Impact of 30 day hold Cedar Conversion to Elementary.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Human Capital Investment Programme Disability Activation Project (DACT) WELCOME Support Workshop Thursday 7 th February
Advertisements

April 21, 2010 Barbara C. Jordan Elementary School Update Presented by.
1 Guidance for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 By David G. Bullock, Partner Macias Gini & O’Connell LLP.
WELCOME STARKE COUNTY CITIZENS! Please Sign the Attendance Sheet.
2013 BUDGET General Fund Revenues$84,870,998 Expenditures Divisional 69,635,424 Non-Divisional 5,695,509 Transfers 9,540,065 84,870,998 $ Nil * Capital$14,788,522.
Lodi Unified School District Construction Projects Status Board Study Session August 19, 2008 Prepared by: Douglas Barge Douglas Barge Art Hand Art Hand.
Remsenburg – Speonk Union Free School District Elementary School Bond Planning Presentation October 12, 2010 BBS Architects and Engineers and Triton Construction.
Educational Facilities Developer Fee Information October /5/2015.
Enabling Private Sector Investment To Deliver Privatisation Bolanle Onagoruwa Director General Bureau of Public Enterprises Presidential Power Sector Workshop.
Performance Monitoring All All Contracts require basic monitoring once awarded. The Goal of contract monitoring is to ensure that the contract is satisfactorily.
First Interim Report December 18, Tonight’s Presentation District’s First Interim Report Provides a summary to the Governing Board of the District’s.
1111 Operating Budget – March 5, Council Budget Direction – April 2012  City will move to three year budget cycle  City will hold tax increases.
COD Institutional Effectiveness Process (IEP) Planning, Assessment, Allocation Learn More.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES LOB - Ring Building Construction Coordination Michael P. Bromfield Construction Engineer NSLS-II Conventional Facilities.
Recommended Strategic Plan Board of Trustees August 27, 2012 Moravian Manor.
Olympia School District Slide 1 9/15/2015 Administration Budget Proposal School Year.
Community Bond Oversight Committee Report to the Board of Trustees Presented by: Ashton Cumberbatch, Bobby Jenkins, and Eliza May October 11, 2010.
Shrewsbury Public Schools Fiscal Year 2013 Administrative Budget Recommendation March 14, 2012.
School District No. 73 (Kamloops/Thompson) Draft Operating Budget DRAFT BUDGET FOR
Board of Education Presentation 2015 Referendum Projects September 9, 2015 Update.
Budget Committee Workshop February16, Oregon’s local budget law is a group of statutes that require local governments to prepare and adopt annual.
Facilities Maintenance Status Report John Ozurovich, Director Facilities – Saddleback College John Edwards, Director Facilities – Irvine Valley College.
Reduction in Certificated Staff For Tahoe Truckee Unified School District.
January 24, …a delivery method which entails a commitment by the Construction Manager to deliver the project within a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP).
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 1 Process Development and Integration for the Six-Year Program.
Toronto Catholic District School Board Budget Consultation Meeting Catholic Education Centre May 5, 2008.
PRELIMINARY INFORMATION (BUDGET-BUILDING STILL IN PROGRESS) WINSTON-SALEM/FORSYTH COUNTY SCHOOLS BUDGET 1.
Sunnyside stands for education $88 million bond M&O override.
Month/Date Budget Calendar Activity Responsibility Beginning January 2010 Prepare Budget Calendar and Budget Plan for review. CFO, Superintendent.
Toronto Catholic DSB Preliminary Budget Status Committee of the Whole Board April 14, 2008.
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Gillian Charles 1/24/13 Update on RTF Financials.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Technology Domain Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Presentation to Board June 17, 2008 Presented by: J. A. Sabo, Associate Director – Leading Services & Treasurer of the Board BUDGET York Catholic.
Grants and Contracts Jim Butterfield and Kathy Blackwood October 5, 2004.
School District Merger Study Crown Point Central School and Ticonderoga Central School December 4, 2012 Castallo and Silky Education Consultants.
Budgeting 101. Class Activity Describe what you think the school district budget process looks like – steps and time lines. Completing some of the steps.
Cassidy Elementary – Renovation Architect: Tate.Hill.Jacobs: Architects General Contractor: D.W. Wilburn, Inc. Substantial Completion Date:August, 2010.
Bond Oversight Committee Meeting Fourth Quarter 2015 January 26, 2016.
1 Staffing Timelines and the Issuance of Contracts and Letters of Reasonable Assurance Tom Hancock Administrator for Human Resources January 28, 2016.
UNIVERSITY OF DAR ES SALAAM t Selection and Employment of Consultants Negotiations with Consultants; Monitoring Performance of Consultants; Resolving Disputes.
1 Hospital Revitalization Grant Performance Report: Free State.
Measure N Modernization IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS Planning, Bidding, Construction, and Occupancy.
Alpine County Government Center Board of Supervisors Presentation October 2, 2012.
Miller Driscoll Building Committee Construction Update Thursday April 7, :00 PM - 7:00 PM Presented by: Turner Construction, CMA 1 Additions & Alterations.
League of California Cities Federal Briefing October 10, 2012 Federal Sequestration Understanding Impacts to Your City & How to Take Action.
Building Project Community Meeting Fieldcrest High School February 18, :30 pm.
Durham County Non-Profit Funding Program Board of County Commissioners’ Worksession August 6, 2012.
Wolf Creek School Division No.72. Why do we adjust the spring budget? Alberta Education requirement of a budget update. This is an information only item.
MASON PUBLIC SCHOOLS Bond Committee Meeting #1 August 9, 2016.
Long-Term Planning Presented by: APP Site Visit Don Untch
Williamsville Central School District Long-Range Financial Plan and Reserve Plan Report December 2016 Prepared By: Thomas Maturski - Assistant Superintendent.
EXTENSION OF COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT
Bond Oversight Committee
Welcome to the Winter 2004 Provincial Council Meeting
2017 Annual Program Evaluation Update
November 14, 2016 Randy Mabson, Program Coordinator
Sausalito Downtown Public Restroom
Bond and Override Report
Citizens’ Bond Oversight Committee December 18, 2013
Public Hearing Presentation
RYE SCHOOL DISTRICT PRESENTATION TO THE RYE BUDGET COMMITTEE
The Asset Management Journey for Building Assets
Preliminary Budget February 11, 2019.
FY 2020 Community Grants Training
Charter System Principals’ Budget Sharing Guidance
Richfield Springs Central School District Smart Schools Initiative
Governor Induction Part 3
Richfield Springs Central School District Smart Schools Initiative
East Windsor – Forest Glade Area
Lafayette Airport Commission New Terminal Program Update
Presentation transcript:

Impact of 30 day hold Cedar Conversion to Elementary

Business Committee Motion At the December 10, 2014 Business Committee Meeting the Committee passed the following motion: “That the Business Committee recommends to the Board of Education of School District 68 (Nanaimo/Ladysmith) that it enact a 30-day hold on the construction and awarding of contracts at Cedar Elementary in order to review the long term impact of the construction at Cedar Elementary on the District.”

Business Committee Motion At the same Business Committee meeting Trustees asked for a staff comment on what impact, if passed, the motion might have on Facilities support staffing

Site visit On December 15 th a site visit for trustees was held at Cedar Elementary. Progress was reported as: ◦Playfield is substantially complete ◦Demolition substantially complete ◦Steel stud framing virtually complete ◦Under slab plumbing is complete ◦Concrete slabs have been made good ◦Plumbing rough in nearly complete ◦Electrical rough in underway

Site Meeting - Budget Reminder At the site meeting staff advised that the project budget allocations are: ◦$361,000 – Local capital (Playfield) ◦$1,000,000 – 14/15 AFG (Building+Site) ◦$1,000,000 – 15/16 AFG (Building+Site) ◦$2,361,000 – Total

Financials At the site meeting it was asked how much has been spent to date? As of December 10 th : ◦Approximately 100% of the local capital has been expended. ◦Approximately 55% of the 14/15 AFG capital has been expended.

Impact to Schedule The impact of a 30 calendar day Hold on the project would result in a ‘construction’ completion of around August 31. This was arrived at by adding 30 days to the schedule reported on November 12 th. A 30 day hold would substantially affect planning for the opening and complications in opening would be probable. Up to and including a possible delay in opening.

Contracts affected It is important to understand that the project at Cedar is “board managed” ◦The District is acting as its own general contractor ◦Labour is supplied under the CUPE collective agreement ◦All subcontracts are with the district ◦All supplies are purchased by the district ◦All overhead and rentals are by the district

Agreement “Directly” affected The District has an Energy Manager agreement with BC hydro. They fund 50% of the salary. ◦As part of the agreement with have an agreed SEMP (strategic energy management plan) which includes 2 projects at cedar separately funded out of the 14/15 AFG  C-OP or continuous optimization (2-variable speed drives)  Exterior Lighting upgrade + interior lighting controls Staff recommend to continue with these projects

Tender Affected A mechanical tender is required. The publish date has been delayed until the 18 th of December and publication will depend on the outcome of the meeting tonight. Staff feel it would be prudent to delay the tender, if the ‘hold’ is approved as the intentions of the District would not be clear and likely confuse bidders.  The delay of this tender would likely cause coordination complications later in the project.

Planning ‘focus’ affected Staff would turn planning efforts to other projects in an effort to appropriately reallocate CUPE forces and support other ‘approved’ projects. This shift in project focus would affect the momentum of the project if restarted.

Affect on Staffing Staff working at Cedar secondary would be reallocated to other approved projects. These projects include: ◦Approved 14/15 AFG projects (IS, SEMP, 10 year plan, etc.) ◦Approved Local Capital projects (North Oyster) ◦School funded projects (Various) ◦Other projects (yet to be identified) ◦Miscellaneous Maintenance work (as required)

In summary 30 day hold would: ◦Put a hold on the unspent Cedar $ ◦Cause a refocus of planning to other projects ◦Cause a reallocation of AFG forces ◦Require re-planning for a condensed schedule ◦Delay the mechanical tender ◦Delay or suspend misc. supplies/contracts ◦In affect be longer than 30 days due to demobilization and remobilization ◦Potentially delay opening ◦Cause an increase in project cost ◦Create confusion and uncertainty with respect to future of project ◦Cause uncertainty around planning for district goals

Past 30 days & Section 54 notice Layoffs could be up to 11 regular and 5 casual – i.e. the full compliment of workers currently funded outside of the operating budget. HR advised that layoffs of this magnitude require a Section 54 notice. Section 54 requires that no layoffs occur in the first 60 days after the notice. Therefore, Section 54 notice should be given immediately, if the hold is passed (Dec 18) 60 day layoff period will cause significant pressures on existing AFG plans and Operating resources to keep forces employed.