William D. Corbett KTA-Tator, Inc.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Removing Coatings and Cleaning Masonry Substrates
Advertisements

SSPC PA-2 “Measurement of Dry Coating Thickness with magnetic Gages”
Preparing a Coating Inspection Plan
I work in tribology and am lost in data. How can I make my job easier? Three parts to this project 1.A Review of ASM Handbook Volume 5 2.A summary of a.
AS9102 First Article Inspection Report
Surface Finish An engineering component may be cast, forged, drawn, welded or stamped, etc. All the surfaces may not have functional requirements and need.
Presented by: Derrick Castle, PCS Kentucky Transportation Cabinet Writing a Good Specification for Bridge Painting.
Calculating Coating Lifetime Costs
Ahead in abrasives. Introduction Eurogrit BV Eurogrit’s head-office in Papendrecht The Netherlands.
Manufacture and Testing of a Large Zirconium Clad Vessel David Clift, P.Eng. Production Manager Ellett Industries September 14, 2005.
Waterjetting—New Standards for Assessing End Condition Cleanliness
PPAP Requirements Training
Steps to a More Effective Power Tool Cleaning Presented by: Earl Bowry, Jotun Paints, Inc.
Update on SSPC Standards Useful to the Steel Fabrication Industry
First Article Inspection Report
Concrete Cleanliness Inspections – Extent of Paint Removal For repaints, verify adequacy of paint removal Definitions for the amount of paint or stain.
William D. Corbett, KTA-Tator, Inc. Chair – SSPC Committee C.3.2 on
Establish Verification Procedures (Task 11 / Principle 6)
Standards, Training, and Certification in the Oil and Gas Industry Presented by: Ernst Toussaint, TransCanada.
World Health Organization
Acceptance Sampling Plans by Variables
TERMINOLOGY OF ISO 9001:2000 By KOESWIDIJONO. ISO ISO : THE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION IS A WORLDWIDE FEDERATION OF NATIONAL STANDARDS.
Busting The Myths of Wet Abrasive Blasting
William D. Corbett KTA-Tator, Inc.
Surface Preparation - QA Assessments (con’t)
Practical Coating Thickness Measurement Overview Presented by: Paul Lomax, Fischer Technology, Inc.
Presented by: Skip Vernon, Coating and Lining Technologies, Inc. How to Update and Develop an Effective Coating Specification.
Adhesion Testing for Protective Coatings
Pull-Off Adhesion Testing Presented by: David Beamish,
Digital Data Management For Coating Inspection Tasks On Steel Structures Presented by: Joe Walker, Elcometer.
William D. Corbett KTA-Tator, Inc.
Alison B. Kaelin, ASQ-CQA KTA-Tator, Inc.
First Article Inspection
WWLC Standard Operating Procedures Presented by Frank Hall, Laboratory Certification Coordinator.
24/03/2006 Introduction to IMO Performance Standard for Protective Coating and IACS Common Structural Rules BV Surveyor’s Training Development Department.
Presented by: Tony Serdenes, Greenman-Pedersen
Presented by: David Beamish DeFelsko Corporation
Use of Field-Applied Fluoropolymer Coatings for Maintenance and Restoration Applications D+D Webinar Bob Parker (AGCCA) June 29, 2011.
Application of Thermal Spray
XL2 800 General Testing Procedure Good surface preparation is essential for obtaining accurate test results. All non- representative material (e.g.,
Standards, Training, and Certification in the Wastewater Industry Presented by: Bob Murphy, Sherwin Williams.
Validation Defination Establishing documentary evidence which provides a high degree of assurance that specification process will consistently produce.
Standards, Training, and Certifications in the Marine Coatings Industry Presented by: Earl Bowry.
By Terry Treutel Ride Quality Consultant Former WisDOT Ride Spec Coordinator.
Thanks for giving me an opportunity to share with you our process for controlling media and other supplies. Disclaimer: We are not yet accredited to ISO.
SURFACE TEXTURE MESUREMENT. Surface Metrology  Surface metrology or surface topology refers to the geometry and texture of surfaces.  The Surface Texture.
Informations and comments on ECE-TRANS-WP.29-GRB e 1 Louis-Ferdinand PARDO (France) Transmitted by the expert from France Informal document GRB
Marlborough Boys College
National Highway Institute 5-1 REV-2, JAN 2006 EQUIPMENT FACTORS AFFECTING INERTIAL PROFILER MEASUREMENTS BLOCK 5.
Henry L. Alexander CMfgE CQE Calibration Program Manager Perry Johnson Laboratory Accreditation, Inc NCSL International Workshop and Symposium Communicating.
Introduction for the Implementation of Software Configuration Management I thought I knew it all !
Marlborough Boys College
MECH 373 Instrumentation and Measurement
Rockwell Hardness Test blogspot
Marlborough Boys College
Inspection of Thermal Spray Coatings
Presented by Harry C. Elinsky, Jr. Filtech, Inc.
NACE SPECIFICATION White Metal Blast Cleaning
This teaching material has been made freely available by the KEMRI-Wellcome Trust (Kilifi, Kenya). You can freely download,
Plastic Pipe Rule – Tracking and Traceability Proposed Requirements
Coating Failure at a Gas Compressor Facility
First Article Inspection
Guide for successful completion of First Article Inspection Reports
Guide for successful completion of First Article Inspection Reports
John Kern SSPC Technical Services Dept.
Lab # 5: Surface Roughness Test
Craig Woolhouse Elcometer
Quality Control Instrumentation for Paint and Coating Installations
William Corbett, Carly McGee and Jason Coley KTA-Tator, Inc.
Bob Cloutier, for SSPC Technical Services Dept.
Presentation transcript:

William D. Corbett KTA-Tator, Inc. Determining Conformance to Steel Profile/Surface Roughness/ Peak Count Requirements William D. Corbett KTA-Tator, Inc.

Webinar Content Review of industry standards Review of instrumentation and measurement acquisition procedures Content of Proposed SSPC Standard

Learning Objectives/Outcomes Completion of this webinar will enable the participant to describe: The industry standards for surface profile, surface roughness and peak count measurement The instruments used to measure surface profile/ roughness and to quantify peak count The proposed content of the SSPC standard, “Procedure for Determining Conformance to Steel Profile/Surface Roughness/Peak Count Requirements”

Industry Standards for Surface Profile, Surface Roughness and Peak Count Measurement ASME B46.1, Surface Texture (Surface Roughness, Waviness and Lay) ASTM D4417, Standard Test Methods for Measurement of Surface Profile of Blast Cleaned Steel ASTM D7127, Standard Test Methods for Measurement of Surface Roughness of Abrasive Blast Cleaned Metal Surfaces Using a Portable Stylus Instrument

Industry Standards for Surface Profile, Surface Roughness and Peak Count Measurement, continued ISO 4287, Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) - Surface Texture: Profile Method - Terms, Definitions and Surface Texture Parameters ISO 8503, Preparation of steel substrates before application of paints and related products - Surface roughness characteristics of blast-cleaned steel substrates Part 4: Method for the calibration of ISO surface profile comparators and for the determination of surface profile - Stylus instrument procedure Part 5: Replica tape method for determination of the surface profile NACE SP0287, Field Measurement of Surface Profile of Abrasive Blast Cleaned Steel Surfaces

Proposed SSPC Standard Procedure for Determining Conformance to Steel Profile/Surface Roughness/Peak Count Requirements Draft #6b (May 21, 2012) in SSPC Standards Review Committee (SRC) After SRC approval, SSPC Board must approve Timeline for approval is unknown at this time

Content of Proposed SSPC Standard Scope; Description; Referenced Standards; Definitions Description of Instruments; Verification of Accuracy Required Number & Location of Readings Reporting Conformance to the Specified Surface Profile Range Appendix A: Calibration & Verification of Accuracy Appendix B: Determining Compliance based on Process Control Procedure Appendix C: Additional Considerations when Measuring Surface Profile

Instrumentation and Measurement Acquisition Procedures Visual Comparators Depth Micrometers Replica Tape Stylus Instruments

Visual Comparators ASTM D4417, Method A 5-10 X illuminated magnifier Comparator Disc

Visual Comparators Three Comparator Discs Stencil Code S: Sand G/S: Grit/Slag SH: Shot Stencil Code Profile depth (2) Abrasive Type (Sand) Year reference (1970)

Visual Comparators Select Disc Attach Disc to Comparator Examine Surface Select Segment(s)

ISO Visual Comparators Grit or Shot prepared surfaces Used with 5-10X magnifier Surface roughness “graded” as: Fine Medium Coarse

Depth Micrometers Instrument sets on peaks of the profile while a conical-shaped point projects into the valleys Digital models store and upload data for analysis (“paperless”)

Replica Tape Used in conjunction with a spring-loaded micrometer (analog or digital) Compressible foam attached to 2 mils of polyester film (Mylar®) Digital version of micrometer can upload data (USB)

Replica Tape

Using HT Replica Tape Obtain measurement with X-Coarse replica tape If reading is 0.8-1.5 mils (red zone), record the measurement using Coarse tape If reading is 2.6-4.5 mils (blue zone), record the measurement using X-Coarse tape If reading is between 1.5-2.5 mils using X-Coarse, obtain a second reading (same location) with the Coarse tape If the reading with the Coarse tape is also within 1.5-2.5 mils inclusive, average the two values

Portable Stylus Instruments (ASTM D7127) Retractable arm with diamond point stylus Arm is automatically retracted Rt: The distance between the highest peak and the lowest valley within any given evaluation length Rmax: The greatest distance between the highest peak and lowest valley for any of the five sampling lengths that comprise an evaluation length Pc: The number of peak/valley pairs, per unit of evaluation length, extending outside a “deadband” centered around the mean line over the sampling length

Frequency of Surface Profile Measurements No. of readings indicated in ASTM standards No. of locations not indicated in ASTM standards No. of locations may be indicated by the project specification Proposed SSPC Standard provides no. of locations to characterize the surface Primary purpose of this webinar

Number of Readings (to determine location average) Based on Test Method (unless otherwise specified) ASTM D4417 “Sufficient” number of readings for Method A (visual comparator) 10 readings per “location” for Method B (depth micrometer) 3 readings per “location” for Method C (replica tape) ASTM D7127 (portable stylus instrument) 5 traces per “location”

Number of Locations (to characterize the surface) Minimum of three 6” x 6” (15cm x 15cm) locations Per surface preparation “apparatus” Per work shift or 12-hour period (whichever is shorter) Optional method (Non-mandatory Appendix B) Based on changes in process between acceptance of jobsite standard & completion of production surface preparation

Surface Preparation “Apparatus” 1 2 Individual Blast Pot (multiple nozzles) [1] Individual abrasive recycling/blast cleaning units (multiple pots) [2] Individual centrifugal units (stationary or mobile) [3] Individual power tool [4] 3 4

Reporting Report: Example (based on replica tape): Range of Location Averages (lowest location average & highest location average) Surface Profile Measurement (per “apparatus”) Example (based on replica tape): Location 1: 4.5, 4.8, 4.1 mils; (4.5) Location 2: 4.0, 5.0, 3.8 mils; (4.3) Location 3: 3.5, 4.1, 4.8 mils; (4.1) Range: 4.1-4.5 mils; Average 4.3 mils

Conformance to the Specified Surface Profile Range The average of the “location averages” must fall within the specified surface profile range Location averages and average surface profile measurements outside of the specified range are not acceptable The magnitude of the non-conforming surface profile measurement areas must be determined, marked and recorded

Chalk line demarcating non-conforming area OK 6” x 6” (15cm x 15cm) areas OK End of Prepared Area Non-conforming Location Non-conforming Location OK OK OK OK Chalk line demarcating non-conforming area OK

Appendix A: Calibration & Verification of Accuracy (shop/field) Calibration of instruments (applies to ASTM D4417 methods B&C; ASTM D7127) Calibration by manufacturer or approved laboratory only Recalibration per manufacturer’s recommended interval (typically annual) Obtain a dated Certificate of Traceability

Appendix A: Calibration & Verification of Accuracy (shop/field) ASTM D4417 Method A (visual comparator): visual for damage Microscopic examination in a laboratory to confirm depth of valley relative to corresponding peak (if necessary)

Appendix A: Calibration & Verification of Accuracy (shop/field) ASTM D4417 Method B (depth micrometer) Zero set (float glass plate) beginning & end of shift Verify accuracy using shim with cut-out/hole on float glass plate Verify cone tip condition using 10x magnifier Tips are replaceable (re-verify accuracy upon replacement)

Appendix A: Calibration & Verification of Accuracy (shop/field) ASTM D4417 Method C (replica tape) Select appropriate tape Coarse (0.8-2.5 mils) X-Coarse (1.5-4.5 mils) X-Coarse Plus (4-5 mils) Recheck if in “overlap area” of 1.5-2.5 mils Verify accuracy of micrometer using traceable shims

Appendix A: Calibration & Verification of Accuracy (shop/field) ASTM D7127 (portable stylus instrument) Set gage parameters (sampling & evaluation length, deadband & filter) per Standard Verify accuracy using standard (provided with gage) prior to each use

Appendix B: Determining Compliance Based on Process Control Procedure Based on establishing a process control prior to production blast or power tool cleaning Within 15 minutes after start of surface preparation, prepare sample area (min 2’ x 2’) Measure surface profile. If surface profile conforms, document process control items

Appendix B: Determining Compliance Based on Process Control Procedure A change in process during production requires re-measurement Denote time of the change & location of surfaces prepared prior to the change Obtain two measurements at random locations One in an area prepared prior to the change in process One in an area prepared after the change in process Document: Locations of tests; test method(s); test results; conformance to specification The magnitude of the non-conforming surface profile measurement areas must be determined, marked and recorded (as described earlier)

PROCESS CONTROL ITEMS FOR ABRASIVE NOZZLE BLAST CLEANING TABLE B1 PROCESS CONTROL ITEMS FOR ABRASIVE NOZZLE BLAST CLEANING 1 Worker performing abrasive blast cleaning 2 Blast nozzle type 3 Blast nozzle size 4 Number of nozzles operating from same compressor 5 Abrasive manufacturer 6 Abrasive type, hardness and physical shape (e.g., steel grit, steel shot, or ratio of mix, or type of mineral abrasive, such as garnet, coal slag, etc.) 7 Abrasive size (sieve size) 8 Air pressure at nozzle 9 Blast hose length (as a range) 10 Blast hose diameter 11 Compressor size (CFM) 12 Air pressure at compressor

FOR POWER TOOL CLEANING (SP 11, SP 15 only) TABLE B2 PROCESS CONTROL ITEMS FOR POWER TOOL CLEANING (SP 11, SP 15 only) 1 Worker performing power tool cleaning 2 Power tool type, model and manufacturer 3 Power tool media manufacturer 4 Type of media used (e.g. wire brush, coated abrasive disc, abrasive embedded in matrix, wire bristle, impact tool) 5 Abrasive media size 6 Grade of media 7 Replacement/substitution of consumables (e.g., disc, wire brush, needles, bristles) 8 Compressor size (CFM) if tool is air-powered

FOR CENTRIFUGAL BLAST CLEANING TABLE B3 PROCESS CONTROL ITEMS FOR CENTRIFUGAL BLAST CLEANING 1 Unit Operator 2 Blast wheel type 3 Wheel motor power 4 Wheel positioning 5 Control cage movement 6 Media flow rate 7 Abrasive manufacturer 8 Abrasive type and physical shape (e.g., steel grit, steel shot, or ratio of mix, or type of mineral abrasive, such as garnet, coal slag, etc.) 9 Abrasive size (sieve size) 10 Configuration, orientation and size of piece being cleaned (if in shop)

Appendix C: Additional Considerations Measuring surfaces prepared in the shop using centrifugal blast cleaning units Potential for variability due to wheel alignment and configuration of item Measuring surfaces prepared using portable centrifugal blast cleaning units Potential for variability due to uneven distribution of blast media

Appendix C: Additional Considerations Measuring surface profile exposed by waterjetting units Profile may vary considerably. Additional measurement locations may be required Measuring surfaces prepared using power tools (SSPC-SP11; SP15) Consider productive life of cleaning media; Additional measurement locations may be required Use ASTM D4417, Method B only

Appendix C: Precautions Determining surface profile on flame cut edges Removal of carburization (hardening) may be required prior to blast cleaning Effect of existing surface profile on newly generated surface profile Existing profile beneath coating may exceed specified profile for maintenance painting. Prepare test area prior to production work Pitted steel: Measure in non-pitted areas

Summary During this webinar, we have described : The industry standards for surface profile, surface roughness and peak count measurement The instruments used to measure surface profile/ roughness and to quantify peak count The proposed content of the SSPC standard, “Procedure for Determining Conformance to Steel Profile/Surface Roughness/Peak Count Requirements”

William D. Corbett KTA-Tator, Inc. Determining Conformance to Steel Profile/Surface Roughness/ Peak Count Requirements THE END William D. Corbett KTA-Tator, Inc.