Computing Leadership Summit STEM Education Steve Robinson U.S. Department of Education White House Domestic Policy Council February 22, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
Advertisements

RHODE ISLANDS RACE TO THE TOP ROUND TWO RI Science and Technology Advisory Council May 6, 2010.
STEM ACTION CENTER HB 150 Applied Science 7 th and 8 th Grade STEM Pathways and Certification.
Common Core State Standards OVERVIEW CESA #9 - September 2010 Presented by: CESA #9 School Improvement Services Jayne Werner and Yvonne Vandenberg.
Third-Party Evaluation Studies as a Basis for Determining Program Effectiveness and Improvement Needs Center for Research and Reform in Education Johns.
High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services And After-School Partnerships Demonstration Program (CFDA Number: ) CLOSING DATE: August 12, 2008.
AMERICAN COMPETITIVENESS INITIATIVE U.S. Department of Education.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Federal Initiatives Update Investing in Innovation (i3)
Shelda Hale, Title III, ELL and Immigrant Education Kentucky Department of Education.
STEM Education Reorganization April 3, STEM Reorganization: Background  The President has placed a very high priority on using government resources.
Framing Our Conversation
Analysis and Next Steps. Summary Nevada’s final score of ranks 24 out of the 36 states that applied Among the ten grant recipients,
MSBO 2009 CONFERENCESEPTEMBER SECRETARY OF EDUCATION DISCRETIONARY FUNDS Sally Vaughn Deputy Superintendent, Ph.D. Michigan Department of Education.
SAVING AND CREATING JOBS AND REFORMING EDUCATION National Teacher Forum U.S. Department of Education April 30, 2009.
Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
Common Core State Standards and Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) Common Core State Standards and Partnership for.
Suzanne Hedberg Instructional Staff Developer Pinellas County Schools FCR-STEM Conference December 8, 2012.
1 Sustaining Technical Programs The NSF’s Advanced Technological Education Program and American Competitiveness Mike Lesiecki, MATEC A Member of the Academic.
Create a Marshall/West Virginia Technology Engineering Math (S.T.E.M.) Academy, including a West Virginia Virtual S.T.E.M. Academy to serve the entire.
1 Tier 1 Education: Review Participant Training January AmeriCorps External Reviewer Training.
Understanding Stimulus Funding and Leveraging Philanthropy to Support Long-Term Education Goals A Webinar for the Foundation Community February 16, 2010.
SAVING AND CREATING JOBS AND REFORMING EDUCATION U.S. Department of Education June 12, 2009.
Overview Slides April 17, 2012 Q&A Webinar i3 Scale-up and Validation Applications Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the.
Texas High School Project and the Texas Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (T-STEM) Initiative Texas Regional Collaboration March 6, 2007.
Massie Ritsch U.S. Department of Education ESEA REAUTHORIZATION.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Investing in Innovation Program (i3) Mathematics and Science Partnership Conference March 22, 2011.
Summary Document March 2010 Investing in Innovation (i3) Fund Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the official notice of.
The Federal Stimulus: An Overview
DRAFT – Not for Circulation Investing in Innovation (i3) 2012 Development Competition Summary Document February 2012 Note: These slides are intended as.
Overview Slides March 13, 2012 Q&A Webinar i3 Development Pre-Application Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the official.
P-20: New Day, New Way Deborah Lowe Vandell Chancellor’s CEO Roundtable Thursday, February 7, 2008 Deborah Lowe Vandell Chancellor’s CEO Roundtable Thursday,
An America Built to Last Martha Kanter, Under Secretary Illinois Board of Higher Education February 5, 2013.
Texas Science Technology Engineering and Math (T-STEM) Initiative Robin Gelinas—Texas Education Agency Director of Policy Initiatives.
Presenters: Martin J. Blank, Martin J. Blank, President, Institute for Educational Leadership; Director, Coalition for Community Schools S. Kwesi Rollins.
Arts in Education Model Development and Dissemination Grant Program (AEMDD) Pre-Application Webinar U.S. Department of Education Office of Innovation and.
Successful K–12 STEM Education Identifying Effective Approaches in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Committee on Highly Successful Schools.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
July 25, 2011 National Education Statistics Agenda Committee Investing in Innovation (i3) Fund.
U.S. Department of Education Reform Agenda Overview April 2010.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
Final Review Day 2: Education in America. Problems with American Education -Currently 68% of students in high school will graduate -Dropping out of high.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships, Title II, Part B, NCLB.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
SAM REDDING ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE CENTER ON INNOVATIONS IN LEARNING CENTER ON SCHOOL TURNAROUND BUILDING STATE CAPACITY AND PRODUCTIVITY CENTER.
HANDOUT 3 Middle School Reform. 2 What does it take to prepare our middle school students for the 21 st Century? They must be able to … Work in teams.
Title I, IDEA Part B and IDEA Part C September 2, 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Use of Funds Guidance 1.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Jaquanda Pugh Teacher assist II February 22, 2010.
INVESTING IN INNOVATION (i3) SUMMARY OF 2015 i3 HIGHEST-RATED APPLICATIONS (HRAs)
ESEA Title II: Improving Teacher Quality State Grant Program Informational Meeting Overview of RFP Rich Jachino Statewide Coordinator November 17, 2009.
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference Crystal City, VA July 30, 2010 Jacqueline Jones, PhD Senior Advisor to the Secretary for Early Learning.
Past, Present, & Key to our Future. * In 1995 a survey was conducted across DE and it was found that the predominant form of Science Education was textbook.
February 2016 Overview of the Every Student Succeeds Act.
Center on School Turnaround at WestEd. 2 3 Race to the Top School Improvement Grants Alignment of Existing Federal Resources ESEA Flexibility Lowest-
Preparing for the Title III Part F STEM Competition Alliance of Hispanic Serving Institutions Educators Grantsmanship Institute March 20, 2016.
Program Information for Applicants School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Aim: Does the US need to reform the educational system? Do Now: Make a list of the best aspects of the education you receive and make a list of the worst.
Enhancing Education Through Technology ( EETT/Title II D) Competitive Grant Application Technical Assistance Workshop New York State Education Department.
1 Commonwealth of Massachusetts STEM Advisory Council Moving the STEM Agenda Forward CONFIDENTIAL DRAFT FOR POLICY DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES ONLY STEM Advisory.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts STEM Advisory Council
Washington County Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Harford County Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Investing in Innovation (i3) Fund
Build Your Own ESSA Explainer
Calvert County March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
RACE TO THE TOP: An Overview
Title II Preparing, Training, and Recruiting High Quality Teachers and Principals Ismail Ardahanli.
Talbot County Children Entering School Ready to Learn
NC Mathematics and Science Partnership Program
Presentation transcript:

Computing Leadership Summit STEM Education Steve Robinson U.S. Department of Education White House Domestic Policy Council February 22, 2010

STEM

President Obama, at the National Academies President addressed the National Academies last April on THE NECESSITY OF SCIENCE.

President Obama, at the National Academies President addressed the National Academies last April on THE NECESSITY OF SCIENCE. The President set a goal : American students will move from the middle to the top of the pack over the next decade.

President Obama, at the National Academies President addressed the National Academies last April on THE NECESSITY OF SCIENCE. The President set a goal : American students will move from the middle to the top of the pack over the next decade. Science The United States ranks 21st of 30 OECD countries in science literacy. One quarter of U.S. fifteen-year-olds do not reach the baseline level of science competence.

President Obama, at the National Academies President addressed the National Academies last April on THE NECESSITY OF SCIENCE. The President set a goal : American students will move from the middle to the top of the pack over the next decade. Math The United States ranks 25th of 30 OECD countries in math literacy. Over one quarter of American fifteen-year-olds performed below the baseline level of mathematics competence.

President Obama, at the National Academies President addressed the National Academies last April on THE NECESSITY OF SCIENCE. The President set a goal : American students will move from the middle to the top of the pack over the next decade. NAEP Math average scores for 4 th and 8 th graders:

President Obama, at the National Academies President addressed the National Academies last April on THE NECESSITY OF SCIENCE. The President set a goal : American students will move from the middle to the top of the pack over the next decade. The President HAS CALLED ALL OF US TO DO OUR PARTS in this task.

President Obama, at the National Academies President addressed the National Academies last April on THE NECESSITY OF SCIENCE. The President set a goal : American students will move from the middle to the top of the pack over the next decade The President HAS CALLED ALL OF US TO DO OUR PARTS in this task. “ENCOURAGING YOUNG PEOPLE TO CREATE AND BUILD AND INVENT - TO BE MAKERS OF THINGS, NOT JUST CONSUMERS OF THINGS ”.

So…..

At the Department of Education….

Race to the Top

The Race to the Top fund is the “moon shot” of education reform. The $4.35 billion in the Race to the Top fund is a bigger pot of discretionary money for K-12 reform than all eight previous Secretaries of Education had combined during the department’s previous 28 years.

Race to the Top The Race to the Top fund is the “moon shot” of education reform. The $4.35 billion in the Race to the Top fund is a bigger discretionary fund for K-12 reform than all eight previous Secretaries of Education had combined during the department’s previous 28 years.

Race to the Top The RTT guidelines specify reforms and commitments across the four key areas.

Four Areas of Reform 1.Rigorous standards and assessments 2.Effective teachers and school leaders 3.Data systems. 4.Turning around low-performing schools.

Race to the Top Competitive Preference Priority An application that meets this priority may be favored over an application of comparable merit that does not.

Race to the Top Competitive Preference Priority An application that meets this priority may be favored over an application of comparable merit that does not. Emphasis on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM).

Race to the Top Emphasis on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) Proposed Priority 2: Competitive Preference Priority--Emphasis on Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) To meet this priority, the State's application must describe plans to address the need to (i) offer a rigorous course of study in mathematics, sciences, technology, and engineering; (ii) cooperate with industry experts, museums, universities, research centers, or other STEM-capable community partners to prepare and assist teachers in integrating STEM content across grades and disciplines, in promoting effective and relevant instruction, and in offering applied learning opportunities for students; and (iii) prepare more students for advanced study and careers in the sciences, technology, engineering, and mathematics, including addressing the needs of underrepresented groups and of women and girls in the areas of science, technology, engineering and mathematics.

Investing in Innovation Fund

30 i3 “Development” “Validation” “Scale-up” Types of Awards Available Under i3 Estimated Funding Available Up to $5MM/awardUp to $30MM/awardUp to $50MM/award Evidence Required Reasonable – research- based findings or theories Moderate – either high internal validity and medium external validity, or vice versa Strong – both high internal validity and high external validity Scaling Required Able to further develop and scale Able to be scaled to the regional or state level Able to be scaled to the national, regional, or state level Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the official Notice in the Federal Register.

31 Proposed i3 Eligibility Criteria and Grant Requirements Eligible Organizations (Based on historical success closing achievement gaps and improving academic achievement) LEAs Non-profits, in partnership with LEAs or a consortium of schools Eligible Organizations (Based on historical success closing achievement gaps and improving academic achievement) LEAs Non-profits, in partnership with LEAs or a consortium of schools MUST Demonstrate 20% private sector matching funding Conduct an independent program evaluation Cooperate with technical assistance Share broadly the results of any evaluations An applicant may not submit an application for the same proposed project under more than one type of grant Demonstrate 20% private sector matching funding Conduct an independent program evaluation Cooperate with technical assistance Share broadly the results of any evaluations An applicant may not submit an application for the same proposed project under more than one type of grant Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the official Notice in the Federal Register.

32 Improve Achievement for High-Need Students Support Effective Teachers and School Leaders Improve the Use of Data Complement the Implementation of High Standards and High-Quality Assessments Turn Around Persistently Low- Performing Schools, Whole- School Reform, and Targeted Approaches to Reform Improve Early Learning Outcomes Support College Access and Success Address the Unique Learning Needs of Students with Disabilities and Limited English Proficient Students Serve Schools in Rural LEAs Proposed i3 Priorities Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the official Notice in the Federal Register. Required for all applications Must address one (Absolute Priority) May address one or more (Competitive Preference)

Educational Technology

Computer Science?

It Changes the World…

Where does CS fit? Math? Science? Engineering? Technology? 21st Century Skills? Who teaches it? Do standards exist? Who uses them?

Computational Thinking?