.
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
LCLS-II Injector layout design and study Feng Zhou 8/19/2015.
Problems of charge compensation in a ring e+e- higgs factory Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk 5 rd TLEP3 workshop, FNAL, July 25, 2013.
SL_THOMSON C. Vaccarezza on behalf of the SL_Thomson team.
Multi-bunch Operation for LCLS, LCLS_II, LCLS_2025
Jefferson Lab, Newport News, U.S.A.
Discussion on Emittance Evolution through FCC-e+e-
Impact of Magnet Performance on the Physics Program of MICE
Yuhui Li How to edit the title slide
Beam-beam R&D for eRHIC Linac-Ring Option
ERL Main-Linac Cryomodule
J.B. Rosenzweig and Scott Anderson UCLA Dept. of Physics and Astronomy
Injector: What is needed to improve the beam quality?
Beam dynamics requirements after LS2
Selected simulations for XFEL photo injector
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Injector Setup for G0 and HAPPEX & Lessons Learned
Modified Beam Parameter Range
Laser Heater Integration into XFEL. Update.
Beam-Beam Effects in High-Energy Colliders:
Simulations for the LCLS Photo-Injector C
Thermal Emittance Measurement at PITZ
Current State of the Lattice Studies for the XFEL Injector
PS2 meeting NMC lattice for PS2 Y. Papaphilippou September 28th, 2007.
JLEIC Reaching 140 GeV CM Energy: Concept and Luminosity Estimate
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Minimized emittance for high charge with multi cell superconducting guns and solenoidal focusing D. Lipka, BESSY.
Update on ERL Cooler Design Studies
S2E Meeting on Yauhen Kot.
Presentation transcript:

Injector Optimization for Simultaneous Operation with Different Bunch Charges Yauhen Kot BD Meeting

Contents How it theoretically can work, technical constraints WP for 20pC WP for 100pC Operation pC WP for 250pC Operation pC WP for 500pC Operation pC WP for 1000pC Operation pC Conclusions: operation with single bunch charge Conclusions: simultaneous operation with two bunch charges Simultaneous operation with two laser systems and single solenoid Simultaneous operation with two laser systems and two solenoids

Operation with two different bunch charges within the same system. How can it theoretically work? - The problem of the operation with two different bunch charges at the same time is a question whether it is possible to achieve the same optics functions at the first quadrupole for both charges - Generally bunch charge affects the optics functions  similar optics for different charges at the same settings of the solenoid and laser can occur only in the exceptional cases. Remarks…

Typical beta development over the laser spot size. (seen at the end of the ACC1) 100% transmission from the cathode Emittance minimum Beta minimum  Small beta for transmission under 100%  Local maximum at the point of 100% transmission  Shortly after the 100% transmission emittance minimum  And much later the beta function minimum For higher charges the whole curve shifts to the right

Operation with two different bunch charges within the same system. How can it theoreticaly work? Operation within the same system but with two different charges is only possible If we “catch” the beta for higher charge on the falling arm and the other one on the rising arm The problem of the operation with two different bunch charges at the same time is a question whether it is possible to achieve the same optics functions at the first quadrupole for both charges Generally bunch charge affects the optics functions  similar optics for different charges at the same settings of the solenoid and laser can occur only in the exceptional cases. …and hope that alfas also coincide

Technical and Theoretical Constraints -Max K1 of the quadrupoles in the injector < Generally it is not guaranteed that a theoretical match is possible for any initial betas

Working points for 20pC. Emittance Point of View Match possible MaxB(1)XYrms  Opt. sensitivity  D Scan for XFEL Injector. 20pC Best Emittance Comfortable Optics Conditions  100% transmission beginning at XY=40  m  Stable optics solutions with the emittance > 0,10 mm mrad possible  Operation reasonable with XYrms between  m  and MaxB(1) range of T Mismatch after the change of solenoid field by T

2D Scan for XFEL Injector. 100pC Stable optics match is possible Possible to match with the current configuration Emittance minimum  Working Point with respect to the emittance minimum at T x 125 mm  Best emittance: 0,1716 mm mrad  Stable optics solutions with the emittance > 0,24 possible  100% transmission beginning at XY=75mm  Operation reasonable with XYrms between  m  and MaxB(1) range of T MaxB(1)XYrms 

Simultaneous Operation with 20pC and 100pC Obviously no common areas  simultaneous operation of the bunch of 20pC with the bunch charge over 100pC is not possible. The situation cannot be cured by means of the additional solenoid only. Another laser system is needed. Match possible Charge100% Transmission at XYrms,  m XY operation window MaxB1 operation window Working Point for best  _min, mm mrad Xyrms,  m MaxB1, T

2D Scan for XFEL Injector. 250pC  Working Point with respect to the emittance minimum at T x 200 mm  Best emittance: 0,2832 mm mrad  Stable optics solutions with the emittance > 0,32 possible  Operation reasonable with XYrms above 170mm  and MaxB(1) range of T Transmission below 100% MaxB(1)XYrms 

Simultaneous Operation with 100pC and 250pC Playable range for both charges Operation with both charges simultaneously is imaginable for MaxB(1)= and

Simultaneous Operation with 100pC and 250pC. MaxB(1)= and Both twiss functions coincide for both bunch charges at almost the same settings of the laser. Combined working point at MaxB(1)= XYrms=225 Combined working point is almost the same as the working point for 250pC Generally: the emittance of the smaller bunch charge could be more effective reduced by means of the laser beam size. On the other hand it grows even faster for larger laser beam sizes Operation of the both bunch charges (150 and 250pC) at the same settings of the laser and the solenoid field is possible. In that case we get the best possible emittance and somehow unstable optics for 250pC on the one hand and very stable optics solution but blowed up emittance for 100pC. MaxB(1)= MaxB(1)=0.2235

SettingsEmittanceOptics Sensitivity MaxB(1), T XYrms,  m  _250  _100    , , , ,012 MaxB(1)XY  _250  _100    WP for Simultaneous Operation with 100pC and 250pC

2D Scan for XFEL Injector. 500pC Emittance minimum  Working Point with respect to the emittance minimum at T x 300  m  Best emittance: 0,4302 mm mrad  Stable optics solutions with the emittance > 0,60 mm mrad possible  Operation reasonable with XYrms between 250  m and 475  m  and MaxB(1) range of T 500pC Emittance Match possible, stable optics solution No match possible MaxB(1)XYrms 

Simultaneous Operation with 250pC and 500pC Playable range for both charges Imaginable for MaxB(1)= and

Simultaneous Operation with 250pC and 500pC. MaxB(1)= and MaxB(1)= MaxB(1)=  Operation at MaxB(1)= gives similar but not equal optics  Operation at MaxB(1)= provides a long range of laser beam size (275 to 375mm) with almost equal optics for 250pC and 500pC.

MaxB(1)XY  _500  _250    WP for Simultaneous Operation with 250pC and 500pC SettingsEmittanceOptics Sensitivity MaxB(1), T XYrms,  m  _500  _250   

2D Scan for XFEL Injector. 1000pC Emittance minimum Emittance minimum is feasible but may have an unstable optics Working point for the emittance minimum: MaxB(1)XYrms   100% transmission beginning at XY=365  m  Stable optics solutions with the emittance > 1,00 mm mrad possible  Operation reasonable with XYrms between 365  m and 600  m  and MaxB(1) range of T Match possible, stable optics solution No match possible

Simultaneous Operation with 500pC and 1000pC Playable range for both charges  Imaginable for MaxB(1)= and T

Simultaneous Operation with 500pC and 1000pC. MaxB(1)= and MaxB(1)= MaxB(1)=  Operation at MaxB(1)= T: same optics and same emittance for XY=400. Only different charges  Operation at MaxB(1)= T: equal optics for XY=500mm. At this point is 500pC bunch significantly larger than the one with 1000pC!

SettingsEmittanceOptics Sensitivity MaxB(1), T XYrms,  m  _1000  _500    ,27921, ,37121, ,4251, ,45181, ,43821, MaxB(1)XY  _1000  _500    WP for Simultaneous Operation with 500pC and 1000pC

Conclusions – I. Working Points for the Operation with Different Bunch Charges Charge100% Transmission at XYrms,  m XY operation window MaxB1 operation window Working Point for best  _min, mm mrad Xyrms,  m MaxB1, T Charge100% Transmission at XYrms,  m XY operation window MaxB1 operation window Working Point for best  _min, mm mrad Sensitivity of the optics solution  XYrms,  m MaxB1, T  Relaxed optics for the bunch charge of 20pC  Tough optics conditions for the bunch charge over 100pC

Conclusions – II. Operation with Two Different Bunch Charges Bunch PairMaxB(1)XY  _higher charge, %  _smaller charge, %  higher charge  smaller charge  Charge1  Char ge pC pC pC  WP is to be chosen at the smallest laser beam size which still provides the 100% transmission of the bunch with the higher charge.  WP could be mostly found in the near of the emittance optimum for the higher charge  Lower bunch charge will necessarily suffer a big emittance increase  Relaxed optics for the lower bunch at the combined WP

Operation with Two Laser Systems and Single Solenoid That means:  Fixed solenoid field for each WP  But variable laser beam sizes for each bunch charge Scan over all possible laser beam sizes for each solenoid field and look for

Operation with Two Laser Systems and Single Solenoid Table: Max Solenoid Field Strength for different operation modes, T Charge of the Partner Bunch, pC Bunch Charge, pC Table: Laser Beam Size rms for different operation modes,  m Charge of the Partner Bunch, pC Bunch Charge, pC

Operation with Two Laser Systems. Emittance Table: Emittance for different operational modes, mm mrad Charge of the Partner Bunch, pC Bunch Charge, pC Table: Emittance change in % for different operational modes Charge of the Partner Bunch, pC Bunch Charge, pC

Operation with Two Laser Systems and Two Solenoids That means:  Variable solenoid field for each bunch charge  Variable laser beam sizes for each bunch charge Scan for each WP of bunch 1 the whole area of WPs of bunch 2 and look for

Operation with two laser systems and additional solenoid Table: Max Solenoid Field Strength for different operation modes, T Charge of the Partner Bunch, pC Bunch Charge, pC Table: Laser Beam Size rms for different operation modes,  m Charge of the Partner Bunch, pC Bunch Charge, pC

Operation with two laser systems and additional solenoid Table: Emittance for different operational modes, mm mrad Charge of the Partner Bunch, pC Bunch Charge, pC Table: Emittance change in % for different operational modes Charge of the Partner Bunch, pC Bunch Charge, pC