Rate Setting in New York Case Study: Con Edison Electric Rate Proceeding Thomas Dvorsky Director, Office of Electric, Gas and Water New York State Public.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FIBI FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK OF ISRAEL O verview
Advertisements

Rate Plan. Value Story When asked, our customers identify the following topics as ways MidAmerican Energy provides value – Emergency Response.
LDC Infrastructure Replacement and Expansion: Rate Issues Jesse S. Reyes Assistant Attorney General Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office June 17, 2014.
CLECO TRANSMISSION RATE CASE. AGENDA Welcome and Introduction Purpose of Meeting Transmission System Update Formula Rate Overview Formula Rate Protocols.
October 30, 2014 Terry Wolf, Manager of Transmission Services.
1 Northeast Public Power Association Electric Utility Basics Electric Rates and Cost of Service Studies.
How to read a FINANCIAL REPORT
Breaking Down Barriers to Energy Efficiency Utility Revenue Decoupling and other Revenue Stabilization Tools Jim Lazar, RAP Senior Advisor Presented to:
Experiences In Responding to the Challenges Post 9-11 Gerald A. Norlander, Executive Director Public Utility Law Project of New York, Inc. Rebuilding Utility.
FIBI FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK OF ISRAEL O verview
CONSUMER PROTECTIONS AND SERVICE QUALITY March 14, 2011.
NEW YORK Market Profile July NEW YORK Market Service Map Market Size: $21.7 Billion Market Potential 20.9 Million Potential Customers.
ACCOUNTING CONCEPTS. BASIC CASH FLOW MODEL  REVENUES = PRICE * VOLUME = R  SALVAGE = VALUE OF CAPITAL AT THE END OF THE PROJECT LIFE = S  PROFIT =
Incentive Regulation Topics Scott A. Struck, CPA Financial Analysis Division Public Utilities Bureau Illinois Commerce Commission.
Ryan Williams. Learning Objectives Prepare common-sized Income Statements and Balance Sheets. Compute financial ratios listed in Table 4.1. Discuss uses.
Drafting Rate Case Orders Energy Regulatory Partnership Program Abuja, Nigeria July 14-18, 2008 Presented by Robert W. Kehres.
File & Suspend Rate Cases Water & Wastewater Reference Manual1.
The Australian Energy Regulator. Today’s agenda Presentations from : ◦AER — Chris Pattas, General Manager - Networks ◦Consumer Challenge Panel — Hugh.
NASUCA Baltimore Meeting November 11-14, 2012 Mark Schuling, Iowa Consumer Advocate.
Rate and Revenue Considerations When Starting an Energy Efficiency Program APPA’s National Conference June 13 th, 2009 Salt Lake City, Utah Mark Beauchamp,
Presentation to Energy & Technology/Planning & Development Committees Considerations on Establishing Municipal Utilities Joint Informational Forum Legislative.
Example of Revenue Decoupling Utah Committee of Consumer Services Witness: David Dismukes Docket No T01 CCS Exhibit 1.1 Allowed Revenue per Customer.
Regulatory Update Dennis Derricks May 5, 2010 Regulatory Update Dennis Derricks May 5, 2010.
WRDC Finance Committee Nancy Scott Utilities Division ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION March 17, 2011.
Limited Proceedings Water & Wastewater Reference Manual1.
Utility Service Quality Regulation in Pennsylvania A Presentation For The NARUC Consumer Affairs Subcommittee September 27, 2005 By Wayne L. Williams,
DSM Incentive Returns Proposal – Benefit/Cost Ratio Approach Utah Committee of Consumer Services Witness: David Dismukes Docket No T01 Supplemental.
0 0 Six Sigma – Financial Overview. 1 1 Roles and Responsibilities of the Finance Support Team Policy Setting – Define Savings/Benefits – Provide tools.
TA 96 on pricing Prices for interconnection and for UNEs to be based on cost, to be nondiscriminatory, and may include a reasonable profit –Cost to be.
Understanding Financial Reports and the Income Statement Chapter 2 Robinson, Munter, Grant.
Indiana’s “NowGen” 630 MW IGCC Plant On-line the Summer 2012 Chairman David Lott Hardy.
1 WPL Regulatory Update Scott R. Smith Director, Regulatory Affairs.
Greater Oklahoma City. QUALITY JOBS PROGRAM New jobs to the state Must average county wage or $28,878 whichever is lower Company must achieve $2.5 million.
NARUC Energy Regulatory Partnership Program The Georgian National Energy Regulatory Commission and The Vermont Public Service Board by Ann Bishop Vermont.
August 21, 2015 Terry Wolf, Manager of Transmission Services.
University of Minnesota Office of Internal / External Sales Fiscal Year-End Actions for Internal/External Sales Organizations.
APPA’s Financial Planning for Municipals Mark Beauchamp, CPA, CMA, MBA September 27, 2005 Business & Finance Workshop.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SERVICES SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Leading the Way in Electricity | Business Customer Division 1 For External Use Economic Development.
NARUC SUMMER COMMITTEE MEETINGS Committee on Water Agenda California Regulatory Initiatives Case History – California American Water B. Kent Turner – President.
August 22, 2014 Terry Wolf, Manager of Transmission Services.
Arizona Water Issues Arizona Water Issues Setting Rates for Regulated Water Utilities Nancy Scott Utilities Division ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION June.
Presented to the City of Dover, Delaware June 6, 2006 Revenue Requirements, Cost of Service and Rate Adjustments for the Electric Utility.
1 RORB Return on Rate Base. Legal Basis  Section 43, (f) of Republic Act No Section 43. Functions of the ERC – x x x (a) x x x (f) x x x “The rates.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2002 Principles of Taxation Chapter 15 Investment and Personal Financial Planning.
Alternative Rate Structure Paul Smith Vice President, Rates Duke Energy Ohio June 20, 2006.
The Professional’s Source for Turf Care First Quarter /29/04.
1 Water Department FY 2014 Sources and Uses FY 2014 Sources Retail Sales$54,788,834 Wholesale Sales646,250 Other Operating Revenues145,000 Non-Operating.
Reliability-Must-Run (RMR) Cost Evaluation and Settlement Basis Ino González ERCOT RMR Workshop May 24, 2016.
Willmar Municipal Utilities Annual Rate Update Meeting Wesley Hompe P.E. General Manager Friday, August 15,
November 16, 2012 Terry Wolf, Manager of Transmission Services.
City of Fernley, Nevada – 164 th Ave. NE, Suite 300, Redmond, WA April 18, 2007 Rate Study Findings Water and Sewer Utility Rates.
Smart Grid Tariff Changes
2016 Annual Attachment O Stakeholder Meeting Ameren Missouri
SMECO Demand Response filing
Analyzing Financial Statements
City of richmond FY mid-year budget review
2018 Second Quarter Results NASDAQ: fult
2017 AND FOURTH Quarter Results
City of Lebanon, Missouri Electric Department
Rochester Public Utilities Presentation on Forward-Looking Transmission Revenue Requirements Update for Calendar 2018 October 20, 2017.
Liberty Interactive Corporation Q3-11 Earnings Call November 8, 2011
2017 Annual Attachment O Stakeholder Meeting Ameren Missouri
2018 FIRST Quarter Results NASDAQ: fult
2018 and fourth Quarter Results NASDAQ: fult
2018 THIRd Quarter Results NASDAQ: fult
Arizona Public Service Company 2012 Renewable Energy Standard Implementation Plan Arizona Corporation Commission Open Meeting August 17, 2011.
2018 Annual Attachment O Stakeholder Meeting Ameren Missouri
OKLAHOMA INDUSTRIAL ENERGY CONSUMERS (OIEC)
Data as of September 30, 2019 unless otherwise noted
Presentation transcript:

Rate Setting in New York Case Study: Con Edison Electric Rate Proceeding Thomas Dvorsky Director, Office of Electric, Gas and Water New York State Public Service Commission May 24, 2011  NY DPS Staff Position  Summary of Joint Proposal

2 After four months of formal discovery and analysis of the rate filing, Staff developed its own position and submitted expert testimony. The following schedule reconciles Staff’s position with the Company’s filing on each of the revenue requirement components.

3 Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc Revenue Requirement Reconciliation Company Request vs. Trial Staff Recommendation For the Rate Year Ending March 31, 2011 ($000's) Amount Company Revenue Requirement Request$840,381 Trial Staff Recommendation477,360 Revenue Difference to Reconcile($363,021) Difference Rate Effect Sales Revenues($6,519)($6,729) Other Operating Revenues / Regulatory Deferrals(4,593)(4,740) Operations and Maintenance Expenses Company Labor(45,714) Austerity Adjustment(31,300) Interference(26,762) Informational Advertising(8,700) Employee Welfare Expense(3,906) Research & Development(3,467) Insurance(2,482) All Other O&M Expenses(11,785) Total Operations and Maintenance Expenses(134,116)(138,428) Depreciation Expense(21,239)(21,922)

4 Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc Revenue Requirement Reconciliation Company Request vs. Trial Staff Recommendation (continued) For the Rate Year Ending March 31, 2011 ($000's) Difference Rate Effect Taxes Other Than Income Taxes Property Taxes(17,408) Payroll Taxes(4,419) All other(5,045) Total Taxes Other Than Income Taxes(26,872)(27,736) Income Tax Impacts of Staff Adjustments Book v. Tax Depreciation Differences, SIT Tax Credit(4,389)(7,502) Rate Base Net Plant(211,783) Working Capital(128,499) Accumulated Deferred Income Taxes(86,082) All Other Rate Base(11,909) Total Rate Base(438,273) (49,756) Rate of Return Company Request11.68% Trial Staff Recommendation11.00% Pre-tax ROR Difference-0.68% Rate Base per Company Request15,326,271 Total Rate of Return(103,814)(107,152) Unreconciled Difference944 Total Revenue Difference Reconciled($363,021)

5 After testimony was filed by Staff and other parties in the case, discussions took place over a three week period in an attempt to reach a negotiated settlement. The following summarizes the Joint Proposal that was reached.

6 Revenue Requirement Issues Three year agreement Levelized rate increase each year of approximately $423 million per year, this equates to an approximate 9.9% annual increase on T&D or 3.8% on total bill. (This is based increased of $550 million – RY1, $315 million – RY2 and $298 million – RY3. For reference, the Company’s original filing requested $840 million for RY1 and Staff’s filed case supported a $511 million increase for RY1)

7 Revenue Requirement Issues (con’t) ROE 10.15% with sharing thresholds and deferral limitation –Earnings Sharing – RY1 (see below re RYs 2&3) 1% dead-band (100 basis points); 50%/50% sharing (cust/comp) for ROE above 11.15%; 75%/25% sharing for ROE above 12.15%; 90%/10% sharing for ROE above 13.15%; –Sharing will be calculated per books, excluding incentives and tax refunds, using the lower of Con Edison’s actual average equity ratio or 50.0%. –The earnings sharing provision will be lower in RY2 and RY3 in order to capture a greater proportion of benefits for customers that may be achieved from the implementation of the Management Audit recommendations: Earnings sharing starts 50 BPs above ROE 60/40% sharing of earnings (10.65% %) 75/25% sharing of earnings (12.15% %) 90/10% sharing of earnings above 13.15%

8 Revenue Requirement Issues (con’t) T&D Capital Expenditure Caps, RY1 - $1.2 billion, RY2 - $1.16 and RY3 - $1.14 billion (includes $100 million of capitalized pension expense added in Company’s formal update) –For RY1, expenditures above the caps that do not meet an extraordinary circumstances threshold, but are demonstrated to be needed, will not be allowed to earn an equity return on those investments in future rates. The return would be limited to the Company’s embedded cost of debt. –For RY2 and RY3, on a cumulative basis, the company must demonstrate in its next base rate case, that any capital expenditures above the caps were prudent and necessary. Downward reconciliation of carrying charges related to T&D Plant as one bucket and Production, Shared Services, Interference Capital as another bucket. –Reconciliation is annual for RY1 and cumulative for RY2 and RY3

9 Revenue Requirement Issues (con’t) Labor Productivity - 2% per year; RY1, RY2, RY3 No new O&M programs for RY2 and RY3. O&M increased for labor rates and general escalation for RY2 and RY3. Interference O&M - 100% downward reconciliation, 80%/20% (company/customer) sharing upward within 30% band, unless attributable to major new municipal projects, then sharing continues. Property Taxes - reconciliation with 80%/20% sharing, upward and downward, with 10 basis point ($12 million) cap on Company exposure Pensions – 100% reconciliation Austerity - $45 million in RY1, of which $14 million gets phased back in; $7 million in RY2, and $7 million in RY3

10 Non-Revenue Requirement Issues Improved Reliability Performance Mechanism –$112 million at risk tied to Network Outage Duration, CAIDI (radial), Network Outages per 1000 customers, SAIFI (radial), Remote Monitoring System Reporting and Restoration Times Improved Customer Service Performance Incentive mechanism –$40 million at risk tied to Complaint Rates, Call Answer Rate and Customer Satisfaction Surveys of Emergency Callers, Phone Center Callers and Service Center Visitors Increased Low-Income discount program –Participants receive a $8.50 discount on the Customer Charge Con Edison customer charge $15.76 per month, Low Income customer would pay $7.26 per month –To qualify, a customer must be receiving public benefits based on income such as Supplemental Security Income, Temporary Assistance to Needy Persons/Families, or Food Stamps –Approximately 375,000 residential participants out of 2.5 million residential customers. Total cost of program $40 million per year. Cost is spread to all utility customers

11 Non-Revenue Requirement Issues (con’t) Revised Business Incentive Rate to include new incubator program, increased biomedical research, and increased allocation to Westchester County. Collaborative to examine Standby Rate cost allocation between contract and as-used demand charges Collaborative to consider Rate Ready Consolidated Billing model to enable ESCOs to provide multiple rate components Collaborative to discuss the Company’s current distributed generation and renewable energy initiatives. Phase-in of $10.8 million of the $14 million NYPA deficiency by RY3. Phase-out of declining block delivery rates to foster energy efficiency