Welcome Welcome! Please sign in. Your participation is important! Thank you for taking the time to get involved!

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. Route 30 Environmental Impact Statement & Phase I Design Report Community Advisory Group Meeting Thursday May 8, 2008.
Advertisements

Oregon 62: I-5 to Dutton Rd. (Medford) Oregon 62: I-5 to Dutton Rd. (Medford) for Jackson County Planning Commission May 9, 2013.
Oregon 62: I-5 to Dutton Rd. (Medford) for Jackson County Planning Commission May 9, 2013.
PUBLIC MEETING May 12, 2011 P U B L I C I N V O L V E M E N T Project Status PHASE III Construction PHASE II Contract Plan Preparation & Land Acquisition.
Identify Problems, Planning Objectives and Constraints.
Interim Guidance on the Application of Travel and Land Use Forecasting in NEPA Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee October 14, 2010.
Introduction to EIS/EA Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation.
I-66 Corridor Improvements Outside the Beltway CTB Briefing
Watershed Approaches and Community Based Planning
Gateway National Recreation Area Jamaica Bay Transportation Studies at Floyd Bennett Field, Jacob Riis Park, Riis Landing, and the Former Pennsylvania.
Clean Water Act Integrated Planning Framework Sewer Smart Summit October 23, 2012.
Kickoff Meeting Presentation March 3, P resentation T opics Description of the Proposed Project Need for the Project Project Background Description.
1 C E T A S Range of Alternatives Presentation Date Project Name Project location (city, county) ODOT Key Number:
New I-65 Interchange at Worthsville Road Welcome!.
From KY 89 at the northern city limits of McKee to the recently improved section of US 421 just north of the Jackson-Rockcastle County line. Six-Year Highway.
Environmental Assessment Public Meeting
Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2 June 25,
Lec 20, Ch.11: Transportation Planning Process (objectives)
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users SAFETEA-LU Key Safety Provisions Federal Highway Administration.
Board of Supervisors General Plan Study Session Circulation Element Traffic, Circulation, Land Use Correlation Traffic, Circulation, Land Use Correlation.
Intersection & Interchange Geometrics (IIG) Innovative Design Considerations for All Users Module 8 Intersection- Interchange Evaluation Process.
9 Closing the Project Teaching Strategies
Best Practices Related to Research Problem Identification, Scoping, and Programming: A Researcher’s View Martin Pietrucha, Director The Thomas D. Larson.
Barrington Road at Jane Addams Memorial Tollway (Interstate 90) Interchange Improvement Study Hoffman Estates Village Hall June 27, 2012.
Meeting Agenda Stakeholder Participation Panel July 14, 2003 Welcome/Introductions Study Overview Tasks/Products/Schedule Traffic Patterns Break Key Project.
CCJPA Sacramento to Roseville 3 rd Track Project Sacramento Stakeholder Advisory Committee (SAC) Meeting #1 HDR Office Tuesday, May 20, :00 - 9:00.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
WORK ZONE SAFETY & MOBILITY Meeting the Federal Rule Jim Allen Safety Implementation Engineer ATSSA Illinois Chapter Meeting.
Project Scoping Fundamentals Alan Lively Project Delivery Specialist Local Government Section April 6, 2010.
1 Context Sensitive Design CE 453 Highway Design Iowa State University Howard R. Green Company.
Highway Location Study CE 453 Lecture 4 See also lab 2 and lab 4 instructions, and EIS lecture notes See also 04 DOT development process.doc Refs:
December 2006 Study Update We’ve been busy since our last round of advisory committee and task force meetings were held in the summer and fall. Our next.
Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
1 C E T A S Triage Presentation, Date Project Name Project location (city, county) ODOT Key Number:
April 9, 2011 Mike Wieszchowski, P.E., PTOE Professional Traffic Operations Engineer Road Use Planning Guidelines to Protect Your Roadways.
WRITING A BETTER PURPOSE AND NEED A COMMON SENSE APPROACH Kevin E. Davis Environmental Supervisor ODOT-OES.
Introduction Session 01 Matakuliah: S0753 – Teknik Jalan Raya Tahun: 2009.
Linking Planning & NEPA Overview Mitch Batuzich FHWA Texas Division FHWA Texas Division April 17, 2007.
4733 Bethesda Ave, Suite 600 Bethesda, MD (P) Developing Criteria for Project Programming.
Oregon Passenger Rail Leadership Council Meeting June 6, 2012.
Phase I Engineering and Environmental Studies Project Development Flowchart US Route 45; IL Route 132 to IL Route 173 and Millburn Bypass CSS
1 EMS Fundamentals An Introduction to the EMS Process Roadmap AASHTO EMS Workshop.
1 Identify Preferred Alternative and Finalize Plan Planning Steps 7 & 8.
CHAPTER 4 ALTERNATIVES. --- “The driving impetus for conducting environmental impact studies is to comparatively present the effects of proposed alternatives.
Developing a Purpose & Need Statement. Objectives  Understand when the P&N is developed in the PDP  Understand the importance of a well- written/well-justified.
I-66 Corridor Improvements Morteza Farajian Interstate 66 Corridor Improvements From US Route 15 in Prince William County To Interstate 495 in Fairfax.
Company LOGO Georgia Truck Lane Needs Identification Study Talking Freight Seminar March 19, 2008 Matthew Fowler, P.T.P Assistant State Planning Administrator.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 (Harbor Bridge) Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Citizens’ Advisory.
Preparation Plan. Objectives Describe the role and importance of a preparation plan. Describe the key contents of a preparation plan. Identify and discuss.
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
I-465 at I-65 Interchange Modification Public Meeting 6:00pm Monday, October 1, 2012 South Grove Intermediate School Beech Grove, Indiana.
Safety Data Initiatives in Reauthorization – What Can We Expect? Kathy Krause, FHWA Office of Safety 30 th Annual International Traffic Records Forum July.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 Harbor Bridge Project Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Public.
Connecting South Dakota and the Nation Access Management Training Brooke White, Access Management Engineer.
FOOTHILL ELEMENTARY TRAFFIC PROBLEM SOLVING May 19, :30 p.m.
PP 620: Public Policy and Health Administration Unit One Seminar Kris R. Foote, J.D., M.P.A., M.S.W. Kaplan University.
PURPOSE & NEED Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 1: How to Determine Which Resources Should be Considered in a SCEA How to identify what.
Iron Range Tourism Bureau April 25, 2013 Hwy 53 Update.
Unit 1 THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS AND THE ROLE OF THE MPO LCTCC Educational Program.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 Harbor Bridge Project Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Citizens.
All information presented is preliminary and subject to revision I-515 Alternatives Development Study Public Information Meeting March 31, 2016 Welcome.
County Road 19(Manning Road) & County Road 22 Improvements Environmental Study/ Preliminary Design Report November 2008.
Alternative Alignments Public Meeting
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
Willow Meadows Civic Club Meeting September 13, 2011
Technical and Public Advisory Committee Meeting #3
Chapter 5. The Transportation-Planning Process
Purpose & Need Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
Presentation transcript:

Welcome Welcome! Please sign in. Your participation is important! Thank you for taking the time to get involved!

MODOT is studying transportation issues along 257 miles of I-44 between the Missouri/Oklahoma state line and the St. Louis/Franklin county line. The issues cover a wide range of factors such as traffic operations, safety, highway design elements and system condition. The purpose of tonight’s meeting is to present information related to the issues and obtain input from you, the I-44 users, to help us better understand the needs and uses of the corridor. Please review the exhibits and share your thoughts, information and questions with the study team. Why We Are Here

There are six stations at tonight’s meeting with information that will help you understand the purpose and process of this study. Please take the time to visit all six stations. At Stations 5 & 6 we would like your input on issues that concern you about I-44. You can mark up project maps at Station 5 with information we should know, and provide written or oral comments, or both, at Station 6. What you will find at each station: Station 1: Background Station 2: Engineering Data Issues Station 3: Environmental Resources Station 4: Working Maps Station 5: Public Comment Forms Station 6: What’s Next? Summary of Stations

1 This station includes background information about I-44, the study purpose and scope, explains the NEPA process, and defines a Purpose and Need Statement. Project Purpose: To seek the most effective approach to improving the I-44 transportation corridor in Missouri. This Purpose and Need Study will: Identify Transportation Problems Establish Evaluation Criteria Determine Modal Strategies Establish Logical Termini Present Environmental, Planning, Engineering and Traffic Data which affects all of the above. We encourage you to stay involved. Station 1: Project Background

I-44 in Missouri was originally designed and constructed from the mid-1950s to the mid-1960s. It plays a key role in serving the state’s commercial and recreational traffic. In addition, I-44 is part of the I-44/I-40 corridor that extends from California to Missouri. Existing traffic volumes on I-44 vary from 19,000 vehicles per day to nearly 72,000 vehicles per day, and travel along the interstate is expected to increase significantly in the future. Given the critical importance of I-44 to the state’s economy, the age of the facility, increasing traffic volumes and rapid growth along portions of the study corridor, MoDOT and its planning partners determined it was time to begin the first step in assessing the extent of the deficiencies and needs along the corridor. I-44 Background

The purpose of this I-44 study is to develop a comprehensive list of transportation issues along the I-44 study corridor, translate those issues into a purpose and need statement and identify sections of I-44, known as sections of independent utility, that would make appropriate stand-alone improvement projects in the future. Key study activities include the following: Data Gathering Community Involvement Land Use Forums Agency Coordination Purpose and Need Statement Study Purpose & Scope

The NEPA process requires that transportation decisions balance such important factors as engineering and transportation needs with social, economic and natural environmental factors. During the process, a wide range of partners, including the public, businesses, interest groups and government agencies provide input into project and environmental decisions. What is NEPA ? National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)

NEPA requires a “purpose and need statement” for proposed actions. The purpose statement identifies the objectives to be achieved. The needs statement identifies the problem that does, or will, exist. The Purpose and Need Statement is not intended to propose a particular solution. It is used to: Define the issue(s) and clarify the desired outcome. Guide the development of a reasonable range of alternatives. Develop criteria to measure the alternative solutions. Justify alternatives moved forward during the screening process. This statement would serve as the starting point for detailed analyses in the future. What is a Purpose and Need Statement?

2 The exhibits at this station describe the engineering data the study team has collected along I-44 and the issues that have been identified. As noted, the issues described at this station will be included in the project’s Purpose and Need Statement. This station includes detailed analyses of the following: Crash Data Traffic Data Roadway Geometrics Station 2: Engineering Data

Level of Service Free flow; low volumes and high speeds; most drivers can select their own speed A Stable flow; speeds somewhat restricted by traffic; standard LOS used for rural highway design throughout the U.S B Stable flow; speed controlled by traffic; standard LOS used for urban highway design throughout the U.S. C Approaching unstable flow; lower speeds D Unstable flow; low, varied speeds; volumes at or near capacity E Forced flow; low speeds to stoppages; volume exceeds capacity F Level of Service (LOS) is a measure of how effectively a highway can move the volume of traffic it carries. Ranging from LOS A (free-flow conditions) to LOS F (gridlock), the measure takes into account the driver’s speed, freedom to maneuver and proximity to other vehicles. See photographs and descriptions to the right. Of course a highway facility operates at different levels of service at different times of the day. Traffic operations during peak periods like morning and evening rush hour are much different than the middle of the night, for example. As engineers plan for I-44 improvements, they must determine the number of lanes and basic design needed to reach a minimum level of service during peak periods in the future. This ensures that traffic operations will be acceptable during the busiest times, but also means traffic will not operate perfectly all the time. Consider the design of a parking lot at a shopping mall. A properly designed lot would be very congested the morning after Thanksgiving, but traffic would move and spaces would be available – similar to LOS D. On average mornings, there would be very little traffic and spaces would be readily available – similar to LOS A. To design this parking lot for no congestion and ample parking spaces the day after Thanksgiving would not be a wise use of resources and would result in substantial impacts to the surrounding area. The same concept can be applied in planning and designing roadways. Consistent with standards used throughout the country, the minimum LOS being used for I-44 during peak periods in the future is C in the rural areas, and D in urban areas. That means during the busiest times, traffic will move well, and at other times it will operate better. LOS Information Source: Highway Capacity Manual 2000, Transportation Research Board.

3 The exhibits at this station describe the environmental data that the study team has been collecting along I-44. Because of the large study area, most data comes from searches of various statewide databases. More detailed field studies will be conducted in future phases of the project. The location of sensitive resources will be considered by MoDOT in a future project phase when I-44 alternatives are developed. Local residents are very valuable sources for identifying important resources. Please let us know of any resources that the study team should consider. Station 3: Environmental Data

4 The most important activity tonight occurs at this station. Tell us about your community’s needs, issues and opportunities! Steps for this station: 1. Identify the area on the map where you would like to make a comment. 2. Tell a study team member or write any additional engineering or environmental issues in this area on the map. Station 4: Tell us what we need to know! MoDOT’s proactive efforts in soliciting stakeholder input on issues affecting I-44 in conjunction with the establishment of the project’s Purpose & Need are consistent with the requirements of Section 6002 of SAFETEA-LU relating to stakeholder and agency input at key steps during the NEPA process.

5 Your input is a key factor in this study. Your comments, ideas, and thoughts are valued. At this station, please take a moment to record your thoughts to ensure that the study team understands your concerns. Also at this station, find out how you can stay involved and where to find more information about the study. We want your comments: Written comment form (drop-off tonight or mail-in) Website: Station 5: Your comments are important! MoDOT’s proactive efforts in soliciting stakeholder input on issues affecting I-44 in conjunction with the establishment of the project’s Purpose & Need are consistent with the requirements of Section 6002 of SAFETEA-LU relating to stakeholder and agency input at key steps during the NEPA process.

Visit Our Web Site Us Sign Up for the Newsletter Please include your name, , address, and zip code on the sign-in sheet. Write Us I-44 Planning for Progress Attn: Charles Pursley, MoDOT Project Manager 105 W. Capitol Avenue P.O. Box 270 Jefferson City, MO Call Us ASK-MODOT ( ) How to Stay Involved

6 Station 6: By first identifying the nature of the transportation issues that face I-44, we can then… ….move on to the development and evaluation of alternatives that can solve the identified issues. Eventually… …the solution that best solves the transportation issues and minimizes impacts will emerge. This Study Future Efforts What’s Next for I-44?

Following these public information meetings, the study team will continue to develop the Purpose and Need Statement, taking into account the input we’ve received tonight. Among the key results of the completed Purpose and Need Statement will be: The identification of the transportation problems that affect I-44. These problems will drive the establishment of alternatives that will be investigated in the future. The establishment of Sections of Independent Utility (SIUs) – sections of I-44 that are logical to study as standalone projects. What’s Next for this Purpose and Need Study? What’s Next for this Purpose and Need Study?

Environmental Process Next in National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Process We are here Scoping Purpose & Need Due Early 2008 Evaluation Criteria Alternative Screening Alternative Development Formal Public Comment on DEIS Record of Decision (ROD) Formal Public Comment on FEIS Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS)

After appropriate improvements (preferred alternatives) are identified, construction and funding need to be resolved. Preliminary estimates suggest that improvements to I-44 could cost billions of dollars. Among the funding mechanisms under consideration are: Prioritization – to allow construction to occur as needed. Design-Build – a technique to fast-track the design/ construction process. Legislative Actions – among the ideas currently being discussed in the Missouri General Assembly are truck-only lanes on I-44 and I-70 with a combination of funding strategies. Construction and Funding

Schedule