USAID ROLE IN IMPACT ASSESSMENT AT THE MDBs Jim Hester Agency Environmental Coordinator.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
World Trade Organization Donor Coordination Dialogue Annex D Support for effective implementation of a new Trade Facilitation Agreement World Bank World.
Advertisements

Reliability Center Data Request Task Force Report WECC Board Meeting April 2009.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
Policies and Processes for Limiting Conflict of Interest Patrick N. Breysse, PhD, CIH Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health Vice-Chair,
Federal Budget Process Steve Kidd and Allison Boehm Budget and Program Analysis Staff April 2009.
Presentation by Cambodian Participants Phuket, Thailand February 2012 Health Impact Assessment Royal Government of Cambodia.
SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE Scoping.
Environmental Review: NEPA, TEPA and Tribes. NEPA – good and bad for Tribes Tribes can use as tool to slow, examine, participate in process and urge changes.
CONTEXT OF ANE’s IMPLEMENTATION OF 22 CFR 216 Jim Hester Agency Environmental Coordinator.
TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTIONAL ANIMAL CARE AND USE PROGRAM WORKSHOP OFFICE OF RESEARCH LINDA M. GARDINER, Ph.D. DIRECTOR RESEARCH ENHANCEMENT.
HEADQUARTERS Strategic Environmental Assessment ”SEA is a systematic process for evaluating the environmental consequences of proposed policy, plan or.
References to Economic Instruments in Selected MEAs Matthew Stilwell Matthew Stilwell.
The CEE Bankwatch Network's mission is to prevent the environmentally and socially harmful impacts of international development finance, and to promote.
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
USAID Environmental Procedures. EA Training Course 2 USAID Procedures Overview  USAID environmental review requirements are:  A specific example of.
Environmental Impact Assessment Review Process for Oil and Gas Projects In Saskatchewan Larry Lechner, P. Eng. Director Environmental Assessment Branch.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATION FOR PESTICIDES Jim Hester Agency Environmental Coordinator.
Disclosure and Public Consultation Transparency and Participation in the Application of Safeguard Policies Johnson Appavoo Operations Analyst WB Safeguards.
Disclosure and Public Consultation Transparency and Participation in the Application of Safeguard Policies.
Environmental Assessment in Newfoundland & Labrador Environmental Assessment in Federations: Current Dynamics and Emerging Issues Conference Current Dynamics.
What If I Must Go Beyond a Preliminary Assessment? (the example of a USAID EA under Reg. 216) [DATE][SPEAKERS NAMES]
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview
BioCarbon Fund Projects and World Bank Safeguard Policies Jean-Roger Mercier September 12, 2005.
Energy Issues in Peru and the Andes: Environmental and Social Aspects George Washington University January 28, 2005 Dr. Robert H. Montgomery Head, Environmental.
Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.
USAID Environmental Procedures. EA Training Course Tellus Institute 2 USAID Procedures Overview  USAID environmental review requirements are:  A specific.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
Environmental Procedures Best Practices Review STRENGTHENING MISSION ENVRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE & PROJECT OUTCOMES.
Stakeholder consultations Kyiv May 13, Why stakeholder consultations? To help improve project design and implementation To inform people about changes.
PACIFIC AID EFFECTIVENESS PRINCIPLES. Purpose of Presentation Provide an overview of Pacific Principles on Aid Effectiveness Provide an overview of Pacific.
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE: FROM PLANNING TO PROJECT Ohio Planning Conference July 16, 2014.
Gulana Hajiyeva Environmental Specialist World Bank Moscow Safeguards Training, May 30 – June 1, 2012.
BioCarbon Fund Projects and World Bank Safeguards Jean-Roger Mercier July 11, 2005.
USAID Environmental Procedures. EA Training Course Tellus Institute 2 USAID Procedures Overview  USAID environmental review requirements are:  A specific.
Writing the IEE (EPTM Chapter 4). EA Training Course Tellus Institute 2 Writing the IEE IEE Review  Used when at least one screening outcome is “IEE.
IDB Draft Disaster Risk Management Policy 0 Bruce Juba Representative Country Office Barbados Inter-American Development Bank Comprehensive Disaster Management.
ADS 204 – Environmental Procedures. EA Training Course Tellus Institute 2 USAID ADS 204  Authority  Objective è Environmental sustainability.
Environmental Management Plan (EMP) Required for: Full EIA based on Palestinian EIA Policy Category A projects based on World Bank Policy.
© 2009 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP which may not be reproduced,
22 CFR 216: Environmental Impact Assessment Jim Hester Agency Environmental Coordinator.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
Environmental Assessment in British Columbia Forum of Federations Conference September 14, 2009.
 Council Overview  Past Priorities and Recommendations  Current Priorities ◦ Promoting Equity in State Policies and Programs ◦ Adverse Birth Outcomes.
USAID Environmental Guidelines Purpose and Overview
INTRODUCTION: World Bank Environmental and Social Safeguard Policies Training Workshop for Financial Intermediaries and Implementing Agencies May-June,
Update on work of IUCN Council Private Sector Task Force Diana Shand Regional Councillor and Chair of Private Sector Task Force The International Union.
TEN-T Executive Agency and Project Management Anna LIVIERATOU-TOLL TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Programme and Policy Coordinator European Economic and.
UNEP EIA Training Resource ManualTopic 14Slide 1 What is SEA? F systematic, transparent process F instrument for decision-making F addresses environmental.
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation NEPA&CEQ.
Regional Planning CCRPC Board Training March 21, 2012.
INTERNATIONAL AND TRANSBOUNDARY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT LAW OCTOBER 29, 2012.
Disclosure and Public Consultation Transparency and Participation in the Application of Safeguard Policies Presenter: Johnson Appavoo Presentation prepared.
PP 620: Public Policy and Health Administration Unit One Seminar Kris R. Foote, J.D., M.P.A., M.S.W. Kaplan University.
Executive Order Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews Priority Issues.
Implementation of FAO Environmental Impact Assessment Guidelines in the new FAO project cycle Alemneh Dejene Climate Impact, Adaptation and Environmental.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
Required Documentation: Determination and Overview (EPTM Chapter 3)
Legislative History. First enacted in 1934  Enacted due to concerns over the loss of commercial and sport fisheries from water resource developments.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 12. Risk Management.
Two Energy Facility Permitting Reforms: New Hampshire’s Site Evaluation Committee, and the Federal FAST-41 Tom Burack, Esq., Sheehan Phinney New England.
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Consultation & Participation
North Slope Science Initiative (NSSI)
Relationship between World Bank and Romanian EA requirements
References to Economic Instruments in Selected MEAs
SCHIP Advisory Council Duties and Responsibilities:
Meeting of PAP/RAC Focal Points, Split, Croatia, 8-9 May 2019
Roles and Responsibilities
Presentation transcript:

USAID ROLE IN IMPACT ASSESSMENT AT THE MDBs Jim Hester Agency Environmental Coordinator

Three MDBs (IDB, IBRD, NADBank) fund large scale projects in LAC. US taxpayer money funds the Banks. MDBs all have good MDBs all have good EIA procedures but implementation is uneven Due to may factors, some MDB projects are environmentally unsound Why Must USAID LAC Care? USAID ends up paying to fix the problems Congress has tasked USAID to ensure MDB projects are environmentally sound sound

“IFI” Title XIII The International Financial Institutions Act (IFI) of 1977 is the operational standards for U.S. government involvement in MDBs. The International Financial Institutions Act (IFI) of 1977 is the operational standards for U.S. government involvement in MDBs. In 1988 Congress added Title XIII to address growing environmental concerns In 1988 Congress added Title XIII to address growing environmental concerns Title XIII assigns specific roles to USAID, Treasury and State for implementation. Title XIII assigns specific roles to USAID, Treasury and State for implementation.

Roles and responsibilities (cont) If USAID believes an MDB loan will have an adverse environmental impact, USAID, in consultation with Treasury and State, undertakes an investigation and shares the information with the public. If USAID believes an MDB loan will have an adverse environmental impact, USAID, in consultation with Treasury and State, undertakes an investigation and shares the information with the public. Treasury instructs the U.S. Executive Directors (USEDs) at the MDBs to urge the banks to circulate their environmental assessments in adequate time to permit this kind of evaluation. Treasury instructs the U.S. Executive Directors (USEDs) at the MDBs to urge the banks to circulate their environmental assessments in adequate time to permit this kind of evaluation.

Who Leads, Who Supports Each section of Title XIII states which organizations lead and which support. The roles flip around. Each section of Title XIII states which organizations lead and which support. The roles flip around. USAID leads in 3 sections USAID leads in 3 sections Treasury leads in 12 sections Treasury leads in 12 sections Treasury and State share the lead in 1 Section. Treasury and State share the lead in 1 Section. State does not lead by itself in any. State does not lead by itself in any.

Roles and responsibilities (cont) USAID (in consultation with Treasury and State Departments) identifies MDB projects likely to have adverse impacts on the environment, natural resources, public health or indigenous people. USAID then reports to Congress twice a year. USAID (in consultation with Treasury and State Departments) identifies MDB projects likely to have adverse impacts on the environment, natural resources, public health or indigenous people. USAID then reports to Congress twice a year. Treasury forwards reports to the USEDs to try and eliminate or mitigate potential adverse environmental impacts. Treasury forwards reports to the USEDs to try and eliminate or mitigate potential adverse environmental impacts.

Treasury, in consultation with State and USAID, creates a system for cooperative exchange of information. Treasury, in consultation with State and USAID, creates a system for cooperative exchange of information. Treasury instructs the USEDs to support impact assessment education and capacity building in the MDBs and borrowing countries. Treasury instructs the USEDs to support impact assessment education and capacity building in the MDBs and borrowing countries. Roles and responsibilities (cont)

Treasury shall instruct the USEDs to promote: Treasury shall instruct the USEDs to promote:  Use of environment in economic analyses  Development of environmental projects  Incorporation of environment in policy projects  Increased numbers of MDB environment staff  Increases in local NGO/community involvement in decision making  Sharing of information with NGOs/communities early in project design processes

The Pelosi Amendment (added in 1989)  Treasury instructs USEDs “not to vote in favor” of any project which would have a significant effect on the environment, unless for at least 120 days prior to the vote, an EA has been completed and made available to the EDs, affected groups and NGOs.  Treasury ensures an EA accompanies the proposal throughout the review process, and considers recommendations from all other Federal agencies and interested members of the public.

The Pelosi Amendment (cont) The Treasury Department:  consults other Federal agencies and instructs USEDs to seek systematic implementation of EAs  develops procedures for considering EAs, and requires interagency and public reviews of the EAs  in consultation with other agencies, makes staff available for the above activities without cost to the MDBs

Title XIII within USAID Lead responsibility resides in EGAT/ESP Lead responsibility resides in EGAT/ESP Supporting roles Supporting roles  PPC  LAC  Missions

Examples of Recent MDB Projects Reviewed Under Title XIII Peru – Camisea Peru – Camisea Azerbaijan/Georgia/Turkey – Baku/Tblisi/Ceyhan Oil Pipeline Azerbaijan/Georgia/Turkey – Baku/Tblisi/Ceyhan Oil Pipeline Russia – Sakhalin Island Pipeline Russia – Sakhalin Island Pipeline