Weigh-In-Motion (WIM) Data Collection & Reporting Office of Highway Policy Information 2012 Highway Information Seminar - Session: 6B Thursday, October.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Weigh-In Motion (WIM) Detectors
Advertisements

Traffic Data For Pavement 2012 FHWA Highway Information Seminar, Arlington, VA Tianjia Tang, PE, Ph.D. Chief, Travel Monitoring and Surveys Division 421.
Retroreflectivity: Raising the Nighttime Brightness of Traffic Signs and Markings Office of Technology Applications Peter Hatzi.
How to Build a Better Bus Garage: Mn/DOTs Facility Guidebook 18 th National Conference on Rural Public and Intercity Bus Transportation Gerry Weiss, State.
Axle and Length Classification Steven Jessberger
Traffic Monitoring Guide Truck Weight Monitoring Section 5.
NCHRP Task 254 Project Vehicle Size & Weight Management Technology Transfer/Best Practices.
Welcome to FHWA’s TMAS version 2.0 Demonstration
Impacting Local Government Updating Functional Classification Using GIS September 12, 2013 Bentonville, Arkansas.
By Mr.Surasak Kaewdee Transportation Engineering Dr. Kunnawee Kanitpong (Adviser) Asian Institute of Technology ANALYSIS OF TRAFFIC LOADING CHARACTERISTICS.
Canadian Truck Size & Weight Harmonization New Brunswick Department of Transportation Subcommittee on Highway Transport Portland, Maine June 6-9, 2010.
Minnesota Department of Transportation House Transportation Policy & Finance Committee February 23, 2015.
PaveDAT Pavement Damage Assessment Tool Roger Mingo, P.E.
Federal Highway Administration Size and Weight Technologies ITS America Conference - May 2006 Session #35 Office of Freight Management and Operations Mike.
INDOT Challenge: How to Maintain Our Highway Infrastructure Mark Newland Deputy Commissioner of Traffic Management Indiana Department of Transportation.
WEIGH-IN-MOTION SYSTEM CALIBRATION. CURRENT CHALLENGES Significant Growth in CMV Traffic Increased congestion and delay Demand for larger and heavier.
Analysis and Multi-Level Modeling of Truck Freight Demand Huili Wang, Kitae Jang, Ching-Yao Chan California PATH, University of California at Berkeley.
INTEGRATION OF WEIGH-IN-MOTION TECHNOLOGY INTO NIST’S HANDBOOK 44 Webinar: Talking Freight September 21, 2011 Dan Middleton Texas Transportation Institute.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Performance Management.
SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.
Commercial Vehicles and Freight Mobility Mark Newland Deputy Commissioner of Traffic Management Indiana Department of Transportation.
1 May 3, 2010 Paul Pisano Team Leader, Road Weather Management Federal Highway Administration Road Weather Hazards OFCM Mini-Workshop: “Moving To Incorporate.
ARISTOTELION UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI SCHOOL OF TECHNOLOGY FACULTY OF RURAL AND SURVEYING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING.
Norman W. Garrick Travel Flow Data Some Basic Concepts Good travel flow data for all modes of travel is important for transportation planning and design.
1 Idaho Highway Cost Allocation Study Patrick Balducci, Battelle Joe Stowers, Sydec July 27, 2010.
Optimal Highway Durability in Cold Regions Jia Yan Washington State University 18 June 2015.
Getting More Value from All Highway Data FHWA’s Current Initiatives and Future Plans Presented at Data System Requirements and Gaps to Support Restructuring.
Talking Freight April 15, General Themes Seen in Reauthorization Proposals/Positions Defining a federal role in freight and goods movement given.
Traffic Volume Data Collection Daniel Jenkins, PE Substitute – Steven Jessberger Office of Highway Policy Information October 23, 2012.
Best Practices Related to Research Problem Identification, Scoping, and Programming: A Researcher’s View Martin Pietrucha, Director The Thomas D. Larson.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
National VMT Development Procedure Highway Information Seminar October , 2012 Patrick Zhang, PE
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Act of 2011 Potential Freight Implications FHWA Talking Freight December 2011 Tony Furst, Director FHWA.
COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLE WEIGHT ENFORCEMENT. CURRENT CHALLENGES Significant Growth in CMV Traffic Increased congestion and delay Demand for larger and.
B-WIM for Bridge Enforcement and Structural Safety
VIRGINIA’S IMPLEMENTATION of the FINAL RULE on WORK ZONE SAFETY and MOBILITY Virginia Department of Transportation’s Instructional and Informational Memorandum-LD-241.
Office of Highway Safety Highway Factors David S. Rayburn.
WVDOT/MPO/FHWA Transportation Planning Conference WVDOT Traffic Data Collection, Processing and Analysis Handbook Presented to September 16, 2015 Presented.
Rich Quinley California Department of Transportation.
Tolling Overweight Vehicles on Highways Rod Klashinsky, International Road Dynamics, Inc.
1 25 th International Conference on IIPS, AMS Annual Meeting, Phoenix, AZ An Update on FHWA Road Weather Management Initiatives Paul Pisano Federal Highway.
Highway Information Seminar October 25, 2012 Adella Santos, NHTS Program Manager FHWA, Office of Highway Policy Information.
Interpreting Demand and Capacity for Street and Highway Design Lecture 6 CE 5720 Norman Garrick Norman W. Garrick.
BIM Bridge Inspection and Maintenance Technical Standards Branch Class B Bridge Inspection Course Inspection Policies and Procedures INSPECTION POLICIES.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Performance Measure Update.
Data Palooza Workshop May 9, 2013 Rabinder Bains, FHWA – Office of Policy and Government Affairs.
2012 HIS Session 2 What’s new with Traffic Monitoring? Bicycle and Pedestrian Data Collection FHWA - Washington DC Steven Jessberger
1 Part 4 HPMS Vehicle Summary Data Computation. Additional Columns 2  Ucode=if(urban_code=99999, “Rural”, “Urban”)  VMT=(end_point-begin_point)*AADT.
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING II
New Mexico Department of Transportation Research Bureau Expanding the Use of Weigh-In-Motion Data.
Analyzing Changes to Truck Size and Weight Regulations Methods for States presented to AASHTO Subcommittee on Highway Transport presented by Donald Ludlow,
Design Criteria CTC 440. Objectives Know what “design criteria” means Determine design criteria for various types of facilities.
Abstract Background Methodology Methods While the project is in the data-collection and background research phase, there are several studies that utilize.
Tiffany Julien Office of Freight Management and Operations Implementation of the National Freight Network 1.
The Use of PAVEDAT for the District-wide Truck Enforcement Plan June 20, 2012 Mark Berndt Eulois Cleckley.
HPMS Traffic Data Review Highway Information Seminar Oct , 2012 Patrick Zhang, P.E Office of Highway Information Policy, FHWA 1.
AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan Development & Implementation Status 2004 Traffic Records Forum David M. Smith Senior Transportation Specialist, Office.
Company LOGO Georgia Truck Lane Needs Identification Study Talking Freight Seminar March 19, 2008 Matthew Fowler, P.T.P Assistant State Planning Administrator.
A Rational Procedure for development of traffic distribution factors Harikishan Perugu, PTP Transportation Engineer/Planner OKI Regional Council of Governments.
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Traffic Monitoring Guide (TMG) - What’s New? 2012 Highway Information Seminar - Session: 2C Tuesday October 23, :45 pm – 4:00 pm By: David L. Jones.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 and Managing National Highway Performance Michael Nesbitt Federal Highway.
Federal Highway Administration University Course on Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Publication No. FHWA-HRT Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning.
0 Freight Activities: Year in Review Dec. 12 th 2015.
Kanok Boriboonsomsin, Guoyuan Wu, Peng Hao, and Matthew Barth
Idaho Transportation Department (ITD)
Fuel cost and road damage: evidence from weigh-in-motion data
Overview of FHWA CMAQ & System Performance Measures
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING II
Emily Guenther Zach Olson Laura Scott Cameron Wein
Presentation transcript:

Weigh-In-Motion (WIM) Data Collection & Reporting Office of Highway Policy Information 2012 Highway Information Seminar - Session: 6B Thursday, October 25, :00 am – 9:30 am By: David L. Jones Sr.,Transportation Specialist

Provide Background and Update Describe Truck Weight Program State Reporting Requirements (TMG) Update WIM System Deployment & Sensor Technology Identify Data Collection Issues TWS Status & National Loading Trends Open Discussions dialogue OBJECTIVE

1831Thaddeus Fairbanks 1918BPRs First Road Test 1934 Hayden-Cartwright Act 1939 Type A Loadometer 181 Years of Vehicle Weighing

1942Strain Gage Load Cell 1950O.K. Norman 181 Years of Vehicle Weighing

1985Traffic Monitoring Guide 1955AASHO Road Test Approved 1971TWS Manual 181 Years of Vehicle Weighing 2012Traffic Monitoring Guide Update

Ensure Quality Input Data Provide Latest Procedural and Program Guidelines Transferable Techniques and Procedures ITS Data Bike and Pedestrian TMG Update Project Goals

Chapter 1 – Traffic Monitoring Theory, Technology, and Concepts Chapter 2 – Traffic Monitoring Program – Business Planning and Design Chapter 3 – Traffic Monitoring Methodologies Chapter 4 – Traffic Monitoring for Non- Motorized Traffic Table Of Contents

Chapter 5 – Transportation Management and Operations Chapter 6 – HPMS Requirements for Traffic Data Chapter 7 – Traffic Monitoring Data Formats Appendices: Table Of Contents

Speed Non-motorized data Data Formats Reporting Requirements Expanded Examples, Appendixes and References What’s New

Updated ~2+ days NHI TMG Training Course Public Website: Other Associated Work Project Information // Project Schedule // Panel Members // Panel // Public Review and Comment

Weigh-In-Motion?  Process of Measuring Dynamic Tire Forces  Using in Pavement Sensors  To Estimate a Static Vehicle Weight

Why Weigh?

Pavement Design / Maintenance

Bridge Design / Loading

Pavement Design / Maintenance Bridge Design / Loading

Pavement Design / Maintenance Bridge Design / Loading Enforcement

Pavement Design / Maintenance Bridge Design / Loading Enforcement Research

Pavement Design / Maintenance Bridge Design / Loading Enforcement Research Freight Movement

Why Weigh in Motion? Traffic Stream Use of the Highway System

Truck Weight Program Components Users Needs –End in Mind –2002 Pavement Design Guide Resources –Federal-aid and construction funds Locations –Available funds Truck Weight Groups –Criteria for groups

A.Define truck weight roadway groups Maximum Weight in a Given Weight Group (x 1,000 lbs) Fraction of Axles in Each Weight Group Heavily Loaded Moderately Loaded Lightly Loaded Tandem Axle Load Distributions

A.Define truck weight roadway groups RuralUrban Interstate and arterial major through-truck routes Interstate and arterial major truck routes Other roads (e.g., regional agricultural roads) with little through traffic Interstate and other freeways serving primarily local truck traffic Special cases (e.g., recreational, ports)

A.Define truck weight roadway groups B.6 sites / group RuralUrban Interstate and arterial major through-truck routes Interstate and arterial major truck routes Other roads (e.g., regional agricultural roads) with little through traffic Interstate and other freeways serving primarily local truck traffic Special cases (e.g., recreational, ports)

A.Define truck weight roadway groups B.6 sites / group C.One continuous WIM within group Capture day-of-week and seasonal changes within each group

A.Define truck weight roadway groups B.6 sites / group C.One continuous WIM within group Capture day-of-week and seasonal changes within each group D. Calibrate, Calibrate, Calibrate

Criteria for Groups Can be easily applied in any state Logical means for disguising between heavy and light loaded roadways

WIM Sensor Technology Bending Plates” – Strain gauge/load cells Load Cell” – Hydraulic load cells Piezo” -electric cables/film/quartz Capacitance” mats/pads/strips Bridge” Strain gauges on bridge beams

Minimum quarterly WIM submittal truck weight data from permanent weight-in-motion (WIM) sites within 26 days after the close of the quarter. ***Monthly WIM Submittal is Encouraged*** Reporting Requirements

Truck Weight Study Status

TMAS Products System wide Vehicle weight by vehicle class Axle Load Distribution Equivalent Single Axle Load (ESAL) Day-of-Week and Seasonal Patterns

W-Tables (TWS) W1-Weigh Station Characteristics W2-Comparison of Weighted vs. Counted W3-Average Empty, Loaded, and Cargo Weights W4-Equivalency Factors W5-Gross Vehicle Weights W6-Overweight Vehicle Report W7-Distribution of Overweight Vehicles VTRIS Reports:

Rural Interstate Travel by Vehicle Type 1Equivalent axle loads provide a means of measuring vehicle wear on pavements by relating them to an80 kilonewton (18,000 pound) single axle load. 2 All 2-axle, 4-tire trucks. Includes pickup trucks, panel trucks, vans and other vehicles (such as campers,motor homes, etc.) 3 All vehicles on a single frame have either 2 axles and 6 tires or 3 or more axles (including camping andrecreational vehicles and motor homes.) Average Daily TrafficEquivalent Single Axle Loads Percent Automobiles, Buses and Light Trucks Heavy Single Unit Trucks All Combination Trucks Distribution of Average Daily Traffic Volumes and Equivalent Axle Loads on the Rural Interstate System as a Percent of Total

Urban Interstate Travel by Vehicle Type 1Equivalent axle loads provide a means of measuring vehicle wear on pavements by relating them to an80 kilonewton (18,000 pound) single axle load. 2 All 2-axle, 4-tire trucks. Includes pickup trucks, panel trucks, vans and other vehicles (such as campers,motor homes, etc.) 3 All vehicles on a single frame have either 2 axles and 6 tires or 3 or more axles (including camping andrecreational vehicles and motor homes.) Average Daily TrafficEquivalent Single Axle Loads Percent Automobiles, Buses and Light Trucks Heavy Single Unit Trucks 3- & 4-Axle Combination Trucks Distribution of Average Daily Traffic Volumes and Equivalent Axle Loads on the Rural Interstate System as a Percent of Total

Greater than 10M tons per year 5 to 10 M tons per year Less than 5 M tons per year

Monthly Average GVW Variations

Hourly Average GVW Variations

Data Quality Act Data Quality Quality Assurance Statement The Federal Highway Administration provides high-quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. FHWA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement. Requests for Correction On October 1, 2002, the Department of Transportation (DOT) issued agency guidelines to ensure the quality of disseminated information. If you are affected by information that the Department has disseminated on or after October 1, 2002 (i.e., if you are harmed because the information does not meet the standards of the guidelines or a correction of the information would benefit you), you may request that the Department correct that information. We regard information originally disseminated before October 1, 2002, as being subject to this correction process only if it remains readily available to the public (e.g., it is posted on a DOT website) and it continues to play a significant, active role in Department programs or in private sector decisions. Information on how to submit a request can be found at

Data Quality Elements Data collection Data Processing Process improvement Implementation plan Data quality program.

FUTURE WIM’s Future Role

National estimates of heavy vehicle highway travel on a monthly basis National estimates of axle loadings and highway ton-miles of freight moved each month, and Highway specific estimates of truck volumes and loadings Travel Monitoring Analysis System

46  Traffic Volume Trends  GIS  Freight Management  Safety “THE EASY BUTTON” Travel Monitoring Analysis System

Session 6B Summary Truck Weight User Needs? Truck Weight Program Components? Submittal Requirements? Data Quality? Truck Weight Data Reports?

Questions What questions do you still have about the Traffic Monitoring Program? Expectations met?

THANK YOU ! David L. Jones Sr.