Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Sponsor: NAVSEA Keyport Mentor: Mike Kapus Ben Brand, Kendra Brower, Joe Langevin, Jeffrey Le To power our vehicle, we have.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mechatronics Design Association EngSoc Budget Presentation 2012.
Advertisements

Project Title Here IEEE UCSD Overview Robo-Magellan is a robotics competition emphasizing autonomous navigation and obstacle avoidance over varied, outdoor.
Georgia Tech Aerial Robotics Dr. Daniel P Schrage Jeong Hur Fidencio Tapia Suresh K Kannan SUCCEED Poster Session 6 March 1997.
Greg Beau SerajAnanya. Outline  Project overview  Project-specific success criteria  Block diagram  Component selection rationale  Packaging design.
Presented By: Lynbrook Robotics, Team 846 John Chai, David Liu, Aashish Sreenharan, Michael Wachenschwanz, and Toshi Tochibana Available online at lynbrookrobotics.comlynbrookrobotics.com.
Remote Monitoring and Management Solutions ®
Objectives The objective of this design process was to create a small, autonomous robot capable of completing a set of predefined objectives within an.
Autonomous Quadrocopter Proposal Brad Bergerhouse, Nelson Gaske, Austin Wenzel Dr. Malinowski.
Part 1: Introduction FRC Introduction  FRC 2907 since 2008  Each area of the robot has a team assigned  The Electronics team is headed this year.
Intelligent Ground Vehicle Competition 2006 Brigham Young University.
Nandini Vemuri (EE) Jason Jack (CE) Ryan Schmitt (CE) Jeff Howe (EE) John Corleto (CE) Emily Phillips (EE) Power Distribution Subsystem Wireless Communication.
Field Navigational GPS Robot Final Presentation & Review Chris Foley, Kris Horn, Richard Neil Pittman, Michael Willis.
REAL-TIME SOFTWARE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT Instructor: Dr. Hany H. Ammar Dept. of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, WVU.
R I T Team Members: Nandini Vemuri → Team Lead, System Testing, Motor Expert Jason Jack → GUI Design, Microcontroller Expert, Website Administrator John.
Smart Rover Aaron Westphal Ben Merkel Joe Merrill Mike Wissolik.
A.U.V. Emeric Rochford Dale Williams Bryan Douse Ryan Gray.
Critical Design Review Colorado State University - Pueblo April 15, 2005.
Nandini Vemuri (EE) Jason Jack (CE) Ryan Schmitt (CE) Jeff Howe (EE) John Corleto (CE) Emily Phillips (EE) Power Distribution Subsystem Wireless Communication.
A.U.V. Emeric Rochford Dale Williams Bryan Douse Ryan Gray.
Deon Blaauw Modular Robot Design University of Stellenbosch Department of Electric and Electronic Engineering.
Infosession UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO MECHATRONICS DESIGN ASSOCIATION.
Design and Implementation of Metallic Waste Collection Robot
Milestone #1: Specifications and Requirements. Overview of Design Team Goals Education Design and construction process Competition Teamwork Communication.
Electrical and Computer Engineering Personal Head-Up Display Ivan Bercovich Radu-Andrei Ivan Jeff Little Felipe Vilas-Boas Faculty: Dr. Tilman Wolf Midway.
Client: Space Systems & Controls Laboratory (SSCL) Advisor : Matthew Nelson Anders Nelson (EE) Mathew Wymore (CprE)
Jonathan Wong Chong 14.8V Polymer Li-Ion Batteries o Only powering thrusters 19v 4Ah Li-Ion External Laptop Battery o Powers main.
InSeT System Inertial Sensor Tracking System Underground Mine Safety For Personnel Utilizing Inertial Sensors Technical Presentation.
Abstract Design Considerations and Future Plans In this project we focus on integrating sensors into a small electrical vehicle to enable it to navigate.
Patrick Lazar, Tausif Shaikh, Johanna Thomas, Kaleel Mahmood
Milestone #4 Test Plan & Conceptual Design Review Group 4 Victoria Jefferson Reece Spencer Andy Jeanthenor Yanira Torres Kevin Miles Tadamitsu Byrne 1.
Mentors Workshop Pneumatic Sub-System Mark McLeod Team 358 Festo/Hauppauge H.S. F For I Inspiration and R Recognition of S Science and T Technology.
Milestone #2 Project Proposal Group 4 Victoria Jefferson Reece Spencer Andy Jeanthanor Yanira Torres Kevin Miles Tadamitsu Byrne 1.
MDA Info Session General Meeting: Information & Recruitment Sept 19, 2012: 7-8pm Mechatronics Design Association General Info Session Sept 2012.
Ruslan Masinjila Aida Militaru.  Nature of the Problem  Our Solution: The Roaming Security Robot  Functionalities  General System View  System Design.
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY MADRAS Department of Engineering Design AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER ROBOTIC LABORATORY Researchers : Dr. Asokan Thondiyath, Mr.
Project Proposal: Student: Rowan Pivetta Supervisor: Dr Nasser Asgari.
Kurran Kelly – Lead Designer Silas Van Natter – Team Lead Josh Van Patten – Team Budget Manager Brandt Pedrow – Team Liaison and Recorder Branden Bakken.
Robot sensors MVRT 2010 – 2011 season. Analog versus Digital Analog Goes from 0 to 254 Numerous values Similar to making waves because there are not sudden.
Underwater Robotic Fish Phase II: Buoyancy P15029 Project Summary The objective of this project is to create an underwater robot that looks and swims like.
AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER VEHICLE Propulsion Vertical Thrust Controloverview The AUV Team Thrust Experiment Pool Testing The ultimate purpose of the AUV is.
Into the Abyss Deep Sea Exploration Kellen Osbourn SCM 330 MWF 8:00-9:00am.
Hybrid Power Controller (HPC) Mid-Semester Presentation Senior Design I.
Ali Alkuwari Patrick SwannJad FarahMarcus SchafferKorhan Demirkaya Long QuyDenden TekesteNgoc MaiSteven Weaver.
MSU ROV Team Final Presentation Senior Design 1 April 18, 2013.
Hybrid Power Controller (HPC) Final Presentation Senior Design II.
Path The purpose of this project is to design a universal data recording device to monitor the health of a Dresser-Rand compressor during operation. In.
MSU SeaMATE ROV Explorer Class
Hybrid Power Controller (HPC) Mid-Semester Presentation Senior Design I.
Mid-Semester Review Senior Design 2 October 8, 2013
Hybrid Power Controller (HPC) Mid-Semester Presentation Senior Design II.
MSU ROV Team Final Review Senior Design 2 November 19, 2013.
ECE 477 FINAL PRESENTATION TEAM 6  SPRING OUTLINE  Project overview  Block diagram  Design challenges  Individual contributions  Project demonstration.
Ali Alkuwari Patrick SwannJad FarahMarcus SchafferKorhan Demirkaya Long QuyDenden TekesteNgoc MaiSteven Weaver.
PROGRAMMABLE LOGIC CONTROLLER
Cass Lake Bena Robotics Team 3134 & Team  Drivetrains  Electrical System  Operator Interface.
UNH FIREFIGHTING ROBOT Ryan Morin, Craig Shurtleff, Andrew Levenbaum, Stephen Tobin, and Liam O’Connor University of New Hampshire: College of Engineering.
Fish Tank Project Introduction ME 121Portland State University Mechanical and Materials Engineering.
Autonomous Wheelchair Tyler Morton & Ben Hoerst Senior Design Advisor: Dr. Stanislaw Legowski Project Advisor: Dr. Steven Barrett ECE Senior Design.
Robotic Submarine (RoboSub) Information Session September 19, 2013.
The entire system was tested in a small swimming pool. The fully constructed submarine is shown in Fig. 14. The only hardware that was not on the submarine.
Mechatronics Hydrophobe Josh Pritts – Vice President /EE Team Leader.
Autonomous Surface Vehicle
ROBOT ARM 2017 Rules Rachel Mason.
Design and Development of an Autonomous Surface Watercraft
Forging new generations of engineers
AUVs Autonomous Underwater Vehicle
Trainings 10/28 Woooooo!!.
Forging new generations of engineers
Preliminary PCB Layout and Design: Team 16
Underwater Remotely Operated Vehicle ( )
Presentation transcript:

Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Sponsor: NAVSEA Keyport Mentor: Mike Kapus Ben Brand, Kendra Brower, Joe Langevin, Jeffrey Le To power our vehicle, we have chosen Lithium Polymer batteries for their exceptional power density. LiPo batteries are volatile if not carefully monitored, so we have integrated a multi-stage battery monitoring system to ensure the safety of those interacting with the vehicle. Impact Analysis Acknowledgements We would like to recognize the following individuals and companies for helping us make this project successful: Mike Kapus & NAVSEA Keyport, Dr. Patrick Pedrow, Cindy Zimmerman, Ning Hsu, Jack Hagemeister, John Yates, Kirk Reinkens, Miles Pepper, Kurt Hutchinson, Digilent, and Clippard Pneumatics. We sincerely appreciate their contributions to making this project a success! We could not have done it without them! Objective Power Our objective was to build an autonomous underwater vehicle capable of navigating an obstacle course via the utilization of:  Image Recognition  Acoustic Localization  Torpedo Launching  Markers Dropping  Object Grasping The vehicle will compete in the international RoboSub competition which takes place in San Diego, CA in July. Our task was to design and build the mechanical and electrical aspects of the vehicle while a Computer Science senior design team was responsible for the vehicle’s image recognition software. Navigation Our navigation system allows the submarine to be aware of its depth, orientation, and heading at all times. We built an array of sensors including an accelerometer, gyroscope, depth sensor, and compass which are used in our navigation algorithm to accurately maneuver the vehicle. Vision In order to navigate the obstacle course, our AUV must recognize and react to its surroundings. It accomplishes this using a forward and downward facing FireWire cameras. The video stream is sent to our computer where it is analyzed and used to make operational decisions. Claws Our AUV is required to grasp and release multiple objects positioned in various orientations. We have multiple claws designed to handle each unique scenario. These claws extended from beneath the sub via a 14” pneumatic piston and are retracted when the task is Torpedo Launcher One aspect of the competition involves firing torpedoes at various sized targets. Our solution involved using SolidWorks to design a torpedo with neutral buoyancy and a center of mass about the torpedo’s geometric center. As a result, the torpedo will maintain a constant heading without pitching upward or downward. It was 3D printed to fit perfectly inside a short PVC barrel and is launched using a pneumatic piston. Our maximum target distance is approximately 8 feet. Acoustics Acoustic signals are captured through an array of three hydrophones and processed through analog circuitry. This circuit outputs three signals which are interpreted by an FPGA which uses phase differences to determine the approximate location of the acoustic source. The FPGA then relays this information to the onboard computer via serial communication. Pneumatics Marker Dropper The task of the marker dropper is to deposit payloads into specifically labeled bins. We accomplish this using a 3D printed mechanism and a pneumatic piston. The piston pushes and pulls a sliding “trap door” which releases a 1” steel sphere. Inside our pressure case is an array of subsystems and sensors which need to communicate with a central computing device. To establish this communication, we designed a PCB which mates with a commercial microcontroller board. Our PCB has over 30 connectors which mate with our accelerometer, gyroscope, compass, computer, leak detector, power supply, depth sensor, motor controllers, and solenoids. The AUV utilizes a pneumatics system powered by a 48in 3 paintball tank at 3000 PSI. This pressure is then regulated down to 100 PSI and distributed into 10 solenoids through a series of manifolds. These solenoids control the air flow to different aspects of the submarine including the marker dropper, torpedo launcher, and grasping claws. All of our pneumatics equipment was generously donated by Clippard Minimatics. Thrusters Our submarine uses six thrusters to maneuver through the obstacle course. The thrusters use just 19.1v at 4.25A to produce a maximum continuous thrust of 4.85 ft-lbs. Recommendations Safety Precautions Since water and electricity do not mix, we have implemented a variety of safety precautions to ensure the health and wellbeing of those interacting with the sub. These precautions include:  Emergency Kill Switches  Fuses  Leak Detection  Roll Detection  Battery Monitoring Future work for this AUV will involve improvements in efficiency by developing methods to use less air, power, and weight. The most effective way we can reduce the weight of the vehicle is to use a smaller pressure case. As a first year team, using a large Pelican case simplifies construction but results in increased buoyancy, thus requiring us to add weight to achieve neutral buoyancy. Additionally, initiatives to consume less power include improving the efficiency of the image processing code and using high- efficiency voltage regulation. Submarine Design & Subsystems Signals & Communications Team Lamarr Through the design and construction of our AUV, we will impact the world in a variety of positive ways. From a societal perspective, our AUV may inspire fellow engineers to invent devices which improve people’s quality of living. From an economic perspective, inspiring engineers may also lead to financial growth in the field of robotics. Additionally, many of the components used to build an AUV are manufactured in America, thus supporting the American economy. From a global perspective, many robotic components contain rare earth metals which are primarily mined in China. Utilizing parts containing these metals could potentially be contributing to geopolitical tension between the United States and China. Furthermore, the utilization of these resources supports China’s mining efforts which are known to be detrimental to the environment. While autonomous submarines can benefit our nation’s military, they can also be used for non-combative purposes. For example, from an environmental perspective, the technology we develop can be used to clean up oil spills and even perform non-intrusive “check ups” on the habitats of reef or deep sea creatures without direct human contact. completed.