Session 12 Theory of Change. Session Objectives Module 1, Unit 3, Session 12 By the end of this session, campaign managers should be able to: Define a.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process
Advertisements

Strengthening MPA Management through Local Communities Philippine Environmental Governance Project (EcoGov)
Proposal Development Guidelines for Signature Grantee Semi-Finalists The Covenant Foundation.
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals The Covenant Foundation.
What can outcomes based planning and evaluation do for you? Elizabeth Kryder-Reid, Director, Museum Studies, IUPUI and Principal Investigator, Shaping.
Sustainability Planning Pat Simmons Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services.
“Strengthening MPA Management through Local Communities” Philippine Environmental Governance Project (EcoGov)
1 Theories of Change and Logic Models: Telling Them Apart Heléne Clark Director, ActKnowledge Andrea A. Anderson Research.
2014 AmeriCorps External Reviewer Training Assessing Need, Theory of Change, and Logic Model.
1 Theory of Change Chesapeake Bay Funders Network Program Evaluation Training Workshop OMG Center for Collaborative Learning January 9-10, 2008.
Research Plan: Using Data to Create Impactful Pride Campaigns
1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Session Four: M&E System for AfT bankable projects UNITED NATIONS Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA) Expert Group Meeting on Monitoring.
ANGKANA “ TAO” MAKVILAI Tiger Conservation Pride Campaign in HKK wildlife Sanctuary, Thailand CRITICAL ANALYSIS PRESENTATION.
“Strengthening MPA Management through Local Communities” Philippine Environmental Governance Project (EcoGov)
Logic Modeling for Success Dr Kathryn Wehrmann Illinois State University.
2014 AmeriCorps State and National Symposium How to Develop a Program Logic Model.
The P Process Analysis. Presentation Objectives By the end of this session you should be able to: explain the rationale for conducting a situation analysis;
The Community Investment Triangle Targeting Our Resources Part 3: Aligning Around Strategies for Impact.
Customer Focus Module Preview
Where have all the fishes gone?
FORMATIVE EVALUATION Intermediate Injury Prevention Course August 23-26, 2011, Billings, MT.
2014 AmeriCorps External Reviewer Training
A Tool to Monitor Local Level SPF SIG Activities
Theme 2: Expanding Assessment and Evaluation for FNMI Students Goal #1: First Nations, Métis and Inuit student achievement is increased as measured by.
Theories of Change and Logic Models: Telling Them Apart
Communicating Ocean Sciences to Informal Audiences (COSIA) Session 3 Teaching & Learning.
Do it pro bono. Strategic Scorecard Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Strategic Scorecard Service.
Utilising a Theory of Change approach to Achieve Adaptive Co-Management Anna Evely, Ioan Fazey, Xavier Lambin and Michelle Pinard Universities of Aberdeen.
Creative Strategy and Development. Agenda Understand and be able to articulate the message development process Understand the structure, content and purpose.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Gaana Balbar Set our taimen free CRITICAL ANALYSIS PRESENTATION.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Rare Pride English Program Week 3 Summary February 16, 2009 – February 20, 2009.
Logic Models and Theory of Change Models: Defining and Telling Apart
Curriculum Mapping: its MANY benefits of investing time and effort.
The Philippine Reef Rangers….. The Philippine Reef Rangers…. ….removing barriers.
Elaina Todd Guam Southern Watersheds Campaign CRITICAL ANALYSIS PRESENTATION.
Rare Pride English Program First Training Phase- Week 3 September 20, 2010 – September 24, 2010.
1 Designing Effective Programs: –Introduction to Program Design Steps –Organizational Strategic Planning –Approaches and Models –Evaluation, scheduling,
Unit 3: Concept Modeling & Threat Ranking. Session 1 Concept Modeling.
Conservation Strategies Pathways to Success Conservation Coaches Network New Coach Training.
Hunt for consumption not to extinction Pride Campaign Santi “Joy” Saypanya CRITICAL ANALYSIS PRESENTATION.
Mapping the logic behind your programming Primary Prevention Institute
Session 3 SMART Objectives. Setting smart SMART Goals Daniel Hayden Internal Discussion October
The P Process Strategic Design
1 ANALYSIS. 2 Presentation Objectives By the end of this session you should be able to: Explain the importance of analysis to developing an effective.
Session on Improving governance of the MCs CF Retreat 930 to 1100 am, April 5, 2011 Boljoon, Cebu.
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals The Covenant Foundation.
Improvement Model and PDSA Cycles. Organ Donation The Service Improvement Model provides a framework to test, implement and sustain change ideas to overcome.
Pride’s 2.0 Process 1.Focus on priority conservation targets & key threats 2.Align campaign components (targets, threats, audiences, objectives, etc) 3.Align.
Module 2, Unit 6 Objective Setting & Monitoring. Review – open ended questions.
District Leadership Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the District Leadership Module PowerPoint. The actual Overview PowerPoint is 73.
Developing a Project Proposal - SPROUT - ACTRAV-Turin.
Adrienne DiTommaso, MPA, CNCS Office of Research and Evaluation
Proposal Development Guidelines for Signature Grantee Semi-Finalists The Covenant Foundation.
Cohort Review Presentation Cohort Status Report: {Insert Cohort Name} Complete by: {Insert you name} Date: {Insert Date}
Theory of Change Models Outcomes-Based Program Design Models.
Stuart Birnbaum Department of Geological Sciences The University of Texas at San Antonio Learning objectives and assessments June 15, 2015.
Session Objectives Did we meet these objectives? Module 2, Unit 4, Session 1 Use the brainstorming function in Miradi to isolate the factor chains of the.
Setting Preliminary SMART Objectives. By the end of this lesson you will be able to: Describe the characteristics of a SMART Objective. Demonstrate Rare’s.
Session: Instructional methods; How to prepare practical exercise/case study 24 th January 2013 Dr. Eliona Kulluri Bimbashi (University of Tirana)
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
Welcome IPFS Additional Strategic Plan Guidance March 3, 2016 The webinar will begin shortly.
Debunking Theories of Change
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Workshop to develop theories of change
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals
Wednesday 13 September UKCF Conference Cardiff
Presentation transcript:

Session 12 Theory of Change

Session Objectives Module 1, Unit 3, Session 12 By the end of this session, campaign managers should be able to: Define a Theory of Change Apply the Theory of Change template provided in this session to revise their Draft Theory of Change Evaluate and weigh their Draft Theory of Change through the scoring process

The Change Process Review

“A Theory of Change describes the types of interventions that bring about the outcomes depicted in the pathway of a change map. Each outcome in the pathway of change is tied to an intervention, revealing the often complex web of activity that is required to bring about change.” ActKnowledge & the Aspen Institute Roundtable on Community Change History of Theory of Change

and-logic-model-

6

Get from Court House to the Zoo 7

Creates a commonly understood vision of the long-term goals, how they will be reached, and what will be used to measure progress along the way Is developed through a repetitive process Engages stakeholders Is built on data and validated assumptions A Theory of Change (ToC) Module 1, Unit 3, Session 12

K + A + IC + BR  BC  TR  CR Conservation (CR) -- What target are we trying to conserve? Threat Reduction (TR) -- What are the main threats to our conservation target, and which can we reduce? Behavior Change (BC) -- What behaviors for which group(s) must change in order to reduce this threat? Barrier Removal (BR) -- What are the barriers to adoption of the new behavior we want to see, and how can we remove them? IC (Interpersonal Communication) -- What conversations are needed to encourage people to adopt the new behavior? Attitude (A) -- What attitudes must shift for these conversations to happen? Knowledge (K) -- What knowledge is needed to increase awareness and help shift these attitudes? Rare’s Theory of Change Template Module 1, Unit 3, Session 12

Take a look at your Cohort ToC

Summary Table Narrative Action Table What Will Your Final ToC Look Like?

Detailed Theory of Change Table Module 1, Unit 3, Session 12

Take a look at Your Draft ToC

Scoring your Draft Theory of Change Review the Theory of Change that you have drafted earlier and highlight areas where you feel data is missing or where assumptions may yet need further validation. Where do you think your Theory of Change is weak? Try to take the information that you have and put it into the following formula. Remember start at the right and work left.

1.A clear and testable hypothesis 2.Demonstrate accountability for your results and actions 3.A visual representation 4.Logical steps 5.SMART 6.Blueprint for monitoring your performance 7.Defines success with stakeholders Getting a Grade A Theory of Change A justification for developing your organizational capabilities. A powerful communication tool to capture the complexity of your initiative.

TOC Reality Check Pair Up! Share the Theory of Change (ToC) from your application and the results of the individual exercise with your partner. Using the scoring sheet, each partner should score the others' ToC. Person “B” uses the scoring sheet to score person “A's” ToC. Roles are then reversed. to Adam & Ariela

TOC Reality Check Use this Score Card to help you redo your Theory of Change & Narrative

Assignment: Draft Theory of Change Narrative (30 Points) 1.Using your organizational draft Theory of Change that was originally completed during the application stage, you revise and score based upon the handout provided by the Regional Pride Program Manager. 2. Using the template provided by your instructor you write a narrative paragraph 100 – 150 Words to complete your Draft Theory of Change based upon your latest revisions. The narrative paragraph articulates your proposed Pride campaign strategy. It will explain how you change behaviors of key groups to reduce threats to the biodiversity target in your site.

Assignment: Draft Theory of Change Narrative (30 Points) 3. Using the handout you review your draft Theory of Change to ensure that it meets the following criteria: – identifies the conservation result (CR) and conservation target in your site that your campaign will focus on; – identifies the principal threat(s) (TR) to this conservation target; – identifies the behavior change (BC) needed to reduce the threat; – proposes or presents alternate behaviors and the barriers that might prevent the target audiences from adopting them; – identifies barrier removal (BR) tools that exist and who might provide them; – identifies the type of interpersonal communication (IC) your Pride campaign will need to generate to help the target group change their behavior; – identifies the knowledge (K) and attitudes (A) needed for these discussions to take place. 4. Please include a statement articulating why you believe this campaign strategy will be effective, how it fits into your Lead Agencies larger strategic plan, citing proof of concept for this type of Theory of Change at other sites, case studies, or analogous situations. COMPLETE BY WEDNESDAY MIDNIGHT THIS WEEK

Assignment Activity to Adam & Ariela by Wednesday Midnight

28 Write a narrative paragraph 100 – 150 Words to complete your Draft Theory of Change. This paragraph articulates your proposed Pride campaign strategy, i.e. how you will change behaviors of key groups to reduce threats to the biodiversity target in your site. Assignment Activity Please include a statement articulating why you believe this campaign strategy will be effective, how it fits into your Lead Agencies larger strategic plan, citing proof of concept for this type of Theory of Change at other sites, case studies, or analogous situations. to Adam & Ariela by Wednesday Midnight

29 Narrative Summary To eliminate the principal threat posed to the endemic and endangered Andrea Quail Dove, invasive rodents must be eradicated from Serena Island and their re-invasion prevented. Key target groups (Fishermen and Recreational Visitors) will be informed of the biodiversity value of the island, the threats posed by rodents, and the benefits of eradication. They will be asked to petition the government to approve an eradication program and to modify their behaviors to ensure re-invasion does not occur. There will be 100% compliance in adopting rodent monitoring and trapping strategies on their boats prior to their using the island. The Serena Pride Campaign will be deemed successful if rodents are eradicated from the island, re- invasion has not taken place, and if the population of endemic Andrea Quail Doves rebounds from 100 birds in 2007 to 250 by Words Example of Narrative

Session Objectives Module 1, Unit 3, Session 12 Did we meet these objectives? Define a Theory of Change Apply the Theory of Change template provided in this session to revise their Draft Theory of Change Evaluate and weigh their Draft Theory of Change through the scoring process