CSIRO; Swinburne Error Recognition Emil Lenc (and Arin) University of Sydney / CAASTRO www.caastro.org CASS Radio Astronomy School 2014 Based on lectures.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Crash Course in Radio Astronomy and Interferometry: 4
Advertisements

A Crash Course in Radio Astronomy and Interferometry: 2
CSIRO; Swinburne Calibration & Editing Emil Lenc University of Sydney / CAASTRO CASS Radio Astronomy School 2014 Based on lectures given.
Basics of mm interferometry Turku Summer School – June 2009 Sébastien Muller Nordic ARC Onsala Space Observatory, Sweden.
Imaging & Deconvolution Interferometry, Visibilities ➛ Image, Deconvolution methods CASS Radio Astronomy School 2010 Emil Lenc ASKAP Software Scientist.
Fourier Transform A Fourier Transform is an integral transform that re-expresses a function in terms of different sine waves of varying amplitudes, wavelengths,
Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array Expanded Very Large Array Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope Very Long Baseline Array Whoever North American.
CS 551 / CS 645 Antialiasing. What is a pixel? A pixel is not… –A box –A disk –A teeny tiny little light A pixel is a point –It has no dimension –It occupies.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Lecture 13 Further with interferometry – Resolution and the field of view; Binning in frequency and.
SKADS: Array Configuration Studies Implementation of Figures-of-Merit on Spatial-Dynamic-Range Progress made & Current status Dharam V. Lal & Andrei P.
Interferometric Spectral Line Imaging Martin Zwaan (Chapters of synthesis imaging book)
Image Analysis Jim Lovell ATNF Synthesis Imaging Workshop May 2003.
Image Analysis Jim Lovell ATNF Synthesis Imaging Workshop September 2001.
Twelfth Synthesis Imaging Workshop 2010 June 8-15 Widefield Imaging II: Mosaicing Juergen Ott (NRAO)
lecture 5, Sampling and the Nyquist Condition Sampling Outline  FT of comb function  Sampling Nyquist Condition  sinc interpolation Truncation.
Interference Daniel Mitchell, ATNF and Sydney University.
Environmental Data Analysis with MatLab Lecture 24: Confidence Limits of Spectra; Bootstraps.
1 Synthesis Imaging Workshop Error recognition R. D. Ekers Narrabri, 20 Sep 2006.
1 Synthesis Imaging Workshop Error recognition R. D. Ekers Narrabri, 14 May 2003.
Twelfth Synthesis Imaging Workshop 2010 June 8-15 High Fidelity Imaging Rick Perley, NRAO-Socorro.
CSIRO; Swinburne Error Recognition Emil Lenc University of Sydney / CAASTRO CASS Radio Astronomy School 2012 Based on lectures given previously.
Interferometry Basics
Topic 7 - Fourier Transforms DIGITAL IMAGE PROCESSING Course 3624 Department of Physics and Astronomy Professor Bob Warwick.
14 Sep 1998R D Ekers - Synth Image Workshop: INTRODUCTION 1 Synthesis Imaging Workshop Introduction R. D. Ekers 14 Sep 1998.
Tenth Summer Synthesis Imaging Workshop University of New Mexico, June 13-20, 2006 ERROR RECOGNITION & IMAGE ANALYSIS Ed Fomalont (NRAO)
Ninth Synthesis Imaging Summer School Socorro, June 15-22, 2004 Mosaicing Tim Cornwell.
Solar observation modes: Commissioning and operational C. Vocks and G. Mann 1. Spectrometer and imaging modes 2. Commissioning proposals 3. Operational.
Phased Array Feeds John O’Sullivan SKANZ 2012 CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science,
Wideband Imaging and Measurements ASTRONOMY AND SPACE SCIENCE Jamie Stevens | ATCA Senior Systems Scientist / ATCA Lead Scientist 2 October 2014.
Survey Quality Jim Condon NRAO, Charlottesville. Survey Qualities Leiden 2011 Feb 25 Point-source detection limit S lim Resolution Ω s Brightness sensitivity.
1 The OSKAR Simulator (Version 2!) AAVP Workshop, ASTRON, 15 th December 2011 Fred Dulwich, Ben Mort, Stef Salvini.
S.T. MyersEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting September 6-7, 2007 EVLA Algorithm Research & Development Steven T. Myers (NRAO) CASA Project Scientist with.
Which dipoles to use to optimize survey speed? –What tapering? –Trade-off between sensitivity, FOV and low side-lobe levels –Station beam stability, pointing.
RadioNet First Software Forum, Jodrell Bank – 01Mar05 1 Algorthmic Issues from the First RadioNet Software Forum – a synthesis Steven T. Myers National.
Tod R. Lauer (NOAO) July 19, 2010 The Formation of Astronomical Images Tod R. Lauer.
CABB Data Reduction Review Summary of recommendations Dave McConnell June 2011.
Ninth Synthesis Imaging Summer School Socorro, June 15-22, 2004 Spectral Line II John Hibbard.
Fundamental limits of radio interferometers: Source parameter estimation Cathryn Trott Randall Wayth Steven Tingay Curtin University International Centre.
Wide-field imaging Max Voronkov (filling up for Tim Cornwell) Software Scientist – ASKAP 1 st October 2010.
Мulti-frequency VLA observations of M87. Observations’ parameters Test VLA observations (configuration D) of M87 (RA=12:28, Dec=12:40) took place on November.
Non-coplanar arrays Wide field imaging Non-copalanar arrays Kumar Golap Tim Cornwell.
Sanjay BhatnagarEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting May 8-9, EVLA Algorithm Research & Development Progress & Plans Sanjay Bhatnagar CASA/EVLA.
Observing Strategies at cm wavelengths Making good decisions Jessica Chapman Synthesis Workshop May 2003.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Lecture 14 Reprise: dirty beam, dirty image. Sensitivity Wide-band imaging Weighting –Uniform vs Natural.
Tenth Summer Synthesis Imaging Workshop University of New Mexico, June 13-20, 2006 High Dynamic Range Imaging Craig Walker.
The Australia Telescope National Facility Ray Norris CSIRO ATNF.
Ninth Synthesis Imaging Summer School Socorro, June 15-22, 2004 ERROR RECOGNITION and IMAGE ANALYSIS Ed Fomalont.
Ninth Synthesis Imaging Summer School Socorro, June 15-22, 2004 High Dynamic Range Imaging Craig Walker.
Error Recognition in Interferometric Imaging A Lecture Presented at the 8 th Synthesis Imaging Summer School Socorro, New Mexico 20 June 2002 Steven T.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Lecture 16 Further with interferometry – Digital correlation Earth-rotation synthesis and non-planar.
Fourier Transform.
WIDE-FIELD IMAGING IN CLASSIC AIPS Eric W. Greisen National Radio Astronomy Observatory Socorro, NM, USA.
In conclusion the intensity level of the CCD is linear up to the saturation limit, but there is a spilling of charges well before the saturation if.
1/20 Radio interferometric imaging of spatial structure that varies with time and frequency Urvashi Rau ( NRAO ) Wednesday Lunch Talk 29 Aug 2012 Outline.
Imaging issues Full beam, full bandwidth, full Stokes noise limited imaging Algorithmic Requirements: –PB corrections: Rotation, Freq. & Poln. dependence,
Self-calibration Steven Tingay Swinburne University of Technology
NRAO VLA Archive Survey
Lecture 15 Deconvolution CLEAN MEM Why does CLEAN work? Parallel CLEAN
CLEAN: Iterative Deconvolution
following the lectures of Ron Ekers (and others)
Observing Strategies for the Compact Array
Imaging and Calibration Challenges
Wide-field imaging Max Voronkov (filling up for Tim Cornwell)
ERROR RECOGNITION & IMAGE ANALYSIS
Deconvolution and Multi frequency synthesis
Image Error Analysis Fourier-domain analysis of errors.
Introduction to Difmap
Error Recognition in Interferometric Imaging
EVLA Algorithm Research & Development
21 cm Foreground Subtraction in the Image Plane and in the uv-Plane
Presentation transcript:

CSIRO; Swinburne Error Recognition Emil Lenc (and Arin) University of Sydney / CAASTRO CASS Radio Astronomy School 2014 Based on lectures given previously by Ron Ekers and Steven Tingay

Error Recognition Some are hard to fixSome are easy to fix Some errors are easy to recognise

Where do errors occur? ›Most errors and defects occur in the uv plane -Measurement errors (imperfect calibration – see Emil Lenc’s Calibration and Editing talk). -Approximations made in the uv plane. -Approximations made in the transform to the image plane. ›Some are due to manipulations in the image plane. -Deconvolution (see Rick Perley’s talk). ›What we usually care about are effects in the image plane (not always e.g. spectral line). ›The relative contribution of certain errors will vary depending on the nature of the observation.

Image or uv plane? ›We need to work between the uv plane and the image plane. -Different types of errors may be more obvious in one plane than the other. -A good understanding of the relationship between both planes helps (see John Dickey’s talk on Fourier Transforms). ›Errors obey Fourier transform relations. -Narrow features transform to wide features and vice versa. -Symmetries important – real/imaginary, odd/even, point/line/ring. -The transform of a serious error may not be serious! -Some effects are diluted by the number of other samples.

General form of errors ›Additive errors (out-of-field sources, RFI, cross-talk, baseline-based errors, noise) -V + ε  I + F[ε] ›Multiplicative errors (uv-coverage effects, gain errors, atmospheric effects) -V  ε  I ★ F[ε] ›Convolutional errors (primary beam effect, convolutional gridding) -V ★ ε  I  F[ε] ›Other errors -Bandwidth and time average smearing. -Non-coplanar effects (see Wide Field Imaging talk by Martin Bell) -Deconvolutional errors (see Deconvolution talk by Rick Perley) -Software!!! (see everyone!)

Error Diagnosis ›If ε is pure real, then the form of the error in the uv plane is a real and even function i.e. F[ε] will be symmetric. -Such errors are often due to amplitude calibration errors. ›If ε has an imaginary component, then the form of the error in the uv plane is complex and odd i.e. F[ε] will be asymmetric. -Such errors are often due to phase calibration errors. ›Short duration errors -Localized in uv plane but distributed in image plane. -Narrow features in uv are extended in orthogonal direction in image. ›Long timescale errors -Ridge in uv plane causes corrugations in image plane -Ring in uv plane causes concentric “Bessel” rings in image plane

Gain Errors Adapted from Myers deg phase error anti-symmetric ridges 20% amp error symmetric ridges

Additive Errors: RFI Dirty Map PSF Observation of 1 Jy source

Finding RFI Observation of 1 Jy source See Mark’s talk for more on removing RFI.

The Bigger Picture

>6 deg!

The Bigger Picture

Multiplicative Errors Dirty Map PSF

Primary Beam Error Common in widefield imaging/instruments Deconvolved Peeled Peeling applicable to transient and variable sources too.

Point Deconvolution Errors Pixel centredPixel not centred

Point Deconvolution Errors

Deconvolution Errors (Large-scale Structure) True sky Standard CLEAN Standard CLEAN does not handle large-scale structure well – results in negative bowls. More modern algorithms such as Multi-scale CLEAN are necessary to minimise deconvolution errors (see Rick Perley’s talk).

Wideband Deconvolution Errors Dirty Image (2.1 GHz CABB Obs) PSF

Wideband Deconvolution Errors Deconvolved Image Standard CLEAN

Wideband Deconvolution Errors Source SED What standard CLEAN fits with

Wideband Deconvolution Errors Deconvolved Image Multi-frequency CLEAN (see Rick Perley’s talk)

Missing short baselines No short baselines Paul Rayner 2001 Can only be fixed with additional data. See Shari’s talk on observing strategies.

Smearing Errors Bandwidth average smearing Average 512x1MHz band Time-average smearing Averaging 1000s

Finding the errors in your way ›Avoid sausage factory processing (at least initially) -Try to understand each processing step. -Look closely at the data after each step, check and image calibrators. -Does the data look plausible. ›Take a different perspective -Look at your data in different domains (time, uv, image, frequency). -Plot different combinations of variables in different spaces. -Look at residuals, FT your dirty image, FT your beam. ›Process your data in different ways -Try different software, algorithms. -Partition and process your data in different ways -Try split in time chunks, split up frequency band -Different weighting, different uv tapers.

Error reduction … Process Have errors been beaten to submission? Determine greatest contributing error Do Science Attempt to reduce effect of error No Yes

What’s happening? 5.5 GHz observation, 3 configurations, 2 GHz bandwidth 2000:1 dynamic range

What’s happening ›Amplitude calibration errors. ›Hot spot near edge of 4.5 GHz beam (outside 6.5 GHz beam) -Causes steepening of source spectra. -Causes position dependent effects. -Will need to consider peeling techniques. ›Spectral variation throughout the image (flat and steep) -Must use multi-frequency deconvolution. ›Structures on many different scales. -Must use appropriate deconvolution algorithms. ›North-west hot spot is bright and slightly extended. -Difficult to deconvolve accurately. -Small cell size or uv-subtract component.

What’s happening? 38,000:1 dynamic range

1. Can you deal with something new? What’s happening? A.Heat haze B.Antenna deformation C.Ionosphere D.Compression artifacts Low frequency MWA obs. ✔

2. Be daring in your search What’s happening? A.Primary Beam error B.RFI C.Venetian blinds left open D.Deconvolution error ✔

3. Can you work this out? What’s happening? A.Amplitude errors B.Cosmic ray C.Bandwidth smearing D.RFI ✔

4. Dare to solve this! What’s happening? A.Amplitude errors B.Phase of moon incorrect C.Position-dependent errors D.Source outside imaged field ✔

5. Don’t give up! What’s happening? A.RFI B.Bandwidth smearing C.Daylight savings not set D.Position-dependent errors ✔

6. Are you able to solve this? What’s happening? A.Amplitude errors B.Tartan from wrong clan C.Data stored in HEX D.Phase errors ✔

7. A tricky problem What’s happening? A.Missing short baselines B.Missing long baselines C.Missing astronomer D.Alien Resurrection ✔

8. End of game question What’s happening? A.Amplitude errors B.Phase errors C.Deconvolution errors D.Position-dep. errors E.Almost everything ✔

Acknowledgements ›This talk is based on talks by: -Steven Tingay -Ron Ekers -ASP Conference Series Vol. 180, p.321 – available online ›Special thanks to Arin Lenc for running the pop quiz.