CME/Flare Mechanisms Solar “minimum” event this January For use to VSE must be able to predict CME/flare Spiro K. Antiochos Naval Research Laboratory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Observational evidence of a magnetic flux rope eruption associated with the X3 flare on 2002 July 15 Liu Yu Solar Seminar, 2003 June 16.
Advertisements

1 A New Model of Solar Flare Trigger Mechanism Kanya Kusano (Hiroshima University) Collaboration with T.Maeshiro (Hiroshima Univ.) T.Yokoyama (Univ. of.
The 3D picture of a flare Loukas Vlahos. Points for discussion  When cartoons drive the analysis of the data and the simulations….life becomes very complicated.
The magnetic nature of solar flares Paper by E.R. Priest & T.G. Forbes Review presented by Hui Song.
The Relationship Between CMEs and Post-eruption Arcades Peter T. Gallagher, Chia-Hsien Lin, Claire Raftery, Ryan O. Milligan.
Estimating the magnetic energy in solar magnetic configurations Stéphane Régnier Reconnection seminar on Thursday 15 December 2005.
TRACE and RHESSI observations of the failed eruption of the magnetic flux rope Tomasz Mrozek Astronomical Institute University of Wrocław.
Lecture 4 The Formation and Evolution of CMEs. Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) Appear as loop like features that breakup helmet streamers in the corona.
Magnetic Reconnection Across the HCS Mark Moldwin UM and Megan Cartwright UC-Berkeley Isradynamics April 2010 With thanks to Mark Linton at NRL Linton.
The Hemispheric Pattern of Filaments and Consequences for Filament Formation Duncan H Mackay Solar Physics Group University of St. Andrews.
3D Simulations of Large-Scale Coronal Dynamics
Observations –Morphology –Quantitative properties Underlying Physics –Aly-Sturrock limit Present Theories/Models Coronal Mass Ejections (CME) S. K. Antiochos,
STEREO AND SPACE WEATHER Variable conditions in space that can have adverse effects on human life and society Space Weather: Variable conditions in space.
What can helicity redistribution in solar eruptions tell us about reconnection in these events? by Brian Welsch, JSPS Fellow (Short-Term ), Space Sciences.
Chip Manchester 1, Fang Fang 1, Bart van der Holst 1, Bill Abbett 2 (1)University of Michigan (2)University of California Berkeley Study of Flux Emergence:
SDO/AIA science plan: prioritization and implementation: Five Objectives in 10 steps [session no.]1 I: C1/M8/C10 Transients: Drivers & Destabilization.
Solar evidence for magnetic reconnection H. S. Hudson Space Sciences Lab, UC Berkeley.
Two energy release processes for CMEs: MHD catastrophe and magnetic reconnection Yao CHEN Department of Space Science and Applied Physics Shandong University.
Vincent Surges Advisors: Yingna Su Aad van Ballegooijen Observations and Magnetic Field Modeling of a flare/CME event on 2010 April 8.
Understanding Magnetic Eruptions on the Sun and their Interplanetary Consequences A Solar and Heliospheric Research grant funded by the DoD MURI program.
Discussion Group B: Progress on Initiation Mechanisms 1. Determine topology of initiating field –Initiate broad observational investigation on filament.
Rapid Changes in the Longitudinal Magnetic Field Associated with the July gamma -ray Flare Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Haimin Wang, Valentyna Abramenko,
Solar-B XRT XRT-1 The Science and Capability of the Solar-B / X-Ray Telescope Solar-B XRT Presenter: Ed DeLuca Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory.
Discussion Summary: Group B –Solar Active Regions And Their Production of Flares and Coronal Mass Ejections Discussion Leaders: George Fisher Hugh Hudson.
Center for Space Environment Modeling Ward Manchester University of Michigan Yuhong Fan High Altitude Observatory SHINE July.
Coronal Mass Ejections: Models and Their Observational Basis (P.F. Chen Living Rev. Solar Phys.) 张英智 中国科学院空间科学与应用研究中心空间天气学国家重点实验室.
Judy Karpen, Spiro Antiochos, Rick DeVore, and Mark Linton MHD Simulations of Flux Cancellation on the Sun* *Work supported by ONR and NASA.
Ward Manchester University of Michigan Coupling of the Coronal and Subphotospheric Magnetic Field in Active Regions by Shear Flows Driven by The Lorentz.
Magnetic Topology and the Corona- Heliosphere Connection Background: –Frozen-in flux (τ D ~ L 2 / η >> τ L ) implies that magnetic topology constrains.
The May 1,1998 and May 12, 1997 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
Center for Space Environment Modeling Numerical Model of CME Initiation and Shock Development for the 1998 May 2 Event Ilia.
Modeling Magnetic Reconnection in a Complex Solar Corona Dana Longcope Montana State University & Institute for Theoretical Physics.
2007 PROM WORKSHOP Space Sciences Lab / UC-Berkeley Sheared-Field Prominences and the Eruptive Implications of Magnetic Topology B. J. Lynch, Y. Li, J.
SDO/AIA science plan: prioritization and implementation: Five Objectives in 10 steps [C1]1 I: C1/M8/C10 Transients: Drivers & Destabilization Chair(s):
F1B: Determine the Dominant Processes of Particle Acceleration Phase , Open the Frontier UV Spectroscopic determin- ation of pre/post-shock density,
The May 1997 and May 1998 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
Data-Driven MHD Modeling of CME Events
Twist & writhe of kink-unstable magnetic flux ropes I flux rope: helicity sum of twist and writhe: kink instability: twist  and writhe  (sum is constant)
Thomas Zurbuchen University of Michigan The Structure and Sources of the Solar Wind during the Solar Cycle.
Coronal Heating of an Active Region Observed by XRT on May 5, 2010 A Look at Quasi-static vs Alfven Wave Heating of Coronal Loops Amanda Persichetti Aad.
CME Initiation: The Matrix Reloaded David Alexander, Rice University.
Coronal Mass Ejection As a Result of Magnetic Helicity Accumulation
Frontiers in Modeling Magnetic Flux Emergence and the Development of Solar Eruptive Activities Organizers: Mark Linton and Yuhong Fan SHINE Liaison: KD.
1Yang Liu/Magnetic FieldHMI Science – 1 May 2003 Magnetic Field Goals – magnetic field & eruptive events Yang Liu Stanford University.
Flare Energy Build-Up in a Decaying Active Region Near a Coronal Hole Yingna Su Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Collaborators: A. A. van Ballegooijen,
1 Introduction: Onset of solar flares and coronal mass ejections Yokoyama, T. Dept. Earth & Planetary Science, University of Tokyo Isobe, H. Univ. Tokyo.
ISSI Jan 2009 Early Stages of Eruptions Alphonse C. Sterling 1 NASA/MSFC 1 Currently at JAXA/ISAS, Sagamihara, Japan.
Napa 2008, WG F The Earliest Phases of Solar Eruptions Alphonse C. Sterling 1 NASA/MSFC 1 Currently at JAXA/ISAS, Sagamihara, Japan.
ESS 7 Lecture 13 October 29, 2008 Substorms. Time Series of Images of the Auroral Substorm This set of images in the ultra-violet from the Polar satellite.
Solar seminor: 4 Oct (1)Eruption of a multiple-turn helical magnetic flux tube in a large flare : Evidence for external and i ternal reconnection.
White light coronagraph showing prominances and streamers The Coronal Magnetic Field.
Observations and nonlinear force-free field modeling of active region Y. Su, A. van Ballegooijen, B. W. Lites, E. E. DeLuca, L. Golub, P. C. Grigis,
III. APPLICATIONS of RECONNECTION Yohkoh Bright Pts Loops Holes A magnetic world T=few MK 1. Coronal Heating.
SHINE Formation and Eruption of Filament Flux Ropes A. A. van Ballegooijen 1 & D. H. Mackay 2 1 Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge,
Funding from: BOF, Odysseus & GOA (KU Leuven), EC-FP7 (Soteria, Giovanni Lapenta, Lapo Bettarini Centrum voor.
A Numerical Study of the Breakout Model for Coronal Mass Ejection Initiation P. MacNeice, S.K. Antiochos, A. Phillips, D.S. Spicer, C.R. DeVore, and K.
A Topological Analysis of the Magnetic Breakout Model by Rhona Maclean University of St Andrews 10 th August 2004 Collaborators: Colin Beveridge, Dana.
Observations –Morphology –Quantitative properties Underlying Physics –Aly-Sturrock limit Present Theories/Models Coronal Mass Ejections (CME) S. K. Antiochos,
Shine 2004, A. Sterling CME Eruption Onset Observations: Dimmings Alphonse C. Sterling NASA/MSFC/NSSTC.
Introduction to Space Weather Jie Zhang CSI 662 / PHYS 660 Spring, 2012 Copyright © The Sun: Magnetic Structure Feb. 16, 2012.
Initiation of Coronal Mass Ejections: Implications for Forecasting Solar Energetic Particle Storms Ron Moore, Alphonse Sterling, David Falconer, John Davis.
Ward Manchester University of Michigan
Scientists Propose Mechanism to Describe Solar Eruptions of All Sizes
Corona Mass Ejection (CME) Solar Energetic Particle Events
Introduction to Space Weather
Solar and Heliospheric Physics
Preflare State Rust et al. (1994) 太陽雑誌会.
Ron Moore and Alphonse Sterling
Solar Eruption Onset: Where Does the Action Begin?
Taiyou Zasshikai on May 17, 2004
Presentation transcript:

CME/Flare Mechanisms Solar “minimum” event this January For use to VSE must be able to predict CME/flare Spiro K. Antiochos Naval Research Laboratory

Present State of Understanding on CME/Flare Mechanisms Know where eruption can occur –Sheared filament channel –Very robust indicator Promising ideas for why eruption occurs –Reconnection and twisted flux rope models But not yet able to determine when –Essential for predicting possible geo-effectiveness –Observationally constrained Also need to determine how will erupt –Essential for predicting SEPs

Where does Eruption Occur? 07/14/00 event – from Schrijver et al 08/16/05 NASA Science Update Filament channel provides necessary energy for eruption For long range prediction (groups A & B), need to understand how they form (and what they are!)

Why does Eruption Occur? (e.g., T. Forbes) (DeVore et al) + - PIL Strongly non-potential field forms in narrow region over polarity-inversion line Exact topology still unobserved – critical for eruption mechanism Held down by ~ potential overlying coronal field Force balance breaks down and field expands outward explosively producing CME, shock, particles, etc. (see following talk by Roussev) Field reconnects below eruption to a more potential state producing flare, X-rays, etc. –Generic to all models

Reconnection models (Resistive): –Sheared 3D arcade topology (but not essential) –Reconnection removes overlying field –Tether-cutting: reconnection inside filament channel –Breakout: reconnection outside filament channel Needs multi-polarity system Twisted flux rope models (Ideal): –Twist is essential to pre-eruption topology –Generally bipolar polarity region (not essential) –Ideal (kink-like) instability/loss-of-equilibrium moves aside overlying field Models for CME Initiation

Breakout Model (from Lynch et al ) Multi-polar field & footpoint shear Reconnection removes overlying flux CME due to run-away expansion, accelerates when flare turns on

Twisted Flux Rope Model Bipolar field with some process to form twisted rope Bulk of energy still in shear Rope lifts/kinks for some critical twist, overlying field moves aside (Fan 2005 – flux “emergence”)(Amari et al 2003 – flux “cancellation”)

Why does Eruption Occur? Both breakout and twisted flux rope models shown to produce fast eruption in idealized 3D simulations –Role of tether-cutting still unclear Now testing with observed magnetic fields Beginning to incorporate better plasma energetics Need to incorporate better photosphere-corona interaction –Flux emergence and cancellation But, overall, impressive progress has been made in recent years

When will Eruption Occur? Breakout: onset of fast reconnection at coronal null –Current sheet thins to critical scale Flux rope: system reaches critical twist or energy Question needs more theoretical and numerical study Given answer, then in principle, could use observations to determine coronal B –Effective extrapolation methods in use –But B not measured in force-free region –Perhaps some combination of observations will work (need STEREO, SOLAR-B, and SDO)

When will Eruption Occur? Given sufficiently accurate field (and driver), could use numerical models to predict eruption –Reconnection: calculate free energy – see DeVore poster calculate growth of current sheets –Twisted rope: calculate equilibrium and ideal stability –But photospheric driving (emergence/cancellation) may be difficult to predict For near term, need to find pre-eruption observational signatures –For breakout, pre-eruption reconnection

Observational Signatures of Breakout Initial potential state Filament channel grows Stressed field and null Onset of breakout reconnection Null and distant brightenings? Footpoint signatures move toward neutral line Onset of flare reconnection Flare ribbons move apart as usual

Signatures of Breakout in July 14, 1998 Flare Extrapolated potential field (Aulanier et al 2000) Two-flux system embedded bipole, topology identical to 3D breakout simulation

Signatures of Breakout in July 14, 1998 Flare Overlying loops disappear before flare and see disturbance along spine, distant brightening (see also papers by Sterling & Moore et al)

Prospects for Future Theoretical/numerical work proceeding at good pace –Have effective mix of groups, codes, expertise, … –Need to concentrate on resolving basic physics questions Will have revolutionary observations in few years –Solar-B (and SOLIS) vector B fields – ultra-high resolution –90 ◦ viewing from STEREO –Multi-T images from SDO, spectroscopy from Solar-B Need “campaign-style” attack on: –How do filament channels form? –What is their magnetic structure? Both theory and observations should be ready by Sentinels –Provide in situ tests for CME/flare mechanisms –Determine structure of eruption near Sun –Connect eruption to particle production