Resolving Differences: Twists and Turns in a Quasi ‑ Synchronous Online Collaborative Mathematics Problem-Solving Session Ramon Prudencio S. Toledo Alan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Techniques For Leading Group Discussions
Advertisements

The 5 R’sBronzeSilverGold Reflective Responsible Reasoning Resourceful Resilient.
Girls and Mathematics Feb – March 2009 St Augustine’s School Danson School Parkway School.
How Do you operate in conflict?
Integrating Guided Inquiry and Modeling: An example of “Reading an Object” for any grade, any age, any science topic Gordon Berry* and Mary Hynes-Berry**
SECTION 2-3 Mathematical Modeling – Triangular Numbers HW: Investigate Pascal’s Triangle o Write out the first 8 rows o Identify the linear, rectangular.
CSCL’07 Information as a Social Achievement: Collaborative Information Behavior in CSCL Nan Zhou Alan Zemel Gerry Stahl The Virtual Math Teams Project.
Computer Assisted Collaborative Learning. Collaborative Learning What is Collaborative Learning? Why does CL help learners? How is CL used in CACL? How.
PD1: Getting started.
Engineering Design Process Presentation Explanation
Professional Facilitation
Introduction to Using Visual Representations in Math.
Test Preparation Strategies
Introduction to Professional Writing Sue Webb AIM: webbsuza Session 2.
AfL – A pupil perspective Presented by Sean, Lucy, Najeeb and Nayaab PORTSWOOD PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIDE PASSION SUCCESS.
Fractions, Decimals and Percents Mini-course Session Three.
Assessment Photo Album Subject: Geometry, Technology, and Family & Consumer Sciences Grade: 9 – 10 By: Julie Owens Unit: 2-Dimensional Objects Polygons.
What do you need to know? How will you choose?. Moving Up… Current Situation Attendance Punctuality Behaviour Progress.
Communication Skills Anyone can hear. It is virtually automatic. Listening is another matter. It takes skill, patience, practice and conscious effort.
Problem Solving.  Critical Thinking enables a person to solve problems and make decisions. Therefore - Problem solving and decision making are practical.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Techniques For Leading Group Discussions.
VMT CSCL Workshop June Collaborative Problems and Pedagogy.
to Effective Conflict Resolution
We’re All in This Together! Welcome to Honors Algebra 2! I am looking forward to assisting you in learning and have high expectations of you for this year.
Learning about Click to begin… Joe Deevy. It’s a triangle with one 90° angle The 90° angle usually has a square drawn inside.
Therese E. Ritter, MCT New Horizons Computer Learning Centers— Great Lakes A Look at Conflict and Consensus in Decision Making.
Chapter 2 Exploring What It Means to Know and Do Mathematics Copyright © Allyn and Bacon 2010 This multimedia product and its contents are protected under.
Welcome to Honors Geometry! Mrs. Holman
Pythagorean Theorem Unit Review Fill out your unit review sheet and work these problems. You will go over these problems on Friday before taking your test.
CSCL 2007 Creativity, Collaboration and Competence: Agency in online synchronous chat environments Elizabeth Charles & Wes Shumar Dawson College, Montreal,
MICROSOFT LYNC MICROSOFT LYNC PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Northern Elementary School  2013.
STEP 1: Collecting, Organizing, & Analyzing School Data STEP 2: Identifying Core Values, Crafting the School’s Vision, Mission STEP 3: Determining School.
Secret Codes Presented by the MathScience Innovation Center written by Theresa Meade.
Introduction Negotiation is something that everyone does, almost daily 1-1.
Create a List of Themes Work in teams of three or less. Make sure each of you write them on your own sheet of paper. Using the ABCs. Come up with three.
Chat Analysis in Virtual Math Teams Gerry Stahl & the VMT Team The Math Drexel The Drexel
1 Group Cognition in Online Collaborative Math Problem Solving Gerry Stahl Drexel University, Philadelphia, USA
Critical Thinking Lesson 8
Plenary 4 Summer Institute Thunder Bay. 2 Consider this relation…
The Disembodied Act Copresence and indexical symmetry in computer-mediated communication Alan Zemel Wesley Shumar Murat Perit Cakir Drexel University VMT.
1 The Structure of Collaborative Problem Solving in a Virtual Math Team Gerry Stahl the Drexel.
SECTION 2-3 Mathematical Modeling. When you draw graphs or pictures of situation or when you write equations that describe a problem, you are creating.
Participation Frameworks and Decision-making in Problem-Solving Chats Progress Report January 12, 2005.
Symmetry and Order of Rotation Aim: To recognise symmetry and rotational symmetry. Look at the letter A, it has one line of symmetry. A Does the letter.
Class Procedures & Requirements Transitional Algebra.
Problem Solving, Decision Making, Negotiation and Compromise
Formative Assessment Assignment Use this template as an example and share your story.
Meaning making in CSCL: Conditions and preconditions for cognitive processes by groups Gerry Stahl The Math Drexel The Drexel
PLCs in Mount Airy City Schools Purpose of PLCs Collaborative meetings of educators in which data-driven decisions are made to improve teacher’s instruction.
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
PET PART 5 -Speaking TEST 2.
Alice Development Environment. Which area contains our “program” (set of instructions)? D AB C.
Inset 2016 Year 3 Inset Create this design using sticks: Remove 8 sticks to make 2 squares. Remove 8 sticks to make 3 squares. Remove 8 sticks.
Algebraic Reasoning Inquiry Project
Standards for Mathematical Practice and the
Fractions, Decimals and Percents Mini-course
Leadership in Teams and Decision Groups
Working effectively in a team
Engineering Design Process Presentation Explanation
Mathematics and Special Education Leadership Protocols
Nan Zhou, iSchool at Drexel iConference 06
Teaching and learning functional mathematics
Teamwork and Problem Solving टीमवर्क आणि समस्या सोडवणे
Murat P. Cakir, Alan Zemel, Gerry Stahl
Cooperative Learning Concepts
Engineering Design Process Presentation Explanation
Engineering Design Process Presentation Explanation
Engineering Design Process Presentation Explanation
Engineering Design Process
Techniques For Leading Group Discussions
Presentation transcript:

Resolving Differences: Twists and Turns in a Quasi ‑ Synchronous Online Collaborative Mathematics Problem-Solving Session Ramon Prudencio S. Toledo Alan R. Zemel Gerry Stahl The Virtual Math Teams & College of Information Science and Technology at Drexel University, Philadelphia, USA

16 July 2007The VMT at Drexel University Problem

16 July 2007The VMT at Drexel University Data  AIM® log of PoWwow 10  Participants: self-selected, self-described middle-school students  Problem available before the session  Moderator available to assist in the technology but not in problem solving  Excerpt: 010 – 077 of roughly 580 lines

16 July 2007The VMT at Drexel University An excerpt from VMT chat excerpt 010 Alice (7:01:05 PM): Is this everyone? 011 MFPowwow (7:01:15 PM): If you create a picture that you would like to share with your group, you can mail it to powwow or you can make a direct connection with me. 012 MFPowwow (7:01:24 PM): This is everyone tonight. 013 Alice (7:01:36 PM): ok 014 Alice (7:02:04 PM): so… MFPowwow (7:02:12 PM): So you’ve all seen the problem. If you’ve got any ideas, now’s the time to start. :-) 014 Alice (7:02:29 PM): Ok 017 Alice (7:02:38 PM): Anyone have a pic? 018 Mario (7:02:58 PM): Just the one with the problem statement 019 Alice (7:03:17 PM): lol 020 Mario (7:03:25 PM): Should we label some points? 021 Mario (7:03:56 PM): Like, center is O 022 Alice (7:04:04 PM): We could do that 023 Mario (7:04:21 PM): Vertex where red line meets is, what, V? 024 Alice (7:04:38 PM): The center? 025 Mario (7:04:47 PM): No, down at the vertex 026 Alice (7:04:52 PM): oh 027 Alice (7:05:00 PM): That might help 028 Alice (7:05:16 PM): Lets find out whats wrong with the pic first. 029 Mario (7:05:20 PM): You name where the green line meets the base 030 Alice (7:05:30 PM): B 031 Alice (7:06:19 PM): I have an idea that might help us find whats wrong with the pic. 032 Mario (7:06:30 PM): We could use good ol' Pythag thm to see what BV is 033 Alice (7:06:40 PM): Lets not 034 Mario (7:06:46 PM): What's your idea? 035 Alice (7:07:01 PM): It states that something is wrong with the pic. 036 Alice (7:07:08 PM): so we can't find what BV is 037 Mario (7:07:31 PM): Yeah, and I think if we 'found' BV, it would be something not possible

16 July 2007The VMT at Drexel University How do participants in an online quasi-synchronous collaborative mathematics problem solving resolve their differences?  How are resources achieved?  How are choices and order of approach determined in problem solving?  How is the validity of an approach collaboratively assessed?  How is the appropriateness of a proposed solution collaboratively assessed?

16 July 2007The VMT at Drexel University How are resources achieved?  Resources are situational: they have to be brought into the problem solving 020 Mario (7:03:25 PM): Should we label some points? 021 Mario (7:03:56 PM): Like, center is O 022 Alice (7:04:04 PM): We could do that 023 Mario (7:04:21 PM): Vertex where red line meets is, what, V? 024 Alice (7:04:38 PM): The center? 025 Mario (7:04:47 PM): No, down at the vertex 026 Alice (7:04:52 PM): oh 027 Alice (7:05:00 PM): That might help 028 Alice (7:05:16 PM): Lets find out whats wrong with the pic first. 029 Mario (7:05:20 PM): You name where the green line meets the base 030 Alice (7:05:30 PM): B 031 Alice (7:06:19 PM): I have an idea that might help us find whats wrong with the pic.

16 July 2007The VMT at Drexel University How are resources achieved?  Resources are situational: they have to be brought into the problem solving shapes shapes 069 Mario (7:12:14 PM): Otherwise, the red lines and the base are almost an equilateral triangle 070 Alice (7:12:32 PM): I think this requires trig 071 Mario (7:12:50 PM): So, one possible wrong thing is, this is really a hexagon

16 July 2007The VMT at Drexel University How are choices and order of approach determined in problem solving?  Cooperation vs. collaboration  Participant invitations  Participants choose: Collaborating participants Collaborating participants Which approaches are to be used Which approaches are to be used The order in which the approaches are used The order in which the approaches are used

16 July 2007The VMT at Drexel University Collaboration vs. cooperation  Management of collective as a collaborative group which will work together instead of subdividing the problem among its members 017 Alice (7:02:38 PM): Anyone have a pic? 018 Mario (7:02:58 PM): Just the one with the problem statement 019 Alice (7:03:17 PM): lol 020 Mario (7:03:25 PM): Should we label some points? 021 Mario (7:03:56 PM): Like, center is O 022 Alice (7:04:04 PM): We could do that 023 Mario (7:04:21 PM): Vertex where red line meets is, what, V? 024 Alice (7:04:38 PM): The center? 025 Mario (7:04:47 PM): No, down at the vertex 026 Alice (7:04:52 PM): oh 027 Alice (7:05:00 PM): That might help

16 July 2007The VMT at Drexel University Participant invitations  For co-participants Non-directive Non-directive Directive Directive  However, there can be self-selection

16 July 2007The VMT at Drexel University Participant invitations  Participant invitation: non-directive Non-directive = invitation does not prescribe a task for invited participant Non-directive = invitation does not prescribe a task for invited participant 010 Alice (7:01:05 PM): Is this everyone? 011 MFPowwow (7:01:15 PM): If you create a picture that you would like to share with your group, you can mail it to powwow or you can make a direct connection with me. 012 MFPowwow (7:01:24 PM): This is everyone tonight. 013 Alice (7:01:36 PM): ok 014 Alice (7:02:04 PM): so… MFPowwow (7:02:12 PM): So you’ve all seen the problem. If you’ve got any ideas, now’s the time to start. :-) 014 Alice (7:02:29 PM): Ok

16 July 2007The VMT at Drexel University Participant invitations  Participant invitation: non-directive Non-directive = invitation does not prescribe a task for invited participant Non-directive = invitation does not prescribe a task for invited participant 034 Mario (7:06:46 PM): What's your idea? 035 Alice (7:07:01 PM): It states that something is wrong with the pic. 036 Alice (7:07:08 PM): so we can't find what BV is 037 Mario (7:07:31 PM): Yeah, and I think if we 'found' BV, it would be something not possible

16 July 2007The VMT at Drexel University Participant invitations  Expected response to non-directive invitation: availability 010 Alice (7:01:05 PM): Is this everyone? 011 MFPowwow (7:01:15 PM): If you create a picture that you would like to share with your group, you can mail it to powwow or you can make a direct connection with me. 012 MFPowwow (7:01:24 PM): This is everyone tonight. 013 Alice (7:01:36 PM): ok 014 Alice (7:02:04 PM): so… MFPowwow (7:02:12 PM): So you’ve all seen the problem. If you’ve got any ideas, now’s the time to start. :-) 014 Alice (7:02:29 PM): Ok

16 July 2007The VMT at Drexel University Participant invitations  Participant invitation: Directive Directive = expects a particular form of participation from other participants Directive = expects a particular form of participation from other participants 017 Alice (7:02:38 PM): Anyone have a pic? 018 Mario (7:02:58 PM): Just the one with the problem statement 019 Alice (7:03:17 PM): lol 020 Mario (7:03:25 PM): Should we label some points? 021 Mario (7:03:56 PM): Like, center is O 022 Alice (7:04:04 PM): We could do that

16 July 2007The VMT at Drexel University Participant invitations  Participant invitation: Directive Expected response: follow through of directive Expected response: follow through of directive 017 Alice (7:02:38 PM): Anyone have a pic? 018 Mario (7:02:58 PM): Just the one with the problem statement 019 Alice (7:03:17 PM): lol 020 Mario (7:03:25 PM): Should we label some points? 021 Mario (7:03:56 PM): Like, center is O 022 Alice (7:04:04 PM): We could do that

16 July 2007The VMT at Drexel University Self-selection  Self-selection = participant volunteers through repetitions of claims or proposals 017 Alice (7:02:38 PM): Anyone have a pic? * * * 028 Alice (7:05:16 PM): Lets find out whats wrong with the pic first. * * * 031 Alice (7:06:19 PM): I have an idea that might help us find whats wrong with the pic. * * * 035 Alice (7:07:01 PM): It states that something is wrong with the pic. * * * 062 Alice (7:11:28 PM): I know whats wrong with the pic

16 July 2007The VMT at Drexel University How are choices and order of approach determined in problem solving?  Constitution of the problem as a shared problem Identification of resources, approaches and solutions Identification of resources, approaches and solutions 017 Alice (7:02:38 PM): Anyone have a pic? 018 Mario (7:02:58 PM): Just the one with the problem statement 019 Alice (7:03:17 PM): lol 020 Mario (7:03:25 PM): Should we label some points? 021 Mario (7:03:56 PM): Like, center is O 022 Alice (7:04:04 PM): We could do that 023 Mario (7:04:21 PM): Vertex where red line meets is, what, V? 024 Alice (7:04:38 PM): The center? 025 Mario (7:04:47 PM): No, down at the vertex 026 Alice (7:04:52 PM): oh 027 Alice (7:05:00 PM): That might help 028 Alice (7:05:16 PM): Lets find out whats wrong with the pic first. 029 Mario (7:05:20 PM): You name where the green line meets the base 030 Alice (7:05:30 PM): B 031 Alice (7:06:19 PM): I have an idea that might help us find whats wrong with the pic. 032 Mario (7:06:30 PM): We could use good ol' Pythag thm to see what BV is 033 Alice (7:06:40 PM): Lets not

16 July 2007The VMT at Drexel University How are choices and order of approach determined in problem solving?  Revelation of some strategy Produce steps which describe the strategy. Produce steps which describe the strategy. Build on the formulation of the problem. Build on the formulation of the problem. 017 Alice (7:02:38 PM): Anyone have a pic? 018 Mario (7:02:58 PM): Just the one with the problem statement 019 Alice (7:03:17 PM): lol 020 Mario (7:03:25 PM): Should we label some points? 021 Mario (7:03:56 PM): Like, center is O 022 Alice (7:04:04 PM): We could do that 023 Mario (7:04:21 PM): Vertex where red line meets is, what, V? 024 Alice (7:04:38 PM): The center? 025 Mario (7:04:47 PM): No, down at the vertex 026 Alice (7:04:52 PM): oh 027 Alice (7:05:00 PM): That might help 028 Alice (7:05:16 PM): Lets find out whats wrong with the pic first. 029 Mario (7:05:20 PM): You name where the green line meets the base 030 Alice (7:05:30 PM): B 031 Alice (7:06:19 PM): I have an idea that might help us find whats wrong with the pic. 032 Mario (7:06:30 PM): We could use good ol' Pythag thm to see what BV is 033 Alice (7:06:40 PM): Lets not

16 July 2007The VMT at Drexel University How are choices and order of approach determined in problem solving?  The pronominal ‘we’ and its variants are used to solicit participation.  Co-participants are solicited to participate in one’s approach. Produce steps which describe the strategy. Produce steps which describe the strategy. Build on the formulation of the problem. Build on the formulation of the problem. 017 Alice (7:02:38 PM): Anyone have a pic? 018 Mario (7:02:58 PM): Just the one with the problem statement 019 Alice (7:03:17 PM): lol 020 Mario (7:03:25 PM): Should we label some points? 021 Mario (7:03:56 PM): Like, center is O 022 Alice (7:04:04 PM): We could do that 023 Mario (7:04:21 PM): Vertex where red line meets is, what, V? 024 Alice (7:04:38 PM): The center? 025 Mario (7:04:47 PM): No, down at the vertex 026 Alice (7:04:52 PM): oh 027 Alice (7:05:00 PM): That might help 028 Alice (7:05:16 PM): Lets find out whats wrong with the pic first. 029 Mario (7:05:20 PM): You name where the green line meets the base 030 Alice (7:05:30 PM): B 031 Alice (7:06:19 PM): I have an idea that might help us find whats wrong with the pic. 032 Mario (7:06:30 PM): We could use good ol' Pythag thm to see what BV is 033 Alice (7:06:40 PM): Lets not

16 July 2007The VMT at Drexel University How are choices and order of approach determined in problem solving?  Resolution may be through tokens of agreement 066 Alice (7:11:45 PM): The diagnol is not Mario (7:11:51 PM): Right 068 Fatima (7:12:02 PM): exactly 069 Mario (7:12:14 PM): Otherwise, the red lines and the base are almost an equilateral triangle 070 Alice (7:12:32 PM): I think this requires trig 071 Mario (7:12:50 PM): So, one possible wrong thing is, this is really a hexagon 072 Alice (7:12:56 PM): No 073 Mario (7:13:01 PM): Right 074 Alice (7:13:09 PM): Im talking about the triangle diagnol 075 Mario (7:13:11 PM): Let'sd stick with octagon 076 Mario (7:13:24 PM): So we assume 4 is right 077 Alice (7:13:32 PM): yes

16 July 2007The VMT at Drexel University How are choices and order of approach determined in problem solving?  Resolution may be through accommodation to an alternative approach 028 Alice (7:05:16 PM): Lets find out whats wrong with the pic first. 029 Mario (7:05:20 PM): You name where the green line meets the base 030 Alice (7:05:30 PM): B 031 Alice (7:06:19 PM): I have an idea that might help us find whats wrong with the pic. 032 Mario (7:06:30 PM): We could use good ol' Pythag thm to see what BV is 033 Alice (7:06:40 PM): Lets not 034 Mario (7:06:46 PM): What's your idea? 035 Alice (7:07:01 PM): It states that something is wrong with the pic. 036 Alice (7:07:08 PM): so we can't find what BV is 037 Mario (7:07:31 PM): Yeah, and I think if we 'found' BV, it would be something not possible

16 July 2007The VMT at Drexel University How is the validity of an approach collaboratively assessed?  Appeal to the problem formulation (appeal to the writer of the problem) 035 Alice (7:07:01 PM): It states that something is wrong with the pic. 036 Alice (7:07:08 PM): so we can't find what BV is 037 Mario (7:07:31 PM): Yeah, and I think if we 'found' BV, it would be something not possible  Appeal to a familiar method (Pythagorean Theorem) 020 Mario (7:03:25 PM): Should we label some points? 021 Mario (7:03:56 PM): Like, center is O 022 Alice (7:04:04 PM): We could do that 023 Mario (7:04:21 PM): Vertex where red line meets is, what, V? 024 Alice (7:04:38 PM): The center? 025 Mario (7:04:47 PM): No, down at the vertex 026 Alice (7:04:52 PM): oh 027 Alice (7:05:00 PM): That might help 028 Alice (7:05:16 PM): Lets find out whats wrong with the pic first. 029 Mario (7:05:20 PM): You name where the green line meets the base 030 Alice (7:05:30 PM): B 031 Alice (7:06:19 PM): I have an idea that might help us find whats wrong with the pic. 032 Mario (7:06:30 PM): We could use good ol' Pythag thm to see what BV is

16 July 2007The VMT at Drexel University How is the appropriateness of a proposed solution collaboratively assessed? 058 Mario (7:11:10 PM): With the numbers given, BV would be 059 Mario (7:11:11 PM): yeah 060 Alice (7:11:14 PM): I think thats wrong 061 Fatima (7:11:19 PM): how so? 062 Alice (7:11:28 PM): I know whats wrong with the pic 063 Mario (7:11:31 PM): base would be twice that 064 Fatima (7:11:33 PM): what 065 Mario (7:11:41 PM): 4.54 ish 066 Alice (7:11:45 PM): The diagnol is not Mario (7:11:51 PM): Right 068 Fatima (7:12:02 PM): exactly 069 Mario (7:12:14 PM): Otherwise, the red lines and the base are almost an equilateral triangle 070 Alice (7:12:32 PM): I think this requires trig 071 Mario (7:12:50 PM): So, one possible wrong thing is, this is really a hexagon 072 Alice (7:12:56 PM): No 073 Mario (7:13:01 PM): Right 074 Alice (7:13:09 PM): Im talking about the triangle diagnol 075 Mario (7:13:11 PM): Let'sd stick with octagon 076 Mario (7:13:24 PM): So we assume 4 is right 077 Alice (7:13:32 PM): yes

16 July 2007The VMT at Drexel University How is the appropriateness of a proposed solution collaboratively assessed?  In this case, appropriateness is based on mutual agreement(!) 058 Mario (7:11:10 PM): With the numbers given, BV would be 059 Mario (7:11:11 PM): yeah 060 Alice (7:11:14 PM): I think thats wrong 061 Fatima (7:11:19 PM): how so? 062 Alice (7:11:28 PM): I know whats wrong with the pic 063 Mario (7:11:31 PM): base would be twice that 064 Fatima (7:11:33 PM): what 065 Mario (7:11:41 PM): 4.54 ish 066 Alice (7:11:45 PM): The diagnol is not Mario (7:11:51 PM): Right 068 Fatima (7:12:02 PM): exactly 069 Mario (7:12:14 PM): Otherwise, the red lines and the base are almost an equilateral triangle 070 Alice (7:12:32 PM): I think this requires trig 071 Mario (7:12:50 PM): So, one possible wrong thing is, this is really a hexagon 072 Alice (7:12:56 PM): No 073 Mario (7:13:01 PM): Right 074 Alice (7:13:09 PM): Im talking about the triangle diagnol 075 Mario (7:13:11 PM): Let'sd stick with octagon 076 Mario (7:13:24 PM): So we assume 4 is right 077 Alice (7:13:32 PM): yes

16 July 2007The VMT at Drexel University How is the appropriateness of a proposed solution collaboratively assessed?  The agreement is based on a result which neither proposal obtained, but the group moves on. 058 Mario (7:11:10 PM): With the numbers given, BV would be 059 Mario (7:11:11 PM): yeah 060 Alice (7:11:14 PM): I think thats wrong 061 Fatima (7:11:19 PM): how so? 062 Alice (7:11:28 PM): I know whats wrong with the pic 063 Mario (7:11:31 PM): base would be twice that 064 Fatima (7:11:33 PM): what 065 Mario (7:11:41 PM): 4.54 ish 066 Alice (7:11:45 PM): The diagnol is not Mario (7:11:51 PM): Right 068 Fatima (7:12:02 PM): exactly 069 Mario (7:12:14 PM): Otherwise, the red lines and the base are almost an equilateral triangle 070 Alice (7:12:32 PM): I think this requires trig 071 Mario (7:12:50 PM): So, one possible wrong thing is, this is really a hexagon 072 Alice (7:12:56 PM): No 073 Mario (7:13:01 PM): Right 074 Alice (7:13:09 PM): Im talking about the triangle diagnol 075 Mario (7:13:11 PM): Let'sd stick with octagon 076 Mario (7:13:24 PM): So we assume 4 is right 077 Alice (7:13:32 PM): yes

16 July 2007The VMT at Drexel University Summative findings  Each proponent of a proposal wants the collective to use their proposal.  Spurned proponents find alternate ways to reallocate participation by recycling a proposal or presenting a new step which reorients participants to the spurned proposal.  Participants use achieved shared resources to build competing proposals.  Due to the quasi-synchronous nature of chat, participants may select parts of competing proposals and append them to their own proposals.

16 July 2007The VMT at Drexel University Next steps  Investigation of resolution of differences in quasi-synchronous online collaborative environments with dual interaction spaces (shared whiteboard and chat window)