Page - 1 70 th IETF – Vancouver, December 2007 PCEP Requirements and Extensions for the support of Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (WSON) Young

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CCAMP WG, IETF 80th, Prague, Czech Republic draft-gonzalezdedios-subwavelength-framework-00 Framework for GMPLS and path computation support of sub-wavelength.
Advertisements

Page th IETF – Stockholm, Sweden, July 2009 WSON Signal Characteristics and Network Element Compatibility Constraints for GMPLS Greg
Page th IETF – San Francisco, CA, March 2009 Framework for GMPLS and PCE Control of Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (WSON) Greg
Page - 1 Stateful PCE Kexin Tang Xuerong Wang Yuanlin Bao ZTE Corporation draft-tang-pce-stateful-pce-01.txt.
Page th IETF – San Francisco, CA, March 2009 Information Model for Impaired Optical Path Validation Greg Grotto.
OSPF Extensions in Support of RWA in WSONs CCAMP WG, IETF 76th, Hiroshima, Japan draft-zhang-ccamp-rwa-wson-routing-ospf-02.txt Fatai Zhang
76th IETF – Hiroshima, Japan, November 2009 PCEP Requirements for WSON Impairments Young Huawei Greg
Page th IETF – Stockholm, July 2009 A Framework for the Control and Measurement of Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (WSON) with Impairments.
76th IETF – Hiroshima, November 2009 PCEP Requirements and Extensions for the support of Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (WSON) Young
Page th IETF – Anaheim, California, March 2010 Routing and Wavelength Assignment Information Model for Wavelength Switched Optical Networks Young.
Page th IETF – Beijing, November 2010 A Framework for the Control and Measurement of Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (WSON) with Impairments.
IETF 77, Maastricht, Netherlands, July 25-30, 2010Page - 1 Information Modele Electro-Optical Multi- Layer G.709 network draft-xie-ccamp-multi-elec-opt-network-ext-req-00.
Page th IETF – Anaheim, California, March 2010 Signaling Extensions for Wavelength Switched Optical Networks draft-bernstein-ccamp-wson-signaling-06.txt.
G : DCM Signaling Mechanism Using GMPLS RSVP-TE ITU-T Workshop on IP-Optical, Chitose, Japan 7/11/2002 Dimitrios Pendarakis, Tellium, Inc. ITU-T.
Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching: An Overview of Signaling Enhancements and Recovery Techniques IEEE Communications Magazine July 2001.
Requirement and protocol for WSON and non-WSON interoperability CCAMP WG, IETF 81th, Quebec City, Canada draft-shimazaki-ccamp-wson-interoperability-00.
Research on Wavelength Switched Optical Networks for the Next 10 years ICT Session 1 of PhD Academy Xin WANG TANAKA Lab. Waseda University Oct. 05, 2011.
Sponsored by BellSouth, Cisco, UC Micro Program Design and Development of an MPLambdaS Simulator Jian Wang, Biswanath Mukherjee, S, J, Ben Yoo University.
Page th IETF – Vancouver, December 2007 Framework for GMPLS and PCE Control of Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (WSON) & RWA Information for.
Page th IETF – Anaheim, California, March 2010 Framework for GMPLS and PCE Control of Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (WSON) Young
Page th IETF – Orlando, FL, March 2013 Information Model for Impaired Optical Path Validation Greg BernsteinGrotto Networking Young Lee Huawei Xian.
WSON General WG Drafts 1.Routing and Wavelength Assignment Information Model for WSON (v14) 2.General Network Element Constraint Encoding for GMPLS Controlled.
WSON Specific WG Drafts 1.Routing and Wavelength Assignment Information Encoding for Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (v14) 2.GMPLS OSPF Enhancement.
CCAMP WG, IETF 76th, Hiroshima, Japan draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework-00.txt Fatai Zhang Dan Li Jianrui.
Page th IETF – Dublin, Ireland, July 2008 Framework for GMPLS and PCE Control of Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (WSON) Greg
IETF 69, PCE WG, Chicago Encoding of Objective Functions in PCE Communication and Discovery Protocols draft-leroux-pce-of-01.txt J.L. Le Roux (France Telecom)
TERENA Networking Conference 2004, Rhodes, Greece, June Differentiated Optical Services and Optical SLAs Afrodite Sevasti Greek Research and.
Waveband switching. WBS –In GMPLS networks, underlying network nodes need to support multiple switching granularities –Therefore, ordinary wavelength-switching.
1 Framework for GMPLS based control of Flexi-grid DWDM networks draft-ogrcetal-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk-02 CCAMP WG, IETF 86 Oscar González de Dios, Telefónica.
Page rd IETF – Minneapolis, MN, November 2008 A Framework for the Control and Measurement of Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (WSON) with Impairments.
Page th IETF – Philadelphia, March 2008 Signaling Extensions for Wavelength Switched Optical Networks Greg
PCEP extensions for the computation of route offers with price draft-carrozzo-pce-pcep-route-price-00 G. Carrozzo, G. Bernini, G. Landi {g.carrozzo, g.bernini,
, 74 th IETF, San Francisco, U.S.A., March draft-seno-ccamp-wson-impairment-compensate-cntl-00.txt Issued March 2 nd, ,
Page th IETF – San Francisco, CA, March 2009 A Framework for the Control and Measurement of Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (WSON) with Impairments.
Optimization of Wavelength Assignment for QoS Multicast in WDM Networks Xiao-Hua Jia, Ding-Zhu Du, Xiao-Dong Hu, Man-Kei Lee, and Jun Gu, IEEE TRANSACTIONS.
1 Common Constraint Information Extension to GMPLS Route for WDM Switch Optical Network draft-kang-ccamp-wdm-switch-info-00.txt Zhihong Kang
Application-oriented Stateful PCE Architecture and Use-cases for Transport Networks Young Lee, Xian Zhang, Haomian Zhang, Dhruv Dhody (Huawei), Guoying.
Signaling Extensions for Wavelength Switched Optical Networks draft-bernstein-ccamp-wson-signaling-02.txt Greg BernsteinGrotto Networking Young LeeHuawei.
Page th IETF – Vancouver, December 2007 Signaling Extensions for Wavelength Switched Optical Networks Greg
IETF-69th Chicago1 Extensions to GMPLS RSVP-TE for Bidirectional Lightpath with the Same Wavelength draft-xu-rsvpte-bidir-wave-00 Sugang Xu, Hiroaki Harai,
Page rd IETF – Minneapolis, MN, November 2008 Information Model for Impaired Optical Path Validation Greg Grotto.
IETF-70th Vancouver1 Extensions to GMPLS RSVP-TE for Bidirectional Lightpath with the Same Wavelength draft-xu-rsvpte-bidir-wave-01 Sugang Xu, Hiroaki.
June 4, 2003Carleton University & EIONGMPLS - 1 GMPLS Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching Vijay Mahendran Sumita Ponnuchamy Christy Gnanapragasam.
(Slide set by Norvald Stol/Steinar Bjørnstad
IETF-74, San Francisco, March 2009 PCE Working Group Meeting IETF-74, March 2009, San Francisco Online Agenda and Slides at:
1 Simple provisioning, complex consolidation – An approach to improve the efficiency of provisioning oriented optical networks Tamás Kárász Budapest University.
Page th IETF – Chicago, July 2007 Applicability of GMPLS and PCE to Wavelength Switched Optical Networks Greg
Page th IETF – Hiroshima, Japan, November 2009 WSON Signal Characteristics and Network Element Compatibility Constraints for GMPLS Greg
79th IETF – Beijing, November 2010 OSPF Enhancement for Signal and Network Element Compatibility for Wavelength Switched Optical Networks Young
Applicability of Existing Solutions to the Problem Space draft-takeda-l1vpn-applicability-03.txt.
55th IETF GSMP WG, Atlanta 1 General Switch Management Protocol (GSMP) v3 for Optical Support 55 th IETF GSMP WG, Atlanta Jun Kyun Choi
66th IETF, Montreal, July 2006 PCE Working Group Meeting IETF-66, July 2006, Montreal A Backward Recursive PCE-based Computation (BRPC) procedure to compute.
1 73th IETF, CCAMP WG, Minneapolis, MN, USA November 2008 RSVP-TE based Impairments Collection Mechanism Zafar Ali, Roberto Cassata (Cisco Systems) Marco.
Page th IETF – Dublin, Ireland, July 2008 Performance Evaluation of PCE Architectures for Wavelength Switched Optical Networks Editors: Greg
77th IETF – Anaheim, March 2010 PCEP Extensions in support of WSON Signal Compatibility Constraints Young Huawei Greg.
Page th IETF – Hiroshima, Japan, November 2009 Framework for GMPLS and PCE Control of Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (WSON) Greg
PCEP extensions for GMPLS CCAMP WG, IETF 79th, Beijing, China draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01 Cyril Margaria Nokia Siemens Networks Oscar González.
70th IETF Vancouver, December 2007 CCAMP Working Group Online Agenda and Slides at: Charter page:
Use Case for Distributed Data Center in SUPA
CCAMP Working Group Status
PCEP Extensions For Transporting Traffic Engineering (TE) Data
PCEP Extensions in Support of Transporting Traffic Engineering Data
Applicability of GMPLS and PCE to Wavelength Switched Optical Networks
IETF 78th Maastricht, Netherlands, July 2010
73rd IETF – Minneapolis, MN, November 2008
OSPF Enhancement for Signal and Network Element Compatibility for Wavelength Switched Optical Networks
Guard Bands requirements for GMPLS controlled optical networks
CHAPTER 8 Network Management
draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-01
PCEP extensions for GMPLS
Presentation transcript:

Page th IETF – Vancouver, December 2007 PCEP Requirements and Extensions for the support of Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (WSON) Young Huawei Greg Grotto Draft-lee-pce-WSON-routing-wavelength-00.txt

Page th IETF – Vancouver, December 2007 Outline Applicability of PCE to WSON/RWA RWA Computation Architecture –Combined RWA –Separate Routing and WA –Routing with Distributed WA PCEP Requirements RWA Information Requirement for PCE Summary

Page th IETF – Vancouver, December 2007 Applicability of PCE-based Architecture for WSON RWA RWA information Connectivity Information Per port wavelength restriction WDM link (fiber) lambda range/ channel spacing Laser Transmitter range Wavelength conversion Wavelength Availability Control Plane Connection Controller Optical Connection Request Global TED PCE PCEP RWA Info OPM+ PLC Info xx xx WSON Light-path Signaling (GMPLS)

Page th IETF – Vancouver, December 2007 RWA Computation Architecture Combined RWA –Routing and WA are performed at a single computational entity Separate Routing and WA –Separate entities perform Routing and WA (e.g., one PCE for Routing and one PCE for WA in tandem) Routing with Distributed WA –Routing is performed at a computation entity (e.g., PCE) while WA via signaling PCC PCE R+WA PCC PCE R PCE WA NE PCE NE RSVP-TE (Wavelength Set) RSVP-TE (Wavelength Set)

Page th IETF – Vancouver, December 2007 PCEP Requirements PCE Computation Options Wavelength Assignment and Wavelength Set information Optimization Degree Lightpath Route Parameters Wavelength Selection Preference (optional) Timeliness Characteristics (optional) Duration of lightpath (optional)

Page th IETF – Vancouver, December 2007 PCE Computation Options The following RWA computation options should be conveyed in the PC Request: –The request is for Wavelength Assignment (WA) only. –The request is for both Routing and Wavelength Assignment (R+WA). –The request is for Routing (R) only. –The request is for Routing (R) with the suggested/restricted wavelength set. PCCPCE PC Request {RP object: RC bits} PC Reply {RP object: RC bits}

Page th IETF – Vancouver, December 2007 Wavelength Assignment and Wavelength Set information The PCE MUST specify the wavelength assignment and/or wavelength set information in response to the wavelength assignment/wavelength set Request made by the PCC in the PCReq message. –ERO and Exact Assignment: If the original request is either for both Routing and Wavelength Assignment or for Wavelength Assignment only, the exact wavelength assignment result can be conveyed to PCC using the ERO object and ERO Label subobject within the ERO. Note that this is not a new requirement. Current PCEP allows this mechanism which is defined as the Label Set mechanism in [RFC3471]. –Wavelength Set (Inclusive/Exclusive List/Range): If the original request is for Routing with wavelength suggested/restricted wavelength set, then the Wavelength Set information must be provided to the PCC.

Page th IETF – Vancouver, December 2007 Optimization Degree The PC Request Message should indicate the degree of optimization associated with lightpath computation. –Concurrent Optimization: multiple lightpaths requested at one time. –Lightpath(s) and backup lightpath(s) requested at one time. –Sequential Optimization: single lightpath requested at a time. The PC Reply Message should include the original optimization degree associated with the request when replying the path computation results.

Page th IETF – Vancouver, December 2007 Lightpath Route Parameters The following Lightpath Route Parameters should be indicated: –Bidirectional Assignment of wavelengths for a bidirectional LSP request. –Possible simultaneous assignment of the same wavelength to primary and backup paths. The PC Reply Message should include the original lightpath route parameter associated with the request when replying the path computation results.

Page th IETF – Vancouver, December 2007 Wavelength Selection Preference - optional The PC Request may indicate the Wavelength Selection Preference to which a path computation request is applied. The Wavelength Selection Preference to be supported at the minimum is: –Random –First Fit –Most Used –Least Loaded –Don’t Care The PC Reply should indicate which wavelength selection preference has actually been applied.

Page th IETF – Vancouver, December 2007 The request may indicate specific timeliness characteristics of lightpath. ­ Time Critical: this type of request is useful for those lightpath establishment requests used for restoration of service or other high priority real time services. ­ Soft Time Bound: this type of request is a more typical new connection request. While expected to be responsive, there should be more time to take into account network optimization. ­ Scheduled: this type of request is useful when the requested lightpath connections are not time critical (i.e., the request is significantly ahead of their intended "in-service" time. Timeliness Characteristics - optional

Page th IETF – Vancouver, December 2007 The request may indicate specific lightpath duration information associated with the request. This may be useful to the PCE since it is not worthwhile to optimize lightpaths with relatively short duration as compared to pseudo-static paths. Duration of lightpath - optional

Page th IETF – Vancouver, December 2007 Summary Lightpath provisioning in WSON requires a routing and wavelength assignment (RWA) process which is computationally challenging. PCE technology is very promising to undertake RWA computation in WSON. Emerging routing features such as optical impairment constraint-based (ICBR) routing can also be readily built upon this PCE infrastructure.

Page th IETF – Vancouver, December 2007 Next Steps Continue to refine PCEP requirements and encoding details Keep pace with WSON Framework/Info drafts –Explore Methods of RWA Information Transfer Any Questions?