SNECMA – Space Engines Division

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EXTROVERTSpace Propulsion 08 Bi-propellant Liquid Rocket Engines.
Advertisements

FEDERAL SPACE AGENCY International conference “Europe space policy: ambitions 2015” Session 1. “General view on propulsion systems: LV of the future”
Marat Kulakhmetov.  AS8 AS8.
Analysis of Rocket Propulsion
Spring 2011: [F&S, Chapter 6]. Q; What velocity, v, do I need to just escape the gravitational pull of the planet? (the escape velocity).
Space Camp/Academy Huntsville, AL S.T.S. – The Space Shuttle –Orbiters –Space Shuttle Main Engines –External Tank –Solid Rocket Boosters.
Liquid Rocket Engine Cycles
Rocket Engines Liquid Propellant –Mono propellant Catalysts –Bi-propellant Solid Propellant –Grain Patterns Hybrid Nuclear Electric Performance Energy.
Uncontrolled copy not subject to amendment
MAE 5391: Rocket Propulsion Overview of Propulsion Systems
Propulsion Systems. Propulsion System A machine that produces thrust to push an object forward The amount of thrust depends on the mass flow through the.
Hybrid Propulsion System Basics
Propellants Dr. Andrew Ketsdever.
Pistonless Dual Chamber Rocket Fuel Pump Steve Harrington, Ph.D Joint Propulsion Conference.
Pistonless Dual Chamber Rocket Fuel Pump
Uncontrolled copy not subject to amendment Rocketry Revision 1.00.
MAE 4262: ROCKETS AND MISSION ANALYSIS Single and Multi-Stage Rockets September 9, 2014 Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department Florida Institute.
Principles of Propulsion and its Application in Space Launchers Prof. Dr.-Ing. Uwe Apel Hochschule Bremen REVA Seminar1.
An Introduction to Rocket
Class 4: Fundamentals of Rocket Propulsion
Spacecraft Propulsion Dr Andrew Ketsdever Lesson 13 MAE 5595.
Rocket Power Introduction to Rockets and Missiles Scott Schoneman.
Rockets 101 AIAA – March 2009 Theory of Rockets Dr. Eric Besnard California State University, Long Beach Project Director, California Launch Vehicle Education.
1 Propulsion Overview MAE155A Dr. Nacouzi. 2 Agenda Introduction to Propulsion Propulsion Systems: Liquids, Solids, other Basic Propulsion Performance.
Lesson 12: Hybrid Propulsion System Design
1 2/10/2005Thrust Chamber Assembly Concept Design Review Liquid Bi-Propellant Thruster Concept Design Review Adam Pender Jason Wennerberg Arun Padmanabhan.
MAE 4262: ROCKETS AND MISSION ANALYSIS
Hybrid Rocket Project Joel Beilke University of Minnesota Duluth Industrial Engineering Fall Semester 2004 LAST ONE!
MAE 4262: ROCKETS AND MISSION ANALYSIS
 The word "rocket" can mean different things. Most people think of a tall, thin, round vehicle. They think of a rocket that launches into space. "Rocket"
Aerospace fuel and it’s composition
Rocket Engine Physics and Design
36th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference
A3 Altitude Test Facility
Thortek Expander Cycle Engine Presentation - 15 Slides 1 Design of an Expander Cycle Engine with J-2 Equivalent Thrust AIAA th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE.
Satellites and Launch Vehicles. “Gee Whiz” Facts Number of satellites currently in orbit is over 900 Satellites orbit at altitudes from 100 miles (Low.
Welcome to AE6450 Space and Rocket Propulsion Dr
EXTROVERTSpace Propulsion 02 1 Thrust, Rocket Equation, Specific Impulse, Mass Ratio.
Rocket engines are reaction engines The shuttle weighs 165,000 pounds empty. The external tank weighs 78,100 pounds empty. The two solid rocket boosters.
Comprehend the different types of rockets Comprehend the propulsion and flight of rockets Comprehend the types of launch vehicles Comprehend the factors.
Thermal Model of MEMS Thruster Apurva Varia Propulsion Branch Code 597.
How Rocket Engines Operate List the Types and Characteristics of Rocket Engines How Rockets Work.
SPACE PROPULSION BASED ON HIGH-BETA MAGNETIC FUSION ROCKET I. V. Romadanov, S. V. Ryzhkov Bauman Moscow State Technical University
ROCKET PROPULSION LECTURE 1: INTRODUCTION Propulsion Lecture 1 - INTRODUCTION.
Design of Supersonic Intake / Nozzle P M V Subbarao Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi Meeting the Cruising Conditions…
AAE450 Spring 2009 Lunar Lander Main Engine Thaddaeus Halsmer Thursday, February 12, 2009 Thaddaeus Halsmer, Propulsion.
Nuclear Propulsion Allen May. What is it?  Any Propulsion Method that uses some form of nuclear reaction.
Rocket Engines India Morris November 3, What are Rocket Engines??? Jet engines that use only propellant mass for forming the high speed jet/ thrust.
Solid Rocket Motors A solid rocket motor is a system that uses solid propellants to produce thrust Advantages High thrust Simple Storability High density.
Launch Structure Challenge - Background Humans landed on the moon in 1969 – Apollo 11 space flight. In 2003, NASA started a new program (Ares) to send.
Dave McGrath ACM Chief Engineer February 18, 2010
Apex. TRL:# Risk:  Apex has designed a rocket engine to meet the following criteria: Hybrid engine utilizing liquid N 2 O oxidizer Produce between 75.
Thermal stratification in LH2 tank of cryogenic propulsion stage tested in ISRO facility Presentation to ICEC26-ICMC th March 2016 M Xavier, Division.
By George Taktikos. Overview Process differs from conventional rocket engines Process differs from conventional rocket engines Uses nuclear reaction to.
Rocket Lab KAIST H 2 O 2 - 케로신 로켓을 초기 가속장치로 갖는 새로운 램젯 추진기관 박 근 홍 국방과학연구소 대함유도무기체계개발단.
액체로켓엔진의 이론과 실제 한국항공우주연구원 발사체추진제어팀 임 하 영.
THE TSIOLKOVSKY ROCKET EQUATION
Rockets AND PROJECTILE MOTION.
Liquid Rocket Engines Require many moving parts and plumbing.
Analysis of Multistage Rockets
Basics of Rocket Propulsion
Rocket Engines Liquid Propellant Solid Propellant Hybrid Nuclear
Development and Principles of Rocketry
In-situ Propellant Production and ERV Propulsion System
11/18/2018 Development of Cryogenic Engine for GSLV MkIII: Technological Challenges RS Praveen, N Jayan, KS Bijukumar, J Jayaprakash, V Narayanan, G Ayyappan.
Shuttle Main Engine LOX System (typical of 3)
Section 5: Lecture 3 The Optimum Rocket Nozzle
Propulsion Systems Aircraft, Rocket, Space © 2011 Project Lead The Way, Inc.Aerospace Engineering.
Team A Propulsion 1/16/01.
Section 5: Lecture 3 The Optimum Rocket Nozzle
Presentation transcript:

SNECMA – Space Engines Division CVA Summer School 2010 - Roma July 8, 2011 LIQUID ROCKET PROPULSION Christophe ROTHMUND SNECMA – Space Engines Division christophe.rothmund@snecma.fr

CONTENTS Part 4 : ANATOMY OF A ROCKET ENGINE Part 1 : LIQUID ROCKET ENGINES   Part 2 : NEAR TERM PROPULSION SYSTEMS Part 3 : ELECTRIC PROPULSION Part 1 : LIQUID ROCKET ENGINES  Part 2 : ANATOMY OF A ROCKET ENGINE Part 3 : TEST FACILITIES  Part 4 : NUCLEAR PROPULSION Part 4 : ANATOMY OF A ROCKET ENGINE   Part 5 : ADVANCED PROPULSION

Part 1 LIQUID ROCKET ENGINES

LIQUID ROCKET ENGINE TYPES SOLID GRAIN NUCLEAR REACTOR NUCLEAR THERMAL FUEL

LIQUID PROPELLANTS MONOPROPELLANTS : BIPROPELLANTS : Hydrazine, Hydrogen peroxyde BIPROPELLANTS : FUELS : OXIDIZERS : Kerosine, ethanol Liquid hydrogen, UDMH, MMH, Hydrazine Liquid oxygen, N2O4, Hydrogen peroxyde

HYBRID PROPELLANTS liquid propellant : oxidizer - solid propellant : fuel (solid oxidizers are problematic and lower performing than liquid oxidizers) oxidizers : gaseous or liquid oxygen nitrous oxide. fuels : polymers (e.g.polyethylene), cross-linked rubber (e.g.HTPB), liquefying fuels (e.g. paraffin). Solid fuels (HTPB or paraffin) allow for the incorporation of high-energy fuel additives (e.g.aluminium).

CHEMICAL REACTIONS BIPROPELLANTS Dimethylhydrazine (UDMH) : H2N – N (CH3)2 (l)+ 2 N2O4 (l)  - > 3 N2 (g) + 4 H2O (g) + 2 CO2 (g)   Hydrazine hydrate (N2H4,H2O) : 2 (N2H4,H2O) (l) + N2O4 (l)  - > 3 N2 (g) + 6 H2O (g)   Monomethylhydrazine (MMH) :  4 H2N – NHCH3 (l) + 5 N2O4 (l)  - > 9 N2 (g) + 12 H2O (g) + 4 CO2 (g)   Kerosene (CH2 is the approximate formula ) with hydrogen peroxide : CH2 + 3H2O2 → CO2 + 4H2O Kerosene and liquid oxygen (LOX) CH2 + 1.5O2 → CO2 + H2O  Hydrogen and oxygen (liquids) : 2 H2 (g)+ O2 (g)   - > 2 H2O (g) MONOPROPELLANTS Hydrogen peroxyde (H2O2) H2O2 (l) - > H2O (l) + 1/2 O2 (g) Hydrazine (N2H4) N2H4 (l) - >  N2 (g) + 2 H2 (g)

Specific impulse of various propulsion technologies Engine type Specific impulse Jet engine 300 s Solid rocket 250 s Bipropellant rocket 450 s Ion thruster 3000 s VASIMR 30000 s

PROPULSION BASICS Pressure-fed cycle Pros : Simplicity Low complexity Cons : Low performance Oldest and simplest cycle, Rarely used nowadays on launch vehicles, Powered France’s Launch vehicle family Diamant.

Gas-generator cycle Pros : Higher presssures Lowerturbine temperatures Highest performance Cons : Moderate performance Most widely used cycle in the western world,

Preburner cycle Pros : Higher presssures Lowerturbine temperatures Highest performance Cons : High complexity Used on the Shuttle and the H-2A main engine

Expander cycle Pros : Thermally challenging Highest performance Cons : For cryogenic engines only Limited power therefore not suited for high thrusts Oldest cryogenic engine in service (RL-10) Used in Japan and Europe

Full flow staged combustion rocket cycle Pros : Higher presssures Lowerturbine temperatures Highest performance Cons : Very high complexity Never flown, Demonstration only (IPD) so far

Hybrid rocket cycle Pros : Higher performance than solids Lower complexity than liquids Cons : Lower performance than liquids Higher complexity than solids

Nuclear thermal rocket cycle Pros : Highest performance Cons : Very high complexity Radiations Never flown, Demonstration only so far

NOZZLES

THRUST CHAMBER ASSEMBLY GIMBAL Chamber Characteristics: • Combustion • High pressure • High temperature • Very low net fluid velocity INJECTOR COMBUSTION CHAMBER Exit Characteristics: • Flow expands to fill enlarged volume • Reduced pressure • Reduced temperature • Very high fluid velocity NOZZLE EXTENSION

Thrust chamber cooling methods

Nozzle design challenges Structural factors Structural concerns Physical Weight, Center of Gravity Service Life Running time, Number of starts Duty Cycle/Operating Range Continuous operation at one power level Throttled operation Materials Compatibility Strength, Heat transfer capability Loads Testing Altitude Simulation or Sea Level Sideloads Flight Lift off, shut down, restart Transportation Temperature June 16, 1997

KEY REQUIREMENTS FOR SAFE NOZZLE OPERATION Sea level : - stable operation on ground high performance Vacuum : - high vacuum performance - low package volume Bell nozzle Advanced concepts with altitude adaptation Dual-bell nozzle Extendible nozzle Plug nozzle (“Aerospike”)

Nozzle Types Conical Nozzle Simple cone shape - easy to fabricate Rarely used on modern rockets Bell Nozzle Bell shape reduces divergence loss over a similar length conical nozzle Allows shorter nozzles to be used Annular Nozzles (spike or pug) Altitude compensating nozzle Aerospike is a spike nozzle that uses a secondary gas bleed to “fill out” the truncated portion of the spike nozzle

Nozzle extension cooling systems Laser welded jacket to liner Brazed tubes inside jacket Brazed jacket to liner Materials : stainless steel, copper, nickel, copper/nickel

AEROSPIKE NOZZLES Linear aerospike Rocketdyne XRS-2200 Rocketdyne AMPS-1 1960’s World’s first aerospike flight, September 20, 2003 (California State Univ. Long Beach) Annular aerospike

ANATOMY OF A ROCKET ENGINE Part 2 ANATOMY OF A ROCKET ENGINE 1 – Gas generator cycle : F-1 and Vulcain engines 2 – Staged combustion cycle : SSME 3 – Expander cycle : Vinci 4 – Linear aerospike XRS2200 5 – Nuclear : NERVA/RIFT

Rocketdyne F-1

Engine flow diagram Rocketdyne F-1

Engine characteristics Rocketdyne F-1 Apollo 4, 6, and 8 Apollo 9 on Thrust (sea level): 6.67 MN 6.77 MN Burn time: 150 s 165s Specific impulse: 260 s 263 s Engine weight dry: 8.353 t 8.391 t Engine weight burnout: 9.115 t 9.153 t Height: 5.79 m Diameter: 3.76 m Exit to throat ratio: 16 to 1 Propellants: LOX & RP-1 Mixture ratio: 2.27:1 oxidizer to fuel

Engine components Rocketdyne F-1

TESTS AND LAUNCHES 100 m 1000 m

VULCAIN 2

VULCAIN 1 TO VULCAIN 2 EVOLUTION

Engine characteristics VULCAIN 2   Vulcain 1 Vulcain 2 Vacuum thrust 1140 kN 1350 kN Mixture ratio 4,9 to 5,3 6,13 Vacuum specific impulse 430 s 434 s Dry weight 1680 kg 2040 kg Chamber pressure 110 bar 116 bar Expansion ratio 45 60 Design life 6000 s 20 starts 5400 s

Vulcain 2 Flow diagram VULCAIN 2

VULCAIN 2 Thrust chamber

Hydrogen turbopump VULCAIN 2 34200 rpm, 11,3 MW

Oxygen turbopump VULCAIN 2 13300 rpm, 2,9 MW

Space Shuttle Main Engine

Engine characteristics SSME   SSME Propellants LOX – LH2 Vacuum thrust at 109 % 2279 kN Mixture ratio 6 Vacuum specific impulse 452 s Dry weight 3527 kg Chamber pressure 206,4 bar Expansion ratio 69 Throttle range 67 % - 109 % Design life 7,5 hours 55 starts

SSME Flow schematic SSME 2,07 bar 6,9 bar 190,3 bar 29,1 bar 511,6 bar

SSME Powerhead Oxygen Hydrogen SSME Fuel Preburner Oxidizer Preburner Main chamber Oxygen Hydrogen

F1 vs. SSME test comparison Last Planned SSME Test : July 29, 2009 Duration : 520 sec, NASA Stennis

VINCI

FLOW DIAGRAM VINCI

Engine characteristics VINCI   Vinci Propellants LOX – LH2 Vacuum thrust 180 kN Mixture ratio 5,80 Vacuum specific impulse 465 s Chamber pressure 60 bar Expansion ratio 240

VINCI Hydrogen turbopump

Oxygen turbopump VINCI

Combustion chamber VINCI 122 co-axial injection elements 228 cooling channels

Nozzle extension VINCI

Vinci test facility with altitude simulation

TYPICAL SMALL ENGINES BIPROPELLANT MONOPROPELLANT Typical applications : Attitude control Roll control Soft landings (Moon, Mars, …)

SPACESHIPONE HYBRID ENGINE

AMROC (USA)

LIQUID ROCKET ENGINE TEST FACILITIES

Major elements of a test program

PF52 Vulcain powerpack test facility Vulcain 1 – hydrogen TP test

Vinci test facility with altitude simulation

PF50 and P5 Vulcain engine test stands LOX Tank Engine

NASA A-3 J-2X altitude simulation engine test stand simulated altitude : approximately 30 km

BEWARE OF HYDROGEN IMPURITIES… - Avoid risky configurations (e.g. low points, ...) - Define and integrate the cleansing constraints - Easily accessible equipment after commissioning, - Rapid reaction instrumentation (e.g. fast pressure sensors, ...)

HYBRID ENGINE TEST FACILITY

Part 4 NUCLEAR PROPULSION

INTEREST OF NUCLEAR THERMAL PROPULSION Energy ! →1 kg of fissionable material (U235) contains 10 000 000 times more energy, as 1 kg of chemical fuel. Consequences : Higher specific impulse - higher useful load fraction - No oxidizer required !

Nuclear - thermal propulsion Isp = 888.3 s F = 333.6 kN Tc = 2700 K m = 5.7 t Size of 1972 Vintage 350 kN NERVA Engine

American nuclear rockets of the 1960’s Photo courtesy of National Nuclear Security Administration / Nevada Site Office KIWI A KIWI B Phoebus 1 Phoebus 2 1958-60 1961-64 1965-66 1967 100 MW 1000 MW 50000 MW 1.125 kN 11.25 kN 56.25 kN Engine and reactor in Engine Test Stand One (Nevada Test Site)

UPPER STAGE COMPARISON S-IV B NERVA Departure mass 121.2 t 53.694 t Dry mass 12.2 t 12.429 t Thrust 91 kN 266.8 kN Duration 475 s 1250 s Isp 4180 m/s 7840 m/s Payload 39 t 54.5 t For Saturn V

NERVA ultimate goal : manned Mars flight

ANY QUESTIONS ?