Dashboards as a Data Management Tool Dr. David C. Oehler Director of Assessment, Information and Analysis Northwest Missouri State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic.
Advertisements

The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
“Building Quality Culture with Facts” “Using a Dashboard in IQA”
EVALUATOR TIPS FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT WRITING The following slides were excerpted from an evaluator training session presented as part of the June 2011.
Strategic Visioning Process Pleasant Valley District #62
AACRAO CONSULTING SERVICES Strategic Enrollment Management Consultation University of Michigan-Flint Phase Two Consulting Report March 26-28, 2007.
Using LibQUAL+ to Develop Accountability with Key Stakeholders Raynna Bowlby Based upon presentation made w/co-presenter Dan O’Mahony (Brown U. Library)
2025 Planning Contacts Meeting November 8, 2012 K-State 2025.
Academic Dashboard AASCU Academic Affairs Summer Meeting July 28, 2006 Kichoon Yang, Provost Northwest Missouri State University.
 Introductions  Charge from President Blake  Timeline  Structure  Outcomes.
Marvin W. Peterson & Thomas E. Perorazio The National Center for Postsecondary Improvement, Project 5.2 The University of Michigan Ross A. Griffith, Wake.
Institutional Effectiveness Operational Update Presentation made to the Indiana State University Board of Trustees October 5, 2001.
ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP: SESSION 1 ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES ACADEMIC AND STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES PRESENTED BY THE DIVISION OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS.
IT Strategic Planning Project – Hamilton Campus FY2005.
University Methodology to Lead Change... in support of Human Resources goals for: Work Realignment Workforce Reduction and Changes Workforce Development.
Process Management Robert A. Sedlak, Ph.D Provost and Vice Chancellor, UW-Stout Education Community of Practice Conference At Tusside in Turkey September.
ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS FOR TSPC ACCREDITATION Assessment and Work Sample Conference January 13, 2012 Hilda Rosselli, Western Oregon University.
Orientation to Performance and Quality Improvement Plan
Total ‘Student Experience’ Benchmarking:. Benchmarking© Tribal Education Limited 2005 What is it?  Tool to deliver;  Internal & External Benchmarking.
Strategic Planning A tool for improvement. Strategic Planning LEAD ► Panelists  Dr. Katie Hope, Department of Nursing  Dr. Sue George, Department of.
Data Dashboards and Key Performance Indicators Presented by: Melissa Wright, M.A. Assistant Director, Baseline September 21, #labgabLike.
Columbia-Greene Community College The following presentation is a chronology of the College strategic planning process, plan and committee progress The.
1 Balanced Scorecards for Colleges and Universities: Development and Deployment.
Objective Explain What is the Balanced Scorecard
1 Focus on Quality and the Academic Quality Improvement Program At Cuyahoga Community College.
EXTREME MAKEOVER CE EDITION Heather McRae & Ratka Janjic.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Maureen Noonan Bischof Eden Inoway-Ronnie Office of the Provost Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association Annual Meeting April 22, 2007.
Director of Institutional Research Unit,
Institutional Effectiveness & B-CU Dr. Helena Mariella-Walrond VP of Institutional Effectiveness Cory A. Potter Director of Assessment Administrative.
Strategic Planning Retreat for UWF Boards Richard S. Podemski Associate Vice President for Research & Dean, Graduate School June 12, 2013.
Measuring for Performance: The Balanced Scorecard
Balanced Scorecard 101 A Brief Overview of the BSC Methodology
Institutional Effectiveness & B-CU Dr. Helena Mariella-Walrond VP of Institutional Effectiveness Cory A. Potter Director of Assessment Academic.
Creating Sustainable Organizations The Baldrige Performance Excellence Program Sherry Martin HIV Quality of Care Advisory Committee September 13, 2012.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
University Strategic Resource Planning Council Budget.
1 Focus on Quality and the Academic Quality Improvement Program At Cuyahoga Community College.
Working Definition of Program Evaluation
Data Development and Pilots Academic Leadership Retreat August 2015.
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
Washington State University Strategic Plan Overview and Implementation Process On web site at
December 14, 2011/Office of the NIH CIO Operational Analysis – What Does It Mean To The Project Manager? NIH Project Management Community of Excellence.
Developed by Yolanda S. George, AAAS Education & Human Resources Programs and Patricia Campbell, Campbell-Kibler Associates, Inc. With input from the AGEP.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
Quality and San Juan College Dr. Carol Spencer. About San Juan College.
Data Warehouses and Dashboard – A Primer Mr. Tod R. Massa Director, Policy Research & Data Warehousing, State Council of Higher Education for Virginia.
The NCATE Journey Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University AACTE/NCATE Orientation - Spring 2008.
Assessment for Student Learning Kick-Off: Assessment Fellows Assessment Coordinators Pat Hulsebosch Ex. Director-Office of Academic Quality August 28,
1 Focus on Quality and the Academic Quality Improvement Program At Cuyahoga Community College.
Anne Arundel County Public Schools Intro to Online Data Systems For AP’s Oct 27 th and 28th, 2010 Mike Ballard Cathy Gillette.
District Leadership Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the District Leadership Module PowerPoint. The actual Overview PowerPoint is 73.
Ascending to Assessment Greatness in presented by the Division of Institutional Effectiveness Helena Mariella-Walrond, PhD Vice President Cory.
August 15, 2005 © Campus Strategies 1 Measurement: Linking Budgeting to Planning MSU Planning/Budgeting/ Measurement Retreat August 15, 2005 Larry Goldstein.
IT Leading the Way to Institutional Effectiveness Presenter: Kendell Rice, Ph.D. July 11, 2007.
Involve internal and external stakeholders using various communications tools. Align and focus the entire school system with measurable outcomes. Excite.
The Essentials of Strategic Enrollment Planning James Mager Associate Vice President.
It’s More than a List of Questions: Using the Quality Award Criteria as Your Roadmap to Excellence! Ruta Kadonoff Courtney Bishnoi.
KEYS TO GREATNESS IN STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Presented by Helena Mariella-Walrond, PhD Provost and Senior Vice President Cory Potter Executive.
Balanced Scorecard The University of Texas at El Paso Division of the Vice President for Business Affairs.
1 Balanced Scorecard Philosophy, Basics, Fundamentals, and Functions.
Help Me Understand the Basics of Non-academic Assessment A BETHUNE-COOKMAN UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP Presented by Cory A. Potter Executive.
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
Dave Wallace ANDREA CHAPPELL IST September 13, 2012
Student Affairs Assessment
Assessment Cycle and Academic Effect
Assessment Committee Meeting Continuous Program Improvement
Assessment Leadership Day Continuous Program Improvement
DISTRICT ACCREDITATION QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
Presentation transcript:

Dashboards as a Data Management Tool Dr. David C. Oehler Director of Assessment, Information and Analysis Northwest Missouri State University

06/21/20062 Presentation Overview  Facilitating decision-making and driving improvement  Measurement impact on focus of institutional activities and processes  How we developed our system and integrated it into information systems

Building a House of Quality MANAGEMENT BY FACT CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT CUSTOMER FOCUS HIGH EXPECTATIONS INVOLVEMENT ASSESSMENT & FEEDBACK TRUST SHARED VALUES AND VISION

06/21/20064 Facilitating Decision-making and Driving Improvement  Importance of institutional culture  Importance of internal communication  Alignment with mission and vision  Alignment with strategic planning

06/21/20065 “All work is process.” “Every process is perfectly designed to create the outcomes it produces.” “If you can’t define it, you can’t measure it; if you don’t measure it, you won’t improve it.” Institutional Culture CQI Philosophy

06/21/20066 Communication – Northwest’s Planning Model  Since 1993, all units at Northwest use a Seven-Step Planning Process (the Hubbard Cycle) to focus and define their work.  This process is based on five underlying questions:

06/21/20067 CQI Underlying Questions 1. Who are your customers/clients? 2. What are their expectations? 3. How do you “deliver” quality? 4. How do you know how well you are doing? 5. What performance improvement targets are reasonable?

06/21/20068 Key Quality Indicators  “Key” - identifying a few very important things to watch.  “Quality” - a perception held by students, stakeholders, and each other.  “Indicators” - evaluative tools that indirectly measure aspects of quality; multiple indicators are needed where direct measures are not available.

06/21/ What are your key decision areas? (as defined in your job description) 2. What kinds of decisions do you make? 3. What information do you need to make good decisions? 4. What data do you need to create good information? 5. What is the best way to obtain that data? Focusing on Peoples’ Information Needs

06/21/ Communication and Systems Alignment  Annual Report Format  Five-year Academic Department Review (Coordinating Board for Higher Education)  Annual departmental visits (Deans’ executive summaries)

Phase 1: STRATEGIC CONTEXT Phase 2: STRATEGY IDENTIFICATION & REFINEMENT Phase 3: 7-STEP TACTICAL PLAN DEVELOPMENT & DEPLOYMENT Phase 4: BALDRIGE SELF- ASSESSMENT MISSION/ VISION/ VALUES DECISION DRIVERS ENVIRON- MENTAL SCAN INTERNAL ANALYSIS STRATEGIC KQIs TACTICAL KQIs OBJECTIVES ASSESSMENT ACTION PLANS RESULTS PROCESS MANAGEMENT FACULTY/ STAFF FOCUS PLANNING STUDENT FOCUS INFORMATION & ANALYSIS LEADERSHIP NORTHWEST QUALITY SYSTEMS MODEL TRENDS IMPROVEMENTS STRETCH GOALS STRATEGIC INITIATIVES SI CHAMPIONS DEPLOYMENT PLAN MEASUREMENT PLAN COMMUNI- CATIONS PLAN

06/21/ Presentation Overview  Facilitating decision-making and driving improvement  Measurement impact on focus of institutional activities and processes  How we developed our system and integrated it into information systems

What is measured gets noticed What is noticed gets acted on What is acted on gets improved This and the following slide were adapted from a Dee W. Hook presentation. Phenomenon of Measurement

06/21/ What is a Dashboard?  Definition/use:  Both a process and a tool  Looking for unfavorable trends or patterns and focusing energy on improving priority areas  A (diagnostic) means for monitoring performance to ascertain what is working well and where additional attention is needed  A few (4-6) sets of indicators, representing the most central areas related to high performance

06/21/ How Does a Dashboard Focus Activities and Processes?  Requires clear definition of outcomes  Focuses on a manageable (small) set of key outcomes (results)  Encourages cross-functional communication  Requires fact-based decision processes  Data reporting structures  Process improvement orientation  Layering of detail (summative vs. formative)

06/21/  Dashboards help you know what’s important  Dashboards focus on actions that make a difference  Collect data to create information you can use, then use it Time is Increasingly a Precious Resource

06/21/  Assessment needs to answer questions  Systems to collect, analyze, and report information need to be developed to support the specific information requirements Data for Decision-making

06/21/ Assessment System Design 1. Data Collection  Centralized measures  Decentralized measures 3. Reporting Systems  Summative Information  Formative Information 2. Data Processing  Disaggregation system  Aggregation system  No transformation 4. Analysis/Decision-making  Cabinet, Deans, Directors, Department Chairs  Department Chairs, Faculty

Data Collection Reporting Systems Analysis and Decision-making Centralized Decentralized Disaggregation System Aggregation System Summative Information (Dashboards, Profiles) Formative Information (Operational) Cabinet, Governing Board, External Audiences Directors, Department Chairs, Faculty, Staff No Transformation Deans, Directors, Department Chairs No Transformation Directors, Department Chairs Much Little Detail Data Processing

06/21/ What Metrics are in a Dashboard?  The Dashboard includes a balanced view of an organization  Learning and Growth (student academic progress; faculty and staff development, scholarship and research productivity)  Customer Relations (students, faculty, staff, alumni, parent satisfaction and involvement)  Internal Processes (functional area performance – accuracy, timeliness, friendliness)  Financial Measures (fiscal health and viability)

06/21/ Northwest’s Dashboard Model  Our model includes several types of information/report presentations  Dashboards – single screen current status  Trend charts – key data element trends over time  Data tables –key data detail trends over time  Majors, minors, advisees, degrees, SCH, financials  Special interest charts/tables

06/21/ Features of the Northwest Balanced Scorecard System  Dashboard “lights” to indicate current status  Hyperlinks to navigate through workbooks  Hyperlinks to “drill down” to detail  Comparative data links for setting targets  Real-time data updates  Accommodates various data sources  Modular design to facilitate upgrading  Automated updating of modules

President’s Dashboard

Provost’s Dashboard

VP Student Affairs’ Dashboard

Additional Detail

06/21/ Comparative Data  In order to judge how good your performance is, results should be put into some context  Trends over time  Comparisons to other internal units  Comparisons with peer groups  Comparisons outside of the education sector

06/21/ Interpreting Dashboard Indicators  To follow up on indicators of interest, use hyperlinks to access increasing levels of detail  Student satisfaction as an example  President’s dashboard to  Provost’s dashboard to  Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory data trends

Praxis and C-BASE results module Major Field test results module Academic Profile results module Undergrad majors and minors, Graduate majors, Degrees, Advisees module Student opinionnaires of teaching module General Education local module Program SCH generation module Financial data module Placement data module EMSAS module (freshman success) Alumni satisfaction module Major field local/senior capstone module Department ‘A’ Profile and Dashboard College ‘A’ Profile and Dashboard Department ‘etc.’ Profile and Dashboard College ‘etc.’ Profile and Dashboard Provost’s Profile and Dashboard Service unit ‘A’ Profile and Dashboard Service unit ‘B’ Profile and Dashboard Service unit ‘C’ Profile and Dashboard Service unit ‘etc.’ Profile and Dashboard President’s Dashboard Provost’s Dashboard Metrics Architecture July 28, 2002 Comparative data for targets Student satisfaction module

06/21/ Presentation Overview  Facilitating decision-making and driving improvement  Measurement impact on focus of institutional activities and processes  How we developed our system and integrated it into information systems

06/21/ Northwest Dashboard Information and Sharing Days  Contact information:  Dave Oehler  Northwest Missouri State University  800 University Drive  (voice) 