U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Action Plan for the Development of Watershed and Sub-Watershed Boundaries for northwestern Mississippi.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Delineating Basins with Coastal Data Because flash floods do not occur over the ocean, FFMP calculations should not include precipitation estimates over.
Advertisements

Hydrological Modeling. Overview Introduction Watershed delineation Automatic delineation Flow length.
Applications of LIDAR Data in the McPherson Watershed, Fort Bragg, North Carolina Beth M. Wrege and Michelle Cienek.
Providing Geography for Topology; A Schematic View of the National Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) James E. Mitchell, Ph.D. IT GIS Manager Kurt L. Johnson.
WRAP Hydro Data Model: Its Structure and application to find Input Parameters for the Water Rights Analysis Package Centre For Research In Water Resources.
G EOSPATIAL D ATA L AYERS FOR A RC H YDRO R IVER Arc Hydro River Meeting Clark Siler Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin.
Fort Bragg Cantonment Area Background The USGS is working with the U.S. Army at Fort Bragg to develop a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWP3). The.
Introduction to NHDPlus: A Framework for Advanced Water Applications Cindy McKay Horizon Systems Corporation Cindy McKay Horizon Systems Corporation.
Standard watershed and stream delineation recipe - Vector stream (ex. NHD data) fusion into DEM raster (burning in) - Sink removal - Flow direction - Flow.
CEE 795 Water Resources Modeling and GIS Learning Objectives: Perform raster based network delineation from digital elevation models Perform raster based.
National Hydrography Data Use and Applications.
Technology Overview Geographic Information Systems.
1-Degree USGS DEM Control Points Locations National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) Drainage Lines Corrected Stream Lines Filled DEM Burned DEM Flow Area Accumulation.
Urban Storm-Water Management Plan Utilizing Arc View and HEC-HMS College Station, Texas Kara Corcoran CVEN 689.
Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1, 15 January 2007, Pages Biological integrity in.
From Topographic Maps to Digital Elevation Models Daniel Sheehan IS&T Academic Computing Anne Graham MIT Libraries.
NHD Watershed: Tools and Applications
“Flood monitoring and mapping for Emergency Response in San Antonio-Texas” Part I by Silvana Alcoz Source photo Term.
1:2,400 Scale Hydrography Data Integration with NHD
GIS Tools for Watershed Delineation Public Policy Perspectives Teaching Public Policy in the Earth Sciences April 21, 2006 Gary Coutu Department of Geography.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey DEM Preparation Using the New England Method Streamstats Data Preparation Workshop Pete Steeves.
State of New Jersey NHD / WBD Stewardship Conference NJ State Steward Report By: Craig Coutros, NJDEPApril 15, 2009.
Flow Time Time Series Hydro FeaturesHydro Network Channel System Drainage System ArcGIS Hydro Data Model.
ACWQ Austin Canopy & Water Quality Progress Report: Austin Tree-Canopy Resource, Phase II Spring 2012, Geography 4427, Texas State University April 2,
Topographic Maps vs DEM. Topographic Map 1:24,000 Scale 20 ft contour 100 ft contour Stream Center Line.
Introduction National Hydrography Dataset Plus (NHDPlus) Version 2.
GIS in Watershed Analysis. Why watershed Analysis with GIS? Concepts Important datasets Analysis Tools.
Delineation of the Texas Hill Country Watersheds with Named Streams Team Members: Justin McInnis: Project Manager Matt Anding: Assistant Project Manager.
David Nail USGS Geospatial Liaison to Indiana March 13 th, 2007 Update on National Hydrography Data.
Creating Watersheds and Stream Networks
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Geospatial Liaisons - Supporting NHD Stewardship NHD Workshop April 14, 2009.
DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELING GEOG 421: DR. SHUNFU HU, SIUE Project One Steve Klaas Fall 2013.
Fluvial Geomorphic Analyses of the Llano River and Sandy Creek Basins, Central Texas, using GIS and Arc Hydro Tools Franklin T. Heitmuller CE 394K November.
Vision for the National Geospatial Framework for Surface Water Robert M. Hirsch Associate Director for Water U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G. Tarboton and Ayse Irmak GIS in Water Resources Fall 2009.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G. Tarboton and Ayse Irmak GIS in Water Resources Fall 2011.
Esri UC 2014 | Technical Workshop | Creating Watersheds, Stream Networks and Hydrologically Conditioned DEMS Steve Kopp Dean Djokic.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Conflation Lessons In Iowa Using the NHDGeoConflationTool.
National Elevation Dataset - Hydrologic Derivatives (NED-H) Kris Verdin EROS Data Center
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Processing ArcHydro Datasets with NHDPlus Version 2, Emphasizing StreamStats Data Development Webinar.
Processing Elevation Data. Limitations of DEMs for hydro work Dates Static, does not evolve Matching to linear line work due to scale Processing errors.
1 Contractor for the USGS at the EROS Data Center NHD Plus as a geospatial framework for drought indicators Jim Verdin.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G
Introduction to GIS in Water Resources David R. Maidment Director, Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin CRWR.
Spatial Water Data Subcommitte Update to the FGDC CAG
Characterization of Watersheds from DEMs using Spatial Analyst/ArcHydro Robert G. Burns, P.G. Engineering Geologist DWR – Division of Safety of Dams Watershed.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Idaho District Office (208) Data Requirements for StreamStats December 18,
Minnesota Hydrography Land of 10,000 Lakes (or so) Mark Olsen Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road N. St. Paul, MN 55155
The Future of NHDPlus 2009 NHD Stewardship Conference Denver, CO April 14-17, NHD Stewardship Conference Denver, CO April 14-17, 2009 Tommy Dewald.
StreamStats Training Follow-up New and Updated Documents –StreamStats_Preprocessing_ Steps.doc –Coastlines.doc –PostHydroDEM_batch.doc –ProcessingFlowColor.ppt.
Arc Hydro River Aquatic Biology River Network Channel Shape Flooding Multiscale 3D Hydrography Applications.
[Hydrology and Hydraulic Analysis Utilizing Terrain Data] [Barrett Goodwin]
WATERWAYS AND BRIDGES IN TEXAS “Final” Presentation by: Brandon Klenzendorf CE 394K Dr. Maidment.
Field Drainage Technology LiDAR John Nowatzki Extension Ag Machine Systems Specialist.
Field Drainage Technology LiDAR John Nowatzki Extension Ag Machine Systems Specialist.
Using the NHDPlus for drainage area delineation and site matching Kirsten Cassingham, NC Water Science Center Silvia Terziotti, NC Water Science Center.
watershed analysis of Oak Ridge
Definition In scientific literature there is no universal agreement about the usage of the terms: digital elevation model (DEM) digital terrain model (DTM)
National Hydro Data Programs
STREAM NETWORK DELINEATION USING ARC HYDRO AND TauDEM: A comparison of approaches using The Upper Sevier and the Little Bear River Basins Alphonce C. Guzha.
Digital Elevation Model Based Watershed and Stream Network Delineation
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
Hydrography for The Lower Rio Grande Valley A Comparison of Mapped versus Synthetic Streams By Jean Parcher GIS in Water Resources December 4, 2001.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources
Development of a Hydrologic Model for the Wichita Falls District
Creating Watersheds and Stream Networks
IGIC Waters Workgroup Update
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by Ayse Irmak, David R
Presentation transcript:

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Action Plan for the Development of Watershed and Sub-Watershed Boundaries for northwestern Mississippi : Delineating in Problematic Areas Claire E. Rose, K. Van Wilson, Richard A. Rebich U.S. Geological Survey Mississippi Water Science Center 308 S. Airport Rd. Jackson, MS in cooperation with Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality

Background and Issues

Acquisition of LiDAR enables delineation of subtle topographic features Philipp, MS 7.5-minute topographic map, USGS 1981 LiDAR imagery, US ACE 2009

Purpose of Study  To develop sub- watershed boundaries for watersheds in northwest Mississippi.  Complete the WBD for the state of Mississippi to the sub-watershed level.  Watershed and ecosystem health restoration depend on completed sub-watershed boundary dataset.

Map of Current delineation to sub- watershed level (all are in Mississippi Delta region) 37: Number of 10-digit HUC watersheds in Northwest MS that need to be delineated down to the 12- digit HUC sub-watershed boundaries. ~185: Approximate number of12- digit HUC sub-watershed boundaries that would be developed for NW MS

Flowchart of Data Objectives

Errors in the Yazoo River Basin Phase 1 LiDAR Dataset

Explanation of LiDAR Errors USGS NGTOC: Responsible for reviewing LiDAR data before approval for inclusion in NED. Goal of QA/QC: Assure data are sufficient quality for scientific analysis. Errors, anomalies and other issues were documented in the LiDAR Data from the Yazoo River Basin (Phase 1). 147 Errors were found including: Floating water bodies Mismatched seams Bridge remnants Missing data Incomplete tiles Steep shorelines Spikes

Methods- Arc HYDRO Snake Creek Watershed– Upper Bogue Phalia Layers Needed to Auto- delineate using Arc Hydro:  LiDAR exported to DEM  NHD  Watershed boundaries  Aerial imagery

Methods- ArcHYDRO  Fill sinks  Use stream network (NHD) for pour points  Flow direction and flow accumulation  Stream definition and segmentation  Catchment grid delineation and polygon processing  Drainage processing  Joint catchment processing  Set nodes using NHD  Watershed processing – batch delineation  Section off by watershed level and buffer it so it won’t change  Compare to NHD and aerial and previous watershed delineations

Quality Control  Compare to aerial imagery  Compare to NHD  Compare to previously- delineated watershed boundaries

Stewardship between USGS and WBD  Contact made with WBD  Web Seminars at each major step in the process  Guide the GIS specialist in the method and technique  Will ease WBD certification process in the future

Requirements and Standards of WBD  WBD Standards will be updated in March 2012  Use current standards until the update

Timeline Objective 1: LiDAR burned into USGS NED and QA/QC Objective 2: Testing of auto-delineation methods, pilot basin delineation Objective 3: Completion of sub-watershed delineation of NW MS, submission to National WBD

Questions or Comments?  WBD- Watershed Boundary Dataset  NGTOC- USGS National Geospatial Technical Operations Center  LiDAR- Light Detection and Ranging  EROS- USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science Center  NED- National Elevation Dataset  NHD- National Hydrography Dataset  DEM- Digital Elevation Model

Abstract:  Title: Development of Watershed and Sub-Watershed Boundaries for Northwestern Mississippi   The National Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) for the state of Mississippi lacks sub-watershed delineation in northwestern Mississippi, an area of intense agricultural production locally referred to as the Delta. Previous attempts to delineate watersheds in the Delta to the sub-watershed boundaries were unsuccessful due to topographically-uniform, low relief land elevations; land management practices employed by land owners and growers who frequently change drainage patterns; and the fact that the area did not previously have a sufficient scale of digital elevation data that would allow delineation of subtle topographic features.  Since the publication of the Mississippi WBD by the U.S. Geological Survey in 2009, the entire Delta region has been mapped using Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) technology, which has a vertical land surface accuracy of 8.5 centimeters (bare earth). With the availability of LiDAR data, it is now possible to delineate the Delta to the sub- watershed level. The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality, will delineate the sub-watershed boundaries for northwestern Mississippi.  The preferred process to delineate river basins in the Delta to the sub-watershed level and to include these into the National WBD is as follows: (1) LiDAR data must be quality-control checked for errors by the USGS-National Geospatial Technical Operations Center (NGTOC) in Rolla, MO, and then integrated into the National Elevation Dataset (NED) by the USGS-Earth Resources Observation System (EROS) Data Center in Sioux Falls, SD; (2) after inclusion into the NED, the approved Digital Earth Model (DEM) from the NED can be auto-delineated using ArcHYDRO GIS software; (3) the auto-delineated boundaries are then manually checked and corrected to the DEM, aerial imagery, and the National Hydrography Dataset(NHD); (4) once the auto-delineated boundaries are corrected, WBD tools will be used to re-digitize the boundaries to eliminate line fragments; and (5) names and numbers will be assigned to each sub-watershed polygon and then submitted to the National WBD for certification.

Definition of Terms  HUC: Hydrologic Unit Code (Indicates size of watershed).  DEM: Digital Elevation Model  LiDAR: Light Detection and Ranging (Remote sensing technology that can measure distance).  Watershed: 10-digit HUC (~227 square miles).  Sub-watershed: 12-digit HUC (~40 square miles).  5: Average amount of 12-digit HUCs within one 10-digit HUC

Acronyms  WBD- Watershed Boundary Dataset  NGTOC- USGS National Geospatial Technical Operations Center  LiDAR- Light Detection and Ranging  EROS- USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science Center  NED- National Elevation Dataset  NHD- National Hydrography Dataset  DEM- Digital Elevation Model