RF aspects of module vacuum system Riccardo Zennaro CERN.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Choke-mode damped accelerating structures for CLIC main linac Hao Zha, Tsinghua University Jiaru Shi, CERN
Advertisements

CLIC drive beam accelerating (DBA) structure Rolf Wegner.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Prospects of Compact Crab Cavities for LHC Peter McIntosh LHC-CC Workshop, CERN 21 st August 2008.
S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 1 of 38 Sasha Novokhatski SLAC, Stanford University Accelerator Session April 20, 2005 Low R/Q Cavities for Super.
Effects of wake fields in ATF2 low aperture kicker and IP nano-BPMs Karl Bane April 19, 2005.
Design of Standing-Wave Accelerator Structure
Vacuum system in the main Linacs C. Garion CERN/TE/VSC CLIC09 workshop, October.
CIEMAT ACTIVITIES ON STRIPLINE KICKERS I. Rodríguez.
1 Impedance and its link to vacuum chamber geometry T.F. Günzel Vacuum systems for synchrotron light sources 12 th september 2005.
RF particle acceleration Kyrre N. Sjøbæk * FYS 4550 / FYS 9550 – Experimental high energy physics University of Oslo, 26/9/2013 *k.n.sjobak(at)fys.uio.no.
Status of vacuum & interconnections of the CLIC main linac modules C. Garion TE/VSC TBMWG, 9 th November 2009.
TDI longitudinal impedance simulation with CST PS A.Grudiev 20/03/2012.
Introduction to beam impedance O.Berrig 23/
Course B: rf technology Normal conducting rf Part 5: Higher-order-mode damping Walter Wuensch, CERN Sixth International Accelerator School for Linear Colliders.
Overview of CLIC main linac accelerating structure design 21/10/2010 A.Grudiev (CERN)
2nd CLIC Advisory Committee (CLIC-ACE), CERN January 2008 Introduction to the CLIC Power Extraction and Transfer Structure (PETS) Design. I. Syratchev.
Agenda: General kickers analysis Wang-Tsutsui method for computing impedances Benchmarks Conclusions Bibliography Acknowledgments: E.Métral, M.Migliorati,
Simulation of Beam Instabilities in SPring-8 T. Nakamura JASRI / SPring-8
Update of the SPS transverse impedance model Benoit for the impedance team.
Wakefields in XFEL undulator intersections Igor Zagorodnov Beam Dynamics Group Meeting
IMPEDANCE OF Y-CHAMBER FOR SPS CRAB CAVITY By Phoevos Kardasopoulos Thanks to Benoit Salvant, Pei Zhang, Fred Galleazzi, Roberto Torres-Sanchez and Alick.
Higher-Order Modes and Beam-Loading Compensation in CLIC Main Linac Oleksiy Kononenko BE/RF, CERN CLIC RF Structure Development Meeting, March 14, 2012.
Simulation of trapped modes in LHC collimator A.Grudiev.
1 EuroTeV High Bandwidth Wall Current Monitor Alessandro D’Elia CERN- Geneve.
Trapped Modes in LHC Collimator (II) Liling Xiao Advanced Computations Department SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
1 EuroTeV High Bandwidth Wall Current Monitor Alessandro D’Elia AB-BI-PI.
1 Cold L-Band Cavity BPM: Design Status July 2006 Gennady Romanov Linda Valerio Manfred Wendt Fermilab July 21, 2006.
Coupler Short-Range Wakefield Kicks Karl Bane and Igor Zagorodnov Wake Fest 07, 11 December 2007 Thanks to M. Dohlus; and to Z. Li, and other participants.
Long Range Wake Potential of BPM in Undulator Section Igor Zagorodnov and Martin Dohlus Beam Dynamics Group Meeting
CLIC accelerating structures: study of the tolerances and short range wakefield considerations R. Zennaro CERN.
TESLA DAMPING RING RF DEFLECTORS DESIGN F.Marcellini & D. Alesini.
August 21st 2013 BE-ABP Bérengère Lüthi – Summer Student 2013
Marcel Schuh CERN-BE-RF-LR CH-1211 Genève 23, Switzerland 3rd SPL Collaboration Meeting at CERN on November 11-13, 2009 Higher.
Accelerating structure prototypes for 2011 (proposal) A.Grudiev 6/07/11.
ELI and other things A. D’Elia 1. C-BAND STRUCTURES FOR MULTI-BUNCH RF LINACS: ELI_NP PROPOSAL Bunch charge 250 pC Number of bunches 40 Bunch distance.
Computation of Resistive Wakefields Adina Toader and Roger Barlow The University of Manchester ILC-CLIC Beam Dynamics CERN th June.
CLIC Beam instrumentation work shop, CERN, 2 nd & 3 rd of June 2009, Lars Søby BPM overview CLIC instrumentation work shop 2-3 June BPM overview.
Damping intense wake-fields in the main Linacs and PETS structures of the CLIC Linear Collider Vasim Khan: 1 st year PhD Student Supervisor: Dr. Roger.
Structure Wakefields and Tolerances R. Zennaro. Parameters of the CLIC structure “CLIC G” (from A. Grudiev) StructureCLIC_G Frequency: f [GHz]12 Average.
A. Aksoy Beam Dynamics Studies for the CLIC Drive Beam Accelerator A. AKSOY CONTENS ● Basic Lattice Sketches ● Accelerating structure ● Short and long.
LCWS11 WG4 Fully featured accelerating structure engineering design
Wake-fields simulations and Test Structure
RF-kick in the CLIC accelerating structures
T. Agoh (KEK) Introduction CSR emitted in wiggler
Finemet cavity impedance studies
CLIC Main Linac Cavity BPM Snapshot of the work in progress
MDI: Trapped modes and other power losses
RF Power Generation and PETS Design
Summary of the test structure design
F.Marcellini, D.Alesini, A.Ghigo
Electron cloud and collective effects in the FCC-ee Interaction Region
Update on PS Longitudinal Impedance Model
800 MHz 2-Cavity module simulations
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
Système à vide du CLIC: activités en cours
TRANSVERSE RESISTIVE-WALL IMPEDANCE FROM ZOTTER2005’S THEORY
TCTP the CST side F. Caspers, H. Day, A. Grudiev, E. Metral, B. Salvant Acknowledgments: R. Assmann, A. Dallocchio, L. Gentini, C. Zannini Impedance Meeting.
Overview Multi Bunch Beam Dynamics at XFEL
¼ meshed models for Omega3P calculations
Simulation of trapped modes in LHC collimator
Beam impedance of 63mm VM with unshielded Bellows
CEPC Main Ring Cavity Design with HOM Couplers
Beamline Absorber Study Using T3P
Progress in the design of a damped an
Part2: Cavities and Structures
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
TCLIA/TCTV transverse BB impedance versus gap size
Results on RF-Measurements on 3-Convolution HL-LHC fingers
Short-Range Wakes in Elliptical Pipe Geometry
TCLIA/TCTV transverse BB impedance versus gap size
Presentation transcript:

RF aspects of module vacuum system Riccardo Zennaro CERN

Contents Wakefield study in the main linac vacuum chamber Wakefile study in the AC-QUAD main linac intramodule interconnection Wakefield study in the main linac intermodule interconnection

Simple geometry and constant transverse section (with the exceptions of the spacers) 2D problem (HFSS) + longitudinal dependence Problem: resonator in a beam line; (standing waves excited) resistive wakes is the main problem: Copper layer

TE 11 TE TM 01 TM 11 TE

No spacers, r=2.5 mm, dx=1mm x y E H TE 11 TM 11 cutoff=73 GHz TE11 cutoff 2*V/(pC*mm) TE 11 cutoff=35 GHz

x y E H No spacers, r=2.5 mm, dy=1mm TM 11 2*V/(pC*mm)

No spacers, r=2.5 mm beam on axis x y H H 4*V/(pC*mm) TM 01 cutoff=46 GHz

No Spacers Spacers; periods=50 mm, length=2.5mm x y E H

F=36.59 GHz F=36.58GHz

x y E H x y E H x y H H Problem solved (no trapped modes in the pillbox approximation) ?.. In case damping Variation of the beam pipe radius (3.7 mm instead of 2.5 mm) Problem solved (no trapped modes in the pillbox approximation) TE 11 cutoff= from 35 GHz (r=2.5mm) to 24 GHz (r=3.7mm) TM 01 cutoff= from 46 GHz (r=2.5mm) to 31 GHz (r=3.7mm)

Mind the scale x y E H 2*V/(pC*mm)

CLIC module AS/AS QUAD/AS AS/BPM IC (or AS/AS IC) Free space: 30mm20 mm 15mm

Main beam – QUAD/AS intramodule (intermodule) interconnections QUAD/AS intermodule is the same with longer bellows and flexible element Continuous solution Solution with a gap and damping material (under study) From Cedric: CLIC two beam module review 15/09/09

f= GHz Q=1125 f= GHz Q=1310 f=2.020 GHz Q=444 V/pC/mm/2m NB: limit at 2 nd bunch is 7 V/pc/mm/m

mode F (GHz) Q K (V/nC/mm) r x ( Ohm/mm )

Loads:  r =20, tg  =0.2

V/pC/mm/2m

Sealed version with gap Welded version with flexible element Pro: Good RF continuity Con: “dirty” Specific tooling (welding and cutting machine) Axial and radial space needed Pro: “clean” Easy maintenance Availability of linac (procedure tbs) Con: RF properties (to be checked) Damping material Main beam – AS/AS (or AS/BPM) intermodule interconnections From Cedric: CLIC two beam module review 15/09/09

V/pC/mm/2m NB: limit at 2 nd bunch is 7 V/pc/mm/m f: , Q=4279, kick factor 693 V/nC/mm, r x = Ohm/mm

No load Single load Double load V/pC/mm/2m (m)

f=22.05 GHz Q~145 Single load Double load

Double load gap=9mm Double load gap =5mm V/pC/mm/2m Gap=5mmGap=9mm Double load gap=9mm Double load gap =5mm

The transverse wake amplitude due to interconnections seems to be relatively small but, since it is completely undamped (Q~1000), it could be critical (beam dynamics computation to evaluate the criticality). Damping is anyway easy to implement and with good results. Possible optimization for compactness Low impedance of the chamber and small wakefield but large Q factor (~9000); problems in case of build-up Negligible effects of the spacers The geometry can be considered as a simple pillbox for the case of beam on axis or horizontal offset. For this reason the obvious solution is to use a beam pipe of the same radius This solutions provides good results also for the other plane Conclusions Quad vacuum chamber Interconnections