© The Treasury Trends in income inequality and other socio-economic outcomes Ben Gleisner Senior Analyst – Workforce Attachment and Skills.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EHRC Wales 08/06/11 Bill Kerry from
Advertisements

IFS Understanding recent trends in income inequality Alissa Goodman Institute for Fiscal Studies.
IFS Understanding recent trends in income inequality Alissa Goodman Institute for Fiscal Studies.
Income per head and life-expectancy: rich & poor countries Source: Wilkinson & Pickett, The Spirit Level (2009)
Social Change in Western Australia
Work life balance from an economic point of view: Possible indirect effects Liss Schanke Norwegian Association of Local and Regional Authorities
Reclaiming the Commons: Our Health and Our Education Stephen Bezruchka, MD, MPH Departments of Global Health & Health Services School of Public Health.
The cost of inequality Arief Anshory Yusuf. Source: CIA, World Fact Book, 2013, World Bank WDI, and author’s calculation Indonesia can be categorized.
Opening Plenary - There is an alternative... Richard Wilkinson.
INEQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME BEN BRAID LORENZ CURVE.
1 The distribution of the State budget – 2008: social services are one-third of the total budget Total budget: NIS 323 billion Not including debt servicing.
Poverty, Inequality, and Development
Income Inequality in the United States,
1 Income Inequality in Rich Countries A B Atkinson, Nuffield College, Oxford ECINEQ Conference Mallorca July 2005.
Public policy and European society University of Castellanza Session 3(a) Inequality in Europe and the USA March
Deprivation, Poverty and Public Health Lucy Macleod, Interim Director of Public Health.
G. Madonia Department of International Business and Economics, University of Greenwich, Old Royal Naval College, Park Row, Greenwich, London SE10 9LS.
OECD, Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs Social Policy in the OECD: what lessons for Chile? National Social Security Meeting, Santiago.
Income Inequality. Poverty Absolute or relative concept? Basket of goods sufficient for basic needs –Normative concept World Bank traditional uses $1.
Reinert/Windows on the World Economy, 2005 Development Concepts CHAPTER 19.
Sheffield Fair City Campaign Sheffield Executive Board 12 November 2014 Alan Walker, Chair, Fairness Commission Amanda Pearce, Director, Diva Sharon Squires,
Poverty: Facts, Causes and Consequences Hilary Hoynes University of California, Davis California Symposium on Poverty October 2009.
1 Recognition and Response P3 Identifying family and environmental factors which may contribute to neglect.
Distribution of Income and Wealth
What is Economic Growth? How do we know when we are better off?
The question of inequality Donald Hay, Jesus College and Department of Economics, Oxford DCM Social Sciences stream, March 20 th and 21 st 2015.
Does equality pay? Can gender equality and WLB promote economic development and reduce effects of crisis? Liss Schanke Norwegian Association of Local and.
Household Income and Expenditure 2012 Household Budget Survey By Sanjev Bhonoo 18 November
Inequality of income: A matter for socially responsible business? Leanne Holdsworth Holistic Business Solutions Ltd
1 The student will learn about: §4.6 Applications to Economics. producers’ surplus, and consumers’ surplus, the Gini index.
Health in an egalitarian society Espen Dahl Professor Oslo and Akershus University College Harvard Club of New York, April 22th 2015.
Distribution of Household Income Created by Molly Abromitis.
The Spirit Level findings and why they matter Redistribution of wealth - a question of social power 21st May 2012 Sue Christoforou
1 Richard Wilkinson Emeritus Professor of Social Epidemiology University of Nottingham & Kate Pickett Professor of Epidemiology University of York
The Role of the Fiscal Policy in Poverty Reduction Youngsun Koh Korea Development Institute.
The Human Development Index (And More) IB SL. Key Questions... 1.What is it and what does it do? 2.Is it more accurate than using GDP as an indicator.
Social Welfare Policy Contending with Poverty In America.
Childhood Neglect: Improving Outcomes for Children Presentation P3 Childhood Neglect: Improving Outcomes for Children Presentation Identifying family and.
Chapter 10. Lorenz Curve and Gini Coefficient Measure distribution of thing your interested in. E.g.   Share of largest firms in an oligopolistic industry,
Negative Consequences of Income Inequality Reduce common interests of the population Increase social separation of the classes Inequality of opportunity.
Additional analysis of poverty in Scotland 2013/14 Communities Analytical Services July 2015.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright  2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Who Gets What? The Distribution of Income Who Gets What? The.
Poverty in Scotland and the UK Communities Analysis Division– September 2015 While relative poverty in Scotland fell in 2013/14, it remained flat in the.
Wealth and Poverty in the UK. How is Wealth measured? Wealth is made up of the assets that are owned by people living in a country: Housing Housing State.
The socio-economic gradient in teenagers’ reading skills: how does England compare to other countries? John Jerrim, Institute of Education 1.
Duncan Exley Director
How free markets create & divide wealth
Gini Coefficient Real Income Growth (1980=100)
DEVELOPMENT. Development Include: Real GDP per head Standard of living Political freedom Freedom of the speech Level of education Level of health-care….
What is development? How can we measure development?
Introduction to the UK Economy. What are the key objectives of macroeconomic policy? Price Stability (CPI Inflation of 2%) Growth of Real GDP (National.
Measure distribution of thing your interested in. E.g.  Share of largest firms in an oligopolistic industry, e.g share of top eight, sixteen etc  distribution.
How do we know when we are better off?.  Satisfy our wants and needs  We do this through purchasing goods and services  Goods and services gives us.
Inequality in Brazil. Country Profile Population 206 million Upper Middle Income GNI per capita $11,790* Poverty Headcount 7.4% GINI coefficient 52.9%**
FROM RESEARCH TO POLICY ON INEQUALITIES IN HEALTH Michael Marmot International Centre for Health and Society University College London LONDON PUBLIC HEALTH.
How do we know when we are better off?.  Satisfy our wants and needs  We do this through purchasing goods and services  Goods and services gives us.
STEVE SELEZNOW | PRESIDENT & CEO Great Poor by Choice: The Power of Leadership 1.
Health & Inequality Andrew Mason. Are health and social problems related to average income in rich countries ? Source: Wilkinson & Pickett, The Spirit.
Poverty in Scotland Poverty is measured by household income.
Duncan Exley Director
Public policy and European society University of Castellanza
WHAT IS DEVELOPMENT?.
Child Poverty Action Group Scotland
Lecture (ppt 2) Inequality: Concepts, Measures and Experience
Living Standards & Inequality
Richard Wilkinson Kate Pickett & Emeritus Professor of
How much richer are the richest 20% than the poorest 20%?
Economic Inequality in the United States
Inequalities in East Lothian
Capital Accumulation, Private Property and Rising Inequality in China,
Presentation transcript:

© The Treasury Trends in income inequality and other socio-economic outcomes Ben Gleisner Senior Analyst – Workforce Attachment and Skills

© The Treasury Outline 1.Static analysis of income inequality Key concepts – income, equivalence, housing costs, measures Trends for NZ relative to other OECD countries 2.Relationship with other socieconomic outcomes 3.Dynamic analysis – what may determine future equality? Educational outcomes Benefit dependency Wealth inequality 2

© The Treasury Key concepts Definition of income The level of incomes inequality depend on which income concept is used Including government services – HH ‘final income’ – also important Source: MSD household income report 2010 Income inequality in New Zealand (80:20) 3

© The Treasury Key concepts Equivalence Taking into account household composition is important Household 2 Household 3 Income $50,000 Income $76,844 Income $70,226 ‘Equivalent’ incomes Household 1 4

© The Treasury Key concepts Including housing costs Most international comparisons do not factor in housing costs – using ‘before housing costs’ (BHC) However, it is important to consider – lower income households pay a far greater proportion of their income on housing Measures after housing costs (AHC) there show higher inequality Including government services – HH ‘final income’ – also important 5

© The Treasury Key concepts How to measure income inequality 1. Ratios of top – bottom Incomes at the top of each decile (AHC) Source: MSD household income report 2010 Share of total income in the population 2. Gini Coefficient 6 40 % 10 % 40 %

© The Treasury Trends in income inequality Source: MSD household income report

© The Treasury Trends in income inequality Source: Aziz, O. & Gibbons, M. (2010). Fiscal incidence study 2010: Stage 1 report. Wellington: Treasury Gini Coefficient (x100) for Household Disposable Income (HDI) vs Final income (HFI) 8

© The Treasury Trends in income inequality Source: MSD household income report 2010 Change in income inequality in NZ – mid 80s to mid 2000s 9

© The Treasury Trends in income inequality Source: OECD (2008), Growing Unequal? : Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries 10

© The Treasury Trends in income inequality Source: MSD household income report 2010 Gini Coefficient (x100) within OECD countries (around 2004) 11

© The Treasury Conclusions on trends 1.Income inequality in NZ grew sharply between mid 80s and mid 90s, but stabilised recently 2.Including government support, growth is less 3.But still high inequality relative to other OECD countries Including government services – HH ‘final income’ – also important 12

© The Treasury Trends in other variables Index of: Life expectancy Math & Literacy Infant mortality Homicides Imprisonment Teenage births Trust Obesity Mental illness – incl. drug & alcohol addiction Social mobility 13

© The Treasury ‘Variable X’ Trends in other variables As income inequality has increased Variable X has reduced Gini Coeff Variable X 14

© The Treasury Trends in other variables Notes of caution when using results 1.The graphs illustrate the trend in two variables, and the relationship between these trends 2.To make statements about any causal relationship requires more complex analysis 3.Assuming causation, limitations of this approach: a.Lack of data points b.Potential time lags c.Lack of a ‘control’ variable Over time you would expect to see an increase in poor social/health outcomes with increasing inequality 15

© The Treasury Life expectancy (yrs) Trends in other variables Incomes at the top of each decile As income inequality has increased life expectancy has increased Source: StatsNZ 16

© The Treasury School qualifications (% adults > secondary) Trends in other variables As income inequality has increased educational attainment has increased Source: MSD Social Report

© The Treasury Infant mortality (deaths/1000 live births) Trends in other variables As income inequality has increased infant mortality has reduced Source: StatsNZ 18

© The Treasury Homicide (/100,000 people) Trends in other variables As income inequality has increased homicides have fallen Source: StatsNZ 19

© The Treasury Imprisonment rate (/100,000 people) Trends in other variables As income inequality has increased imprisonment rates have increased Source: Corrections NZ 20

© The Treasury Teenage births (pregnancies/1000 teenagers ) Trends in other variables As income inequality has increased teenage births have increased Source: StatsNZ 21

© The Treasury Obesity (% in population BMI > 30) Trends in other variables As income inequality has increased obesity has increased Source: MoH 22

© The Treasury Conclusions on association 1.In some cases, strong positive relationship between income inequality and specific ‘bad’ socio-economic outcomes 2.In other cases strong negative relationship 3.Not as universal as Wilkinson’s thesis may have predicted 4.Other issues to consider e.g. potential time lags, no control variable 5.Useful to have some international comparisons 6.Finally, causation is difficult to prove  Important to think about dynamic effects.  Number of possible variables will determine future inequality. 23

© The Treasury Education outcomes Source: PISA

© The Treasury Benefit dependency Source: WWG report 27

© The Treasury Household wealth Source: Statistics NZ (2001) - Net Worth in New Zealand 25

© The Treasury Household income 26 Source: MSD household income report 2010

© The Treasury Concluding comments 1.NZ experienced a large growth in income inequality between mid 80s and mid 90s, but stabilised since (up to 2009) 2. Movements in inequality appear to be associated with a number of positive and negative outcomes 3.Causation difficult to prove – further worked required on where there are negative relationships. International comparisons useful. 4.Persistent income deprivation may be more of a concern than income inequality – i.e. focus on dynamic inequality 27

© The Treasury Trends in income inequality and other socio-economic outcomes Ben Gleisner Senior Analyst – Workforce Attachment and Skills

© The Treasury Income deciles

© The Treasury Equivalence

© The Treasury Change in real incomes

© The Treasury Benefit dependency

© The Treasury Income

© The Treasury Wealth inequality Source – Motu (2010) Household Wealth and Saving in New Zealand

© The Treasury Wealth vs income inequality Source – Motu (2010) Household Wealth and Saving in New Zealand

© The Treasury Tax changes Source – Treasury – online (Aide Memoire)