Writing Quality IFSP Outcomes/ IEP Goals and Linking to the Global Child Outcomes Kathi Gillaspy, NECTAC Anne Lucas, NECTAC/WRRC Mary Peters, NECTAC NECTAC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
E Embedded Coachingt o Embedded Coaching Sunny Choi, MA. ED, BCBA.
Advertisements

New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
A Focus on Functional Child Outcomes Kathi Gillaspy, NECTAC Maryland State Department of Education/Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services/Early.
IFSP and Functional Outcome and Goal Development
Early Childhood Outcomes Center 1 Understanding the Three Child Outcomes.
Presented in collaboration with Developing High-Quality, Functional IFSP Outcomes and IEP Goals.
Creating Collaborative Standards-Based IEPs: A Training for IEP Team Members Session Three.
Ideas from the Outcomes Think Tank. Gather family’s concerns and general information about child following program procedures Use 3 global outcomes as.
Arizona Early Intervention Program -Assessment Part I-
Early On® Michigan Child Outcomes
IDENTIFICATION & REFERRAL INTAKE FAMILY ASSESSMENT CHILD EVALUATION FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT CHILD AND FAMILY INFORMATION CHILD HEALTH INFORMATION FAMILY.
Presented in collaboration with Developing High-Quality, Functional IFSP Outcomes and IEP Goals.
Individualized Family Service Plan-IFSP The Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP) is a process of looking at the strengths of the Part C eligible child.
Developing High-Quality, Functional IFSP Outcomes In Kansas tiny-k Programs KDEC 2014 Presenters: Kelly Jorgensen, Peggy Kemp, Sarah Walters Kansas Department.
Beth Rous University of Kentucky Working With Multiple Agencies to Plan And Implement Effective Transitions For Head Start Children Beth Rous University.
Presented in collaboration with Developing High-Quality, Functional IFSP Outcomes and IEP Goals.
Presented in collaboration with Developing High-Quality, Functional IFSP Outcomes and IEP Goals.
Pacific TA Meeting: Quality Practices in Early Intervention and Preschool Programs 1.
Early Intervention and Preschool Programs
Assessing Student Learning
1 The Maryland Early Childhood Accountability System Program Effectiveness Based on Results for Children Maryland State Department of Education Division.
© 2013, 2009, 2006, 2003, 2000 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. William L. Heward Exceptional Children An Introduction to Special Education.
Module 1 - Rationale for Consultation in Itinerant ECSE Service Delivery Project DIRECT 2007 Defining Itinerant Roles for Early Childhood Teachers Project.
Pacific TA Meeting: Quality Practices in Early Intervention and Preschool Programs.
Presented in collaboration with Developing High-Quality, Functional IFSP Outcomes and IEP Goals.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Pacific TA Meeting: Quality Practices in Early Intervention and Preschool Programs Overview to Trends and Issues in Quality Services Jane Nell Luster,
1 Enhancing Services in Natural Environments Presenter: Mary Beth Bruder March 3, :00- 2:30 EST Part of a Web-based Conference Call Series Sponsored.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Early Intervention Support for Children and Families.
Corey Herd Cassidy, Ph.D., CCC-SLP Radford University Corey Herd Cassidy, Ph.D., CCC-SLP Radford University Coaching in Natural Environments: Beyond the.
Developing High Quality, Functional IFSP Outcomes Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center Training 1.
Intervention in Natural Environments: Setting the Stage for a Lifetime of Learning Kat Stremel Pip Campbell Sheila Pearson.
INDIVIDUALIZED FAMILY SERVICE PLAN-IFSP. IFSP The Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP) is a process of looking at the strengths of the Part C eligible.
Preparing the Next Generation of Professionals to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Early Intervention and Preschool Special Education Lynne Kahn Kathy.
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 19 Planning Transitions to Support Inclusion.
Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN:
Can you tell me about your day? What happens most mornings? Afternoons? Nights? Weekends? Where do you and your child spend time? What activities do you.
Chapter 2 Observation and Assessment
Planning and Integrating Curriculum: Unit 4, Key Topic 1http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
Children Learn through Incredible Amounts of Practice! The amount of a toddler’s experience with walking is the only predictor of improved proficiency.
Blended Practices for Teaching Young Children in Inclusive Settings Jennifer Grisham-Brown, Ed.D. Mary Louise Hemmeter, Ph.D.
The Relationship of Quality Practices to Child and Family Outcomes A Focus on Functional Child Outcomes Kathi Gillaspy, NECTAC Maryland State Department.
The IEP: Drafting the IEP (Steps 1, 2, 3, and 4) Southwest Ohio Special Education Regional Resource Center Tuesday, November 7, 2006.
Clinton County RESA Early On ® Training & Technical Assistance Higher Education Introduction to: Developing Functional IFSP Outcomes to Meet the Unique.
1 Rating IFSP Outcomes DevelopingHigh-Quality, Functional IFSP Outcomes and IEP Goals Lucas, A., Gillaspy, K., Peters, M. L., & Hurth, J. (2012). Enhancing.
©2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 19 Planning Transitions to Support Inclusion.
1 Setting the Stage Carl Dunst, Robin McWilliam,Mary Beth Bruder, Julianne Woods, Pip Campbell, Dathan Rush, M’lissa Sheldon, Jack Neisworth, Stephen Bagnato,
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
Age Appropriate Assessments: A Necessary Component to Transition.
How to Involve Families in the Child Outcome Summary (COS) Process Debi Donelan, MSSA Early Support for Infants and Toddlers Katrina Martin, Ph.D. SRI.
Guidance for Leading Focused Conversations with Families to Help Complete the DRDP (2015) For Home Visitors, Teachers, and other Service Providers 1 3/25/16.
Developmentally Appropriate Practices. Five Guidelines For Developmentally Appropriate Practices.
Creative Curriculum and GOLD Assessment: Early Childhood Competency Based Evaluation System By Carol Bottom.
Measuring Outcomes that are Functional and Meaningful Chester County Early Intervention Birth to Three August 2015.
Section 6 The Three Global Outcomes. Key Principles for Early Intervention Service Provision 1.Infants and toddlers learn best through every day experiences.
Section 4 Family Assessment for a Child Determined Eligible.
Universal GO 4 IT Training. Welcome and Introductions.
Section 7 Plan of Action and Developing Functional, Measurable IFSP Outcomes.
Coaching in Early Intervention Provider Onboarding Series 3
Functional Assessment: Part 1 OVERVIEW
Moving Maryland Forward: Service Coordinator Resource Group
Service Coordinator TA Call
IFSP and Functional Outcome and Goal Development
Section 3 Evaluation and Assessment Documentation that Informs the 3 Global Outcomes and Eligibility Determination Facilitator’s Notes: Handouts used in.
Plan of Action and Developing Functional, Measurable IFSP Outcomes
Increasing Capacity for Developing High-Quality IEPs/IFSPs
Process for Developing Effective Functional, Routines-Based IFSPs
Developing Effective Functional, Routines-Based IFSPs
Process for Developing Effective, Functional, Routines-Based IFSPs
Presentation transcript:

Writing Quality IFSP Outcomes/ IEP Goals and Linking to the Global Child Outcomes Kathi Gillaspy, NECTAC Anne Lucas, NECTAC/WRRC Mary Peters, NECTAC NECTAC National Early Childhood Inclusion Institute

Understand the connection between functional assessment, 3 global child outcomes, and developing meaningful IFSP outcomes and IEP goals NECTAC Session Purpose Meaningful IFSP outcomes & IEP goals 3 global child outcomes Functional Assessment

 Functional Assessment: Linking with 3 Global Child Outcomes and Functional IFSPs and IEPs  Activity: Nolan’s Video/Global Outcomes  Functional IFSP Outcomes/IEP Goals  Activity: Rating IFSP Outcomes/IEP Goals  Wrap Up Discussion NECTAC Session Outline

NECTAC Using Functional Assessment for 3 Global Child Outcomes and Functional IFSPs/ IEPs Meaningful IFSP outcomes & IEP goals 3 global child outcomes Functional Assessment

Children learn and develop best when:  Participating in natural learning opportunities that occur in everyday routines and activities of children and families and as part family and community life  Interested and engaged in an activity, which in turn strengthens and promotes competency and mastery of skills. (Dunst, Bruder, Trivette, Raab & McLean, 2001; Shelden & Rush, 2001) NECTAC How Children Learn

Learning Activities Interests Exploration and Mastery Engagement Competence Context for Learning: Child Interest and Competence (Dunst, Herter & Shields, 2000) NECTAC

 Assessment of the young child’s skills in the real life contexts of family, culture and community rather than discrete isolated tasks irrelevant to daily life. NECTAC WHAT is Functional Assessment? “the science of the strange behavior of children, with strange adults, in strange settings for the briefest possible period of time.” Bronfenbrenner, 1979, p. 19 Adapted from materials developed by Naomi Younggren, 2011

 contextually relevant information about the child’s strengths and needs  more culturally sensitive  individually focused IS NOT…  domain based and discipline specific  deficit driven  threatening NECTAC WHAT: Functional Assessment is… Adapted from materials developed by Naomi Younggren, 2011

 The more realistic or natural the task,  the more motivated the child  the more applicable it is to everyday events and situations  Authentic tasks and circumstances reinforce  competency-based approach to the education of young children  assessment of all disciplines across complex skills and processes  generalization of learning across settings  Authentic tasks require the assessor to make no inferences about a child's capabilities, because the behaviors sampled are directly observable. University of Illinois at Chicago NECTAC WHAT: Functional Assessment is Authentic… Adapted from materials developed by Naomi Younggren, 2011

Guides identification of FUNCTIONAL individualized goals/outcomes Yields a real picture of the child NECTAC Why is Functional Fundamental? Adapted from materials developed by Naomi Younggren, 2011

 Families and familiar, knowledgeable caregivers in the child’s life  Providers  Teachers  Others, less familiar, can also contribute NECTAC Who Does IT? Adapted from materials developed by Naomi Younggren, 2011

 Over time  “One-time observations even in the natural context, are insufficient and often misleading ” (Bagnato, Neisworth, Pretti-Frontczak, 2010) NECTAC When is IT Done? Adapted from materials developed by Naomi Younggren, 2011

 Knowing the purpose is important  Observation is essential  Keep a focus on being objective vs. subjective  Record keeping is key  Qualitative  Quantitative  Hearing from others who know the child is critical – involve families! NECTAC How is IT Done? Adapted from materials developed by Naomi Younggren, 2011

More than asking questions, or going over questionnaires, and developmental profiles Listening to the family story and hearing about the child’s engagement, independence, and social relationships with various day-to-day routines and activities Asking parents to show or describe Observing how the parent engages the child Setting up play scenarios NECTAC HOW: Involving Families… Adapted from materials developed by Naomi Younggren, 2011

HOW: Asking Questions Related to Everyday Activities and Routines… NECTAC  Can you tell me about your day?  What types of things happen on most mornings? Afternoons? Nights? Weekends?  Where do you and your child spend time?  What types of things or activities do you and your child like to do (e.g., hiking, going on picnics, paying games at home)?  What things or activities do you and your child have to do on a regular basis (e.g., go to the store, give kids a bath, feed the horses, prepare meals, walk the dog)?  What are activities that you and your child have to do?  What are your child’s interests? What things does your child enjoy and what holds your child’s attention? (e.g., people, places, things such as toys, dog, being outside)  What makes your child happy, laugh and/or smile?  What routines and/or activities do your child not like? What makes this routine and/or activity difficult and uncomfortable for your child? What does your child usually do during the routine/activity?  Who are key family members, other caregivers, or important people who spend time with your child and in what settings does this occur?  Are there activities that you used to do before your child was born that you would like to do again?  Are there new activities that you and your child would like to try?  Are there any activities or places that you go (e.g., doctor’s appointments, visiting grandparents) that occur on a less regular basis (e.g., once a week)?

HOW: Gathering Relevant Information… NECTAC Identify Learning Opportunities Improve Functional Abilities Social Relations Engagement Independence Employ Strategies Enhance Learning Opportunities Routines/Activities going well Routines/Activities not going well Hindering Factors Helping Factors Employ Strategies Improve Routine Promote Social Relations Engagement Independence Pip Campbell

6. WHERE is IT Done? NECTAC Only in the children’s natural everyday settings, activities, and routines Adapted from materials developed by Naomi Younggren, 2011

UNDERSTAND  how to gather information and conduct the functional assessment …  what’s working and challenging in everyday activities …  how to use this information to develop IFSP outcomes/IEP goals BELIEVE  that child learn best through participation in everyday activities NECTAC Linking Information Gathering to IFSP Outcomes / IEP Goals Meaningful IFSP outcomes & IEP goals 3 global child outcomes Functional Assessment

Must Meet All Timelines NECTAC Key Steps: IFSP/IEP Process Beginning with initial contacts and referral Gathering Information from parents and caregivers Evaluation and functional assessment Developing IFSPs and IEPs

Using Information within the IFSP/IEP Process Info from IFSP/IEP process Determine Eligibility Develop Outcomes /Goals Select Routines, Activities Settings Develop Strategies/ Objectives Determine People and Resources (Services) Determine Frequency and Intensity Determine Criteria to Measure Progress Family hopes √√ Family concerns priorities √√√ Family resources √√√√ Child needs √√√√√ Child strengths √√√ Child interests √√√√ Behaviors in Settings √√√√√ Desired activities √√√√√√ NECTAC Meaningful IFSP outcomes & IEP goals 3 global child outcomes Functional Assessment

21NECTAC 2012 Video Activity: Nolan’s Story

1.Positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships) 2.Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communication [and early literacy]) 3.Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs NECTAC Global Outcomes

Functional IFSP Outcomes and IEP Goals NECTAC Meaningful IFSP outcomes & IEP goals 3 global child outcomes Functional Assessment

Start with parent ’ s/caregiver ’ s priorities about child’s learning/development and/or family’s needs (hopes for their child and/or family’s participation), not the interventionists’/teachers’ priorities Consider what ’ s working in everyday routines and activities NECTAC Using information to Develop Outcomes/Goals

 IFSP outcomes: What would your family like to see happen for your child/family?  2 types of outcomes  Child Outcomes  Family Outcomes (participation-based or resource based) NECTAC IFSP Outcomes

Developing Outcomes Step 1: Determine the functional area(s) Eating Step 2: What routine(s) does this affect? Meal time with the family Step 3: Child will participate in (routines in question)” “Kim will eat with her family at mealtime...” Step 4: “ by ---ing” (address specific behaviors) “... eating the foods they eat.” NECTAC Adapted from Robin McWilliam’s “Steps to Build a Functional Outcome”:

Child Outcomes: Examples NECTAC Not This “Romeo will improve muscle tone for sitting." This "Romeo will play with toys and eat meals with his family by sitting without much support.”

What Parent States: “We want to be able to take Romeo with us in the car; we need a travel car seat. ” NECTAC Family Outcomes

Family Outcomes: Examples NECTAC This “Karen and Mark will learn about resources and low cost options so they can obtain a car seat.” Not This “Staff will explore options for financial assistance for travel chairs.”

 IEP GOALS: What will the child need to do to be successful in learning and real life activities?  Focus on:  ‘academic’ – activities of a child this age  ‘functional’ NECTAC IEP Goals

Developing IEP Goals Step 1: Determine the academic (preschool activities) and functional area(s) Making choices Step 2: What routine(s) does this affect? Play Step 3: Child will participate in (routines in question)” “Alicia will make choices during play each day” Step 4: “ by ---ing” (address specific behaviors) “... by pointing at what she wants” NECTAC Adapted from Robin McWilliam’s “Steps to Build a Functional Outcome”:

IEP Goals: Example NECTAC This “At least once during a play each day, Tamara will demonstrate her choice by pointing at a toy she wants when presented with options.” Not This “Tamara will make choices.”

33NECTAC 2012 Activity: Rating IFSP Outcomes and IEP Goals Meaningful IFSP outcomes & IEP goals 3 global child outcomes Functional Assessment

The wording of the statement is jargon- free, clear and simple. The statement avoids the use of passive words (e.g., tolerate, receive, improve, maintain). The outcome is discipline-free. The outcome statement is necessary and functional for the child’s and family’s life. Criteria for Rating IFSP Outcomes The wording emphasizes the positive. The statement reflects real-life contextualized settings (e.g., not test items). When the child’s contextual information is available, the following IFSP outcome criteria can also be evaluated: 1.The outcome is based on the family’s priorities and concerns. 2.The outcome describes both the child’s strengths and needs based on information from the initial evaluation or ongoing assessment. NECTAC

The wording of the statement is jargon- free, clear and simple. The statement avoids the use of passive words (e.g., tolerate, receive, improve, maintain). The outcome is discipline-free. The outcome statement is necessary and functional for the child’s and family’s life. Criteria for Rating IFSP Outcomes The wording emphasizes the positive. The statement reflects real-life contextualized settings (e.g., not test items). Nolan will play with toys with his sister during bath time + YES! When the child’s contextual information is available, the following IFSP outcome criteria can also be evaluated: 1.The outcome is based on the family’s priorities and concerns. 2.The outcome describes both the child’s strengths and needs based on information from the initial evaluation or ongoing assessment. NECTAC

The GOAL is written in plain language and is jargon free.. The GOAL describes the child’s involvement in age-appropriate activities to address ‘academic and functional’ areas.. The GOAL describes the conditions in which the child will demonstrate progress without naming placement. The GOAL is measurable and observable. Clear strategies and/or accommodations are included. Criteria for Rating IEP Goals The wording of the GOAL emphasizes the positive. The GOAL describes how the child will demonstrate what s/he knows When the child’s contextual information is available, the following IEP goal criteria can also be evaluated: 1.The GOAL includes what the child is doing now and includes the family’s input and concerns. 2.The GOAL is achievable in one year and specific timelines are noted. 3.The GOAL details Special Factors related to communication, assistive technology and supports specific to the child’s disability and/or English language learning NECTAC

BG will get across what she wants using words. The GOAL is written in plain language and is jargon free. The GOAL describes the child’s involvement in age-appropriate activities to address ‘academic and functional’ areas.. The GOAL describes the conditions in which the child will demonstrate progress without naming placement.. The GOAL is measurable and observable. Clear strategies and/or accommodations are included. The wording emphasizes the positive YES! The GOAL describes how the child will demonstrate what s/he knows. Criteria for Rating IEP Goals When the child’s contextual information is available, the following IEP goal criteria can also be evaluated: 1.The GOAL includes what the child is doing now and includes the family’s input and concerns. 2.The GOAL is achievable in one year and specific timelines are noted. 3.The GOAL details Special Factors related to communication, assistive technology and supports specific to the child’s disability and/or English language learning. NECTAC

Resources for Writing Outcomes and Goals IFSP Rush and Shelden. Tips and Techniques for Developing Participation-Based IFSP Outcomes Statements, BriefCASE, Vol 2, No. 1 fcase/briefcase_vol2_no1.pdf fcase/briefcase_vol2_no1.pdf IEP Contents of the IEP peced/iepguide/index.html#contents peced/iepguide/index.html#contents OSEP model IEP forms id/idea/modelform-iep.pdf id/idea/modelform-iep.pdf Special Factors To Consider peced/iepguide/index.html#contents peced/iepguide/index.html#contents Wisconsin Guide to Connecting Academic Standards and IEPs ndardsguide.pdf ndardsguide.pdf NECTAC

Rating IFSP Outcomes/IEP Goals: A Training Activity Lucas, A., Gillaspy, K., Peters, M. L., & Hurth, J. training.pdf NECTAC Resource for Rating IFSP Outcomes/IEP Goals

NECTAC Resources Part C: Mission and Key Principles of Early Intervention Services Seven Key Principles & Looks Like/Doesn’t Look Like Agreed Upon Practices For Providing Early Intervention Services In Natural Environments Integrating Child Outcomes Measurement into an Effective IFSP Process -based upon the Agreed Upon Practices document. Preschool Special Education: Integrating Child Outcome Measurement with the Individualized Education Program (IEP) Process: Implementation Rating Scale reg.tadnet.org/uploads/file_assets/attachments/281/original_Integrating_outcom es_IEP_rating.pdf? reg.tadnet.org/uploads/file_assets/attachments/281/original_Integrating_outcom es_IEP_rating.pdf?

Kathi Gillaspy, NECTAC/ECO Anne Lucas, NECTAC/WRRC Mary Peters, NECTAC NECTAC Contact Information