SPE 96557 1 High-Pressure Jet Kerf Drilling Shows Significant Potential To Increase ROP 2005 SPE ATCE Dallas, Texas October 9-12, 2005 By John H. Cohen—Maurer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Inverted Motors for Drilling Basic Concepts and Design US and International Patented and Patent Pendings Ken Oglesby Impact Technologies LLC PO Box
Advertisements

Exposing formation to Hydraulic Pressure- Technology Advancement for Horseshoe Canyon CBM Stimulation Original Presentation by: Francois Cantaloube – Schlumberger.
1 references: Bernt S. Aadnoy, Iain Cooper, Stefan Z. Miska, Robert F. Mitchell, Michael L. Payne: Advanced Drilling and Well Technology. SPE 2009, ISBN:
Well Design PE 413 Introduction and API Standards of Casing
MANAGED PRESSURE DRILLING PRESENTATION ______________________________________________________________________ A Continuous Circulating Concentric Casing.
Trican’s Burst Port System (BPS) (Patent Pending) A Cost Effective Method for Horizontal Well Stimulation Lewis Facca / Scott Sherman October 14, 2010.
1 TIW CORPORATION A PEARCE INDUSTRIES COMPANY P.O. Box Houston, Texas U. S. A.
Environmental Drilling By: Josh Humphreys October 8,2006.
“ Unusual Interventions ” Jenna Robertson ICOTA Canada Roundtable October 14, 2010.
Drilling Engineering – PE311 Circulating System
PETE 411 Well Drilling Lesson 37 Coiled Tubing.
Trinity Glen Rose Groundwater Conservation District Monty McGuffin, Santos Tovar and Jim O’Connor Resource Compliance and Protection Department March 10,
Lesson 14 Jet Bit Nozzle Size Selection
Drilling Engineering – PE 311 Drill Bit Optimization
ARTIFICIAL LIFT SYSTEMS ® © 2002 Weatherford. All rights reserved. Unloading Water from Oil Wells Using Air.
A Noble Drilling Corporation Subsidiary TT April 19, 2001 Coiled-Tubing High Pressure Jet Drilling System Dr. William C. Maurer.
PETE 411 Well Drilling Lesson 5 Hole Problems.
Selective Fracturing of a Series of Perforations in a Horizontal Well Using a Resettable Straddle System SPE Josh Thompson Weatherford International.
Hydraulics.
5/20/20151 TORUS ANNULAR BLOWOUT PREVENTER. 5/20/20152 Design Criteria The Torus Annular Blowout Preventer is Designed To Close Around Different Sizes.
Optimising Hydraulic Energy to Dramatically Improve Lateral Reach.
Petroleum Engineering 411 Well Drilling
BASIC MUD LOGGING.
Case Study – Reducing Drilling hours by up to 54% in the Barnett Shale Douglas Gust P.Eng., Q’Max Solutions Inc. Scott Marquess, Q’Max Solutions Inc. Lane.
INNOVATIONS IN DRILLING DAP 2015 MAARTEN MIDDELBURG FEBRUARY 25, 2015 DELFT.
Lesson 34 Horizontal Drilling
Drilling Engineering – PE311 Rotary System
Rock Coring Obtain undisturbed samples of solid, fractured, or weathered rock formations.
Lesson 4 Drilling Cost & Drilling Rate
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. Chapter 12 Drilling Rock and Earth.
Confidential to SMD JIP
BASIC DRILLING SCHOOL. COURSE OBJECTIVES During this drilling school you will get all the knowledge about drilling oil and gas wells, design requirements,
Lesson 25 Well Control, cont’d
New Fluid Solutions, Inc. NFS-BlackSeal ®. Overview Generally, the types of formations that are prone to lost returns are cavernous and vugular, naturally.
Nomis Energy Service Limited  Competitive price  Best service  Super quality  Quick response  Technical-based team.
By M. Ghareeb (Lufkin Middle East) Luca Ponteggia (Agip, Italy)
Dual Gradient Drilling Basic Technology Confidential to DGD JIP
Session 5: CASING DRILLING®
TT Artificial Lift Utilizing CT as a Hollow Sucker Rod Humberto F. Leniek COIL TUBING AMERICAS Dr. William C. Maurer MAURER ENGINEERING INC.
2 Located within the Naval Petroleum Reserve No.3 (NPR-3), RMOTC –Operates in an oil field environment –Explores solutions to energy issues –Demonstrates.
1 Petroleum Engineering 406 Lesson 13 Shallow Water Flows.
Laboratory Testing Of High-Pressure Coiled-Tubing Drilling System
Drilling Operations History Drake’s Well was the first commercial oil well drilled in 1859 in Pennsylvania. Cable Tool Drilling technique was used to drill.
John N. Dougherty, PG Lisa Campbell, PG EPA Region 2, New York City
Case Study – Foothills Region, Canada 2008 CASING DRILLING TM Plastering Success 9-5/8” casing x 12-1/4” EZCase drilled from 850 M to 1,250 M CD effectively.
ENGI 8926: Mechanical Design Project II
Chapter 5 Drilling Techniques and Drilling Problems
AQUAGUARD Keeping drillers out of hot water Case Study.
Confidential to Subsea Mudlift Drilling JIP11/6/00DGD Template 1 of 64 Dual Gradient Drilling Basic Technology Lesson 1 Introduction to DGD Jerome J. Schubert.
Kick Submited to :- Submitted by:- Er Akash Rana Devahish Yadav B.Tech IIIrd Year Petroleum Technology 1.
Rotating System Students: DINESH JOSHI RAJNISH VERMA RAMDEEN BISHNOI
Wellbore Stability in Olmos Formation
Section 6-T14N-R94W Sweetwater County, Wyoming 13000’ Almond Test April 24 th, 2010 James Benson Kristin Carter Patrick Gardner Brandon Heiner Aaron Bounds.
oil Housing Drilling Floor Derrick Conductor 30” (or 36”) (Jet Cleaning.
ESPY 1-22 Solution GROUP P: JEREMIAH LARSON, CLAYTON HAWORTH, MOHAMMED JAFFAL.
TRIBOLOGY IN DRILLING OPERATION CHIH LIN, PHD AUGUST 29, 2013.
Click to edit Master subtitle style Fluid Power Introduction All Images reprinted with permission of National Fluid Power Association.
Overview of Petroleum Industry Chapter 4B – Drilling Operations
Deptt. of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Dr. PDKV, Akola
CASING.
Full-Scale Reservoir Simulation Drilling and Completions Laboratory
Using an Inflatable Element
Cementing How it is Done
INSTRUCTOR © 2017, John R. Fanchi
SUSTAINABLE DRILLING OF OIL & GAS WELLS
Higher ROP & Longer Bit life
Oil-Field Hydraulics Chapter 8 Shut-in Procedures
Requirements and Challenges Extended Laterals
eelReel enables pipeline cleaning to distances > ft.
Design, Testing and Modeling of Axial Oscillation Tools
Presentation transcript:

SPE High-Pressure Jet Kerf Drilling Shows Significant Potential To Increase ROP 2005 SPE ATCE Dallas, Texas October 9-12, 2005 By John H. Cohen—Maurer Technology Inc. Greg Deskins—Maurer Technology Inc. Dr. John Rogers—U.S. Department of Energy (Morgantown, WV)

SPE Drilling Time Study Drilling Consumes Majority of Rig Time Drilling Consumes Majority of Rig Time Increased Depth = Increased Drilling Time Increased Depth = Increased Drilling Time – For all wells, drilling time  33% – For wells >14,000 ft, drilling time  50% To Reduce Costs, ROP Must Increase To Reduce Costs, ROP Must Increase ROP Increase Must be Significant ROP Increase Must be Significant

SPE Drilling Time Breakdown Drilling – 49% Reaming – 3%Conditioning Mud – 5% Tripping – 22% Running Casing – 5% Trouble – 4% Test & Log – 7% Wait Time – 3% BOP – 3% Well Depths >14,000 ft From Andersen (1990)

SPE Reducing Drilling Costs Drilling is Single Largest Cost Item Drilling is Single Largest Cost Item Increased Drilling Efficiency Best Way to Reduce Costs Increased Drilling Efficiency Best Way to Reduce Costs Rate Increases Must Be Large (2X or Greater) Rate Increases Must Be Large (2X or Greater) Jet-Assisted Drilling Meets These Criteria Jet-Assisted Drilling Meets These Criteria

SPE Previous Jet Drilling R&D Exxon (1960s) Exxon (1960s) – Showed that jets alone could remove rock – 15,000 psi at depths up to 12,000 ft Flow Drill (1980s) Flow Drill (1980s) – Ultra HP 30,000-40,000 psi – Concentric drill pipe Shell (1970s) Shell (1970s) Gulf – Erosion Jets (1970s) Gulf – Erosion Jets (1970s)

SPE Jet Kerf Drilling High-Pressure Jets Erode Grooves in Rock High-Pressure Jets Erode Grooves in Rock Mechanical Cutters Break Rock Ledges Mechanical Cutters Break Rock Ledges Pressures Range from 5,000–15,000 psi Pressures Range from 5,000–15,000 psi Can Drill Many Formation at High ROPs Can Drill Many Formation at High ROPs Increases ROP 2X to 4X Conventional Rates Increases ROP 2X to 4X Conventional Rates

SPE Jet Kerf Drilling

SPE High-Pressure Jet Kerf Rates Bit Weight = 2000 lb 10,000 psi 1,000 psi 110 Jet Drilling Rate (ft/hr) Texas Cream Limestone Leander Limestone Glacier Bluff Dolomite Pecos Red Sandstone

SPE Jet Kerf Drilling Video

SPE Original System Concept Coiled Tubing (CT) to Deploy Jet Kerfing BHA Coiled Tubing (CT) to Deploy Jet Kerfing BHA – HP mud motor – Kerfing bit CT Routinely Used with HP Fluids CT Routinely Used with HP Fluids No Tool Joints (Fewer Leak Paths) No Tool Joints (Fewer Leak Paths) Fast Trips Fast Trips

SPE CT Reel Injector Head Jet Kerfing Bit HP Pump HP Flow HP Motor High-Strength Coiled Tubing Jet Kerfing with CT Returns

SPE Field Test I – Catoosa CT-Deployed System CT-Deployed System Problems Making Up BHA Problems Making Up BHA Problems with CT Ballooning Due to HP Problems with CT Ballooning Due to HP Daily Equipment Cost High Daily Equipment Cost High

SPE No Derrick on CT Rig

SPE CT Equipment On Site

SPE High-Pressure Pumps

SPE Catoosa Test Summary Time Lost Making Up BHA Time Lost Making Up BHA High Equipment Costs High Equipment Costs Severe CT Fatigue and Ballooning Problems Severe CT Fatigue and Ballooning Problems Downhole Well Conditions Not Known Downhole Well Conditions Not Known Failed to Test Jet Kerfing Drilling Failed to Test Jet Kerfing Drilling Additional Field Tests Sought Additional Field Tests Sought

SPE Field Test II – RMOTC At DOE-operated Rocky Mountain Oilfield Testing Center (Casper, Wyoming) At DOE-operated Rocky Mountain Oilfield Testing Center (Casper, Wyoming) Rotary Drilling Rotary Drilling Option for Deeper Drilling Option for Deeper Drilling Rig Upgrades Required for HP Service Rig Upgrades Required for HP Service Jointed Drill Pipe with Double-Shoulder Tool Joints Jointed Drill Pipe with Double-Shoulder Tool Joints Variety of Formations Drilled Variety of Formations Drilled

SPE RMOTC Rig Cooper 550 Rig Rated to 275 kip 7000’ depth Pulls doubles

SPE Cost to Upgrade Rig $605,750TOTAL: $500,000New HP Pump $10,000Labor $1,650Welding and X-ray $16,700Gooseneck, unions, hardline, tees, and misc. $5,300Stand Pipe Fill Up Valve 2-1/16" (15,000 psi) $11,800Stand Pipe Master Valve 3-1/16" (15,000 psi) $10,600HP Swivel Joints (Chicksans) $33,500HP 150-ton Drilling Swivel $16,200HP Kelly Hose (10,000 psi) Cost Upgrade for High-Pressure (HP) Service

SPE Upgraded HP Swivel

SPE High-Pressure Pump

SPE Double-Shoulder Tool Joint

SPE RMOTC Bit Runs 10.4– Goose EggConv. Bit Goose EggBit 3 – Run Red Peaks ShaleBit 3 – Run Red Peaks ShaleBit 3 – Run Red Peaks ShaleBit 1 – Run Red Peaks ShaleBit 2 – Run Red Peaks ShaleBit 2 – Run Crow Mountain Sand / Alcova Limestone Bit 2 – Run Crow Mountain SandBit 2 – Run 1 ––– (Cleaning out sand from well)Bit 1 – Run 1 Ratio JKD to Conv. Conv. Rate (ft/hr) Jet Kerf ROP (ft/hr) Formation –

SPE Jet Kerf Drilling Rates

SPE Increase in ROP

SPE High-Pressure Kerf Bit (6½”)

SPE Rapid Erosion of Nozzles

SPE Washout in Side of Bit 3

SPE Sectioned Bit Eroded Nozzle Port

SPE Solution – Extended Nozzle US Patent No. 6,142,248 High-velocity fluid

SPE Summary of RMOTC Tests Drilled Multiple Formations at High ROP (>5X) Drilled Multiple Formations at High ROP (>5X) Used Conventional Rotary Drilling Used Conventional Rotary Drilling No Equipment Problems No Equipment Problems Nozzle Erosion Only Major Issue Nozzle Erosion Only Major Issue

SPE Economic Model Conditions & Assumptions Defined Base-Case Well Defined Base-Case Well – 28 total days on site – 24 drilling days – Value based on rig rate of $10,000/day Hole Sizes for Kerf Drilling ≤6½” Hole Sizes for Kerf Drilling ≤6½” 1/3 of Drilling Days for Kerf Drilling 1/3 of Drilling Days for Kerf Drilling

SPE Wells per year $280,000 Cost per well 8 Small hole drilling days (≤6½”) 24 Drilling days per well 28 Total days per well $10,000 Daily rig cost Base-Case Well

SPE $220 $227 $240 $232 Well Cost with Jet Kerfing $210 $215 $220 $225 $230 $235 $240 $245 2X ROP2.5X ROP3X ROP4X ROP Drilling Rate Cost per Well ($1000) Daily Rig Rate = $10,000

SPE Well Cost including Payback $282 $273 $266 $259 $262 $254 $248 $240 $210 $220 $230 $240 $250 $260 $270 $280 $290 2X ROP2.5X ROP3X ROP4X ROP Drilling Rate Cost Per Well ($1000) 1 Year Payback2 Year Payback

SPE Faster ROP = More Wells Per Year Drilling Rate Days Per Well Wells Per Year Base Case2X ROP2.5X ROP3X ROP4X ROP

SPE Conclusions Increased ROP is Key Factor in Reducing Total Well Costs. Increased ROP is Key Factor in Reducing Total Well Costs. JKD Can Significantly Increase ROP. In Field Tests, System Drilled 1.3–6X Faster than Conventional. JKD Can Significantly Increase ROP. In Field Tests, System Drilled 1.3–6X Faster than Conventional. JKD Successful in Variety of Formation Types. JKD Successful in Variety of Formation Types.

SPE Conclusions (cont’d.) JKD Can Be Accomplished Using off-the- Shelf Equipment to Upgrade Rotary Rigs for HP Operation. HP Kerfing Bits will Require Anti-Erosion Nozzles to Increase Bit Life. Safety Issues for Handling HP Fluids Successfully Addressed on Field Tests. Safety Issues for Handling HP Fluids Successfully Addressed on Field Tests.

SPE