AO4ELT3 May 31, 2013 Fourier-Based Predictive AO Schemes for Tomographic AO systems S. Mark Ammons Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory May 31, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
000509EISPDR_SciInvGIs.1 EIS Performance and Operations Louise Harra Mullard Space Science Laboratory University College London.
Advertisements

RASC, Victoria, 1/08/06 The Future of Adaptive Optics Instrumentation David Andersen HIA.
Adaptive Optics1 John O’Byrne School of Physics University of Sydney.
Page 1 Lecture 12 Part 1: Laser Guide Stars, continued Part 2: Control Systems Intro Claire Max Astro 289, UC Santa Cruz February 14, 2013.
Analysis of the frozen flow assumption using GeMS telemetry data Angela Cortés 1, Alexander Rudy 2, Benoit Neichel 3, Lisa Poyneer 4, Mark Ammons 4, Andres.
Why do astronomers need AO? Lick Observatory, 1 m telescope Long exposure image Short exposure image: “speckles” With adaptive optics Three images of a.
Page 1 Lecture 17 The applications of tomography: LTAO, MCAO, MOAO, GLAO Claire Max AY 289 UC Santa Cruz March 7, 2013.
Extragalactic AO Science James Larkin AOWG Strategic Planning Meeting September 19, 2004.
The Project Office Perspective Antonin Bouchez 1GMT AO Workshop, Canberra Nov
AO4ELT3 May 28, 2013 On-Sky Tests of Sparse-Field Astrometry with GEMS and a 1-meter Telescope S. Mark Ammons Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Olivier.
Trade Study Report: Fixed vs. Variable LGS Asterism V. Velur Caltech Optical Observatories Pasadena, CA V. Velur Caltech Optical Observatories Pasadena,
PILOT: Pathfinder for an International Large Optical Telescope -performance specifications JACARA Science Meeting PILOT Friday March 26 Anglo Australian.
NGAO Companion Sensitivity Performance Budget (WBS ) Rich Dekany, Ralf Flicker, Mike Liu, Chris Neyman, Bruce Macintosh NGAO meeting #6, 4/25/2007.
Adaptive Optics and Optical Interferometry or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Atmosphere Brian Kern Observational Astronomy 10/25/00.
Aug-Nov, 2008 IAG/USP (Keith Taylor) ‏ Instrumentation Concepts Ground-based Optical Telescopes Keith Taylor (IAG/USP) Aug-Nov, 2008 Aug-Sep, 2008 IAG-USP.
Low order wavefront sensor trade study Richard Clare NGAO meeting #4 January
WFS Preliminary design phase report I V. Velur, J. Bell, A. Moore, C. Neyman Design Meeting (Team meeting #10) Sept 17 th, 2007.
NGAO Status R. Dekany January 31, Next Generation AO at Keck Nearing completion of 18 months System Design phase –Science requirements and initial.
The Future of AO at Keck Sept 2004 Mike Brown, for the AOWG and Keck AO team.
Don Gavel: Keck NGAO meeting April 25, LAO Activities Relevant To Keck NGAO Donald Gavel NGAO Team Meeting 6 April 26, 2007.
High Redshift Galaxies: Encircled energy performance budget and IFU spectroscopy Claire Max Sept 14, 2006 NGAO Team Meeting.
MCAO A Pot Pourri: AO vs HST, the Gemini MCAO and AO for ELTs Francois Rigaut, Gemini GSMT SWG, IfA, 12/04/2002.
ATST Science Requirements ScienceTeam. Outline/Scope State Requirements – focus on top level No attempt to give detailed explanation or justification.
1 On-sky validation of LIFT on GeMS C. Plantet 1, S. Meimon 1, J.-M. Conan 1, B. Neichel 2, T. Fusco 1 1: ONERA, the French Aerospace Lab, Chatillon, France.
Adaptive Optics Nicholas Devaney GTC project, Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias 1. Principles 2. Multi-conjugate 3. Performance & challenges.
A visible-light AO system for the 4.2 m SOAR telescope A. Tokovinin, B. Gregory, H. E. Schwarz, V. Terebizh, S. Thomas.
GLAO simulations at ESO European Southern Observatory
Telescope Technologies
Telescopes & recent observational techniques ASTR 3010 Lecture 4 Chapters 3 & 6.
1 Manal Chebbo, Alastair Basden, Richard Myers, Nazim Bharmal, Tim Morris, Thierry Fusco, Jean-Francois Sauvage Fast E2E simulation tools and calibration.
Adaptive Optics Nicholas Devaney GTC project, Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias 1. Principles 2. Multi-conjugate 3. Performance & challenges.
Adaptive Optics1 John O’Byrne School of Physics University of Sydney.
NSF Center for Adaptive Optics UCO Lick Observatory Laboratory for Adaptive Optics Tomographic algorithm for multiconjugate adaptive optics systems Donald.
AO for ELT – Paris, June 2009 MAORY Multi conjugate Adaptive Optics RelaY for the E-ELT Emiliano Diolaiti (INAF–Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna)
Viewing the Universe through distorted lenses: Adaptive optics in astronomy Steven Beckwith Space Telescope Science Institute & JHU.
Low order modes sensing for LGS MCAO with a single NGS S. Esposito, P. M. Gori, G. Brusa Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri Italy Conf. AO4ELT June.
Tomographic reconstruction of stellar wavefronts from multiple laser guide stars C. Baranec, M. Lloyd-Hart, N. M. Milton T. Stalcup, M. Snyder, & R. Angel.
AO review meeting, Florence, November FLAO operating Modes Presented by: S. Esposito Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri / INAF.
NIRSpec Operations Concept Michael Regan(STScI), Jeff Valenti (STScI) Wolfram Freduling(ECF), Harald Kuntschner(ECF), Robert Fosbury (ECF)
Searching for Brown Dwarf Companions to Nearby Stars Michael W. McElwain, James E. Larkin & Adam J. Burgasser (UC Los Angeles) Background on Brown Dwarfs.
1 Characterization of the T/T conditions at Gemini Using AO data Jean-Pierre Véran Lisa Poyneer AO4ELT Conference - Paris June , 2009.
ATLAS The LTAO module for the E-ELT Thierry Fusco ONERA / DOTA On behalf of the ATLAS consortium Advanced Tomography with Laser for AO systems.
Improved Tilt Sensing in an LGS-based Tomographic AO System Based on Instantaneous PSF Estimation Jean-Pierre Véran AO4ELT3, May 2013.
1 MCAO at CfAO meeting M. Le Louarn CfAO - UC Santa Cruz Nov
SITE PARAMETERS RELEVANT FOR HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGING Marc Sarazin European Southern Observatory.
FLAO_01: FLAO system baseline & goal performance F. Quirós-Pacheco, L. Busoni FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
March 31, 2000SPIE CONFERENCE 4007, MUNICH1 Principles, Performance and Limitations of Multi-conjugate Adaptive Optics F.Rigaut 1, B.Ellerbroek 1 and R.Flicker.
Na Laser Guide Stars for CELT CfAO Workshop on Laser Guide Stars 99/12/07 Rich Dekany.
Atmospheric Turbulence: r 0,  0,  0 François Wildi Observatoire de Genève Credit for most slides : Claire Max (UC Santa Cruz) Adaptive Optics in the.
Page 1 Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era Wavefront sensors, correctors François Wildi Observatoire de Genève.
Donald Gavel, Donald Wiberg, Center for Adaptive Optics, U.C. Santa Cruz Marcos Van Dam, Lawrence Livermore National Laboaratory Towards Strehl-Optimal.
NIRISS NRM bad pixel tolerance analysis David Lafrenière 2012 February 21.
AO4ELT, Paris A Split LGS/NGS Atmospheric Tomography for MCAO and MOAO on ELTs Luc Gilles and Brent Ellerbroek Thirty Meter Telescope Observatory.
Robo-AO Overview: System, capabilities, performance Christoph Baranec (PI)
Keck Precision Adaptive Optics Authors: Christopher Neyman 1, Richard Dekany 2, Mitchell Troy 3 and Peter Wizinowich 1. 1 W.M. Keck Observatory, 2 California.
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes Center for Adaptive Optics.
Parameters characterizing the Atmospheric Turbulence: r0, 0, 0
Gemini AO Program March 31, 2000Ellerbroek/Rigaut [ ]1 Scaling Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics Performance Estimates to Extremely Large Telescopes.
Electro-optical systems Sensor Resolution
Page 1 Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era François Wildi Observatoire de Genève Credit for most slides : Claire Max (UC Santa Cruz) Basics of AO.
Page 1 Lecture 15 The applications of tomography: LTAO, MCAO, MOAO, GLAO Claire Max AY 289 March 3, 2016.
Diffraction Limit What is the best angular resolution a telescope would achieve in idealised conditions? Circular aperture: θ min ≈ 1.22 λ/d For the HST:
Lecture 14 AO System Optimization
Pyramid sensors for AO and co-phasing
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
Trade Study Report: Fixed vs. Variable LGS Asterism
Modern Observational/Instrumentation Techniques Astronomy 500
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
NGAO Trade Study GLAO for non-NGAO instruments
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
Presentation transcript:

AO4ELT3 May 31, 2013 Fourier-Based Predictive AO Schemes for Tomographic AO systems S. Mark Ammons Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory May 31, 2013 Thanks to: Lisa Poyneer Alex Rudy Don Gavel Claire Max Luke Johnson Benoit Neichel Andrés Guesalaga Angela Cortes

AO4ELT3 May 31, A final note on GEMS astrometry – the on detector guide window 1.The mechanics of Fourier predictive control 2.Implementing multi-layer predictive control on Shane AO 3.Extending predictive control to tomographic systems: Simulations 4.Application to GEMS telemetryOutline

AO4ELT3 May 31, mas Astrometry on Bright Stars (V > 4) with the GEMS On-Detector Guide Window GEMS On-Detector Guide Windows  GSAOI on-detector guide windows can be read out quickly and saved to prevent target star saturation  1-2 mas stability on central star position (over short term) for V > 4 stars  Performance limited by flat-fielding and detector artifacts on ODGW

AO4ELT3 May 31, 2013 We will Implement Predictive Control on the Upgraded Shane AO System  Project funded by the University of California Office of the President  Goals:  Develop 4-dimensional LQG tomographic predictive control for MCAO and MOAO systems  Implement single-conjugate predictive control on the upgraded Shane LGS AO system at Lick Observatory Optimal control schemes use a model: We need a model of both the control system and the operating conditions (e.g. noise level and atmosphere) Many methods assign parameters MVU/Keck Bayesian - assign star brightness and r0 estimate For best performance, we need to be “data-driven” and use actual measurements to populate our model Getting wind velocity a little wrong is OK Getting wind direction a lot wrong is very bad

AO4ELT3 May 31, 2013

ShaneAO: Adaptive Optics System at the Shane 3-meter Telescope (LGS mode, new fiber laser) ShaneAO is a diffraction- limited imager, spectrograph, and polarimeter for the visible and near-infrared science bands. 7

AO4ELT3 May 31, 2013 Shane AO will Deliver Improved Strehl over Existing Lick System 8 Airy core forming LGS mode, new fiber laser

AO4ELT3 May 31, 2013 ShaneAO instrument characteristics 9 Detector sampling 0.035arcsec/pixel Field of view 20arcsec square Science detector: Hawaii2RG Hawaii2RG Science wavelength coverage: 0.7 to 2.2 microns 0.7 to 2.2microns Spectral resolution R = 500 Slit width: 0.1 arcseconds 0.1arcsec Slit decker: 10 arcseconds (?) 10arcsec Slit angle on sky adjustable 0-360° Long-exposure stabilityhold to the diffraction-limit for one hour hold to ½ slit width for 4 hours Polarimitry mode: polarization analyzer and variable angle waveplate Delta magnitude within seeing disk Dm K =10 Minimum brightness tip/tilt star: m V =18 Tip/tilt star selection field 120arcsec Sky coverage ~90%LGS mode Minimum brightness natural guide star m V =13 Camera readout modesCorrelated double-sampling (CDS) up the ramp (UTR) sub-frame region of interest (ROI) quick take Exposure support:Multiple frame co-added automated nod and expose coordinated with telescope (snap-i- diff, box-4, box-5) automated darks sequence based of history of science exposures Observations supportautomatic data logging automatic data archiving

AO4ELT3 May 31, 2013 ShaneAO is being Asssembled with First Light in Fall Deformable Mirror Wavefront Sensor Science Detector

AO4ELT3 May 31, A final note on GEMS astrometry – the on detector guide window 1.The mechanics of Fourier predictive control 2.Implementing multi-layer predictive control on Shane AO 3.Extending predictive control to tomographic systems: Simulations 4.Application to GEMS telemetryOutline

AO4ELT3 May 31, 2013 Simulation Design LGS Three-Layer Atmosphere We simulate an 8-m MOAO system with tomography:  3 LGSs over 120” diameter  3-layer Taylor frozen-flow atmospheric model assumed at 0, 5, 10 km (55%, 30%, 15%)  Wind velocities randomized, 0-15 m/s  200 realizations of 1 second length, 1 kHz operation  To isolate the effect of prediction on tomographic error, we add no WFS noise

AO4ELT3 May 31, 2013 Back-Projection Tomography 25 iterations per time step, alternating pre- conditioned conjugate gradient / linear steps Minimum Variance Back-Projection Tomography (Gavel 2004)

AO4ELT3 May 31, 2013 Correction Scheme – Shift & Average Multi-sampled Voxels Wind Identification and Estimation not simulated For each layer, replace voxels in downwind direction with shifted and averaged voxels from tomographic time history Only shift voxels originating in multi-sampled region, where height can be effectively determined Wind vectors assumed to be known perfectly Multi-sampled regions Phase height cannot be constrained in sparsely- sampled regions from tomography alone!

AO4ELT3 May 31, 2013 Prediction Improves RMS Errors on Layer Estimates After 1 second, on average, the layer estimates improve 3-13% Downwind regions improve %, especially for high altitude layers Fractional Improvement in Layer Estimates Ground layer 5 km layer 10 km layer

AO4ELT3 May 31, 2013 Prediction Improves RMS Errors on Layer Estimates With downwind layers better determined, the tomographic error improves beyond the radius of the guide stars Tomographic Error vs. Field Radius Maps of Improvement in Layer Estimates LGS radius With shift & average Without shift & average

AO4ELT3 May 31, 2013 Application to GEMS Telemetry Method #1: Apply wind identification step to pseudo open loop slopes provided by A. Guesalaga and B. Neichel Method #2: 1.Perform tomographic reconstruction on pseudo open- loop slopes to estimate true volumetric phase 2.Apply wind identification step to layers of different atmospheric heights We expect that wind layers separated by height will have different temporal properties.

AO4ELT3 May 31, 2013 Tomographic Reconstruction + Wind Identification Cleanly Separates Layers Pseudo Open-Loop slopes Tomographically- reconstructed ground layer Tomographically- reconstructed 4.5 km layer The temporal properties of layers are cleanly distinguished by a tomographic reconstruction (using only geometric information!)

AO4ELT3 May 31, 2013 From Identification to Correction For a tomographic system: Apply a prior that wind vectors in layers separated by geometric tomography should be uncorrelated. If a wind peak is seen with a certain vector that corresponds to a stronger detection in another layer, reject those frequencies. For faster tomography for on-line use: Use Guesalaga & Cortes autocorrelation technique

AO4ELT3 May 31, 2013Summary 1. We will Implement Predictive Control on the Upgraded Shane AO System 2.In simulation, shifting and averaging predictive control provides 3-13% benefits in tomographic wavefront estimation quality at all layers 1.From GEMS telemetry: Adding a tomographic reconstruction to pseudo-open loop slopes, using geometric information only, cleanly separates the temporal properties of the wind flow. 2.This can be exploited to design filters that reject multiple common detections across layers, which are likely to result from tomographic reconstruction error.