I-394 Express Lane Community Task Force March 18, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Some things cant wait for traffic Capital Beltway HOT Lanes Project Fairfax County TAC Update – August 16, 2011 New Travel Choices Ahead.
Advertisements

Minnesotas Congestion Pricing Program Road User Charging Conference January, 2009 By Bernie Arseneau Minnesota (USA) Department of Transportation.
Beltline Highway ITS – Ramp Metering Project ODOT Planners Meeting April 25, 2012.
Joe Rouse California Department of Transportation Division of Traffic Operations Office of System Management Operations.
D2 Roadway Discussion Sound Transit Board September 22, 2011.
Managed Lanes Development Strategy Phase I District Four October 17, 2012.
I-96 Reconstruction/Bridge Repair Project City of Livonia and Redford Township Wayne County May 10, 2013 Association of the Council of Western Wayne Yankee.
Managed Lanes in Washington State
Getting Started with Congestion Pricing A Workshop for Local Partners Federal Highway Administration Office of Operations.
75 Express Lanes Segment D Construction From South of Sheridan Street to North of Griffin Road Presentation to Ivanhoe Community August 27, 2014.
I-15 MANAGED LANES Building on Success Institute of Transportation Studies’ Center for Urban Infrastructure March 7, 2003.
An Analytical Framework for Managed Lane Facility Performance Evaluation Xiaoyue Cathy Liu University of Washington To Be Presented at the Western ITE.
JANUARY 9, 2002 SCAJAQUADA CORRIDOR STUDY Grant Street to Parkside Avenue City of Buffalo Fisher Associates Joseph Passonneau & Partners In Association.
April 6, 2015 I-4 Ultimate Project Overview. Agenda Overview of I-4 Ultimate How to stay informed Studies and communication Responses to questions provided.
CFEE Conference March 23 rd, 2007 By: Jim Madaffer State & Local Authority What We Have, and What We Need.
Case Study 4 New York State Alternate Route 7. Key Issues to Explore: Capacity of the mainline sections of NYS-7 Adequacy of the weaving sections Performance.
TRB Lianyu Chu *, K S Nesamani +, Hamed Benouar* Priority Based High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes Operation * California Center for Innovative Transportation.
CE 578 Highway Traffic Operations Introduction to Freeway Facilities Analysis.
Versatile Applications of EMME/2 and ENIF: Seattle Experience Madhavi Sanakkayala Heather Purdy & Sujay Davuluri Parsons Brinckerhoff, Seattle.
Presentation to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit and the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Peggy Catlin, Deputy Executive Director.
National Road Pricing Conference June 4, 2010 Mark Burris, Texas Transportation Institute Jessie Yung, Federal Highway Administration.
Southern Nevada HOV Plan Update ITE Luncheon July 17, 2014 Jeff Lerud, Project Manager.
Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Transportation Policy Board Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments.
Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.
What are Managed Lanes What are Express Lanes What are HOT Lanes Regional Express Lanes Network I-95 Express I-595 Express I-75 Express.
Urban Road Pricing: US DOT Congestion Initiative and Urban Partnerships 14 th World Congress on ITS IBEC Special Session October 10, 2007 Beijing Exhibition.
I-394 MnPASS Technical Evaluation Preliminary Findings March 23, 2006 Doug Sallman – Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
I-394 MnPASS Technical Evaluation Doug Sallman – Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
Route 1 Project Study Report Overview. A report that describes the transportation problem and identifies the project scope, schedule and estimated cost.
75 Express Lanes Project From NW 170 Street to I-595 TIM Meeting Wednesday, September 2.
Some things can’t wait for traffic Capital Beltway HOT Lanes Project New Travel Choices Ahead.
1 Mississippi River Bridge An Analysis of Alternatives Expert Panel Review Sharon Greene & Associates.
Modeling HOT Lanes TPB’s Approach AMPO Travel Modeling Group March 21, 2006 I:\ateam\meetings_conf\ampo_tms\ \Hot_Lane_Pres_to_AMPO_Final.ppt.
Freeway Congestion In The Washington Region Presentation to National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board February 15, 2006 Item # 9.
FAST Lanes Program Transportation and General Government Policy Committee Association of Metropolitan Municipalities August 16, 2004 Minnesota Department.
1 Using Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Technologies and Strategies to Better Manage Congestion Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator of.
Modeling HOV lane choice behavior for microscopic simulation models and its application to evaluation of HOV lane operation strategies Jun-Seok Oh Western.
MnPASS I-394 High Occupancy Toll (HOT) Lanes Case Study 7 group: Brendon Slotterback Chris Romansky Feng Xie Gabe Gubash
Modeling Various Tolling Schemes Using Emme: Seattle Experience Andrew Natzel, Parsons Brinckerhoff Bhanu Yerra, Parsons Brinckerhoff Craig Helmann, Puget.
The Fargo/Moorhead Area Interstate Operations Study Opportunities and Planned Activities Presentation for the Mn/DOT Travel Demand Modeling Coordinating.
THE EL MONTE HOV / BUSWAY: A Policy Driven Experiment in Congestion Management Frank Quon Division of Operations Deputy District Director HOV LANES IN.
I-394 MnPASS Express Lanes Project Update Guidestar Board Meeting September 7th, 2005.
Estimating Volumes for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia Prepared for: 2009 Planning Applications Conference Houston, TX May 18, 2009 Prepared by: Kenneth D.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Fairfax County Parkway Corridor Study Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee December 1,
SHRP2 Project C05: Final Report to TCC Understanding the Contribution of Operations, Technology, and Design to Meeting Highway Capacity Needs Wayne Kittelson.
I-15 Express Lanes Project January 2012 I-15 Express Lanes Project January 2012.
Regional Transportation Management Center Shared Operations Center – Mn/DOT Traffic Operations – Mn/DOT Maintenance Dispatch – State Patrol Dispatch 400.
Interstate 95 Managed Lanes PD&E Study (95 Express) Project Development and Environment Study SE FSUTMS Users Group The Corradino Group November 2, 2007.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide Attitudinal Evaluation Overview and Update Johanna Zmud / NuStats October 28, 2004 MnPass Copyright WSDOT © 2002.
Henri Stembord Ring Road Management. 2 Defenitions Ring Road or Beltway? Ring Road = series of roads within town for orbital distribution Beltway = Motorway.
District VI, Florida Department of Transportation SE 2 nd Avenue and SE 4 th Street/Biscayne Boulevard Way March 25 th, 2014 Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory.
Garden State Parkway HOT Lanes By Matt Lawson October 14, 2010.
TMCs – The Next Generation ITS Tennessee Annual Meeting / October 8, 2009 Dr. Robert Edelstein, PE, PTOE.
Case Study 4 New York State Alternate Route 7 Problem 2.
I-66 OUTSIDE THE BELTWAY Shrevecrest HOA JUNE 21, Susan Shaw, P. E
Macro / Meso / Micro Framework on I-395 HOT Lane Conversion
Four Winds Condominium Association August 2, 2017
The I-465 West Leg Reconstruction Project
Sully District Council of Citizens Associations January 25, 2017 Susan Shaw, P.E., Megaprojects Director Virginia Department of Transportation.
Evaluation and Re-Design Haifa and Yafa Streets.
TVTC Impact Fee Update Nexus Study January 30, 2008
The Oakton Condominium Association September 12, 2017
I-66 Outside the Beltway Design Public Hearing Meetings November 13, 14 & Susan Shaw, P.E., Megaprojects Director Virginia Department of.
Jim Henricksen, MnDOT Steve Ruegg, WSP
CDOT North I-25 Express Lanes Update April 28, 2016
Study Goals Analyze traffic operations along the corridor and at the two study interchanges Provide safety enhancements Improve multimodal performance.
Florida Transportation Commission FY 2009
Slugging in the I-395 Corridor
Problem 5: Interstate 87 Interchange
Current and proposed HOT facilities update
Presentation transcript:

I-394 Express Lane Community Task Force March 18, 2004

AgendaAgenda Welcome and Introductions Welcome and Introductions Preliminary Traffic Operations and Simulation Results Preliminary Traffic Operations and Simulation Results Discussion of Vehicle Types Allowed Discussion of Vehicle Types Allowed Range of Toll Rates Range of Toll Rates Discussion of Hours of Operation Discussion of Hours of Operation Community Outreach Community Outreach Future Meetings – Discussion Topics Future Meetings – Discussion Topics Welcome and Introductions Welcome and Introductions Preliminary Traffic Operations and Simulation Results Preliminary Traffic Operations and Simulation Results Discussion of Vehicle Types Allowed Discussion of Vehicle Types Allowed Range of Toll Rates Range of Toll Rates Discussion of Hours of Operation Discussion of Hours of Operation Community Outreach Community Outreach Future Meetings – Discussion Topics Future Meetings – Discussion Topics

Model Simulation Process

Purpose of CORSIM Simulation Model “To assist in geometric design of HOT lanes” Evaluating the location of entrances/exits Evaluating the location of entrances/exits Evaluating the length of the weaving sections Evaluating the length of the weaving sections Evaluating closure of specific entrance/exits Evaluating closure of specific entrance/exits Evaluating the impacts to existing bottleneck areas Evaluating the impacts to existing bottleneck areas “To assist in geometric design of HOT lanes” Evaluating the location of entrances/exits Evaluating the location of entrances/exits Evaluating the length of the weaving sections Evaluating the length of the weaving sections Evaluating closure of specific entrance/exits Evaluating closure of specific entrance/exits Evaluating the impacts to existing bottleneck areas Evaluating the impacts to existing bottleneck areas

Existing I-394 / I-94 volumes Existing I-394 / I-94 volumes Base case striping option Base case striping option Access to / from HOV lanes is only allowed at specific locations Access to / from HOV lanes is only allowed at specific locations HOV demand assumed as a percent of total volume at each ramp HOV demand assumed as a percent of total volume at each ramp Existing I-394 / I-94 volumes Existing I-394 / I-94 volumes Base case striping option Base case striping option Access to / from HOV lanes is only allowed at specific locations Access to / from HOV lanes is only allowed at specific locations HOV demand assumed as a percent of total volume at each ramp HOV demand assumed as a percent of total volume at each ramp CORSIM Model Assumptions for Existing Conditions

Access Configuration

Special CORSIM Coding Conventions Separate, adjacent HOV ramps used by HOVs to access I-394 Separate, adjacent HOV ramps used by HOVs to access I-394 Direct ramp-to-ramp connections are not allowed. Mainline “dummy” links used at selected locations Direct ramp-to-ramp connections are not allowed. Mainline “dummy” links used at selected locations Access to/from HOV lanes separated by “dummy” barrier Access to/from HOV lanes separated by “dummy” barrier Separate, adjacent HOV ramps used by HOVs to access I-394 Separate, adjacent HOV ramps used by HOVs to access I-394 Direct ramp-to-ramp connections are not allowed. Mainline “dummy” links used at selected locations Direct ramp-to-ramp connections are not allowed. Mainline “dummy” links used at selected locations Access to/from HOV lanes separated by “dummy” barrier Access to/from HOV lanes separated by “dummy” barrier

Special CORSIM Coding Conventions

Traffic Simulation Examples Baseline Conditions - AM Peak Hour (7:30 – 8:30) Baseline Conditions - AM Peak Hour (7:30 – 8:30) Baseline Conditions - PM Peak Hour (5:00 – 6:00) Baseline Conditions - PM Peak Hour (5:00 – 6:00) HOT Lane near capacity - AM Peak Hour HOT Lane near capacity - AM Peak Hour  Modification of access configuration (near Rev. Lane)  Closure of entrance / exit (near Plymouth Road) Baseline Conditions - AM Peak Hour (7:30 – 8:30) Baseline Conditions - AM Peak Hour (7:30 – 8:30) Baseline Conditions - PM Peak Hour (5:00 – 6:00) Baseline Conditions - PM Peak Hour (5:00 – 6:00) HOT Lane near capacity - AM Peak Hour HOT Lane near capacity - AM Peak Hour  Modification of access configuration (near Rev. Lane)  Closure of entrance / exit (near Plymouth Road)

Current Level of Congestion Color-coded schematics (PM Peak Hour) Eastbound I-94: Tunnel to I-35W Eastbound I-94: Tunnel to I-35W Eastbound I-394: Penn Ave to tunnel Eastbound I-394: Penn Ave to tunnel Eastbound I-394: Louisiana to TH 100 Eastbound I-394: Louisiana to TH 100 Westbound I-394: Downtown to I-394 entrance Westbound I-394: Downtown to I-394 entrance Westbound I-394: Louisiana to TH 169 Westbound I-394: Louisiana to TH 169 Color-coded schematics (PM Peak Hour) Eastbound I-94: Tunnel to I-35W Eastbound I-94: Tunnel to I-35W Eastbound I-394: Penn Ave to tunnel Eastbound I-394: Penn Ave to tunnel Eastbound I-394: Louisiana to TH 100 Eastbound I-394: Louisiana to TH 100 Westbound I-394: Downtown to I-394 entrance Westbound I-394: Downtown to I-394 entrance Westbound I-394: Louisiana to TH 169 Westbound I-394: Louisiana to TH 169

Current Level of Congestion

SimulationEastbound Tunnel to I-35W Tunnel to I-35W Penn Ave to tunnel Penn Ave to tunnel Louisiana to TH 100 Louisiana to TH 100Westbound Entrance from downtown Entrance from downtown Louisiana to TH 169 Louisiana to TH 169SimulationEastbound Tunnel to I-35W Tunnel to I-35W Penn Ave to tunnel Penn Ave to tunnel Louisiana to TH 100 Louisiana to TH 100Westbound Entrance from downtown Entrance from downtown Louisiana to TH 169 Louisiana to TH 169

HOV Lane at Near-Capacity Volumes Simulation assumptions Current I-394 geometrics with base case striping option Current I-394 geometrics with base case striping option Started with existing HOV volumes Started with existing HOV volumes Assumed MnPass SOVs increase volume to 1500 Assumed MnPass SOVs increase volume to 1500 Assumed that 50% of demand for general purpose lane is backfilled Assumed that 50% of demand for general purpose lane is backfilled Simulation assumptions Current I-394 geometrics with base case striping option Current I-394 geometrics with base case striping option Started with existing HOV volumes Started with existing HOV volumes Assumed MnPass SOVs increase volume to 1500 Assumed MnPass SOVs increase volume to 1500 Assumed that 50% of demand for general purpose lane is backfilled Assumed that 50% of demand for general purpose lane is backfilled

Simulation – Input to Design Evaluating the location of entrances/exits & length of access configurations HOT Lane near capacity - AM Peak Hour HOT Lane near capacity - AM Peak Hour EB I-394 exit to reversible lanes (AM Peak) EB I-394 exit to reversible lanes (AM Peak) Evaluating the location of entrances/exits & length of access configurations HOT Lane near capacity - AM Peak Hour HOT Lane near capacity - AM Peak Hour EB I-394 exit to reversible lanes (AM Peak) EB I-394 exit to reversible lanes (AM Peak)

Evaluate entrance / exit closures HOT Lane near capacity - AM Peak Hour HOT Lane near capacity - AM Peak Hour Closure of entrance / exit between Plymouth Road and Ridgedale Drive Closure of entrance / exit between Plymouth Road and Ridgedale Drive Evaluate entrance / exit closures HOT Lane near capacity - AM Peak Hour HOT Lane near capacity - AM Peak Hour Closure of entrance / exit between Plymouth Road and Ridgedale Drive Closure of entrance / exit between Plymouth Road and Ridgedale Drive Simulation – Input to Design

Vehicle Types Allowed Buses Buses Light Comercial Vehicles Light Comercial Vehicles Buses Buses Light Comercial Vehicles Light Comercial Vehicles

Toll Rates Range of Toll Rates Range of Toll Rates Number of Toll Rates Displayed on Signs Number of Toll Rates Displayed on Signs Range of Toll Rates Range of Toll Rates Number of Toll Rates Displayed on Signs Number of Toll Rates Displayed on Signs

Hours of Operation – Current Hours East of Highway 100 (Reversible Section) Eastbound: 6 AM – 1 PM Eastbound: 6 AM – 1 PM Westbound: 2 PM – Midnight Westbound: 2 PM – Midnight Weekends – As Needed Weekends – As Needed West of Highway 100 West of Highway 100 Eastbound: AM Eastbound: AM Westbound: PM Westbound: PM East of Highway 100 (Reversible Section) Eastbound: 6 AM – 1 PM Eastbound: 6 AM – 1 PM Westbound: 2 PM – Midnight Westbound: 2 PM – Midnight Weekends – As Needed Weekends – As Needed West of Highway 100 West of Highway 100 Eastbound: AM Eastbound: AM Westbound: PM Westbound: PM

Entire Facility 6 AM – Midnight (or 24 hours/day) 6 AM – Midnight (or 24 hours/day) East of Highway 100 – Options Eastbound: 6 AM – 1 PM Eastbound: 6 AM – 1 PM Westbound: 2 PM – Midnight Westbound: 2 PM – MidnightWeekends Entire Facility 6 AM – Midnight (or 24 hours/day) 6 AM – Midnight (or 24 hours/day) East of Highway 100 – Options Eastbound: 6 AM – 1 PM Eastbound: 6 AM – 1 PM Westbound: 2 PM – Midnight Westbound: 2 PM – MidnightWeekends Hours of Operation – Proposed Options

Community Involvement

Future Meetings – Discussion Topics April 15, 2004 Final Traffic Operations and Simulation Results Final Traffic Operations and Simulation Results Final Entry/Exit Point Locations Final Entry/Exit Point Locations Final Toll Rates Final Toll Rates Preliminary Demand, Cost and Revenue Analysis Preliminary Demand, Cost and Revenue Analysis Enforcement Plan Discussion Enforcement Plan Discussion April 15, 2004 Final Traffic Operations and Simulation Results Final Traffic Operations and Simulation Results Final Entry/Exit Point Locations Final Entry/Exit Point Locations Final Toll Rates Final Toll Rates Preliminary Demand, Cost and Revenue Analysis Preliminary Demand, Cost and Revenue Analysis Enforcement Plan Discussion Enforcement Plan Discussion

Future Meetings – Discussion Topics May 20, 2004 Final Demand, Cost and Revenue Analysis Final Demand, Cost and Revenue Analysis Final Enforcement Plan Discussion Final Enforcement Plan Discussion Customer Service Plan Customer Service Plan Final Operations Plan – Hours of Operation Final Operations Plan – Hours of Operation October 2004 Potential Meeting Prior to System Testing Potential Meeting Prior to System Testing May 20, 2004 Final Demand, Cost and Revenue Analysis Final Demand, Cost and Revenue Analysis Final Enforcement Plan Discussion Final Enforcement Plan Discussion Customer Service Plan Customer Service Plan Final Operations Plan – Hours of Operation Final Operations Plan – Hours of Operation October 2004 Potential Meeting Prior to System Testing Potential Meeting Prior to System Testing

I-394 Express Lane Community Task Force Thank You !!