Simulation of Positronium in Silica Sodalite Peter Hastings and Amy L.R. Bug Dept. of Physics and Astron., Swarthmore College Philip Sterne Lawrence Livermore.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Wave function approaches to non-adiabatic systems
Advertisements

1 CdS Nano Particles Embedded in Zeolites Nano Technology Course Supervisor: Dr. Taghavinia (Physics Department) Student: A. Izadbakhsh Chemical Eng. Dep.,
Amy Bug, Tim Cronin and Zach Wolfson Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Swarthmore College, U.S.A. Philip Sterne Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, U.S.A.
Positronium in Quartz: Surface and Bulk Bernardo Barbiellini Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts.
Items for Teachers to Prepare for the HSPE Quality Test Preparation DOK Levels Item Specs State Standards.
Chemistry 2 Lecture 2 Particle in a box approximation.
Quantum Monte Carlo Simulation of Vibrational Frequency Shifts in Pure and Doped Solid para-Hydrogen Lecheng Wang, Robert J. Le Roy and Pierre- Nicholas.
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Pravesh Patel 10th Intl. Workshop on Fast Ignition of Fusion Targets June 9-13, 2008, Hersonissos, Crete Experimental.
Melting of Iron at Earth’s core conditions from quantum Monte Carlo free energy calculations Department of Earth Sciences & Department of Physics and Astronomy,
Statistical Models of Solvation Eva Zurek Chemistry Final Presentation.
EEE539 Solid State Electronics 5. Phonons – Thermal Properties Issues that are addressed in this chapter include:  Phonon heat capacity with explanation.
Continuous Time Monte Carlo and Driven Vortices in a Periodic Potential V. Gotcheva, Yanting Wang, Albert Wang and S. Teitel University of Rochester Lattice.
The 511 keV Annihilation Emission From The Galactic Center Department of Physics National Tsing Hua University G.T. Chen 2007/1/2.
Kinetic Lattice Monte Carlo Simulations of Dopant Diffusion/Clustering in Silicon Zudian Qin and Scott T. Dunham Department of Electrical Engineering University.
Plasma Kinetics around a Dust Grain in an Ion Flow N F Cramer and S V Vladimirov, School of Physics, University of Sydney, S A Maiorov, General Physics.
‘Tis not folly to dream: Using Molecular Dynamics to Solve Problems in Chemistry Christopher Adam Hixson and Ralph A. Wheeler Dept. of Chemistry and Biochemistry,
Ch 23 pages Lecture 15 – Molecular interactions.
Monte Carlo Simulation of Interacting Electron Models by a New Determinant Approach Mucheng Zhang (Under the direction of Robert W. Robinson and Heinz-Bernd.
Deformation of Nanotubes Yang Xu and Kenny Higa MatSE 385
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
880.P20 Winter 2006 Richard Kass 1 Confidence Intervals and Upper Limits Confidence intervals (CI) are related to confidence limits (CL). To calculate.
Physical Chemistry 2 nd Edition Thomas Engel, Philip Reid Chapter 23 The Chemical Bond in Diatomic Molecules.
Free energies and phase transitions. Condition for phase coexistence in a one-component system:
St. Petersburg State University. Department of Physics. Division of Computational Physics. COMPUTER SIMULATION OF CURRENT PRODUCED BY PULSE OF HARD RADIATION.
Computational NanoEnginering of Polymer Surface Systems Aquil Frost, Environmental Engineering, Central State University John Lewnard, Mechanical Engineering,
Monte Carlo Simulation of Liquid Water Daniel Shoemaker Reza Toghraee MSE 485/PHYS Spring 2006.
Ch 9 pages Lecture 23 – The Hydrogen Atom.
Specific Heat of Solids Quantum Size Effect on the Specific Heat Electrical and Thermal Conductivities of Solids Thermoelectricity Classical Size Effect.
Electrostatic Effects in Organic Chemistry A guest lecture given in CHM 425 by Jack B. Levy March, 2003 University of North Carolina at Wilmington (subsequently.
Surface and Bulk Fluctuations of the Lennard-Jones Clusrers D. I. Zhukhovitskii.
Determination of the 3  fraction in positron annihilation Bożena Jasińska Institute of Physics, Maria Curie Sklodowska University Lublin, Poland.
Burkhard Militzer, Carnegie Institution of Washington: “Path Integral Monte Carlo”, 2007 Burkhard Militzer Geophysical Laboratory Carnegie Institution.
The Quantum Theory of Atoms and Molecules The Schrödinger equation and how to use wavefunctions Dr Grant Ritchie.
Simulations of radio emission from cosmic ray air showers Tim Huege & Heino Falcke ARENA-Workshop Zeuthen,
Path integral Monte Carlo
Self-organized Models of Selectivity in Ca and Na Channels Bob Eisenberg 1, Dezső Boda 2, Janhavi Giri 1,3, James Fonseca 1, Dirk Gillespie 1, Douglas.
First Principle Calculations of Positron Annihilation in CdSe Quantum Dots.
Gamma-induced positron lifetime and age-momentum
1 Amy Bug, Melaku Muluneh and Jillian Waldman Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Swarthmore College, U.S.A. Philip Sterne Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,
Molecular Modelling - Lecture 2 Techniques for Conformational Sampling Uses CHARMM force field Written in C++
Path Integral Quantum Monte Carlo Consider a harmonic oscillator potential a classical particle moves back and forth periodically in such a potential x(t)=
Physics “Advanced Electronic Structure” Lecture 1. Theoretical Background Contents: 1. Historical Overview. 2. Basic Equations for Interacting Electrons.
Gamma ray interaction with matter A) Primary interactions 1) Coherent scattering (Rayleigh scattering) 2) Incoherent scattering (Compton scattering) 3)
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Effective interactions for reaction calculations Jutta Escher, F.S. Dietrich, D. Gogny, G.P.A. Nobre, I.J. Thompson.
Free electron theory of Metals
Interacting Molecules in a Dense Fluid
Monte Carlo in different ensembles Chapter 5
Generalized van der Waals Partition Function
3/23/2015PHY 752 Spring Lecture 231 PHY 752 Solid State Physics 11-11:50 AM MWF Olin 107 Plan for Lecture 23:  Transport phenomena and Fermi liquid.
Theory of dilute electrolyte solutions and ionized gases
Bulk Hybridization Gap and Surface Conduction in the Kondo Insulator SmB 6 Richard L. Greene, University of Maryland College Park, DMR Recently,
R. Lednicky: Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia I.P. Lokhtin, A.M. Snigirev, L.V. Malinina: Moscow State University, Institute of Nuclear.
The Hydrogen Atom The only atom that can be solved exactly.
Pore size distributionassessed by different techniques Pore size distribution assessed by different techniques M. A. Slasli a, F.Stoeckli a, D.Hugi-Cleary.
QM2 Concept Test 6.1 Choose all of the following statements that are correct about the free electron gas model. 1)The free electron gas model takes into.
Antihydrogen Workshop, June , CERN S.N.Gninenko Production of cold positronium S.N. Gninenko INR, Moscow.
Proposed Laboratory Simulation of Galactic Positron In-Flight Annihilation in Atomic Hydrogen Benjamin Brown, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Comp. Mat. Science School Electrons in Materials Density Functional Theory Richard M. Martin Electron density in La 2 CuO 4 - difference from sum.
Sandipan Dutta and James Dufty Department of Physics, University of Florida Classical Representation of Quantum Systems Work supported under US DOE Grants.
Schrodinger’s Equation for Three Dimensions
Electrical Engineering Materials
The Hydrogen Atom The only atom that can be solved exactly.
Concept test 15.1 Suppose at time
Effect of water and ethanol on the size distribution
Computer Simulations of
Concept test 15.1 Suppose at time
Masoud Aryanpour & Varun Rai
Jan Genzer (Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering)
Physical Chemistry Chapter VI Interaction between Molecules 2019/5/16
Cooper Pairs In the 1950s it was becoming clear that the superelectrons were paired ie there must be a positive interaction that holds a pair of electrons.
Presentation transcript:

Simulation of Positronium in Silica Sodalite Peter Hastings and Amy L.R. Bug Dept. of Physics and Astron., Swarthmore College Philip Sterne Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 1

Positron Annihilation Spectroscopy (PAS) provides information on size and chemical content of zeolitic cavities e+ enters zeolite e+ selects electron e+ in Ps is “picked two gamma rays and thermalizes of solid and forms off” prematurely by with characteristic within tens of ps; positronium (Ps) with another electron energy of 511 keV e+ preferentially natural lifetime of of solid are emitted locates in 125 ps (para) or channels and cavities 140 ns (ortho) Lifetime, , of Ps is determined by electronic density  - :  -1 =  r e 2 c ∫ dr - dr +   (r + )   (r - )  [   ( r - )]    r - - r + ) 2

Simple “free volume” model is commonly used... Data from various molecular solids including zeolites (Y.C. Jean,1995)  -1 =   -1 [  R / (R+  R) + (1/2  ) sin(2  R / (R+  R) ) ] Uniform electronic density in layer  R. Data typically fit with  R = 1.66 Å,    2ns Yet it cannot quantitatively describe diverse data... irregular pore geometry ionic substitution aluminum content presence of adsorbates irregular pore geometry ionic substitution aluminum content presence of adsorbates (Brandt et al, 1960; Eldrup et al, 1981) zeolite    (ns) (  cages?)   (ns) (  cages?) MS-3A MS-4A MS-5A (Mohamed and El-Sayed, 1997) R zeolite    (ns) (  cages?) I 2 (%)   (ns) (  cages?) I 3 (%) MS-3A MS-3A+Kr(  MS-3A+Kr(  (Ito et al., 1982) 3

Our approach is to simulate Ps in zeolites via Path Integral Monte Carlo (PIMC) e- e+ The Quantum density matrix:  (  ) = exp( -  H) is represented in the position basis: = ∫... d r 1 … r P-1 (  P) The solution of the Bloch equation for Ps is instantiated by two “chains of beads” which have become analogous to two interacting, harmonic, ring polymers. The location of each e+ bead is determined by the likelihood of measuring e+ at this location in the solid. Ps wave packet Ps “chains” 4

Some messy details : For Coulomb interaction, use either Yukawa potential (Muser and Berne, 1997) or ( Pollock, 1988) exact Coulomb density matrix:  (  ) ≈ e -  T + + T - ) e -  Vext e - P   (  )  An atom-based density functional code (Sterne et al., 1999) generates V ext (r + ) and   ( r).  Try various models (Sterne-Kaiser: metal, Puska et al. : insulator, Independent particle model ) for  [   . V ext (r - ) is a sum of exponentials (Space et al., 1992). More work is needed to develop an electronic pseudopotential for zeolite hosts. Codes written in Fortran 9X and run both on Linux workstation and Appleseed Macintosh cluster using Mac MPI libraries. 5

RESULTS: PIMC yields new prediction even in a spherical cage R (a.u.)  free-volume R = 10,e+ in Ps R = 6, e+ in Ps x R = 6, e+ alone R = 5,e+ in Ps (Larrimore et al, 2000) The new predictions arise from using a 2-particle model of Ps. 6 symbols: data curves: free volume theory

RESULTS: Si-sodalite lifetimes are consistent with experiment and simple theory, but with a very different physical interpretation x xx Radial probability distributions in sodalite cage:  + (cav pdf),  +  -  chg pdf ).   is 4.3 for insulator model. Experiments on sodalite give  ≈ ns. 7

RESULTS: Ps at this (high) simulation temperature is encapsulated in sodalite cage after 100K steps: total E: a.u., potential E: a.u. MC step Ps energy  = 50 au, P = 250  +  = 50 au,P = 1000 Density averaged over MC run 8

Single particle and two-particle (preferable) Ps models result in different positron annihilation characteristics. PIMC enhances contributions from the surface of the cage, over the simple “free-volume/uniform electronic density” model. The PIMC approach naturally accounts for non-idealized cage and channel shapes and allows one to faithfully calculate energy, structure, and annihilation rate due to realistic electronic density in the host solid. Ps is stable to ionization, and prefers confinement in a single cage of Si-sodalite. Calculated annihilation rates agree favorably with experiment. More sophisticated potential models, chemical effects, and other zeolite frameworks will be considered in the near future. Conclusions and future directions 9

Thanks to... The Donors of the Petrolium Research Fund, administered by the American Chemical Society The Faculty Research Support Fund of Swarthmore College This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by University of California Lawrence Livermore National Laboritory under Contract No. W-7405-Eng.48 10