Session 6 (4/21/09) Dynamics of Genomic Organization & Function in Living Cells I Papers covered: 1.Zink et al., Hum Genetics 102 (1998)24 – 51. 2.Pliss.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BIO 404/504 – Molecular Genetics Dr. Berezney Lecture 3: Assembly, Function & Dynamics of Replication Sites in Living Cells.
Advertisements

Bio 405/505 Advanced Cell & Developmental Biology II The Cell Nucleus Lectures Dr. Berezney Lecture 1: Introduction to Nuclear Organization and Genomic.
Bio 405/505 Cell Nucleus Lectures Session 5 (4/16/09) The Nucleolus: rRNA Gene Organization and Function 1) Koberna et al., J Cell Biol 157 (2002)
ABSTRACT Fluorescence Confocal Microscopy (FCM) is nowadays one of the most important tools in biomedicine research. In fact, it makes possible to accurately.
Session 6 Dynamics of Genomic Organization & Function in Living Cells I Background & Figures for: Zink et al., Hum Genet 102 (1998) Structure and.
Bio 525/ Spring, 2010 Nuclear Architecture and Genomic Function Session 6, Part II: The Nucleolus: rRNA Gene Organization and Function: Background and.
Bio 525/ Spring, 2010 Nuclear Architecture and Genomic Function Session 8: Dynamics of Genomic Organization & Function in Living Cells II; Background and.
Lectures 3 & 4 Transcription / Splicing/ Replication in the Nucleus.
Cell nucleus GFP flow analysis from sequences of LSCFM images Isabel Rodrigues 1,2 and João Sanches 2,3
Outline Group Reading Quiz #2 on Thursday (covers week 5 & 6 readings Chromosome Territories Chromatin Organization –Histone H1 Mechanism of Transcription.
Coupled Transcription and Translation Within Nuclei of Mammalian Cells Francisco J. Iborra, 1 Dean A. Jackson, 2 Peter R. Cook 1* Science, Vol. 293, Issue.
Figure 5. A model for rolling-circle amplification of telomeres
Defective phenotypes of ts alp4 and alp6 mutants and the cellular localization of Alp4 and Alp6 at the MTOC. (A) Wild‐type (left, HM123, Table II), alp4‐1891.
Localization of H2B-GFP protein in HeLa cells.
by Samantha C. Lewis, Lauren F. Uchiyama, and Jodi Nunnari
The Spatial Position and Replication Timing of Chromosomal Domains Are Both Established in Early G1 Phase  Daniela S Dimitrova, David M Gilbert  Molecular.
Analysis of the deep-sequencing data.
Volume 112, Issue 6, Pages (March 2003)
Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis Persists during Unperturbed Mitosis
Volume 19, Issue 23, Pages (December 2009)
Michael W. Linhoff, Saurabh K. Garg, Gail Mandel  Cell 
Dynamics of interphase microtubules in Schizosaccharomyces pombe
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Structure of the Papillomavirus DNA-Tethering Complex E2:Brd4 and a Peptide that Ablates HPV Chromosomal Association  Eric A. Abbate, Christian Voitenleitner,
Cell Cycle Control of Kinesin-Mediated Transport of Bik1 (CLIP-170) Regulates Microtubule Stability and Dynein Activation  Pedro Carvalho, Mohan L Gupta,
Drosophila wingless and Pair-Rule Transcripts Localize Apically by Dynein-Mediated Transport of RNA Particles  Gavin S. Wilkie, Ilan Davis  Cell  Volume.
Single-Molecule Microscopy Reveals Plasma Membrane Microdomains Created by Protein-Protein Networks that Exclude or Trap Signaling Molecules in T Cells 
Localization of ASH1 mRNA Particles in Living Yeast
Volume 18, Issue 19, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 26, Issue 18, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
Budding Yeast Has a Minimal Endomembrane System
Volume 113, Issue 7, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2003)
Volume 112, Issue 6, Pages (March 2003)
Kala Subramanian, Tobias Meyer  Cell 
Volume 77, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 99, Issue 4, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages (April 2012)
Rapid Actin-Based Plasticity in Dendritic Spines
Validation of knock‐in cell line and image calibration (related to Fig 1)‏ Validation of knock‐in cell line and image calibration (related to Fig 1) Validation.
Kami Ahmad, Steven Henikoff  Molecular Cell 
Self-Organization of MTOCs Replaces Centrosome Function during Acentrosomal Spindle Assembly in Live Mouse Oocytes  Melina Schuh, Jan Ellenberg  Cell 
Juan Guan, Harrison Liu, Xiaoyu Shi, Siyu Feng, Bo Huang 
Geoffrey J. Guimaraes, Yimin Dong, Bruce F. McEwen, Jennifer G. DeLuca 
The Mitotic Arrest in Response to Hypoxia and of Polar Bodies during Early Embryogenesis Requires Drosophila Mps1  Matthias G. Fischer, Sebastian Heeger,
Modes of Protein Movement that Lead to the Asymmetric Localization of Partner of Numb during Drosophila Neuroblast Division  Bingwei Lu, Larry Ackerman,
Robert T. Wheeler, Lucy Shapiro  Molecular Cell 
Yuri Oleynikov, Robert H. Singer  Current Biology 
Histone–GFP fusion protein enables sensitive analysis of chromosome dynamics in living mammalian cells  Teru Kanda, Kevin F. Sullivan, Geoffrey M. Wahl 
Volume 111, Issue 6, Pages (September 2016)
Directional Persistence of Cell Migration Coincides with Stability of Asymmetric Intracellular Signaling  Michael C. Weiger, Shoeb Ahmed, Erik S. Welf,
Yun Wah Lam, Angus I. Lamond, Matthias Mann, Jens S. Andersen 
A Chromatin Insulator Determines the Nuclear Localization of DNA
Volume 10, Issue 23, Pages (November 2000)
Cortical NuMA enrichment upon Plk1 inhibition is dynein independent.
Karl Emanuel Busch, Jacky Hayles, Paul Nurse, Damian Brunner 
Volume 99, Issue 4, Pages (August 2010)
Manfred Frick, Katja Schmidt, Benjamin J. Nichols  Current Biology 
FRAP and FLIP analysis of GFP-ADAR2 and GFP-ADAR1C-Term.
Fig. 7. Analysis of dFMRP kinetics in dFMRP granules by FRAP
The Spatial Position and Replication Timing of Chromosomal Domains Are Both Established in Early G1 Phase  Daniela S Dimitrova, David M Gilbert  Molecular.
Fig. 2. Immunocytochemical localization of NPC1 in alveolar type II cells. Isolated rat alveolar type II cells were fixed after 24 h in culture, double-labeled.
Marko Kaksonen, Yidi Sun, David G. Drubin  Cell 
Dynamics of DNA Replication in Mammalian Somatic Cells
Melina Schuh, Christian F. Lehner, Stefan Heidmann  Current Biology 
Temporal Regulation of Topoisomerase IV Activity in E. coli
Drosophila wingless and Pair-Rule Transcripts Localize Apically by Dynein-Mediated Transport of RNA Particles  Gavin S. Wilkie, Ilan Davis  Cell  Volume.
Spa2p Functions as a Scaffold-like Protein to Recruit the Mpk1p MAP Kinase Module to Sites of Polarized Growth  Frank van Drogen, Matthias Peter  Current.
Volume 99, Issue 10, Pages (November 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Session 6 (4/21/09) Dynamics of Genomic Organization & Function in Living Cells I Papers covered: 1.Zink et al., Hum Genetics 102 (1998)24 – Pliss et al., Chromosoma, 2009

Domains)

Double Labeling of DNA During Replication. Ma et al J Cell Biol : CldU: Early S Replicating DNA chaseIdU: Mid/Late S Replicating DNA CldU: Early S Replicating DNA chase IdU: Mid/Late S Replicating DNA Mid S Late S G2 Mitosis

Visualization of Replication Sites (Fluorescence and Electron Microscopy) Early SMid SLate S

Zink et al., Hum Genetics 102 (1998) 24 – 51. Structure and dynamics of human interphase chromosome territories in vivo

Major conclusions of Zink et al., ) Replication-labeled chromatin domains maintain structural integrity following replication (Fig 1 & 2). 2) Replication labeled chromatin domains undergo constant motion and configuration changes (Fig 3 & 4). 3) This motion is constrained to the spatial limits within individual chromosome territories (Fig 3 & 4).

Conclusion 1 Replication-labeled chromatin domains maintain structural integrity following replication (Fig 1 & 2).

Zink D, Cremer T, Saffrich R, Fischer R, Trendelenburg MF, Ansorge W, Stelzer EH. Structure and dynamics of human interphase chromosome territories in vivo. Hum Genet. 1998;102: Zink et al, Hum Genet, 1998, Figure 1. Replication- labeled and segregated human chromatids Cultures of human diploid fibroblasts were grown after initial replication labeling for several cell cycles. All panels show chromatids of fixed cells labelled with IdU/CldU according to the scheme: 2 h IdU pulse/4 h chase/2 h CldU pulse. Both the IdU and the CldU label are depicted in green in panels A–E. C Light optical section through a pre-S-phase nucleus with replication-labeled chromatid territories (green). D Subsequent light optical section from the same nuclear plane showing the two painted 15q territories (red; arrow and arrowhead). E Overlay of the images shown in C and D. In panels F–H the IdU label is shown in green and the CldU label is depicted in red.

Zink et al, Hum Genet, Figure 2: Replication-labelled and segregated human chromatids of human neuroblastoma cells (SH-EP N14; A, B) and diploid fibroblasts (C, D). Panel D shows BrdU labelled chromatid territories; the other panels depict Cy3-AP3-dUTP-labelled chromatids. Panels A and D show fixed chromatids, while panels B and C display in vivo images. A Anaphase depicting two completely replication- labelled chromatids. The inset shows the DAPI counterstain. B Optical section (Cy3 detection) of an interphase nucleus from the same slide as the anaphase shown in A. The inset shows an enlargement of one territory (arrowhead). C Video image (non-confocal) of several typical replication-labelled chromatid territories observed in a nucleus 1 week after microinjection of Cy3-AP3- dUTP. D Optical section of a nucleus (containing whole BrdU-labelled chromatid territories.

Conclusions 2 & 3 (Fig 3 & 4) Replication labeled chromatin domains undergo constant motion and configuration changes. This motion is constrained to the spatial limits within individual chromosome territories.

Zink et al, Hum Genet, 1998 Figure 3: In vivo images of HeLa cells grown for several cell cycles after Cy3-AP3-dUTP microinjection. Time-Lapse Microscopy

Zink et al, Hum Genet, 1998 Figure 3 II: In vivo images of HeLa cells grown for several cell cycles after Cy3-AP3-dUTP microinjection.

Zink et al, Hum Genet, 1998 Figure 4: Time-lapse recording of one nucleus from the neuroblastoma cell line.

Conclusions of Zink et al., ) Replication-labeled chromatin domains maintain structural integrity following replication (Fig 1 & 2). 2) Replication labeled chromatin domains undergo constant motion and configuration changes (Fig 3 & 4). 3) This motion is constrained to the spatial limits within individual chromosome territories (Fig 3 & 4).

Chromatin dynamics is correlated with replication timing Pliss A, Malyavantham K, Bhattacharya S, Zeitz M, Berezney R. Chromosoma Mar 19.

Major Conclusions of Pliss et al., Chromosoma )Chromatin configuration includes both discrete domains and “relaxed” or “diffuse” pool (Fig 1 & 2) 2)Chromatin dynamics includes both linear motion of chromatin domains and transformations of configuration (Fig 1 & 2) 3)Both these parameters of chromatin dynamics are significantly higher in chromatin replicated in early S then in mid and late S-phase (Fig 2 & 3). 4)Motion of chromatin is in complex relation with gene expression (Fig 4)

Conclusion 1 Chromatin configuration includes both discrete domains and “relaxed” or “diffuse” pool (Fig 1 & 2) Conclusion 2 Chromatin dynamics includes both linear motion of chromatin domains and transformations of configuration (Fig 1 & 2)

Fig. 1(a) Early S-phase labeled chromatin in living HeLa cells 3 days following microinjection of Cy3- dUTP. Left: 2D maximal intensity projection of a deconvolved z-stack of optical sections acquired with an inverted fluorescence microscope. Right: a single confocal section.

Fig. 1(b)Comparison of the dynamics of early, mid, and late S-phase replicating chromatin domains

Fig 1(c) Chromatin fluctuates between discrete and diffuse configurations in live cells. HeLa cell labeled in early S-phase was acquired in time-lapse mode and a representative area was cropped.

Conclusion 3 Both chromatin linear motion and reconfigurations are significantly higher in chromatin replicated in early S then in mid and late S-phase (Fig 2 & 3).

Fig 2(a) Schematic illustrating the segregation of replication labeled chromatin. Cell is labeled in two channels for early- (red) and mid- or late- (green) S- phase replicating chromatin. Several generations following the labeling, segregation of the label allows to distinguish individual chromosome territories.

Fig 2 (b) Chromosome territory exhibiting signal for both early and mid S-replicating chromatin domains (ChrD) (red and green channels, respectively)acquired with 3-min intervals (upper row). Second and fourth row: mid and early S-replicating ChrD, respectively, were segmented, corrected for cell movement, and merged. Earlier time point contours (red), subsequent time point (green). Third and fifth rows: enlarged centers of gravity (centroids) of contoured early and mid S replicating ChrD at consecutive 3-min intervals were merged as described above. Centroids of early (row 5, right panel) and mid S (row 3, right panel) replicating ChrD at 0 and 12 min were merged. Corresponding centroids that shifted 4 pixels (~0.3 μm) or less were colored white. (c) White outlined area on the upper row was enlarged for each channel individually to show pronounced differences in the degree of configuration and position changes of early versus mid S-labeled ChrD.

Fig. 3 Comparison of the average translation motion of early, mid, and late S-phase replicating chromatin domains (ChrD).

Fig 3 (e, f ) Effect of transcription inhibitors on chromatin dynamics. (e) Translational motion of the early S-replicated ChrD is significantly reduced by actinomycin D treatment with no significant reduction by α- amanitin. (f ) Time-lapse analysis for motion following actinomycin D treatment.

Conclusion 4 Motion of chromatin is in complex relation with gene expression (Fig 4)

Fig. 4 Visualization of the transcription sites, cDNA, and early S-labeled chromatin indicates association of transcription with relaxed chromatin surrounding the discrete ChrD.

BrdU Pulse 25 min, then chase 150 min; BrdU green channel, cDNA red channel

Major Conclusions of Pliss et al., Chromosoma )Chromatin configuration includes both discrete domains and “relaxed” or “diffuse” pool (Fig 1 & 2) 2)Chromatin dynamics includes both linear motion of chromatin domains and transformations of configuration (Fig 1 & 2) 3)Both these parameters of chromatin dynamics are significantly higher in chromatin replicated in early S then in mid and late S-phase (Fig 2 & 3). 4)Motion of chromatin is in complex relation with gene expression (Fig 4)

Background & Figures for: Phair & Misteli Nature (2000), 404: High mobility of proteins in the mammalian cell nucleus

Mapping of the DNA and proteins in the living cells: Immunocytochemical tools: Labeling with antibodies at both light and electron microscopy level (proteins, nascent DNA and RNA in fixed cells) FISH approach (specific DNA and RNA sequences in fixed cells) Fluorescent proteins fusions (GFP, EGFP, CFP, YFP etc in both fixed and live cells)

Major Conclusions of Phair and Misteli, ) GFP constructs of SF2/ASF, fibrillarin, and HMG-17, co-localize with endogenous proteins and apparently their function is not altered 2) FRAP and FLIP experiments indicate energy independent high mobility for SF2/ASF, fibrillarin, and HMG-17 proteins. FLIP experiments also demonstrate the absence of long term associations of these molecules with various nuclear compartments

Conclusion 1, Figure 1 GFP constructs of SF2/ASF, fibrillarin, and HMG-17, co-localize with endogenous proteins and apparently their function is not altered

Phair and Misteli 2000, Figure 1, Colocalization of GFP-fusion constructs with endogenous proteins.

Conclusion 2, Figure FRAP and FLIP experiments indicate energy independent high mobility for SF2/ASF, fibrillarin, and HMG-17 proteins. FLIP experiments also demonstrate the absence of long term associations of these molecules with various nuclear compartments

FRAP FLIP Schematic representation of FRAP and FLIP techniques

Phair and Misteli 2000, Figure 2, FRAP of nucleoplasmic regions and kinetics of recovery GFP-HMG-17 GFP-SF2/ASF GFP-Fibrillarin

Phair and Misteli 2000, Figure 2 cont, FRAP of nucleoplasmic regions and kinetics of recovery

Phair and Misteli 2000, Figure 3 FRAP of nuclear compartments and kinetics of recovery GFP-SF2/ASF GFP-Fibrillarin

Phair and Misteli 2000, Figure 4 FLIP after bleaching of nucleoplasmic area

Major Conclusions of Phair and Misteli, ) GFP constructs of SF2/ASF, fibrillarin, and HMG-17, co-localize with endogenous proteins and apparently their function is not altered 2) FRAP and FLIP experiments indicate energy independent high mobility for SF2/ASF, fibrillarin, and HMG-17 proteins. FLIP experiments also demonstrate the absence of long term associations of these molecules with various nuclear compartments