Anti-Parallel Merging and Component Reconnection: Role in Magnetospheric Dynamics M.M Kuznetsova, M. Hesse, L. Rastaetter NASA/GSFC T. I. Gombosi University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Progress and Plans on Magnetic Reconnection for CMSO For NSF Site-Visit for CMSO May1-2, Experimental progress [M. Yamada] -Findings on two-fluid.
Advertisements

Madeline Hubbard (Keene High School) Matthew Shindel (Stanwich High School) Advisors: Fathima Muzamil, Dr. Charles Farrugia, Dr. Roy Torbert Objective:
On the Generation of Enhanced Sunward Convection and Transpolar Aurora in the High- Latitude Ionosphere by Magnetic Merging S. Eriksson 1, J. B. H. Baker.
Generation of the transpolar potential Ramon E. Lopez Dept. of Physics UT Arlington.
Grad-Shafranov reconstruction of a bipolar Bz signature in an earthward jet in the tail Hiroshi Hasegawa (2007/02/14)
Cluster, THEMIS, & Geotail Conjunction Event on 11 July 2008 Hiroshi Hasegawa ISAS/JAXA.
Formation of the Magnetosphere 1 Solar Wind. Formation of the Magnetosphere 2 Solar Wind Bow Shock Magnetosheath.
Non-magnetic Planets Yingjuan Ma, Andrew Nagy, Gabor Toth, Igor Sololov, KC Hansen, Darren DeZeeuw, Dalal Najib, Chuanfei Dong, Steve Bougher SWMF User.
ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms
Near-Earth Magnetotail Reconnection and Plasmoid Formation in Connection With a Substorm Onset on 27 August 2001 S. Eriksson 1, M. Oieroset 2, D. N. Baker.
IMF Bx influence on the magnetotail neutral sheet geometry and dynamics E. Gordeev, M. Amosova, V. Sergeev Saint-Petersburg State University, St.Petersburg,
Magnetopause flow vortices revealed during high speed solar wind streams Mona Kessel (NASA GSFC), Yaireska Collado-Vega (University of Puerto Rico), Xi.
Occurrence and properties of substorms associated with pseudobreakups Anita Kullen Space & Plasma Physics, EES.
SuperDARN Workshop May 30 – June Magnetopause reconnection rate and cold plasma density: a study using SuperDARN Mark Lester 1, Adrian Grocott 1,2,
Comparing the solar wind-magnetosphere interaction at Mercury and Saturn A. Masters Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Japan Aerospace Exploration.
Plasma entry in the Mercury’s magnetosphere S. Massetti S. Massetti INAF-IFSI Interplanetary Space Physics Institute, Roma - Italy.
Solar wind interaction with the comet Halley and Venus
Solar wind-magnetosphere coupling Magnetic reconnection In most solar system environments magnetic fields are “frozen” to the plasma - different plasmas.
OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS Observations in an Dayside Event Wenhui Li and Joachim Raeder University of New Hampshire Marit Øieroset University of California,
Addressing magnetic reconnection on multiple scales: What controls the reconnection rate in astrophysical plasmas? John C. Dorelli University of New Hampshire.
O. M. Shalabiea Department of Physics, Northern Borders University, KSA.
Dynamics of the Magnetized Wake and the Acceleration of the Slow solar Wind ¹Università di Pisa F. Rappazzo¹, M. Velli², G. Einaudi¹, R. B. Dahlburg³ ²Università.
Multifluid Simulations of the Magnetosphere. Final Equations Equations are not conservative except for the sum over all species Momentum is transferred.
In-situ Observations of Collisionless Reconnection in the Magnetosphere Tai Phan (UC Berkeley) 1.Basic signatures of reconnection 2.Topics: a.Bursty (explosive)
Location of the High-Latitude Reconnection Site on 14 February 2003 S. Eriksson 1, M. M. Kuznetsova 2, M. W. Dunlop 3, and H. Reme 4 1 LASP, University.
Solar system science using X-Rays Magnetosheath dynamics Shock – shock interactions Auroral X-ray emissions Solar X-rays Comets Other planets Not discussed.
Hamrin, M., Norqvist, P., Marghitu, O., et al. Department of Physics, Umeå University, Sweden Nordic Cluster.
What DMSP Data Tell us About the Thermosphere Response to Solar Wind Forcing Delores Knipp CU Aerospace Engineering Sciences and NCAR HAO With Assistance.
On the importance of IMF |B Y | on polar cap patch formation Qinghe Zhang 1, Beichen Zhang 1, Ruiyuan Liu 1, M. W. Dunlop 2, M. Lockwood 2, 3, J. Moen.
Science Questions What is responsible for the "near" prompt onset of convection in the inner magnetosphere? Fast mode rarefraction wave?. How is the dayside.
Benoit Lavraud CESR/CNRS, Toulouse, France Uppsala, May 2008 The altered solar wind – magnetosphere interaction at low Mach numbers: Magnetosheath and.
3D multi-fluid model Erika Harnett University of Washington.
Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.
Structure and Detection of Rolled-up Kelvin-Helmholtz Vortices in the Tail Flank of the Magnetosphere H. Hasegawa, M. Fujimoto, T. K. M. Nakamura, K. Takagi.
1 Cambridge 2004 Wolfgang Baumjohann IWF/ÖAW Graz, Austria With help from: R. Nakamura, A. Runov, Y. Asano & V.A. Sergeev Magnetotail Transport and Substorms.
EISCAT Svalbard Radar studies of meso-scale plasma flow channels in the polar cusp ionosphere Y. Dåbakk et al.
Reconnection rates in Hall MHD and Collisionless plasmas
Response of the Magnetosphere and Ionosphere to Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure Pulse KYUNG SUN PARK 1, TATSUKI OGINO 2, and DAE-YOUNG LEE 3 1 School of Space.
Reconstruction of Reconnection Configurations From Spacecraft Data Bengt Sonnerup and Wai-Leong Teh Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA Hiroshi Hasegawa.
ISSI Workshop on Mercury, 26–30 June, 2006, Bern Substorm, reconnection, magnetotail in Mercury Rumi Nakamura Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy.
Earth’s Magnetosphere NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Cluster observations of a reconnection site at high- latitude magnetopause Y. Khotyaintsev (1), A. Vaivads (1), Y. Ogawa (1,2), M. André(1), S. Buchert(1),
ESS 7 Lecture 13 October 29, 2008 Substorms. Time Series of Images of the Auroral Substorm This set of images in the ultra-violet from the Polar satellite.
Authors: S. Beyene1, C. J. Owen1, A. P. Walsh1, A. N. Fazakerley1, E
Simulation Study of Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetotail and Solar Corona Zhi-Wei Ma Zhejiang University & Institute of Plasma Physics Beijing,
E.E. Antonova1,2, I.P. Kirpichev2,1, Yu.I. Yermolaev2
Simultaneous in-situ observations of the feature of a typical FTE by Cluster and TC1 Zhang Qinghe Liu Ruiyuan Polar Research Institute of China
Publications in Comparative Magnetospheres Siscoe, G. L.: Towards a comparative theory of magnetospheres, in Solar System Plasma Physics, Vol. II, edited.
Space Weather in Earth’s magnetosphere MODELS  DATA  TOOLS  SYSTEMS  SERVICES  INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS Space Weather Researc h Center Masha Kuznetsova.
Global MHD Simulation with BATSRUS from CCMC ESS 265 UCLA1 (Yasong Ge, Megan Cartwright, Jared Leisner, and Xianzhe Jia)
NASA NAG Structure and Dynamics of the Near Earth Large-Scale Electric Field During Major Geomagnetic Storms P-I John R. Wygant Assoc. Professor.
17th Cluster workshop Uppsala, Sweden , May 12-15, 2009
H. Hasegawa(1), A. Retinò(2), A. Vaivads(3), Y. Khotyaintsev(3), M
Magnetic reconnection in the magnetotail: Geotail observations T. Nagai Tokyo Institute of Technology World Space Environment Forum 2005 May 4, 2005 Wednesday.
Study of the April 20, 2007 CME-Comet interaction event with an MHD model Y. D. Jia 1, C. T. Russell 1, W. B. Manchester 2, K. C. Hansen 2, A. Vourlidas.
ASEN 5335 Aerospace Environments -- Magnetospheres 1 As the magnetized solar wind flows past the Earth, the plasma interacts with Earth’s magnetic field.
Multi-Fluid/Particle Treatment of Magnetospheric- Ionospheric Coupling During Substorms and Storms R. M. Winglee.
Earth’s Magnetosphere Space Weather Training Kennedy Space Center Space Weather Research Center.
Analysis Methods for Magnetopause & Boundary Layer Studies Hiroshi Hasegawa ISAS/JAXA In collaboration with B. U. Ö. Sonnerup & W.-L. Teh.
A Global Hybrid Simulation Study of the Solar Wind Interaction with the Moon David Schriver ESS 265 – June 2, 2005.
Dynamics of the auroral bifurcations at Saturn and their role in magnetopause reconnection LPAP - Université de Liège A. Radioti, J.-C. Gérard, D. Grodent,
Paul Song Center for Atmospheric Research
Global MHD Simulations of Dayside Magnetopause Dynamics.
Effects of Dipole Tilt Angle on Geomagnetic Activities
Introduction to Space Weather
Magnetosphere: Bow Shock Substorm and Storm
MHD Simulation of Plasmoid-Induced-Reconnection in Solar Flares
THEMIS Dayside Lessons learned from the coast phase and the 1st dayside season Current plans for the 2nd dayside season and the extended phases.
Dynamic Coupling between the Magnetosphere and the Ionosphere
Magnetosphere: Structure and Properties
Presentation transcript:

Anti-Parallel Merging and Component Reconnection: Role in Magnetospheric Dynamics M.M Kuznetsova, M. Hesse, L. Rastaetter NASA/GSFC T. I. Gombosi University of Michigan

I. How to reproduce fast reconnection rate of kinetic/two-fluid models in MHD simulations? Small- meso-scale simulations with nongyrotropic corrections Numerical viscosity vs. uniform resistivity. II. How global MHD models describe dayside magnetic reconnection? What is the impact of the IMF clock angle ?

Sub-Solar Flow Stagnation Point: V = 0 Component Reconnection for By  0 ? Magnetically Neutral Points (cusp region, flanks): B = 0 What is the Role of High Speed Flows at Flanks? Reconnection Line Extended Over the Entire Dayside Magnetopause Possible Reconnection Sites.

Steady-state or impulsive reconnection (FTEs, flux ropes ?) Role of velocity sheer at neutral points (K-H instability ?) How global MHD models describe dayside magnetic reconnection?

BATSRUS uses an adaptive grid composed of rectangular blocks arranged in varying degrees of spatial refinement levels. Medium Resolution Runs 1/4 Re: Dayside Magnetosphere + Central Plasma Sheet High Resolution Runs 1/16 Re: Dayside Magnetopause Including Flanks Model Global MHD simulation model : BATSRUS, University of Michigan Grid Simulation Box -255 Re < X < 33 Re |Y|, |Z| < 96 Re

N = 2 cm –3, T = 20,000 K o, Vx = 300 km/s, |B| = 5 nT 0:00 – 2:00 - Startup Bz = - 5nT 2:00 – 4:00 – Northward IMF Bz = 5 nT Simulation Startup: Solar Wind Parameters: Fixed IMF Run 1 : θ = 180 Run 2 : θ = 135 4:00 – 4:05 IMF Turning From Northward Orientation ( θ = 0) to IMF Clock angles 105 < θ < 180: 4:05 – 7:00 Run 3 : θ = 120 Run 4 : θ = 105

After IMF Turning Prior to Night-Side Reconnection Onset 04:00 Time Interval of Interest 4:00 – 6:00 (0 – 120 min ) Rate of dayside reconnection can be estimated as the rate of the polar cap growth

Component Reconnection at Sub-Solar Stagnation Point for Large By ( θ = 105) X = 13.7 Re Y = 0 Z = 0

What is going on at magnetically neutral points at the flanks? What is the role of high speed flows? θ = 135 X = 1.5 Re Y = 15 Re Z = 6 Re

θ = 135

Open Magnetic Flux Increase = Total Reconnected Flux Growth [10 9 Wb ] Flux time (min ) θ = 180 θ = 135 θ = 105 θ = 120

θ = 180 θ = 135 θ = 105 θ = 120 L [Re] time ( min ) L ~ 2 * R R = 13.7 Re R - distance to the sub-solar point  Ψ local = E max dt * 2 Re L = Ψ total / Ψ local L - Effective Length of Reconnection Line

Is the extended reconnection line stable?

Z = 0Y = 0 θ = 180

Y = 0Z = 0 θ = 180

Flux Rope Formation at Sub-Solar Stagnation Region for 120 <  < 135?

Flux Rope Formation θ = 120 Pressure

Flux Rope Formation θ = 120 Density Magnetic Field By

Flux Rope Formation θ = 120

Flux Rope Evolution  = 120 t = 80 min

High resolution global MHD simulations demonstrated flux ropes (FTEs) generation by intermittent component reconnection. We show that FTEs are flux ropes of approximate size 1-2 Re with strong core magnetic field imbedded in the magnetopause. FTE bulge is larger on the magnetosheath side than on the magnetosphere side. The flow around the flux rope is largest at the magnetosphere side. The plasma pressure pattern within the flux rope exhibit a ring- shaped structure surrounding a central depression. Traveling density depletion.

Anatomy of flux transfer event seen by Cluster Sonnerup, Hasegawa, and Paschmann, Geophys. Res. Letters, L11803, 2004 PressureMagnetic Field

High resolution global MHD simulations demonstrated sub-solar component reconnection for IMF clock angles 105 < θ < 180. The rate of reconnection flux loading vary no more than 5-10 % for different IMF orientations in range of IMF Clock angles 105 < θ < 180. Flux budget analysis indicate that magnetic field is reconnection along extended region comparable with magnetopause scale. High resolution simulation demonstrated instability of extended reconnection region and formation of plasmoids and flux ropes. K-H instability is developing close to neutral points in region of fast flows at magnetopause flanks. Summary

Supplemental Slides

Reconnected Flux at Sub-Solar Region |Y| < 1 Re E1E1 E2E2  E0E0 Ψ = E0E0 dt * 2 Re

Open Magnetic Flux Increase (Resolution 1/16 Re) [10 9 Wb ] Flux Theta = 180 Theta = 135 Theta = 105 Theta = 120 time (min )

[10 9 Wb ] Flux [10 9 Wb ] Flux [10 9 Wb ] Flux [10 9 Wb ] Flux time (min) θ = 180 θ = 120 θ = 135 θ = 105 Total Reconnected Flux Reconnected Flux Ψ at Subsolar Region |Y| < 1 Re med resolution (1/4 Re) (1/4 Re ) high resolution (1/16 Re ) (1/16 Re)

θ = 180 θ = 135

Flux Rope Evolution  = 120 t = 84 min