Maturation of Data Assimilation Over the Last Two Decades John C. Derber Environmental Modeling Center NCEP/NWS/NOAA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Numerical Weather Prediction (Met DA) The Analysis of Satellite Data
Advertisements

Numerical Weather Prediction (Met DA) The Analysis of Satellite Data
ECMWF/EUMETSAT NWP-SAF Satellite data assimilation Training Course
Slide 1 ECMWF Training Course - The Global Observing System - 06/2013 The Satellite Global Observing System Stephen English 1.A brief introduction to the.
Numerical Weather Prediction (Met DA) The Analysis of Satellite Data lecture 2 Tony McNally ECMWF.
A fast physical algorithm for hyperspectral sounding retrieval Zhenglong Li #, Jun Li #, Timothy J. and M. Paul Menzel # # Cooperative Institute.
© The Aerospace Corporation 2014 Observation Impact on WRF Model Forecast Accuracy over Southwest Asia Michael D. McAtee Environmental Satellite Systems.
Data Assimilation Andrew Collard. Overview Introduction to Atmospheric Data Assimilation Control Variables Observations Background Error Covariance Summary.
ECMWF COSPAR Training Fortaleza, Brasil, 11-Nov A very first introduction to data assimilation for NWP systems Joaquín Muñoz Sabater ECMWF.
The impact of targeted observations from 2011 Winter Storms Reconnaissance on deterministic forecast accuracy Tom Hamill NOAA Earth System Research Lab,
Satellite Radiance Assimilation John C. Derber Environmental Modeling Center NCEP/NWS/NOAA With input from: Many others.
COPC Meeting, Monterey, May 28-29, 2008 The Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation; A Research to Operations transition organization Lars Peter Riishojgaard.
Slide 1 IPWG, Beijing, October 2008 Slide 1 Assimilation of rain and cloud-affected microwave radiances at ECMWF Alan Geer, Peter Bauer, Philippe.
ATS 351 Lecture 8 Satellites
CORP Symposium Fort Collins, CO August 16, 2006 Session 3: NPOESS AND GOES-R Applications Tropical Cyclone Applications Ray Zehr, NESDIS / RAMM.
Recent Progress on High Impact Weather Forecast with GOES ‐ R and Advanced IR Soundings Jun Li 1, Jinlong Li 1, Jing Zheng 1, Tim Schmit 2, and Hui Liu.
1 Use of Ocean Surface Winds in NCEP’s Global Data Assimilation System Stephen J. Lord Director NCEP Environmental Modeling Center NCEP: “where America’s.
Sean P.F. Casey 1,2,3,4, Lars Peter Riishojgaard 2,3, Michiko Masutani 3,5, Jack Woollen 3,5, Tong Zhu 3,4 and Robert Atlas 6 1 Cooperative Institute for.
ECMWF – 1© European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Developments in the use of AMSU-A, ATMS and HIRS data at ECMWF Heather Lawrence, first-year.
Data assimilation of polar orbiting satellites at ECMWF
Operational Global Model Plans John Derber. Timeline July 25, 2013: Completion of phase 1 WCOSS transition August 20, 2013: GDAS/GFS model/analysis upgrade.
Model & Satellite Data Dr Ian Brooks. ENVI 1400 : Meteorology and Forecasting2.
Introduction to Data Assimilation: Lecture 2
Slide 1 Model Assimilation of Satellite Observations and Retrievals Andrew Collard
1 NCEP data assimilation systems status and plans John C. Derber Environmental Modeling Center NCEP/NWS/NOAA With input from: Many others.
Numerical Weather Prediction (Met DA) The Analysis of Satellite Data (lecture 1:Basic Concepts) Tony McNally ECMWF.
Lecture 6 Observational network Direct measurements (in situ= in place) Indirect measurements, remote sensing Application of satellite observations to.
Slide 1 Sakari Uppala and Dick Dee European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts ECMWF reanalysis: present and future.
ECMWF NAEDEX 2012 – ECMWF Status Report – Stephen Engilsh ECMWF Status Report Stephen English ECMWF.
Lessons on Satellite Meteorology Part VII: Metop Introduction to Metop Instruments The sounders with focus on IASI The GRAS instrument The ASCAT scatterometer.
CrIS Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to NPOESS Program restrictions. ITT INDUSTRIES AER BOMEM BALL DRS EDR Algorithms for.
Future Role of Satellite Data in NCEP’s Numerical Models GOES Users Conference Boulder, CO Dr. Louis Uccellini Director, NCEP October 1, 2002 NCEP: “Where.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Improving Hurricane Intensity.
Challenges and practical applications of data assimilation in numerical weather prediction Data Assimilation Education Forum Part I: Overview of Data Assimilation.
05/06/2016 Juma Al-Maskari, 1 Tropical Cyclones.
Data assimilation and forecasting the weather (!) Eugenia Kalnay and many friends University of Maryland.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Infrared Temperature and.
Assimilation of Satellite Radiances into LM with 1D-Var and Nudging Reinhold, Christoph, Francesca, Blazej, Piotr, Iulia, Michael, Vadim DWD, ARPA-SIM,
Covariance Modeling “Where America’s Climate, Weather, Ocean and Space Weather Services Begin” JCSDA Summer Colloquium July 27, 2015 Presented by John.
1 Using water vapor measurements from hyperspectral advanced IR sounder (AIRS) for tropical cyclone forecast Jun Hui Liu #, Jinlong and Tim.
Weather forecasting by computer Michael Revell NIWA
Hyperspectral Infrared Alone Cloudy Sounding Algorithm Development Objective and Summary To prepare for the synergistic use of data from the high-temporal.
OPC Anticipated Operational Impacts During NESDIS CIP Invocation Fall 2009 COPC Meeting Allan Darling.
EWGLAM Oct Some recent developments in the ECMWF model Mariano Hortal ECMWF Thanks to: A. Beljars (physics), E. Holm (humidity analysis)
1 Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation (NASA, NCEP, NESDIS, OAR) Louis W. Uccellini Director, NCEP November 29, 2001.
AIRS Radiance and Geophysical Products: Methodology and Validation Mitch Goldberg, Larry McMillin NOAA/NESDIS Walter Wolf, Lihang Zhou, Yanni Qu and M.
Lennart Bengtsson ESSC, Uni. Reading THORPEX Conference December 2004 Predictability and predictive skill of weather systems and atmospheric flow patterns.
JAG/ODAA Fall Meeting, October The Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation (JCSDA); Program Overview Presenter: S.-A. Boukabara Materials.
1 NCEP Current Data Usage and Future Plans Dr. Bradley Ballish NCEP/NCO/PMB Presentation to JAG/ODAA October 2008 at OFCM “Where America’s Climate and.
The Impact of Data Assimilation on a Mesoscale Model of the New Zealand Region (NZLAM-VAR) P. Andrews, H. Oliver, M. Uddstrom, A. Korpela X. Zheng and.
Layered Water Vapor Quick Guide by NASA / SPoRT and CIRA Why is the Layered Water Vapor Product important? Water vapor is essential for creating clouds,
Early Results from AIRS and Risk Reduction Benefits for other Advanced Infrared Sounders Mitchell D. Goldberg NOAA/NESDIS Center for Satellite Applications.
DIRECT READOUT APPLICATIONS USING ATOVS ANTHONY L. REALE NOAA/NESDIS OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS.
Blended Sea Surface Temperature EnhancementsPolar Winds Blended Hydrometeorological Products Blended Total Ozone Products are derived by tracking cloud.
© Crown copyright Met Office Assimilating cloud affected infrared radiances at the Met Office Ed Pavelin and Roger Saunders, Met Office, Exeter.
Joint Polar Satellite System (JPSS) John Furgerson, NOAA User Liaison Joint Polar Satellite System.
1. Participating Scientists NOAA/NWS/NCEP/EMC Steve Lord,Michiko Masutani Jack Woollen, Weiyu Yang Russ Treadon, John Derber Robert Kistler NOAA/NWS/NCEP/NCO.
An Overview of Satellite Rainfall Estimation for Flash Flood Monitoring Timothy Love NOAA Climate Prediction Center with USAID- FEWS-NET, MFEWS, AFN Presented.
NOAA Environmental Technology Laboratory Gary A. Wick Observed Differences Between Infrared and Microwave Products Detailed comparisons between infrared.
A Modeling and Data Assimilation Perspective Jim Yoe Chief Administration Officer Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation (JCDSA) NOAA Satellite Science.
© Crown copyright Met Office Report to 22 nd NAEDEX Meeting Roger Saunders + many others, Met Office, Exeter.
The Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation: Science Workshop 2006 John Le Marshall Director, JCSDA.
Global vs mesoscale ATOVS assimilation at the Met Office Global Large obs error (4 K) NESDIS 1B radiances NOAA-15 & 16 HIRS and AMSU thinned to 154 km.
Radiance Simulation System for OSSE  Objectives  To evaluate the impact of observing system data under the context of numerical weather analysis and.
June 20, 2005Workshop on Chemical data assimilation and data needs Data Assimilation Methods Experience from operational meteorological assimilation John.
ECMWF/EUMETSAT NWP-SAF Satellite data assimilation Training Course
Who We Are SSEC (Space Science and Engineering Center) is part of the Graduate School of the University of Wisconsin-Madison (UW). SSEC hosts CIMSS (Cooperative.
In the past thirty five years NOAA, with help from NASA, has established a remote sensing capability on polar and geostationary platforms that has proven.
Project Team: Mark Buehner Cecilien Charette Bin He Peter Houtekamer
Observational Data Source Impacts In The NCEP GDAS
Presentation transcript:

Maturation of Data Assimilation Over the Last Two Decades John C. Derber Environmental Modeling Center NCEP/NWS/NOAA

Roger Daley (1996) ECMWF seminar on data assimilation “Fifteen years ago, data assimilation was a minor and often neglected sub-discipline of numerical weather prediction. The situation is very different today. Data assimilation in now felt to be important for all climate/environmental monitoring and estimating the ocean state. There has been great advances in both modelling and instrumentation for a variety of atmospheric phenomena and variables, and data assimilation provides the bridge between them.”

Optimal Interpolation (1980s) With the advent of optimal interpolation, analysis schemes transitioned from empirical techniques to theoretically based techniques. With these techniques, one could begin to use information on: –Observations and observation errors –Short term forecasts and forecast errors However, for most applications of optimal interpolation, many approximations had to be made.

Variational assimilation (1990s and 2000s) J = J b + J o + J c J = (x-x b ) T B -1 (x-x b ) + (H(x)-y 0 ) T (E+F) -1 (H(x)-y 0 ) + J C J = Fit to background + Fit to observations + constraints x= Analysis x b = Background B= Background error covariance H= Forward model y 0 = Observations E+F= R = Instrument error + Representativeness error J C = Constraint term

Variational assimilation Inclusion of observation operator (H), transforming the analysis variable into the form of the observation operator, which in turn allowed; –Inclusion of radiances and other indirect observations –Definition of analysis variables different than the model variables or observations –Inclusion of forecast model in interpolation operator (4DVAR) Use of all observations at once, eliminating many approximations/complex codes which were prone to failure Allowed inclusion of additional constraint terms

Variational Assimilation Background error covariances –Background error variance now approximately ½ radiosonde error variance (ECMWF) –Fully non-separable covariance matrices –Inclusion of constraints within background error –Ongoing research in situation dependent background errors

Isotropic Error Correlation in Valley Plotted Over Utah Topography obs influence extends into mountains indiscriminately

Anisotropic Error Correlation in Valley Plotted Over Utah Topography obs influence restricted to areas of similar elevation

Anisotropic Error Correlation on Slope Plotted Over Utah Topography obs influence restricted to areas of similar elevation

Anisotropic Error Correlation on Mt Top Plotted Over Utah Topography obs influence restricted to areas of similar elevation

Observations No large scale data voids. Number of observations used in assimilation increasing rapidly (but not as rapidly as number of observations). Both operational and non-operational satellite data being used operationally. Increased use of data assimilation systems in calibration/validation activities for satellites. Expected data impact from data producers always overoptimistic.

Observations Adequate fast forward models for observations still major problem, e.g., –Precipitation (satellite/radar) –Clouds (IR and microwave) –Lightning Biases in forward models/observations greatly impact the usefulness of data

Variational Assimilation Surprises Computational cost for 3DVAR similar to OI (even with all observations used together). Much of need for Nonlinear Normal Mode Initialization came from data selection. Direct use of radiances produces significant impacts in both hemispheres. –In Southern Hemisphere, significantly stronger circulations were produced using radiances. –Southern Hemisphere forecast skill has become similar to Northern Hemisphere skill. Since NH much better observed, is SH easier? –Microwave instruments dominate impact.

Future? Extension of data assimilation techniques to: –Additional analysis variables (including cloud water/ice, etc.) –Smaller scales –Tropical disturbances –Land/ice/ocean surfaces Inclusion of improved bias correction for background and all types of observations Inclusion of observation specific observational/representativeness errors

Future ? Use of situation dependent background errors Trying to catch up with volume of data from new observing platforms Improved models and physics within analysis systems Ensembles? New systems judged on performance. With data assimilation you must do everything right!

Summary Assimilation is the integration of all knowledge of the atmosphere (observations, physics, statistics) to produce the best estimate of the real state of the atmosphere. Data assimilation systems have matured and become fairly good at large scales for the basic meteorological variables. Assimilation has advanced from a necessary evil to an essential scientifically-based component of numerical weather prediction. However, there are many “research groups” still using empirically based techniques and incomplete systems.

Summary Greatest potential improvement is in improved background error estimates (not increasing the number of observations). Unrealistic expectations from data providers in terms of data impacts. Operational community has lead the scientific development of modern data assimilation systems. In data assimilation, details are extremely important – you must do everything right!

Analysis variables Wind, temperature and surface pressure no longer sufficient. Additional variables: –Cloud ice and water –Ozone and other constituent gases –Surface variables (soil moisture, surface temperature, snow, etc. –Aerosols –Oceans –Etc.

Anisotropic Error Correlation on Mt Top Plotted Over Utah Topography ob’s influence restricted to areas of similar elevation x

Sample forecast error structure

Satellite observations Current Instruments (used) Infrared (IR) sounders (HIRS, GOES) Microwave sounders (MSU, AMSU-A/B) Microwave imager (SSM/I (wind speed, precipitation)) SBUV (ozone profiles) Winds inferred from imagery (GOES, GMS, Meteosat) Scatterometers (Quikscat)

Satellite observations Current Instruments (not used) Visible/IR imager (AVHRR, GOES, MODIS) Microwave sounders ( DMSP/T/T2, TMI) TRMM radar Total Ozone (TOMS) Etc.

Satellite observations Future Platforms EOS-PM (AIRS, AMSU-A, HSB, MODIS) GIFTS (IR sounder) DMSP (SSM/IS) NPP(CrIS, ATMS, VIIRS) NPOESS(CMIS, CrIS, OMPS, ATMS, VIIRS, ALT, SARSAT) METOP(AVHRR, AMSU, IASI, GOME, ASCATT) Cosmic (GPS radio-occultation) Etc.

Satellite observations Different observation and error characteristics –Type of data (cloud track winds, radiances, etc.) –Version of instrument type (e.g., IR sounders - AIRS, HIRS, IASI, GOES, GIFTS, etc.) –Different models of same instrument (e.g., NOAA-15 AMSU-A, NOAA-16 AMSU-A)