Commuter Rail Vehicle Technology September 2006. Commuter Rail Vehicle Technologies for FasTracks Diesel & Dual Mode Locomotive Hauled Coaches (LHC) Electric.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Calista AVCP Regional Energy Plan. Preliminary Planning and Stakeholder Involvement Resource Inventory and Data Analysis Develop and Review Draft Energy.
Advertisements

Commuter Rail Overview. 2 Heritage Systems (Pre-1985) Seattle Montréal Miami Vancouver Los Angeles Ft Worth Dallas San Diego New Systems (Since 1985)
Tacoma Link Expansion Infrastructure, Planning and Sustainability Committee Tacoma City Council--Nov. 13, 2013.
Northwest Rail Update Nadine Lee, Northwest Rail Project Manager Regional Transportation District March 21, 2012.
Colorado Rail Passenger Association Spring Meeting June 1, 2013.
Briefing on a Cost-Benefit Analysis Framework for Transit Investments in the Washington Region David Lewis Ph.D. Chief Economist HDR|Decision Economics.
Jan. 16, 208 CoW1 - Light Rail Transit Improving mobility Easing congestion Strengthening our communities Central Corridor Committee of the Whole January.
Commuter Rail Vehicle Technology Analysis | 1 May 2007 Commuter Rail Vehicle Technology Analysis May, 2007.
City of Charlotte Southeastern Rail-Highway Safety Conference Collaborating for Success With Railroads Carolyn Flowers, CATS CEO November 7, 2012.
Federal Transit Administration New Starts Project Development Process
Oceanside-Escondido Rail Line Final Project Presentation John R. VelascoMay 12 th, 2003.
SO YOU WANT MORE PASSENGER RAIL… LOOKING AT THE FUNDING LANDSCAPE ERIC PAPETTI FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION 12/10/2014.
M IAMI F ORT L AUDERDALE W EST P ALM B EACH O RLANDO Addresses Florida’s demand for express, intercity rail travel. Is designed to serve tourists, business.
North Metro Rail Line FasTracks Citizens Advisory Committee September 18, 2013.
TEX RAIL UPDATE AND T MASTER PLAN PAUL J BALLARD PRESIDENT & CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER FORT WORTH TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (THE T) 6 th Annual Northeast.
Caltrain Modernization Program CA Passenger Rail Summit April 29, 2015.
Caltrain Modernization CMAA September 18, Caltrain Today.
Program Update Baltimore MPO November 25, Internal Draft AGENDA  Program Overview  Alternatives Development  Stakeholder and Public Outreach.
Public Transit Department Bus and Fuel Procurement Strategy AzTA/ADOT Transit Conference April 2013.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Planning Process & Alternatives Analysis Unit 7: Forecasting and Encouraging Ridership.
Corridor Electrification Environmental Process SVLG Transportation Committee January 9, 2013.
11. 2 Public Transportation’s Role in a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategy Kevin Desmond King County Metro Transit Division Seattle, WA On behalf of the.
Large Starts Issues for the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking New Starts/Small Starts Listening Session and Seminar San Francisco, CA February 15-16, 2006.
Human Services Coordinated Transportation Plan Thursday July 20, 2006 GF City Hall Rm A102.
San Francisco Mayor’s 2030 Transportation Task Force Current & Near Term Transportation Plans April 30, 2013.
Quantifying Transportation Needs and Assessing Revenue Options: The Texas Experience presented to The Arkansas Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance.
1 UTA & Alternative Fuel Vehicles GOVERNOR’S ENERGY DEVELOPMENT SUMMIT JUNE 2014.
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 16, 2009.
AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 – 8:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback on purpose, needs, and alternatives  Sign up for list  Fill.
1 Introducing The World’s First GMU A Greener, Quieter Lower-Cost Alternative for Passenger Rail --- and a Quick Start That’s A ‘Natural’*
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
Metro South Planning MetroLink in South St. Louis County Metro South MetroLink Extension Alternatives Analysis and Draft Environmental.
PROJECT UPDATE PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE #3 OCTOBER 17 4:30 PM – 6:30 PM Dakota County Northern Service Center.
- Light Rail Transit Improving mobility Easing congestion Strengthening our communities Central Corridor Committee of the Whole February 20, 2008.
1 FTA Research Programs Ronald Hynes Acting Associate Administrator for Research, Demonstration, and Innovation April 17, 2007.
Investigating Performance Improvements and True Costs of Alternative Fuel Buses in Florida Alexander Kolpakov Research Associate Center for Urban Transportation.
Briefing for Transportation Finance Panel Nov 23, 2015 Economic Analysis Reports: 1.I-84 Viaduct in Hartford 2.I-84/Rt8 Mixmaster in Waterbury 3.New Haven.
Northern Lights Express Minneapolis-Duluth/Superior Passenger Rail Alliance December 16, Northern Lights Express Minneapolis-Duluth/Superior Passenger.
Gridlock? – Transport in 2030 Solving Congestion in South East England 14 th November, 2007 Adrian Shooter Chairman, ATOC.
Proposed Interim Guidance – Small Starts. 2 Purpose Before Final Rule, evaluate and rate projects to: Advance projects into project development Provide.
North Metro Competitive Procurement RTD Board FasTracks Monitoring Committee October 8, 2013.
North Metro Rail Line Design/Build Contractor Staff Recommendation FasTracks Monitoring Committee November 5, 2013.
Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position 7 OPERATING REVENUES: Fare revenue is above budget due to fare increases that became effective.
Financial Report through Q4 FY2014 Preliminary Year-end Results December 3, 2014.
Expertise SR 710 North Study An Evaluation of the DEIR/EIS Presentation to the City of San Gabriel City Council February 2, 2016 Leland C Dolley, Special.
Metropolitan Council Transit Capital Improvement Program October 10, 2007.
West Chester Borough Council Restoration of Rail Service Ad-Hoc Committee Initial Committee Meeting West Chester Borough Hall July 23, 2014.
Review of 2016–2021 Strategic Budget Plan Development Process and 2016 Budget Assumptions Financial Administration and Audit Committee April 14,
2014 Annual Program Evaluation (APE) Status Update April 1, 2014.
2015 – 2020 Strategic Budget Plan Financial Administration & Audit Committee June 10, 2014.
2015 Annual Program Evaluation (APE) Status Update July 14, 2015.
2018 – 2023 Strategic Budget Plan
Northwest Area Mobility Study FasTracks Monitoring Committee
A Presentation to: River to Sea TPO Board October 26, 2016.
Review of 2018–2023 Strategic Budget Plan Development Process and
A Presentation to: River to Sea TPO BPAC November 9, 2016.
River to Sea TPO - CAC/TCC
2017 Annual Program Evaluation Update
Future Construction FasTracks Corridors Federal Funding Analysis
Metro Railway How it began
Tampa Historic Streetcar, Inc. May 16, 2018
Capital Programming Committee South Coast Rail Phase 1 Service
Transit Systems Planning
APTA High Speed Rail Policy Forum December 2, 2015
MTA 2019 Final Proposed Budget November Financial Plan
I-85 Corridor Light Rail Transit Feasibility Study
Central Corridor - Light Rail Transit Metropolitan Council
2014 Annual Program Evaluation (APE) Status Update
North Suburban Planning Council
Northeast Area Transit Evaluation (NATE) II Update FasTracks Monitoring Committee August 5, 2014.
Presentation transcript:

Commuter Rail Vehicle Technology September 2006

Commuter Rail Vehicle Technologies for FasTracks Diesel & Dual Mode Locomotive Hauled Coaches (LHC) Electric Multiple Units (EMU) Diesel Multiple Units (DMU)

Detailed Cost Information for Input into the Corridor EISs Original FasTracks Plan assumed LHC technology in budget Current analysis compared EMU and DMU commuter rail vehicle technologies to the Original FasTracks Plan: Capital costs (including vehicles) updated to $2006 Operating and maintenance costs updated to $2006

Options Analyzed: Each corridor as stand alone Two and three corridors sharing same vehicle technology Base diesel price: $2.75/gallon Additional analyses of $2.50 and $3.50/gallon Base Electric price: $0.085/kilowatt hour Additional analysis of $0.10/kilowatt hour Base annual inflation rate: 3% Additional analysis of 0% inflation Three Corridor Analysis: East, Northwest and North Metro

30 Year Capital & O&M Costs* for EMU and DMU Compared to LHC (Original FasTracks Plan) (Inflated Dollars) Comparison of Capital and O&M Costs Assumptions* Diesel: $2.75/gallon Electricity: $0.085/kWh Inflation: 3%/year Each corridor analyzed independently (no savings for same technology in multiple corridors) EMUDMU East Corridor- $ M- $ M North Metro- $37.89 M- $84.16 M Northwest Rail+ $10.3 M- $15.2 M

East Corridor

Results of Analysis: East Corridor EMUs are more cost-effective: EMU: - $215.29M, DMU: - $142.74M Travel time savings allow lower operating costs as fewer EMU trainsets required EMU saves an average of $2.22M/year in O&M costs over DMU Civil cost savings realized as EMUs can negotiate steeper grades Higher cost to electrify corridor is offset by reduced civil and operating costs FTA Cost-effectiveness index (CEI) met – eligible for federal funding

Next Steps East Corridor: Evaluation of options to develop Preferred Alternative for alignment, stations and technology will include: Commuter rail vehicle technology cost analysis Environmental factors, including community impacts Mobility benefits, including travel time and ridership FTA cost-effectiveness criteria Committee, stakeholder and public meetings will be held September through early November

Northwest Rail

Results of Analysis: Northwest Rail Corridor DMUs are more cost-effective: EMU: + $10.3M, DMU: - $15.2M Shorter train lengths than East Corridor due to lower ridership Less frequent service than East Corridor High cost to electrify corridor due to length DMUs are $230K/year less expensive to operate than EMUs

North Metro Corridor

Results of Analysis: North Metro Corridor Both EMUs and DMUs are cost-competitive DMUs are more cost-effective EMU: - $37.89M, DMU: - $84.16M Shorter train lengths than East Corridor Less frequent service than East Corridor Station spacing and corridor length are appropriate for either EMU or DMU

Next Steps Northwest & North Metro Rail: Northwest Rail: Commuter rail vehicle technology cost analysis will be input into the EA evaluation North Metro: Commuter rail vehicle technology cost analysis will be presented as part of the scoping meetings and analyzed as part of the EIS

Multiple Vehicle Technologies for FasTracks Maintenance Facility: One facility can accommodate both vehicle types Minor increase in size Requires track electrification in yards and building (included in EMU costs) Requires fueling facility (included in DMU costs) Requires spare parts for two technologies

30 Year Capital & O&M Costs* for EMU and DMU Compared to LHC (Original FasTracks Plan) (Inflated Dollars) Impact of Higher Energy Prices Assumptions* Diesel: $3.5/gallon Electricity: $0.10/kWh Inflation: 3%/year Each corridor analyzed independently (no savings for same technology in multiple corridors) EMUDMU East Corridor- $ M- $ M North Metro- $99.25M- $ M Northwest Rail- $58.43 M - $37.81 M

30 Year Capital & O&M Costs* for EMU and DMU Compared to LHC (Original FasTracks Plan) (Inflated Dollars) Impact of Low Energy Prices, No Inflation Assumptions* Diesel: $2.50/gallon Electricity: $0.085/kWh Inflation: 0%/year Each corridor analyzed independently (no savings for same technology in multiple corridors) EMUDMU East Corridor- $ M- $79.71 M North Metro+ $0.15M- $44.10 M Northwest Rail+ $60.27 M - $2.44 M