VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna Vie_LSM Kamil Teke and Johannes Böhm.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 12 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Advertisements

Parameterizing a Geometry using the COMSOL Moving Mesh Feature
A comparison of R1 and R4 IVS networks S.B. Lambert, Royal Observatory of Belgium, formerly at NVI, Inc./US Naval Observatory A.-M. Gontier, Paris Observatory.
Processing of VLBI observation in St. Petersburg University Kudryashova Maria Astronomical Institute of Saint Petersburg University.
VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna Creating special files: Process lists, parameter files, TRF and EOP files Tobias Nilsson.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 19 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | A | Cambridge MA V F.
Irwin/McGraw-Hill © Andrew F. Siegel, 1997 and l Chapter 12 l Multiple Regression: Predicting One Factor from Several Others.
OLG LAC Reprocessing EPN 2006 G. Stangl 1, C. Aichhorn 2, S. Krauss 2 (1) Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying (BEV)‏ (2) Space Research Institute,
VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna Hana Spicakova Results obtained using VieVS: Love numbers and FCN period presented at IVS General Meeting.
DFG-Research Unit “Earth rotation and Global Dynamic processes” Poznan, 13 – 17 October 2008 N. Panafidina, M. Rothacher, D. Thaller Comparison and Combination.
VieVS User Workshop 14 – 16 September, 2011 Vienna Processing Intensive Sessions with VieVS Johannes Böhm.
VieVS User Workshop 14 – 16 September, 2011 Vienna VIE_MOD Lucia Plank.
VieVS User Workshop 14 – 21 September, 2011 Vienna Reprocessing the complete history of VLBI observations with VieVS Sigrid Böhm.
VieVS User Workshop 14 – 16 September, 2011 Vienna VIE_GLOB Hana Spicakova.
VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna Introduction Johannes Böhm.
VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna VIE_INIT Tobias Nilsson.
VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna High frequency EOP estimated from the CONT campaigns Tobias Nilsson.
VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna Automatic download and processing of VLBI data using VieVS Tobias Nilsson.
VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna VIE_SETUP Tobias Nilsson.
VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna VIE_GLOB Hana Spicakova.
VieVS User Workshop 14 – 16 September, 2011 Vienna VIE_SIM Jing SUN, Andrea PANY.
VieVS User Workshop 14 – 16 September, 2011 Vienna VIE_SCHED Jing SUN.
VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna Creating OPT-files Detecting and solving problems Tobias Nilsson.
VieVS User Workshop 14 – 16 September, 2011 Vienna VIE_LSM Kamil Teke and Johannes Böhm.
VieVS User Workshop 14 – 16 September, 2011 Vienna External tropospheric files in VieVS Matthias Madzak.
VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna Overwiev of VieVS: Installation, files, structure of the program Tobias Nilsson.
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, Miami Beach, June 2008 Comparison of GMF/GPT with VMF1/ECMWF and Implications for Atmospheric Loading Peter Steigenberger.
GNSS Observations of Earth Orientation Jim Ray, NOAA/NGS 1. Polar motion observability using GNSS – concepts, complications, & error sources – subdaily.
1 1 Slide © 2007 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Chapter 13 Multiple Regression n Multiple Regression Model n Least Squares Method n Multiple.
NGS GPS ORBIT DETERMINATION Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic.
Space Geodesy (1/3) Geodesy provides a foundation for all Earth observations Space geodesy is the use of precise measurements between space objects (e.g.,
Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 2-6 June 2008, Florida, USA GPS in the ITRF Combination D. Angermann, H. Drewes, M. Krügel, B. Meisel Deutsches Geodätisches.
Retreat Miesenbach Daniel Landskron - My previous and upcoming research 12015/04/28 Retreat 2015 Daniel Landskron.
The ICRF, ITRF and VLBA Chopo Ma NASA’s Goddard Spaceflight Center.
SNARF: Theory and Practice, and Implications Thomas Herring Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT
Stat 112 Notes 16 Today: –Outliers and influential points in multiple regression (Chapter 6.7)
University of Colorado Boulder ASEN 5070: Statistical Orbit Determination I Fall 2014 Professor Brandon A. Jones Lecture 26: Singular Value Decomposition.
Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research The University of Colorado 1 STATISTICAL ORBIT DETERMINATION ASEN 5070 LECTURE 11 9/16,18/09.
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Driving Constraints 3.5 September 30, 2013 Radu Serban University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Unified Analysis Workshop, December 5-7, 2007, Beach Resort Monterey, CA GG S Proposals for Extended Parameterization in SINEX Markus Rothacher GeoForschungsZentrum.
January 14, 2003GPS Meteorology Workshop1 Information from a Numerical Weather Model for Improving Atmosphere Delay Estimation in Geodesy Arthur Niell.
Reference Frame Theory & Practice: Implications for SNARF SNARF Workshop 1/27/04 Geoff Blewitt University of Nevada, Reno.
Combination of long time series of tropospheric parameters observed by VLBI R. Heinkelmann, J. Boehm, H. Schuh Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, TU.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 12 Prof. Thomas Herring Room ;
Bundle Adjustment A Modern Synthesis Bill Triggs, Philip McLauchlan, Richard Hartley and Andrew Fitzgibbon Presentation by Marios Xanthidis 5 th of No.
Global VLBI Solution IGG05R01 1 Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics (IGG), Vienna, Austria 2 German Geodetic Research Institute (DGFI), Munich, Germany.
1) Magnetic total field (T) obtained from airborne survey (see R.J.Blakely, 1995) (ΔT) Total field anomaly (IGRF removal), which satisfy potential theory,
2.1 – Linear and Quadratic Equations Linear Equations.
Keyframe Interpolation and Speed Control Jehee Lee Seoul National University.
Workshop, Miami, June 2008 IGS Contribution to ITRF Zuheir Altamimi & Xavier Collilieux IGN, France.
Insensitivity of GNSS to geocenter motion through the network shift approach Paul Rebischung, Zuheir Altamimi, Tim Springer AGU Fall Meeting 2013, San.
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F
IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Status and Future of the IERS Combination Efforts Markus Rothacher GeoForschungsZentrum.
MESF593 Finite Element Methods
IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Strategies for Weekly Routine Generation of Combined IERS Products Markus Rothacher.
Lecture 16: Image alignment
Coordinate Transformations
Assessing the Compatibility of Microwave Geodetic Systems
Kamil Teke and Johannes Böhm
Multi-technique comparison of troposphere zenith delays and gradients during CONT08 Kamil Teke (1,2), Johannes Böhm(1), Tobias Nilsson(1), Harald Schuh(1),
Troposphere and Clock Parameterization During Continuous VLBI Campaigns Kamil Teke1, 2, Johannes Boehm1, Hana Spicakova1, Andrea Pany1, Harald Schuh1 1.
IDS workshop, Venice, Italy, September 2012
VLBI Estimates of Vertical Crustal Motion in Europe
VIE_INIT_V30 Daniel Landskron.
T. Hobiger R. Ichikawa Y. Koyama T. Gotoh T. Otsubo T. Kubooka
GLOBK Velocity and Coordinate Solutions
Correlation coefficients
Presentation transcript:

VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna Vie_LSM Kamil Teke and Johannes Böhm

VieVS User Workshop The first solution is meant to remove large clock offsets (and rates and quadratic terms) for numerical reasons. (Clock offsets can be several kilometers.) Together with the clocks, also constant zenith delays per station are estimated, but these tropospheric delays are not removed from the observations.

VieVS User Workshop Information about clock breaks is read from the OPT files if available. At the epoch of a clock break, a new quadratic function is started. Clock breaks are only considered in the first solution. If ‘apply main solution’ is not ticked, then the station-wise residuals from the first solution will be plotted. These plots are important to locate clock breaks.

VieVS User Workshop If ticked, the main solution with piecewise linear clock offsets will be estimated. If an outlier test is chosen, the outliers will be written into an ascii file in the DATA/OUTLIER directory. The outliers will not be removed during this VieVS solution but can be used for later use with vie_init!

VieVS User Workshop In addition to the piecewise linear clocks, also a rate and a quadratic term can be estimated for the whole session. The reference epoch for the quadratic clock function is at the epoch of the first piecewise linear clock offset.

VieVS User Workshop This combination adds relative constraints on the clock offsets. Actually, observation equations are added to the design matrix which tell that the difference between two adjacent piecewise linear clock offsets is zero  a certain standard deviation . (These constraints are mainly important to bridge gaps without observations to avoid singularity of the normal equation system.)

VieVS User Workshop How to interpret this constraint of 0.5 ps 2 /s ? Our time interval between piecewise linear offsets is 60 minutes, i.e. we have a variance of 1800 ps 2 after one hour. This standard deviation of 42 ps is the standard deviation  which is used for the observation equation.

VieVS User Workshop These ticks define whether zenith wet delays, north gradients and east gradients are estimated.

VieVS User Workshop These are the corresponding time intervals in minutes.

VieVS User Workshop How to interpret this constraint of 0.7 ps 2 /s for the zenith wet delays? (This is similar to the clocks.) Our time interval between piecewise linear offsets is 30 minutes, i.e. we have a variance of 1260 ps 2 after one hour. This is a standard deviation of 35 ps. 35 ps is the standard deviation , which is used for the observation equation.

VieVS User Workshop How to interpret these constraints of 2 mm/day for the gradients? Caveat! Unlike clocks and zenith wet delays, these relative constraints scale linearly, i.e. 2 mm/day correspond to 0.5 mm after 6 hours (360 minutes). 0.5 mm is used as standard deviation. (Please mind that 2 mm/day corresponds to mm after 5 minutes. This constraint is too strong for VLBI2010 simulations with rapid gradients every 5 minutes.)

VieVS User Workshop If ticked, absolute constraints of 1 mm are applied on the gradient offsets, i.e., additional observation equations are added which tell that the gradient offset is zero  1 mm. (This feature might be necessary in early VLBI sessions.)

VieVS User Workshop If like this, the NNR and NNT conditions are applied on all stations which are available in the selected TRF. (If e.g. the station is not in the TRF, the a priori coordinates are taken from the header of the NGS file and the station is not part of the datum.) Typically, the scale is not ticked because the scale is taken from the VLBI observations. (Please mind the possibility of station-wise parameterization to change the datum stations.)

VieVS User Workshop If like this, all stations coordinates are fixed which are available in the selected TRF. (If e.g. the station is not in the TRF, the coordinates are taken from the header of the NGS file and the station is not fixed to those a priori values but the station coordinates are estimated.) (Please mind the possibility of station-wise parameterization.)

VieVS User Workshop Tick here, if you want to estimate polar motion (x, y), UT1-UTC, and nutation (X, Y). Everything is carried out in the new system with the non-rotating origin.

VieVS User Workshop These are the time intervals in minutes.

VieVS User Workshop Tick here if you want to use relative constraints between the piecewise linear offsets for the respective Earth orientation parameter.

VieVS User Workshop Similar to the gradients, these constraints scale linearly. The units are mas/day for polar motion and nutation, and ms/day for UT1-UTC.

VieVS User Workshop If you want to estimate one constant value per session, the recommendation is to set the parameterization as shown above. Very strong relative constraints of 1e-4 m(a)s/day take care that the estimates are the same over the session. Example: The session is from 18 UT to 18 UT. Then, three piecewise linear offsets are set up for each EOP. (They are set up a midnight before the session, at midnight during the session, and at midnight after the session.) The strong constraints take care that all three estimates per session are the same.

VieVS User Workshop If you want to estimate hourly Earth rotation parameters (polar motion and UT1-UTC), you should not estimate nutation, and you should use loose constraints like 30 m(a)s per day (1.25 m(a)s per hour).

VieVS User Workshop Typically, you do not want to estimate sources as piecewise linear offsets. You could do so by selecting certain sources via the source-wise parameterization. The recommendation is to leave the settings like this.

VieVS User Workshop Tick this, if you want to use the normal equations for later use in a global solution with vie_glob.

VieVS User Workshop Tick this, if you want to make a station- or source-wise parameterization. E.g., if you want to set a certain datum for the stations.