GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Downward SW Radiation at Surface and Reflected SW Radiation at TOA Hongqing Liu (Dell) Istvan Laszlo (STAR)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 1. FY09 GOES-R3 Project Proposal Title Page Title: Trace Gas and Aerosol Emissions from GOES-R ABI Project Type: GOES-R algorithm development project.
Advertisements

Xiaolei Niu and R. T. Pinker Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland Radiative Flux Estimates from.
On the Development of GOES-R Longwave Earth Radiation Budget Products Hai-Tien Lee (1) & Istvan Laszlo (2) (1) CICS/ESSIC-NOAA, University of Maryland.
GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Downward SW Radiation at Surface and Reflected SW Radiation at TOA Hongqing Liu (Dell) Istvan Laszlo (STAR)
A Tutorial on MODIS and VIIRS Aerosol Products from Direct Broadcast Data on IDEA Hai Zhang 1, Shobha Kondragunta 2, Hongqing Liu 1 1.IMSG at NOAA 2.NOAA.
Surface Skin/Air Temperature and LW Flux Calculation Y-C. Zhang and W.B. Rossow LandFlux Conference CNES/CESBIO, Toulouse, France May 28 – 31, 2007.
GOES-R AWG 2 nd Validation Workshop Hye-Yun Kim (IMSG), Istvan Laszlo (NOAA) and Hongqing Liu (IMSG) GOES-R AWG 2 nd Validation Workshop, Jan , 2014.
Brief Overview of CM-SAF & Possible use of the Data for NCMPs.
Brief Overview of CM-SAF & Possible use of the Data for NCMPs.
The Radiative Budget of an Atmospheric Column in Tropical Western Pacific Zheng Liu 1 Thomas Ackerman 1,2, Sally McFarlane 2, Jim Mather 2, University.
GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Aerosol Optical Depth/Suspended Matter and Aerosol Particle Size Mi Zhou (IMSG) Pubu Ciren (DELL) Hongqing.
Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies University of Wisconsin - Madison Steve Ackerman Director, Cooperative Institute for Meteorological.
CRN Workshop, March 3-5, An Attempt to Evaluate Satellite LST Using SURFRAD Data Yunyue Yu a, Jeffrey L. Privette b, Mitch Goldberg a a NOAA/NESDIS/StAR.
Aircraft spiral on July 20, 2011 at 14 UTC Validation of GOES-R ABI Surface PM2.5 Concentrations using AIRNOW and Aircraft Data Shobha Kondragunta (NOAA),
Surface Atmospheric Radiation Budget (SARB) working group update Seiji Kato 1, Fred Rose 2, David Rutan 2, Alexander Radkevich 2, Tom Caldwell 2, David.
1 GOES-R AWG Hydrology Algorithm Team: Rainfall Probability June 14, 2011 Presented By: Bob Kuligowski NOAA/NESDIS/STAR.
1 GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Cloud Products Andrew Heidinger (STAR) Michael Pavolonis (STAR) Andi Walther (CIMSS) Pat Heck and Pat.
Z. P. Szewczyk GIST 25, Oct Recent Field Campaigns with CERES Instruments Z. Peter Szewczyk Kory J. Priestley Lou Smith Remote Sensing of Clouds.
1 GOES-R AWG Hydrology Algorithm Team: Rainfall Potential June 14, 2011 Presented By: Bob Kuligowski NOAA/NESDIS/STAR.
Remote sensing of aerosol from the GOES-R Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) Istvan Laszlo 1, Pubu Ciren 2, Hongqing Liu 2, Shobha Kondragunta 1, Xuepeng Zhao.
Radiation Group 3: Manabe and Wetherald (1975) and Trenberth and Fasullo (2009) – What is the energy balance of the climate system? How is it altered by.
Evaluation and applications of a new satellite-based surface solar radiation data set for climate analysis Jörg Trentmann1, Richard Müller1, Christine.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 GOES Solar Radiation Products in Support of Renewable Energy Istvan Laszlo.
1st Progress meeting ELDAS The ELDORADO surface radiation system Bart vd Hurk & Dirk Meetschen et al (see ELDAS web-page)
GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Aerosol Optical Depth/Suspended Matter and Aerosol Particle Size Mi Zhou (IMSG) Pubu Ciren (DELL) Hongqing.
The GOES-R Algorithm Working Group (AWG) program requests a high quality of proxy data for algorithm developments, testing and assessments. The central.
Introduction Invisible clouds in this study mean super-thin clouds which cannot be detected by MODIS but are classified as clouds by CALIPSO. These sub-visual.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Current Status  Framework is in place and algorithms are being integrated.
AGU 2002 Fall Meeting NASA Langley Research Center / Atmospheric Sciences Validation of GOES-8 Derived Cloud Properties Over the Southeastern Pacific J.
1 GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Aviation Application Team – Volcanic Ash Mike Pavolonis (STAR)
1 GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Aviation Application Team – Volcanic Ash Mike Pavolonis (STAR)
1 Center for S a t ellite A pplications and R esearch (STAR) Applicability of GOES-R AWG Cloud Algorithms for JPSS/VIIRS AMS Annual Meeting Future Operational.
GOES and GOES-R ABI Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) Validation Shobha Kondragunta and Istvan Laszlo (NOAA/NESDIS/STAR), Chuanyu Xu (IMSG), Pubu Ciren (Riverside.
Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) will be flown on the next generation of NOAA Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES)-R platform. The sensor.
1 Geostationary Cloud Algorithm Testbed (GEOCAT) Processing Mike Pavolonis and Andy Heidinger (NOAA/NESDIS/STAR) Corey Calvert and William Straka III (UW-CIMSS)
VIPER Quality Assessment Overview Presenter: Sathyadev Ramachandran, SPS Inc.
11 Ice Cover and Sea and Lake Ice Concentration with GOES-R ABI Presented by Yinghui Liu Presented by Yinghui Liu 1 Team Members: Yinghui Liu, Jeffrey.
View_hdf Kam-Pui Lee Science Applications International Corporation CERES Data Management Team Linda Hunt Computer Sciences Corporation Atmospheric Sciences.
Estimating the radiative impacts of aerosol using GERB and SEVIRI H. Brindley Imperial College.
11 The Cryosphere Team Members  Cryosphere Application Team  Jeff Key (Lead; STAR/ASPB) »Peter Romanov (CREST) »Don Cline (NWS/NOHRSC) »Marouane Temimi.
1 GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Derived Motion Winds Jaime Daniels (STAR) Wayne Bresky (IMSG, Inc) Steve Wanzong (CIMSS) Chris Velden.
Radiative Atmospheric Divergence using ARM Mobile Facility, GERB data and AMMA stations –led by Tony Slingo, ESSC, Reading University, UK Links the ARM.
Testing LW fingerprinting with simulated spectra using MERRA Seiji Kato 1, Fred G. Rose 2, Xu Liu 1, Martin Mlynczak 1, and Bruce A. Wielicki 1 1 NASA.
As components of the GOES-R ABI Air Quality products, a multi-channel algorithm similar to MODIS/VIIRS for NOAA’s next generation geostationary satellite.
R. T. Pinker, H. Wang, R. Hollmann, and H. Gadhavi Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland Use of.
A system for satellite LST product monitoring and retrieval algorithm evaluation Peng Yu 12, Yunyue Yu 2, Zhuo Wang 12, and Yuling Liu 12 1 ESSIC/CICS,
Preparing for GOES-R: old tools with new perspectives Bernadette Connell, CIRA CSU, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA ABSTRACT Creating.
RMIB involvement in the Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB) and Climate Monitoring SAF projects Nicolas Clerbaux Remote sensing from Space Division.
Introduction GOES-R ABI will be the first GOES imaging instrument providing observations in both the visible and the near infrared spectral bands. Therefore.
1 GOES-R AWG Aviation Team: SO 2 Detection Presented By: Mike Pavolonis NOAA/NESDIS/STAR.
Sophia Antipolis, 17 octobre 2003 HELIOSAT-II. What is Heliosat? Raw image Irradiation (energy)
V6.6 June 08 1 SPSRB Decision Brief on Declaring “Full-Disk GOES Surface and Insolation Products” Operational Presenter: Hanjun Ding (OSDPD) IPT Lead:
1 GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Snow Cover Team Thomas Painter UCAR Andrew Rost, Kelley Eicher, Chris Bovitz NOHRSC.
1 GOES-R AWG Land Team: ABI Land Surface Albedo (LSA) and Surface Reflectance Algorithm June 14, 2011 Presented by: Shunlin Liang Dongdong Wang, Tao He.
Retrieval Algorithms The derivations for each satellite consist of two steps: 1) cloud detection using a Bayesian Probabilistic Cloud Mask; and 2) application.
CM-SAF Board Meeting, Helsinki, September 2006 CM-SAF TOA radiation status report D. Caprion Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium.
Estimation of Potential Evapotranspiration from Merged CERES and MODIS Observations Anand Inamdar & A. French Arid Land Agricultural Research Center (ALARC/ARS/USDA)
Generation of TOA Radiative Fluxes from the GERB Instrument Data. Part II: First Results Nicolas Clerbaux and GERB team Royal Meteorological Institute.
1 GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Snow Cover Team Thomas Painter UCAR Andrew Rost, Kelley Eicher, Chris Bovitz NOHRSC.
Cloud Fraction from Cloud Mask vs Total Sky Imager Comparison of 1 and 4 km Data The native resolution of the vis channel on GOES Imager is roughly 1 km.
1 GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Hydrology Application Team Bob Kuligowski (STAR)
Interannual Variability and Decadal Change of Solar Reflectance Spectra Zhonghai Jin Costy Loukachine Bruce Wielicki (NASA Langley research Center / SSAI,
Consistent Earth System Data Records for Climate Research: Focus on Shortwave and Longwave Radiative Fluxes Rachel T. Pinker, Yingtao Ma and Eric Nussbaumer.
1 GOES-R AWG Aviation Team: ABI Visibility Algorithm (VP) June 14, 2011 Presented By: R. Bradley Pierce 1 1 NOAA/NESDIS/STAR.
NASA Langley Research Center / Atmospheric Sciences CERES Instantaneous Clear-sky and Monthly Averaged Radiance and Flux Product Overview David Young NASA.
TOA Radiative Flux Estimation From CERES Angular Distribution Models
Satellite Data Resources: Browsing and Accessing Archived Datasets
GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development
Inter-satellite Calibration of HIRS OLR Time Series
Studying the cloud radiative effect using a new, 35yr spanning dataset of cloud properties and radiative fluxes inferred from global satellite observations.
Presentation transcript:

GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Downward SW Radiation at Surface and Reflected SW Radiation at TOA Hongqing Liu (Dell) Istvan Laszlo (STAR) Hye-Yun Kim (IMSG) Rachel Pinker (UMD) Ells Dutton & John Augustine (ESRL) 1

2 OUTLINE Products Validation Strategies Examples Ideas for Further Enhancement and Utility of Validation Tools Summary

Products Shortwave Radiation Products: –Downward Shortwave Radiation at Surface (DSR) CONUS: 25km/60min Full Disk: 50km/60min Mesoscale: 5km/60min –Reflected Shortwave Radiation at TOA (RSR) CONUS: 25km/60min Full Disk: 25km/60min Only daytime 3

Monitoring & Validation Background Functions of tools: –routine monitoring (may not need reference data) –routine validation (reference data, matchup procedure) –deep-dive validation (reference data, other correlative data, matchup) Basic elements: –data acquisition (ABI, ground, other sat products) (Fortran 90) –spatial and temporal matching (lots of possibilities) (Fortran 90) –analysis (computing statistics) (IDL) Metadata Accuracy/Precision RMSE Minimum/Maximum Error –present results (display maps, scatter plots, tables) (IDL) 4

Validation Strategies 5 Satellite Measurements –Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) Cloud and Radiative Swath (CRS) dataset: (1) measured TOA upward SW flux, (2) calculated Surface and Atmospheric Radiation Budget (SARB). /level2_crs_table.html /level2_crs_table.html Reference (“truth”) data Collocation of ABI retrievals and reference data is performed at the instantaneous time scale. Matching: ABI retrievals averaged spatially; ground measurements averaged temporally. Averaging window size is flexible. Independent satellite retrieval (CERES) Collocation: CERES data are averaged to the ABI retrieval grid on a daily basis. Matching: current retrievals use MODIS data as input; CERES is on same platform; no need for temporal matching. Reference Dataset Collocation/Match-up Ground Measurements –High-quality routine ground radiation measurements over Western Hemisphere from 20 stations from SURFRAD (ftp://ftp.srrb.noaa.gov/pub/data/surfrad/) and BSRN (ftp://ftp.bsrn.awi.de/) networks.ftp://ftp.srrb.noaa.gov/pub/data/surfrad/ftp://ftp.bsrn.awi.de/

Routine Validation Tools Instantaneous Monitoring Present retrieval results –Specify date & load data –Selection from ‘Variable’ menu Primary Outputs (image) –DSR –RSR Diagnostic Outputs (image) –Surface diffuse flux –Surface albedo –Clear-sky composite albedo –Clear-sky aerosol optical depth –Water cloud optical depth –Ice cloud optical depth Quality Flags (image) –66 flags (inputs, retrieval, diagnostics) Metadata (ascii file output) Independent of validation truth; can be executed automatically by scripts once retrievals are available. 6

Routine Validation Tools Validation with Ground “Truth” Validates DSR&RSR for a period of time –Specify time period & load data –‘Validation’ menu Generate scatter plot of retrievals against measurements Generate validation statistics and output to ascii file –‘TimeSeries’ menu Generate time series plots of retrieval and measurements over ground stations 7

8 ”Deep-Dive” Validation Tools Validation with CERES An expansion of routine validation with CERES including cross validation against NASA SARB satellite products –Options: Scene types –all; snow ; clear ; water cloud; ice cloud Retrieval path –Hybrid path –Direct path only –Indirect path only –TOA matching (all; succeed; failed) –Surface albedo (all; succeed; failed) –Specify date & load data –Selection from ‘Validation’ menu Reflected SW Radiation at TOA (RSR) Retrieval; Retrieval-CERES; Retrieval-SARB Tuned; Retrieval-SARB Untuned; Statistics (Scatter plot; Statistics in ascii file) Downward SW Radiation at Surface (DSR) Retrieval; Retrieval-SARB Tuned; Retrieval-SARB Untuned; Statistics Absorbed SW Radiation at Surface (ASR) Retrieval; Retrieval-SARB Tuned; Retrieval-SARB Untuned; Statistics Absorbed SW Radiation in Atmosphere (ABS) Retrieval; Retrieval-SARB Tuned; Retrieval-SARB Untuned; Statistics Surface SW Albedo (ALB) Retrieval; Retrieval-SARB Tuned; Retrieval-SARB Untuned; Statistics

Calculate and display –additional statistics (histograms) –temporal averages on different scales (daily, weekly, monthly) Identify signatures by which even non-experts can identify potential problems – needed for routine operational monitoring Implement automatic detection of possible systematic drift or continuous abnormal retrieval in routine validation. –establish “reference” (expected) statistics from good data –compare time series of actual statistics with reference stats –trigger action (e.g., sending warning ) when actual stats exceed reference stats + x std. Combine SW validation with LW radiation retrievals –check consistency e.g., high RSR low OLR is expected for cloudy scenes –additional diagnostic information for deep-dive validation (LW radiation) Current tool uses retrievals from MODIS proxy data. Adjustment to tools for retrievals from geostationary orbit will be needed (data preparation). 9 Ideas for Further Enhancement and Utility of Validation Tools

10 Summary Current tools perform three functions: –routine monitoring of product –routine validation with reference data –deep-dive validation with reference and intermediate data Validation truth data have been identified and processed Planned enhancements include: –more stats –automatic detection of problems –checking consistency with LW

GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Upward LW Radiation at TOA Upward and Downward LW Radiation at Surface Hai-Tien Lee (CICS/UMD) Istvan Laszlo (STAR/NESDIS) Ells Dutton & John Augustine (ESRL) 11 Acknowledgments : NOAA SURFRAD, NASA CERES, BSRN, DOE ARM, Eumetsat GERB & LSA-SAF GOESR AWG Annual Meeting, June 14-16, 2011, Fort Collins, CO

Products Longwave Radiation Products: –Upward LW Radiation at TOA (OLR) CONUS: 25km/60min Full Disk: 25km/60min –Downward LW Radiation at Surface (DLR): Clear sky only CONUS: 25km/60min Full Disk: 25km/60min –Upward LW Radiation at Surface (ULR): Clear sky only CONUS: 25km/60min Full Disk: 25km/60min 12 GOES12 Imager OLR

Validation Strategies Reference Dataset (Ground) Ground Measurements –High-quality routine ground radiation measurements over Western Hemisphere used for validating ABI Longwave Radiation retrievals are collected from 7 stations from SURFRAD network. –Selected stations of BSRN and Eumetsat LSA SAF that provide surface upward and downward longwave radiation measurements can be used for offline/framework algorithm evaluation. 13 StationNetworkLongitudeLatitudeElevation[m]Measurements Used fpk SURFRAD surface LW downward, upward fluxes; clear sky index; interpolated meteorological profiles sxf psu tbl bon dra gwn

Validation Strategies Reference Dataset (Satellite) Satellite Measurements –OLR product from Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) Single Scanner Footprint (SSF) datasets are used as algorithm validation reference. –Future NPP and JPSS OLR (from CERES FM5/6) can be used for routine monitoring and evaluation (possibly with lag). –Operational HIRS OLR from NOAA and MetOp polar orbiters will be used as a backup for routine monitoring purpose. 14

Tools: –IDL (primarily) Data Collocation Instantaneous Monitoring Validation over Ground Stations Validation with CERES Deep-dive Validation over Ground Stations Deep-dive Validation with CERES Statistics: –Metadata (ATBD), plus Mean/StDev for Global, zonal and selected domains of interests –Mean, StdDev, RMS, Min and Max of Errors Visualization: –IDL, GrADs –Figures rendered in PNG format 15 Validation Strategies Tools, Statistics & Visualization

16 Validation Strategies Example of Deep-Dive FM1 FM2 FM3 FM4 OLR Error vs LZA OLR Error vs SEVIRI Ch 5 radiance (UTH) OLR Error vs SEVIRI Ch 9 radiance (window) OLR Error as a function of Ch 7 and Ch 9 radiances Extended OLR Validation (March 2004)

17 Summary Validation truth data have been identified and being acquired Validation tools are designed to perform: –Routine monitoring of product –Routine validation with reference data –Deep-dive validation with reference and auxiliary data Planned enhancements include: –Temporal tracking of stats –Define level of alarms (for routine monitoring) –Explore possible sources of more ground truth –Clear-sky identification with auxiliary data.

END 18

Monitoring & Validation Background Functions of tools: –Routine monitoring (may not need reference data) –Routine validation (reference data, matchup procedure) –Deep-dive validation (reference data, other correlative data, matchup) Basic elements: –Data acquisition (ABI, ground & satellite products) (Unix Script, IDL) –Spatial and temporal matching (closed pixel vs area average) (IDL) –Analysis (computing statistics) (IDL, Datadesk) –Present results (display maps, scatter plots, tables) (IDL, GrADs, Kaleidagraph) Special considerations: –Degradation flag 19