Quick Substorm Development during Initial 10 Minutes of 2003-10-29 Magnetic Storm M. Yamauchi, IRF-Kiruna T. Iyemori, WDC-C2, Kyoto (Geomagnetic) H. Frey,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE AURORAL EMISSIONS AND THE ELECTRON PRECIPITATION UNDER DIFFERENT GEOMAGNETIC CONDITIONS DURING RECURRENT SOLAR WIND STREAM Guineva V. 1, Despirak I.
Advertisements

E. Amata M. Candidi (1), M.F. Marcucci (1), S. Massetti (1), P. Francia (3), U. Villante (3) (1) Istituto di Fisica dello Spazio Interplanetario (IFSI),
ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms
Anti-parallel versus Component Reconnection at the Magnetopause K.J. Trattner Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center Palo Alto, CA, USA and the Polar/TIMAS,
Normal text - click to edit 1 August 2011 Auroral asymmetries in the conjugate hemispheres (and where KuaFu B can do better……) Nikolai Østgaard University.
Identification and Analysis of Magnetic Substorms Patricia Gavin 1, Sandra Brogl 1, Ramon Lopez 2, Hamid Rassoul 1 1. Florida Institute of Technology,
Solar wind-magnetosphere coupling, substorms, and ramifications for ionospheric convection Steve Milan Adrian Grocott (Leics,
The Upgraded and Expanded CARISMA Magnetometer Array: New Pi1 Substorm Science Capabilities I.J. Rae, Ian R. Mann (PI), K. Murphy, David K. Milling (PM),
Peter Boakes 1, Steve Milan 2, Adrian Grocott 2, Mervyn Freeman 3, Gareth Chisham 3, Gary Abel 3, Benoit Hubert 4, Victor Sergeev 5 Rumi Nakamura 1, Wolfgang.
Monitoring of auroral oval location and geomagnetic activity based on magnetic measurements from satellites in low Earth orbit. S. Vennerstrom Technical.
Adrian Grocott *, Steve Milan, Mark Lester, Tim Yeoman University of Leicester, U.K. *currently visiting NIPR, Japan Mervyn Freeman British Antarctic Survey,
State Key Laboratory of Space Weather An inter-hemisphere asymmetry of the cusp region against the geomagnetic dipole tilt Jiankui Shi Center for Space.
O. M. Shalabiea Department of Physics, Northern Borders University, KSA.
Tracing Geomagnetic Conjugate Points by means of Extremely Similar Interhemispheric Auroras N. Sato (1), A. Kadokura (1), Y. Ebihara (1), H. Deguchi (1),
Onsets and Flapping Studied using a Dynamic Harris Sheet Model M. Connors 1, R. Lerner 1, G. Jaugey 2, B. Lavraud 3, M. Volwerk 4, R. L. McPherron 5 1.
Magnetometer and radar study of the ionospheric convection response to sudden changes in the interplanetary magnetic field R. A. D. Fiori 1,2, D. Boteler.
Observation and Theory of Substorm Onset C. Z. (Frank) Cheng (1,2), T. F. Chang (2), Sorin Zaharia (3), N. N. Gorelenkov (4) (1)Plasma and Space Science.
1 Geomagnetic/Ionospheric Models NASA/GSFC, Code 692 During the early part of April 6, 2000 a large coronal “ejecta” event compressed and interacted with.
THEMIS observations of consecutive bursts of Pi2 pulsations during weak geomagnetic times Ching-Chang Cheng ( 鄭慶章 ) Faculty of Physics, Department of Electronic.
Radio and Space Plasma Physics Group The formation of transpolar arcs R. C. Fear and S. E. Milan University of Leicester.
M. Menvielle and A. Marchaudon ESWW2 M. Menvielle (1) and A. Marchaudon (2) (1) Centre d’études des Environnements Terrestre et Planétaires UMR 8615 IPL/CNRS/UVSQ.
Further investigations of the July 23, 2012 extremely rare CME: What if the rare CME was Earth-directed? C. M. Ngwira 1,2, A. Pulkkinen 2, P. Wintoft 3.
Solar wind-magnetosphere- atmosphere coupling: effects of magnetic storms and substorms in atmospheric electric field variations Kleimenova N., Kozyreva.
Magnetospheric ULF wave activity monitoring based on the ULF-index OLGA KOZYREVA and N. Kleimenova Institute of the Earth Physics, RAS.
Finite Gyroradius Effect in Space and Laboratory 1. Radiation belt (Ring current) 2. Auroral phenomena (Substorm current) 3. Shock acceleration and upstream.
1 Cambridge 2004 Wolfgang Baumjohann IWF/ÖAW Graz, Austria With help from: R. Nakamura, A. Runov, Y. Asano & V.A. Sergeev Magnetotail Transport and Substorms.
Magnetosphere-Ionosphere coupling processes reflected in
Constraining Substorm Onset from Space- and Ground-Based Observations Department of Space & Climate Physics Mullard Space Science Laboratory A. P. Walsh.
A. Kullen (1), L. Rosenqvist (1), and G. Marklund (2) (1) Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Uppsala, Sweden (2) Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm,
Global Simulation of Interaction of the Solar Wind with the Earth's Magnetosphere and Ionosphere Tatsuki Ogino Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory.
PAPER I. ENA DATA ANALYSIS RESULTS. The Imager for Magnetopause-to- Aurora Global Exploration (IMAGE) missionis the first NASA Mid-size Explorer (MIDEX)
A T Y Lui, V Angelopoulos, S B Mende, O LeContel, H Frey, E Donovan, D G Sibeck, W Liu, H U Auster, X Li, M Nose, and M O Fillingim Outline  Conjunction.
MAGNETOSPHERIC RESPONSE TO COMPLEX INTERPLANETARY DRIVING DURING SOLAR MINIMUM: MULTI-POINT INVESTIGATION R. Koleva, A. Bochev Space and Solar Terrestrial.
Data Service at the World Data Center for Geomagnetism, Kyoto T. Iyemori, M. Takeda, M. Nose and Y. Odagi World Data Center for Geomagnetism, Kyoto Graduate.
Oxygen Injection Events observed by Freja Satellite M. Yamauchi 1, L. Eliasson 1, H. Nilsson 1, R. Lundin 1, and O. Norberg 2 1.Swedish Institute of Space.
Response of the Magnetosphere and Ionosphere to Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure Pulse KYUNG SUN PARK 1, TATSUKI OGINO 2, and DAE-YOUNG LEE 3 1 School of Space.
Equatorial signatures of an auroral bulge and a filamentation/demarcation of a transpolar arc observed by Cluster M. Yamauchi 1, I. Sandahl 1, R. Lundin.
Recent THEMIS and coordinated GBO measurements of substorm expansion onset: Do we finally have an answer? Larry Kepko NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center.
M. Yamauchi 1, H. Nilsson 1, I. Dandouras 2, H. Reme 2, R. Lundin 3, Y. Ebihara 4 (1) Swedish Institute of Space Physics (IRF), Kiruna, Sweden (2) CNRS.
SS Space Science Program October 2000 Particle energy in the magnetosphere is carried mainly by trapped protons. Proton auroras are caused by protons which.
GEOSYNCHRONOUS SIGNATURES OF AURORAL SUBSTORMS PRECEDED BY PSEUDOBREAKUPS A. Kullen (1), S. Ohtani (2), and H. Singer (3) A. Kullen (1), S. Ohtani (2),
ESS 7 Lecture 13 October 29, 2008 Substorms. Time Series of Images of the Auroral Substorm This set of images in the ultra-violet from the Polar satellite.
2001/02/08T E Moore - SW Interactions via LENA1 Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Interactions via Low Energy Neutral Atom Imaging T E Moore[1], M R Collier[1],
Simultaneous in-situ observations of the feature of a typical FTE by Cluster and TC1 Zhang Qinghe Liu Ruiyuan Polar Research Institute of China
Substorm-origin sub-keV ring current ions: wedge-like structure ICS-9, Graz, ~7 Substorm : production of plasma Sub-keV ring current : fossil of.
Space Science MO&DA Programs - November Page 1 SS It is well known that intense auroral disturbances occur in association with substorms and are.
Morphology of Inner Magnetospheric low- energy ions M. Yamauchi 1, I. Dandouras 2, H. Reme 2, R. Lundin 3, L.M. Kister 4, F. Mazouz 5, Y. Ebihara 6 (1)
MULTI-INSTRUMENT STUDY OF THE ENERGY STEP STRUCTURES OF O + AND H + IONS IN THE CUSP AND POLAR CAP REGIONS Yulia V. Bogdanova, Berndt Klecker and CIS TEAM.
Polar/VIS Science Report Conjugate Auroral Observations and Implications for Magnetospheric Physics. John Sigwarth – NASA/GSFC Nicola Fox – JHU/APL Louis.
© Research Section for Plasma and Space Physics UNIVERSITY OF OSLO Daytime Aurora Jøran Moen.
Cluster observation of electron acceleration by ULF Alfvén waves
Magnetospheric Solitary Structure maintained by 3000 km/s ions and its relation to Auroral Bulge after a Substorm M. Yamauchi1, H. Nilsson1, I. Dandouras2,
GOES Data Status Mutual Benefits of NASA THEMIS and NOAA GOES
Disturbance Dynamo Effects in the Low Latitude Ionosphere
Sub-keV Phenomena of Dayside Ring Current
Oxygen Injection Events observed by Freja Satellite
THEMIS and Space Weather
Evidence for Dayside Interhemispheric Field-Aligned Currents During Strong IMF By Conditions Seen by SuperDARN Radars Joseph B.H. Baker, Bharat Kunduri.
Magnetospheric solitary structure maintained by 3000 km/s ions as a cause of westward moving auroral bulge at 19 MLT M. Yamauchi1, I. Dandouras2, P.W.
Sources of < 10 keV ring current ions: supply mechanism?
THEMIS observations at a substorm onset on March 1, 2008
Environmental conditions during the charging anomaly of the two geosynchronous satellites reported: TELSTAR 401 and Galaxy 15 Elena Saiz, A. Guerrero,
Yama's works Using geomagnetic data
Yuki Takagi1*, Kazuo Shiokawa1, Yuichi Otsuka1, and Martin Connors2  
ESS 200C Substorms Lecture 14.
Analysis of Substorms during the Second THEMIS Tail Season
Subauroral heliosphere-geosphere coupling during November 2004 ionospheric storms: F2-region, North-East Asia Chelpanov M. A., Zolotukhina N.A. Institute.
High-Speed Plasma Flows Observed in the Magnetotail during Geomagemtically Quiet Times: Relationship between Magnetic Reconnection, Substorm and High-Speed.
P. Stauning: The Polar Cap (PC) Index for Space Weather Forecasts
M. Yamauchi1, T. Sergienko1, C. -F. Enell2, A. Schillings1, R
Presentation transcript:

Quick Substorm Development during Initial 10 Minutes of Magnetic Storm M. Yamauchi, IRF-Kiruna T. Iyemori, WDC-C2, Kyoto (Geomagnetic) H. Frey, SSL/UCB (IMAGE-FUV) M. Henderson, LANL, Los Alamos (LANL) H. Singer, NOAA, Boulder (GOES) Many thanks to all teams that provided data

Acknowledgements Ground: Geomagnetic field data are provided partly through INTERMAGNET by British Geological Survey, Danish Meteorological Institute, Ecole et Observatoire des Sciences de la Terre, Finnish Meteorological Institute, Finnish Academy of Science, Geological Survey of Canada, Geological Survey of Sweden, Geoscience Australia, Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences, Institute of Solar- Terrestrial Physics at Irkutsk, The Irish Meteorological Service, Leirvogur geomagnetic station, Lviv Centre of Institute of Space Research, National Institute of Information and Communications Technology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Tromsoe Geophysical Observatory in Norway, and United States Geological Survey. Cutlass HF data and its interpretation is provided by Mark Lester at Leicester University. Satellites: ACE/Geotail/WIND/Polar/Cluster magnetic field data are provided by the ACE/MAG team (PI: N. Ness at Bartol Reseach Institute) through the ACE Science Center, Geotail/MGF team (PI: T. Nagai at Tokyo Institute of Technology) through ISAS/Geotail page, WIND/MFI team (PI: R. Lepping at NASA/GSFC) through NASA/WIND page, Polar/MFE team (PI: C.T. Russell at IGPP), and Cluster/FGM team (PI: A. Balogh at Imperial College) through Cluster data center. Shock arrival timing detected by Cluster is identified by T. Horbury at Imperial College. The Cluster and Polar particle data for shock identification are provided by Cluster CIS team (PI: H. Reme at CESR) and Polar HYDRO team (PI: J. Scudder at Univ. Iowa) through NASA CDAweb. DMSP convection data is provided by Center for Space Sciences at the University of Texas at Dallas and the US Air Force. GOES satellite project is managed by NOAA, and the data is prepared by A. Newman, LANL satellite project is managed by Los-Alamos National Laboratory, and IMAGE project is supported by NASA.

Outline * Focus on the initial 6 minutes of the Halloween magnetic storm starting on 29 October 2003 (sudden commencement at 0611 UT). * Observed three onsets of strong ionospheric westward electrojet (2000~4000 nT) in the inner magnetosphere region. (1) Clear substorm onset in the evening-midnight sector staring at 0612 UT, expanding poleward. (2) Substorm-like westward electrojet in the morning sector starting at 0612~0613 UT (rather that cusp-related activity), expanding west. (3) The strongest activity (~4000 nT) in post-midnight sector started where and when the above two expanding activities met each other. * Gather as much data as possible to demonstrate the development.

Data (1) Overview: Geomagnetic indices (2) Timing of shock arrival (∆B except LANL) (a) Interplanetary space: ACE, Geotail, WIND (b) Magnetosphere: LANL (p+,e-), GOES, Cluster, Polar (c) Earth: Ground geomagnetic field (1s value) (3) Substorm-like geomagnetic activity (a) ground:geomagnetic field (1 min values / Mlat) (b) magnetosphere: GOES (B), LANL (p+,e-) (c) auroral emission: IMAGE (FUV) (4) Not available: EISCAT did not operate Cutlass HF data has no signal due to disturbed condition FAST and DMSP satellites did not cover the region during this 10 minutes.

Geomagnetic indices Examine first 10 min after the SC AU & AL Dst ASM & SYM

ACE + Geotail (+ Wind) ACE: 0558:20 UT / +221 Re GTL: 0609:40 UT / +26 Re Wind: 0619:30 UT / -156 Re  1900 ~ 2000 km/s Geotail ACE Wind By<0

Geosynchronous (dayside) 07 LT 11 LT 13 LT 16 LT 19 LT 07 LT 11 LT 13 LT 16 LT 19 LT 04 LT 0610:50 UT LANL p keVLANL e keV

Geosynchronous (nightside) GOES & Polar 5s resolution data, geographic coordinate GOES-10 ≈ 21 LT (thin lines) GOES-12 ≈ 1 LT (thick lines) Polar ≈ 21 LT (dotted lines) SC = 0611:30~0611:40 UT

Ground ∆B (1 sec resolution) KRN ( Kiruna ) LT, 65° WMQ ( Urumq i) LT, 34° MMB ( Memanmetsu ) LT, 35° KNY (Kanoya ) LT, 22°

Summary of the shock propagation timing IMF B Y < 0

Ground ∆B (1 min resolution) Ground ∆B (∆X or ∆H) sub-auroralauroralpolar cap regionregionregion midnight morning evening midnight morning midnight IQA≈01 LT

GOES & Polar 5s resolution data, geographic coordinate GOES-10 ≈ 21 LT (thin lines) GOES-12 ≈ 1 LT (thick lines) Polar ≈ 21 LT (dotted lines) Onset = 0612:00 UT Extra onset = 0616:40 UT

IMAGE-FUV (southern hemisphere) 0611:40 UT 0613:40 UT 0615:40 UT 0617:40 UT

Ground ∆B + auroral image evening- midnight morning 0611:40 UT 0613:40 UT 0615:40 UT 0617:40 UT IQA≈01 LT

timings of events UT Magnetosphere / Ground ∆B / Aurora 0609:50Shock arrival at Geotail (26 Re upstream) 0610:50+40sShock arrival at geosynchronous satellites 0611:20Start of Sudden commencement (peak at 0612 UT) 0611:30Residual from the previous auroral arc 0612:00Dipolarization at GOES 0612Onset of westward electrojet in evening-midnight 0612~0613Onset of westward electrojet in morning 0613:30 Midnight spot & morning arc are suddenly intensified 0615:40 Both brightened regions expand 0616:40Sharp spike of B at GOES-12 (01 LT) 0617~0618 ∆Bx = nT/min at IQA (01 LT) 0617:40 Both brightened regions merged at post-midnight.

Summary : three onsets During initial 6 minutes of the magnetic storm on 29 October 2003, we observed three onsets of strong ionospheric westward electrojet (2000~4000 nT) in the inner magnetosphere region. (0a) 06:11 UT: The shock swept the magnetosphere 0.3 Re/sec ≈ upstream velocity. (0b) 06:11:21 UT: Global SC at both dayside mid-latitude & morning high-latitude. (1) 06:12 UT Onset of ordinary strong substorm (>1000 nT / 2 min) in the evening-midnight sector with a poleward expanding westward electrojet. * Most likely directly triggered by the shock arrival. * Maintained by direct energy pumping from the SW.

Summary (part 2) (2) 06:12~06:13 UT: Onset of strong westward electrojet + auroral emission in the morning auroral zone (around 65 MLat), eastward electrojet at poleward stations (> 70 Mlat). Activity expand steadily westward toward the night without vortex signature. * Trend (= westward electrojet) + oscillation  Not the cusp or KH-related phenomena. * Auroral & electrojet correspond to Region 2 FAC (J // )  Similar to a local substorm * Powered by SW dynamo via Region 1 J // at conv. reversal.

Summary (part 3) (3) 06:17 UT A localized sharp development (3000 nT / 2 min ∆B) only at 01 LT (IQA station) together with spiky increase of B by GOES-12 at 01 LT. The onset is when and where two previous activities met at high-latitude midnight. * High and sharp activity + localized + unusual spike at GOES  Difficult to understand. One possible scenario (speculation): a part of the dayside J// system is detached and swept tailward, briefly passing very close to the substorm current system, and that this passage triggered the third activity?

extra slides

Norway ∆B

Image / FUV (southern hemisphere)

timing UT MagnetosphereGround/Ionosphere 0609:50Shock arrival at Geotail (26 Re upstream) 0610:50Shock arrival at LANL-02A (11 LT) and LANL-97A (13 LT) 0611:10Shock arrival at LANL-01A (07 LT) 0611:20Shock arrival at (04 LT), (16 LT), Cluster (X=0 Re, Z=-10 Re) 0611:20Start of Sudden commencement 0611:30Residual from the previous auroral arc 0611:30Shock arrival at (19 LT) and Polar (21 LT, Z=0 Re) 0611:40Shock arrival at GOES-12 (01 LT) and GOES-10 (21 LT) 0612:00Start of dipolarization at GOES-12 (01 LT) and GOES-10 (21 LT) 0612 Peak of SC / Onset of westward electrojet in evening-midnight 0612~0613Onset of westward electrojet in morning 0613:30 Midnight spot and the morning arc were suddenly intensified 0615:40 Both brightening expanded 0616:40Sharp spike of B at GOES-12 (01 LT) 0617~0618 ∆Bx = nT/min at IQA (01 LT) 0617:40 The two brightened regions merged at post-midnight.