1 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3© 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Structural Analysis of a Nuclear Fuel Handling Machine.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Design of Steel and Composite-Structures for Seismic Loading – Safety Requirements, Concepts and Methods – Prof. Dr.-Ing. Ekkehard Fehling, University.
Advertisements

Design of Seismic-Resistant Steel Building Structures
Passive Vibration Control
ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures
Limit States Flexure Shear Deflection Fatigue Supports Elastic Plastic
Modeling of Composite Steel Floors Using GT STRUDL
Advanced Flexure Design COMPOSITE BEAM THEORY SLIDES
Subpart R Steel Erection
Rigid-Frame Structures
APPLICATIONS: WHENEVER IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO INSTALL A RAIL SYSTEM DIRECTLY ABOVE A WORK AREA, AN ARTICULATING ARM IS A SOLUTION ARTICULATING ARMS PROVIDE.
Beams and Frames.
Principle Stresses Under a Given Loading
S TRUCTURAL A NALYSIS OF M ECHANICAL M ODULES F OR M ODULAR D ESIGNED N UCLEAR P LANTS J UNE, 2011 By: Steven K. Sherfey, P.E. Presented By: Ankit (Andy)
CM 197 Mechanics of Materials Chap 8: Moments of Inertia
BOLTS TENSION MEMBERS AISC / LRFD WILD CARD
Chapter 5 Fatigue.
Overhead Cranes Considerations and Applications by Craig Pelkola Applications Engineer North American Industries Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
MAE 314 – Solid Mechanics Yun Jing
Shear - Tensile - Compression Stresses Slip Ted 126 Spring 2007.
Bridge Design Project Using SolidWorks and SolidWorks Simulation to design, test and build structures.
Design of Beams Engineering Design vs. Analysis
CM 197 Mechanics of Materials Chap 20: Connections
CM 197 Mechanics of Materials Chap 14: Stresses in Beams
Team K-TRON Team Members: Ryan Vroom Geoff Cunningham Trevor McClenathan Brendan Tighe.
LRFD-Steel Design 1.
Pressure Vessels.
December 3-4, 2007Earthquake Readiness Workshop Seismic Design Considerations Mike Sheehan.
Streamlined Process for Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis of Nuclear Facilities Utilizing GTSTRUDL and MTR/SASSI Wei Li, Michael Perez, Mansour Tabatabaie,
Chapter 6 Plate girder.
Student Satellite Project University of Arizona Team Goals Design, Fabricate, and Analyze a Structure that will Support the Payload –Space Allocation of.
Lecture 5 January 31,  Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 5/ Slide 2 In this Lecture Impulsive.
Multiple Coil Lift Calculation. Purposes of the Study  To investigate the stress distribution in the MCWF and the lifting device.  To make sure mounting.
Static Pushover Analysis
CE415 Spring (3) 1-Hour Exams (Wednesdays: 4 th, 8 th, 12 th weeks)
85M102006D. Seismic Analysis for a Turbine Building with Spring Supported Turbine / Generator Deck Feifei Lu, PE Shaw Power Group, Charlotte, NC June.
LECTURE #1 Book Overview Read Chapt. 1(skip sect. 1.9)
Structures and Mechanisms Subsystems AERSP 401A. Introduction to Structural Estimation Primary Structure: load-bearing structure of the spacecraft Secondary.
Tulkarem Multipurpose Sport Hall Prepared by: Moatasem Ghanim Abdul-Rahman Alsaabneh Malek Salatneh Supervisor: Dr. Shaker Albitar.
8 Principle Stresses Under a Given Loading. © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. MECHANICS OF MATERIALS ThirdEdition Beer Johnston.
Moment Connection Requires Bolts Outside the Flanges
A Load Rating of a 3 Span Continuous Deck-to- Through Truss Bridge in Br|R AASHTOWare BrDR 2013 User Group Meeting A Load Rating of a 3 Span Continuous.
South America Timber Structures Code
Principle Stresses Under a Given Loading
An Analysis of Shell Structure for Dead Load H.M. Fan PPPL September 16, 2005.
6/25/20081 Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis of a Composite Structure on a Backfill Hilltop WSRC-STI Rev 0 Lisa Anderson, Bechtel National,
June 22, 2006 Tae-Kyou Lee GTSTRUDL User’s Group Annual Meeting 2006
Structural Curriculum for Construction Management and Architecture Students 1 Prepared by: Ajay Shanker, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Professor Rinker School.
Reinforcement Information - Code
BASICS OF DYNAMICS AND ASEISMIC DESIGN
THE NORTHBROOK CORPORATE CENTER Redesign of the Lateral Load Resisting System.
A View of NCSX Structural System and Load Path for the Base Support Structure.
CTA, MST – seismic calculation Roland Platzer, ZM1 DESY Hamburg Munich, January 28 th, 2013.
1 Limit State Design Concept. 2 Designer has to ensure the structures, he designs are: Fit for their purpose Safe Economical and durable INTRODUCTION.
Airplane Hangar Design The design of a steel-framed airplane hangar Matthew Klein Edward F. Cross School of Engineering, Walla Walla University, College.
Steel Fabrication & Erection of Belle Chasse Primary School ET-493 Final Proposal Spring 2015 Instructor: Chris Koutsougeras Advisor: Edward Rode’ Derek.
Design of Crane Components
Design of Gantry Girders
Engineering Analysis & Updated Layout Drawings SofaKing 9 March 2005.
2K Cold Box Structural Analysis
Limit State Design Concept
Design of Gantry Girders
Overview of Loads ON and IN Structures / Machines
Principle Stresses Under a Given Loading
Chapter-2 Parts of Steel Bridges.
1.6 Allowable Stress Allowable Load < Failure Load
The Basics of Overhead Crane Pre-op Inspections
Design of Beams - Limit States
Structure I Course Code: ARCH 208 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg
ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures
CALTRANS SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA Version 1.7 November 2012
Presentation transcript:

1 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3© 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Structural Analysis of a Nuclear Fuel Handling Machine Overview By: Steve Sherfey, Westinghouse Electric Company LLC

2 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3© 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Agenda Abstract Analytical Model Hoist & Hook Model Configurations Acceptance Criteria and Codes Service Condition Seismic Condition Special Modeling Technique Primary and Secondary Evaluations

3 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3© 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Abstract Nuclear Power Plants contain Fuel Handling Machines (FHMs) for moving fuel Rail Mounted, Motorized, and Computer controlled Very top heavy Very difficult to qualify Engineers must use a special modeling technique for qualification

4 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3© 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Analytical Model Lower Rail & Wheel Motor Upper Rail Upper Bridge Lower Bridge Lower Rail & Wheel Power Center SFP Hoist Main Hoist

5 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3© 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved..

6 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3© 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Analytical Model - Inputs Design Drawings Boundary Conditions Material and Sectional Properties of Structural Components Proper member releases at bolted connections Response Spectra for the SSE Event Create analytical model using Structural Analysis Computer Code such as GTStrudl

7 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3© 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Analytical Model – Material Properties

8 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3© 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Analytical Model – Sectional Properties

9 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3© 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Analytical Model Response Spectrum (X Direction)

10 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3© 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Analytical Model Response Spectrum (Y Direction)

11 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3© 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Analytical Model Response Spectrum (Z Direction)

12 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3© 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Analytical Model

13 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3© 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Hoist & Hook Model Configurations Main Hoist at Mid Span, SFP Hoist at North End. Main Hoist at North End, SFP Hoist at South End. Main Hoist at North End, SFP Hoist at Mid Span. N

14 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3© 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Acceptance Criteria and Codes Plant Design Specification & Response Spectra AISC Manual of Steel Construction, Allowable Stress Design ASME NOG-1, Rules for Construction of Overhead and Gantry Cranes ASME B&PVC Code, Section III, Division 1, Sub-Section NF CMAA-70, Crane Manufacturers Association of America, “Specifications for Top Running Bridge & Gantry Type Multiple Girder Electric Overhead Traveling Cranes”

15 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3© 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Service Condition Analyzed for all service loads without seismic excitation and qualified per CMAA-70 Loadings shall include Inertia of mass loads from movement of Crane, Trolley, Hoist, and Lifted Load Loadings due to Wind, Skewing, Collision, Platform, and maximum critical hook loads shall be considered when applicable.

16 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3© 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Seismic Condition Analyzed for all normal operation deadweight loads acting simultaneously with seismic excitation from Safe Shutdown Earthquake (SSE) Response spectrum method shall be used –Proper Combination of modes of seismic vibration –Proper Combination of directional seismic responses –Proper Damping factors

17 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3© 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Special Modeling Technique Sliding or rolling must be considered to prevent overturning Force required to cause sliding or rolling must be calculated Each crane drive wheel is restrained in the movement direction with a specified spring stiffness The spring stiffness is derived by iteration An initial stiffness is assumed; the value is changed & analysis rerun until the wheel seismic load equals the sliding/rolling force.

18 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3© 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Required Crane Evaluations Primary Evaluations: Wheel Reactions, Displacements, Accelerations, Structural Steel Stresses, Plate Element Stresses Secondary Evaluations: Welds, Beam Connection Plates, Beam Flange/Web Deformations, Stiffener Plates, Bolts, and Wire Ropes

19 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3© 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Some Typical Items Being Evaluated THE END M SHAPE TO W SHAPE CONNECTION TUBE ON TUBE CONNECTION

20 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3© 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Bolt Evaluations The maximum forces and moments for each connection type can be extracted from GTStrudl types of major bolted connections in the FHM Can be grouped in typical connection types Each connection type has a different bolted configuration pattern due to size, number, and spacing of bolts Each configuration has different sectional properties required for calculating max shear and tension stresses Bolts must be qualified to applicable code

21 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3© 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Slack Rope Evaluations If the lifted load has an upward seismic acceleration greater than 1 g, the hoist wire rope may need to be evaluated for the slack rope condition ASME NOG-1 provides design guidance for performing this evaluation The maximum slack rope allowable is based on a percentage of the rope breaking strength A non-linear time history analysis is normally required for performing the slack rope analysis The analysis is only used for evaluating the rope for the most probable lifted load condition

22 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3© 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved. Structural Analysis of a Nuclear Fuel Handling Machine THE END