FLUKA radioprotection calculations Maria – Ana Popovici Politehnica University of Bucharest.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Advertisements

Preliminary studies for T2 primary target for the NA61 fragmentation beam run 11 th October 2010 – NA61 Collaboration Meeting M. Calviani on behalf of.
P HI T S Exercise ( II ) : How to stop , ,  -rays and neutrons? Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System title1 Feb revised.
EAR2 simulation update Collaboration board meeting Christina Weiss & Vasilis Vlachoudis.
TLEP3 How radiation issues could be studied through FLUKA simulations. Possible approaches/mitigation schemes Alberto Fassò.
1 Activation problems S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2) (1) Politecnico di Milano; (2) CERN.
Hall D Photon Beam Simulation and Rates Part 1: photon beam line Part 2: tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Beam Line and Tagger Review.
Calculation of radiation produced by dark current in the Cornell ERL Lisa Nash, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Advisor: Val Kostroun.
Counting Cosmic Rays through the passage of matter By Edwin Antillon.
Particle Interactions
UCN Phase 2 Design Status September 10, Design Components Bulk Shielding Target Crypt Cryogenic Insert Target Insert UCN Port Beam Window Cooling.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Radiological Design Considerations of Synchrotron Radiation Facilities P.K. Job Radiation Physicist National Synchrotron.
Impact of synchrotron radiation in LEPTON COLLIDER arcs
Geant4 simulation of the attenuation properties of plastic shield for  - radionuclides employed in internal radiotherapy Domenico Lizio 1, Ernesto Amato.
1 Induced radioactivity in the target station and in the decay tunnel from a 4 MW proton beam S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2)
HPS Test Run Setup Takashi Maruyama SLAC Heavy Photon Search Collaboration Meeting Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, May 26-27,
Exercise 7: Importance biasing Exercise 7: Importance biasing 7th FLUKA Course NEA Paris, Sept.29-Oct.3, 2008.
IFluka : a C++ interface between Fairroot and Fluka Motivations Design The CBM case: –Geometry implementation –Settings for radiation studies –Global diagnosis.
Modelling of Electron Air Showers and Cherenkov Light A.Mishev J. Stamenov Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Bulgarian Academy of Sciences.
ELI-NP: the way ahead, March Anna Ferrari An overview of the shielding problems around high energy laser-accelerated beams Anna Ferrari Institute.
SHMS Optics and Background Studies Tanja Horn Hall C Summer Meeting 5 August 2008.
Radiation levels in CBM Radiation effects iFluka (Fluka C++ interface to CbmRoot) Fluka Geometry Models Results Conclusion.
NEW COMMENTS TO ILC BEAM ENERGY MEASUREMENTS BASED ON SYNCHROTRON RADIATION FROM MAGNETIC SPECTROMETER E.Syresin, B. Zalikhanov-DLNP, JINR R. Makarov-MSU.
IFluka : a C++ interface between Fairroot and Fluka Motivations Design The CBM case: –Geometry implementation –Settings for radiation studies –Global diagnosis.
FNAL, May 10, Introduction for Beam Diagnostics Laboratory Main Mission: R&D on charged particle beam diagnostics for e + /e - linear colliders.
Medical Accelerator F. Foppiano, M.G. Pia, M. Piergentili
First AWAKE dump calculations Helmut Vincke. Beam on dump Muon axis inside and outside CERN Distances: Beam impact point to end of West hall: ~300 m Beam.
Simulations on “Energy plus Transmutation” setup, 1.5 GeV Mitja Majerle
Alpha and Beta Interactions
Experimental part: Measurement the energy deposition profile for U ions with energies E=100 MeV/u - 1 GeV/u in iron and copper. Measurement the residual.
Monte Carlo methods in ADS experiments Study for state exam 2008 Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
Electronuclear Interactions in FLUKA
Chapter 5 Interactions of Ionizing Radiation. Ionization The process by which a neutral atom acquires a positive or a negative charge Directly ionizing.
Initial (FLUKA) calculations for synchrotron radiation at TLep April 4 th, 2013 F. Cerutti, A. Ferrari, L. Lari* *BE Dept.
Towards comparisons between TFluka and TGeant3 ( within CbmRoot Framework) Denis Bertini (IT-GSI) Antonin Maire (IPHC Strasbourg)
Validation of EM Part of Geant4
Activation around dump shielding, and design of beam line mask Mathieu Baudin, RP Genevieve Steele, EN-STI Helmut Vincke, RP.
Recent Studies on ILC BDS and MERIT S. Striganov APD meeting, January 24.
PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF SIMULATIONS L.G. Dedenko M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Simulations on “Energy plus Transmutation” setup, 1.5 GeV Mitja Majerle, V Wagner, A Krása, F Křížek This document can be downloaded.
Radiation Shielding Assessment for MuCool Experimental Enclosure C. Johnstone 1), I. Rakhno 2) 1) Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois.
Radiation protection and radiation safety issues for HIE-ISOLDE. FLUKA calculations Y. Romanets ISOLDE Workshop and Users meeting 2010 CERN, 8 December.
Gamma Shielding Calculations
Radiation study of the TPC electronics Georgios Tsiledakis, GSI.
AWAKE: D2E for Alexey beam properties Silvia Cipiccia, Eduard Feldbaumer, Helmut Vincke DGS/RP.
1 July 2004 Radiation Protection Issues 1 M.Brugger, D.Forkel-Wirth, S.Roesler, H.Vincke SC/RP Review of the LHC Collimation Project 30 June – 2 July 2004.
Present status of production target and Room design Takashi Hashimoto, IBS/RISP 2015, February.
1 Activation by Medium Energy Beams V. Chetvertkova, E. Mustafin, I. Strasik (GSI, B eschleunigerphysik), L. Latysheva, N. Sobolevskiy (INR RAS), U. Ratzinger.
Theories of the Atom. Ernest Rutherford (Gold Foil Experiment) Discovered that atoms have a positively charged central mass called the nucleus Hypothesis:
N_TOF EAR-1 Simulations The “γ-flash” A. Tsinganis (CERN/NTUA), C. Guerrero (CERN), V. Vlachoudis (CERN) n_TOF Annual Collaboration Meeting Lisbon, December.
Neutron double differential distributions, dose rates and specific activities from accelerator components irradiated by 50 – 400 MeV protons F. Cerutti.
Prompt dose upstream the 12-ft concrete shielding blocks Igor Rakhno May 4, 2007.
EURISOL, TASK#5, Bucuresti, November 1 Preliminary shielding assessment of EURISOL Post Accelerator D. Ene, D. Ridikas. B. Rapp.
Monte Carlo methods in spallation experiments Defense of the phD thesis Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
First 20 Elements in the Periodic Table
Heating and radiological
SPARCLAB: PW-class Ti:Sa laser+SPARC
Induced-activity experiment:
Analyses to Support Waste Disposition of SNS Inner Reflector Plug
Chapter 5 Interactions of Ionizing Radiation
Measurements and FLUKA Simulations of Bismuth and Aluminum Activation at the CERN Shielding Benchmark Facility(CSBF) E. Iliopoulou, R. Froeschl, M. Brugger,
Calorimeters at CBM A. Ivashkin INR, Moscow.
Electron Beamlines Safety Workshop at ELI Beamlines April 2016
GAMOS tutorial Shielding Exercises
The G4ParticleHP package
Update on GEp GEM Background Rates
Neutronics Studies for the Nab Experiment
How to stop a, b, g-rays and neutrons?
The Hadrontherapy Geant4 advanced example
MAGiC Shielding Simulations
Presentation transcript:

FLUKA radioprotection calculations Maria – Ana Popovici Politehnica University of Bucharest

Dose Legal Limits in Romania ProfessionalPublic Efective dose rate (CNCAN, NSR- 06) 20 mSv /year 55 μSv/day 2.3 μSv/h 1 mSv/year ≈ 2.7μSv/day ≈ 0.11 μSv/h NSR-01 Monitorul Oficial al Romaniei Partea I nr. 404 bis / Fundamental Norms for Radiological Safety

Overview FLUKA simulations of ELI-NP facility “hot spots” (from a radioprotection point of view) were performed for: Gamma Source a) 600 MeV electron beam dump b) 19.5 MeV gamma beam dump (E7, E8 in the general layout) 10 PW Laser (E1)

ELI-NP Facility Layout

FLUKA Settings – Defaults Precisio EMF on Rayleigh scattering and inelastic form factor corrections to Compton scattering activated Detailed photoelectric edge treatment and fluorescence photons activated Low energy neutron transport on down to thermal energies included, (high energy neutron threshold at 20 MeV) Fully analogue absorption for low-energy neutrons Particle transport threshold set at 100 keV Multiple scattering threshold at minimum allowed energy, for both primary and secondary charged particles

FLUKA Settings Delta ray production on with threshold 100 keV Heavy particle e+/e- pair production activated with full explicit production (with the minimum threshold = 2m_e) Heavy particle bremsstrahlung activated with explicit photon production above 300 keV Muon photonuclear interactions activated with explicit generation of secondaries Heavy fragment transport activated

Materials (FLUKA input) Normal concrete (walls)  Normal concrete, used at ELBE(FZD); density 2.6 g/cm3 Composition (mass fraction): HYDROGEN ; OXYGEN ; SILICON ; SODIUM ; MAGNESIU ; ALUMINUM ; IRON ; POTASSIU ; CALCIUM ; TITANIUM ; FLUORINE ; SULFUR ; PHOSPHO ; CHLORINE Heavy concrete (beamdumps)  MPQ Concrete; densiy g/cm3 Composition (mass fraction): HYDROGEN – ; BORON CARBON – ; OXYGEN – ; FLUORINE – E-4; SODIUM E-4 ; MAGNESIU – ; ALUMINUM – ; SILICON – ; PHOSPHO – ; SULFUR – E-4; POTASSIUM – E-4; CALCIUM – ; TITANIUM E-5; MANGANES – ; IRON – ; STRONTIU E-4

Materials (FLUKA input)  Stainless steel (electron pipeline, laser beamdump – as an alternative) AISI316LN; density 7.8 g/cm3 Composition (mass fraction): IRON – ; CHROMIUM ; NICKEL ; MANGANES ; SILICON ; PHOSPHO - 4.5E-4; SULFUR - 3.E-4; CARBON - 3.E-4  Borated polyethylene (beamdump); density g/cm3 Composition (mass fraction): CARBON – ; HYDROGEN – ; OXYGEN – ; BORON-11 – ; BORON-10 –  Wet air (air with moisture); density g/cm3 Composition (mass fraction): NITROGEN ; OXYGEN ; CARBON ; ARGON ; HYDROGEN

Source terms (FLUKA input) Gamma Source ( ELI-NP White Book) a) Electrons: 600 MeV electron beam, 250 pC/pulse, 12kHz, Div = 0.1 mrad, Gaussian, FWHM = 6 MeV b) Photons: 19.5 MeV gamma beam, 8.0E+08 g/pulse, Div = 0.1 mrad, Gaussian, FWHM = MeV

Source terms (FLUKA input) 10 PW Laser (I = 1.0E+22) - (ELI-PP White Book - draft) Hz, 300 J pulse-1 a) Photons 3 thermal components with CUTOFF energy at 4 MeV, isotropic T1 = MeV, N1 = 1.1E+14 sr-1 pulse-1 T2 = 0.58 MeV, N2 = 1.0E+14 sr-1 pulse-1 T3 = 8.8 MeV, N3 = 9.0E+11 sr-1 pulse-1 b) Electrons 38 GeV Gaussian beam, FWHM = 1MeV, CUTOFF energy at 38 GeV, N = 9.0E+13 sr-1 pulse-1, Div = 1o

Source terms (FLUKA input) c1) Protons 1 thermal component with CUTOFF energy at 2 GeV, isotropic T = 20 MeV, N = 1.0E+07 sr-1 pulse-1 c2) Protons uniform energy distribution between 0 and 2 GeV, isotropic T = 20 MeV, N = 1.0E+07 sr -1 MeV -1 pulse PW Laser (I = 1.0E+23) – ELI-PP estimations concerning only protons First estimation 1 thermal component with CUTOFF at 100 MeV, Div = 40 o T = 20 MeV, N = 5.0E+13 sr -1 pulse -1 Second estimation uniform energy distribution between 0 and 100 MeV, Div = 40 o N = 5.0E+13 sr-1 MeV -1 pulse -1

Gamma Source Electron Beamdump - Geometry  Cave dimensions: 19m x 5m x 11m  Lateral walls, roof, floor – thickness = 1m Exception: lateral wall for beamline admitance 1.5 m  Beamline: diameter = 2cm, 2mm thick, in AISI316LN, 1mm thick Al cap

Gamma Source Electron Beamdump - Geometry Beamdump: 6m x 4.5m x 8m in MPQ concrete (Martin Gross design) Beamdump core: graphite (cone, diameter = 10cm, height = 50cm), Al (cylinder, diameter = 10cm, height = 30cm)

Gamma Source Electron Beamdump – FLUKA Simulation

Gamma Source Gamma cave + Beamdump Geometry Cave E7: 8m x 5m x 8m Cave E8: 8m x 5m x 5m Walls – 1.5 m thick Wall opposite to the admitance of the beamline is 2m thick

Gamma Source Gamma cave + Beamdump Geometry Beamdump dimensions: 3m x 3m x 4m Beamdump in normal concrete Central hole in beamdump: 30 cm diameter, 1m length Beamline in stainless steel, diameter 2 cm, 2 mm thick walls, 1 mm thick exit cap in Al.

Gamma Source Gamma cave – FLUKA Simulation

10 PW Laser Laser Cave & Reaction Chamber Geometry Cave dimensions: 5m x 5m x 10m Lateral walls, roof, floor – thickness = 1.5 m Reaction chamber dimensions 1.3m x 1.5m x 2.85m Wall thickness – 6 cm Pipe: diameter = 40 cm, 2cm thick, 2 m length in Al, 2mm thick Al cap

10 PW Laser First Beamdump Geometry & Materials 3m x 3m x 7.5m MPQconcrete BD 50 cm Bor_Poly inside cave Lead core 1.3m x 1.3m x 3m Central hole: 2m long cylinder (diameter = 15cm) + 50 cm height cone

10 PW Laser Second Beamdump Geometry & Materials 3m x 3m x 7.5m AISI316LN stainless steel BD 1m Bor_Poly inside cave 1m Bor_Poly outside the external region of BD Graphite core 1m long cylinder (diameter = 20cm) + 50 cm height cone Central hole: 1m long cylinder (diameter = 20cm)

10 PW Laser Electrons – FLUKA Simulation

10 PW Laser Photons – FLUKA Simulation

10 PW Laser Protons – FLUKA Simulation

10 PW Laser - 1.0E+22 W cm -2 Protons 1 thermal component with CUTOFF energy at 2 GeV, isotropic T = 20 MeV, N = 1.0E+07 sr-1 pulse-1 Protons uniform energy distribution between 0 and 2 GeV, isotropic N = 1.0E+07 sr-1 MeV-1 pulse-1

10 PW Laser - 1.0E+22 W cm -2 Protons (thermal) – FLUKA Simulation

10 PW Laser - 1.0E+22 W cm -2 Protons (uniform) – FLUKA Simulation

10 PW Laser - 1.0E+23 W cm-2 Protons (thermal) – FLUKA Simulation

10 PW Laser - 1.0E+23 W cm-2 ELI-PP estimations concerning only protons 1 thermal component with CUTOFF at 100 MeV, Div = 40 o, T = 20 MeV, N = 5.0E+13 sr-1 pulse-1, uniform energy distribution between 0 and 100 MeV, Div = 40 o, N = 5.0E+13 sr-1 MeV-1 pulse-1

10 PW Laser - 1.0E+23 W cm-2 Protons (uniform) – FLUKA Simulation

Conclusions All the radiation sources at the ELI-NP facility are shieldable in the present simplified layout, even in an uninterrupted 0.1 Hz working regime. An important exception: protons with a rectangular energy distribution. If this source term definition will prove to be valid, then a limitation of the number of shots per day will become necessary. In order to avoid such unwanted limitations, more realistic source definitions would be very helpful.

Conclusions The present calculations are schematic and changes in these results are naturally expected once building and experimental setup details are taken into account. Shielding calculations with FLUKA transport code can and need to be refined, but this requires the cooperation of members of the experimental groups, who need to provide detailed description of their setups. Also, the problem of the source term definition should find a realistic solution for each type of experiment which is to be performed.