New Capability Seminar

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Suspension Bridge Wizard
Advertisements

Definition I. Beams 1. Definition
Basic FEA Procedures Structural Mechanics Displacement-based Formulations.
Beams and Frames.
Finite Element Model Generation Model size Element class – Element type, Number of dimensions, Size – Plane stress & Plane strain – Higher order elements.
RBEs and MPCs in MSC.Nastran
Designing Tensile Structures Using Generic CAD Applications. Structural membranes 2007, Barcelona, September 2007 Javier Sánchez, Tecnun, University.
Abstract/Objectives Better understand the effects of typical GD&T variations on Bolt Stresses in Torque Carrying Bolted Flanges Create Trend Curves for.
Chapter 17 Design Analysis using Inventor Stress Analysis Module
Chapter -9 WEB STIFFENERS.
FE analysis with bar elements E. Tarallo, G. Mastinu POLITECNICO DI MILANO, Dipartimento di Meccanica.
Truss Structures Two-force members connected by a ball and socket joint (i.e., elements do not transmit bending moments) Each member of a truss structure.
Unrestricted © Siemens AG 2014 All rights reserved.Smarter decisions, better products. What’s New Femap /
Evaluation Code for Composite Joints in General Aviation Structures September 17, 2003 Rachael Andrulonis.
ANALYSIS OF STRESS DISTRIBUTION IN ROOTS OF BOLT THREADS Gennady Aryassov, Andres Petritshenko Tallinn University of Technology Department of Mechatronics.
MANE 4240 & CIVL 4240 Introduction to Finite Elements
Chapter 5 Vibration Analysis
Chapter Five Vibration Analysis.
The Finite Element Method
Introduction to virtual engineering László Horváth Budapest Tech John von Neumann Faculty of Informatics Institute of Intelligent Engineering.
Streamlined Process for Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis of Nuclear Facilities Utilizing GTSTRUDL and MTR/SASSI Wei Li, Michael Perez, Mansour Tabatabaie,
9.0 New Features Large Deformation Analysis of thin plate assembly spotwelded together Workshop 2 Spotwelds.
Copyright © 2010 Altair Engineering, Inc. All rights reserved.Altair Proprietary and Confidential Information Section 13 Loads and Boundary Conditions.
Training Manual Aug Element Technology Overview: In this chapter, we will present a brief overview to the following topics: A.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Raft & Piled-raft analysis (Soil-structure interaction analysis)
Analyses of Bolted Joint for Shear Load with Stainless Steel Bushing and Frictionless Shim-Flange Interface Two cases of shim plates were investigated.
GTSTRUDL The GTSTRUDL Base Plate Wizard A Module for the Modeling and Analysis of Base Plates Rob Abernathy CASE Center GTSUG June, 2008 Las Vegas, NV.
1 20-Oct-15 Last course Lecture plan and policies What is FEM? Brief history of the FEM Example of applications Discretization Example of FEM softwares.
Linear Buckling Analysis
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Copyright © 2010 Altair Engineering, Inc. All rights reserved.Altair Proprietary and Confidential Information Section 4 Applications.
Chapter Five Vibration Analysis.
Training Manual Aug Contact and Bolt Pretension Three main areas of contact enhancements in ANSYS 5.7: A.Thermal Contact B.Node-to-Node.
GTSTRUDL Using the GTSTRUDL Base Plate Wizard Example of Creating and Analyzing a Base Plate Rob Abernathy CASE Center GTSUG June, 2009 Atlanta, GA.
11/11/20151 Trusses. 11/11/20152 Element Formulation by Virtual Work u Use virtual work to derive element stiffness matrix based on assumed displacements.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
HOT PLATE CONDUCTION NUMERICAL SOLVER AND VISUALIZER Kurt Hinkle and Ivan Yorgason.
Page 1 Introduction to Lagrange Chapter 12 - ContactMSC.Dytran Seminar Notes CHAPTER 12 - CONTACT.
Teaching Modules for Steel Instruction TENSION MEMBER Design
Free Vibration Analysis Workshop 5.1. Workshop Supplement Free Vibration Analysis August 26, 2005 Inventory # WS5.1-2 Workshop Goals Our goal.
Analyses of Bolted Joint for Bolt Preload and Shear Load
WS-1 WORKSHOP Define Equivalent Section Plate Properties NAS121, Workshop, May 6, 2002.
Results Post Processing using MSC.Acumen
7-1 ANSYS, Inc. Proprietary © 2009 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved. February 23, 2009 Inventory # Workbench - Mechanical Introduction 12.0 Chapter.
Bolted Joint Assembly. Advanced Solid Body Contact Options Goal – In this workshop, our goal is to study the effect that contact stiffness specification.
Copyright © 2010 Altair Engineering, Inc. All rights reserved.Altair Proprietary and Confidential Information Bolt Modeling workbench Application | Special.
Workshop 5-1 NAS101 Workshops Copyright  2001 MSC.Software Corporation WORKSHOP 5 Stiffened Plate Subjected to Pressure Load.
CHAPTER 10 - LAGRANGIAN BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
GTSTRUDL User’s Group BASE PLATE ANALYSIS June 23, 2011 Parimal Gandhi, PE Sr. Engineer 1 Annual Meeting
Workshop 13 Bolt Pretension
Andrew Biehl.  The objective of this project is to develop a method for determining the nut factor of a bolted joint using the finite element method.
Snap Fit Workshop Seventeen Introduction to Contact REFERENCE: Training Manual Introduction to Contact (7-69)
WORKSHOP 15 PARASOLID MODELING NAS120, Workshop 15, November 2003 WS15-1.
© 2011 Autodesk Advanced Techniques for Nonlinear Contact and Drop Shock Analysis Shoubing Zhuang Sr. Research Engineer – Autodesk, Inc. Mike Smell Technical.
Truss Structure Workshop Five Convergence Criteria REFERENCE: Training Manual Obtaining the Solution (3-51)
1 PennDOT Truss Gusset Plate Analysis and Ratings Spreadsheet Overview Karim Naji Assistant Structural Engineer FHWA PA Division
Bolt Pretension with Contact. Nonlinear Structural Analysis Goals Goal: – In this workshop our goal is to investigate the behavior of the pipe clamp assembly.
Algor, the commercial FEM package, an introduction Group: 3 Ian Fulton Timothy Chin James Bernstein Hussain Khersoh.
Chapter Five Modal Analysis.
THERMO-STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
WORKSHOP 7 LINEAR CONTACT
Linear Buckling Analysis
Finite Element Analysis Systems Analysis February 2017
Chapter 7 Explicit Dynamics: Body Interactions
ANALYSIS OF A RUBBER SEAL
Nastran 101 February 28, 2008.
POSTPROCESSING Review analysis results and evaluate the performance
What FEA can be used in:. The whole tower analysis
ANALYSIS OF BEAM BY USING FEM
Presentation transcript:

New Capability Seminar “Linear Gap” New Capability Seminar October 2001

Linear Gaps What is a “linear gap”? Why do I want linear gaps? What is theory/implementation? Patran interface Examples Limitations Conclusions

What is a “linear gap”? The linear gap is a contact element in its simplest form: DOF-to-DOF gaps with initial openings Linear, therefore does not include: friction large displacements material non-linearity X Y Node 2 P = 30 lbs. Ugap Node 1 Uinit Uses iterative solver to determine open/closed status. Node 3

Why do I want linear gaps? Successful analysis will use proper boundary conditions and load paths. Linear gaps can solve a large class of problems Heel-toe interaction Hole bearing Simple contacts Bridge Supports Fitting contacts Efficient when compared to nonlinear methods

Theory / Implementation The linear gaps provide for simple contact, (compressive) forces only. MPC’s are used to define the gaps The displacements and mpcforces are used to determine if each gap is “welded” or “free” Displacement criteria: no penetration (MPC displacement >=0) MPCFORCE criteria: compressive force only (MPCforce <=0) An iterative procedure is used to solve the model based on displacements/mpcforces

X Y Node 2 P = 30 lbs. Ugap Node 1 Uinit Node 3 Uy (opening) Y Uy (closing) Uy (initial) Opening Grid Uyopening - positive disp will open the gap Closing Grid Uyclosing - positive disp will close the gap Initial Opening Uyinitial - initial separation between grids The equation for the gap displacement can be written as: Uygap = Uyopening - Uyclosing + Uyinitial Rearranging in MPC format and setting Uyclosing as the dependant (first) term: Uyclosing - Uyopening + Uygap - Uyinitial = 0 Node 3

Theory / Implementation SPOINTs are defined for Ugap and Uinit SPOINT 55 155 SUPORT puts SPOINT 55 (Ugap) in the R-set for iteration. SUPORT 55 0 SPC defines initial gap opening =.05 (Uinit) SPC 101106 155 0 .05 MPC Entry: (Eq. of motion: Uy3 - Uy2 + Ugap - Uinit = 0) $ SID G1 C1 A1 G2 C2 A2 MPC 101106 3 2 1.0 2 2 -1.0 $ G3 C3 A3 G4 C4 A4 55 0 1.0 155 0 -1.0

MSC.Patran Interface PCL Utility developed to easily create linear gaps and write appropriate MSC.Nastran input entries. Easy Creation/Deletion of linear gaps Useful graphics for visualization Special Verification Creates complete, run-ready, MSC.Nastran job Stores gaps on MSC.Patran db Session file support

CREATING GAPS Initial Assumption: Opened or Closed Special Cases Initial opening defined by nodal distance (automatically calculated) or by user specified value Create gaps within tolerance; if coincident nodes identify the opening node based on Node ID Select Nodes (and direction) on both sides of gap, interface will automatically determine “Opening” and “Closing” Nodes and check for SPC/MPC conflicts

CREATING GAPS Initial Assumption: Opened or Closed Initial opening defined by nodal distance (automatically calculated) or by user specified value User defines “Opening” Node(s), “Closing” Node(s), and directions.

Gap Display: No Options Gap Display: All Options VISUALIZING GAPS Gap Display: No Options (0.15) (0.15-S) (-S) Gap Display: All Options

DELETING GAPS

CREATING JOB

VERIFYING GAPS If any LBC (SPC’s) have been added during the session, “Reload” the form and select appropriate boundary conditions “Rechecks” any model changes related to MPC and/or SPC changes (MPC’s include RBAR, RBE2, RBE3, etc.)

L-Bracket Heel-Toe Analysis 100 Pounds 0.25” Thick Aluminum 3.0” Shear Bolt = .248 Diameter Shear Hole= .250 Diameter Linear gaps defined in radial direction to distribute bearing load 1.0” 2.0” Tension Bolt: 0.5 inches long, .250 Diameter, attached to plate with RBE3 and fixed at bottom “Gap to Ground” along bottom surface

Force Transfer at Shear Bolt Force Transfer at Tension Bolt Local Stress Distribution Force Transfer at Shear Bolt Local Stress Distribution Force Transfer at Tension Bolt

Interference Fit Interference Gaps: Opening node is plate Closing node is pin Initial Gap determined by nodal distance Plate 5 X 4 X .1 .500 hole .40 from edge Pin .506 dia X .1 thick (All Aluminum)

Non-uniform force distribution caused by edge effect

Limitations Remember “simple gaps” only NO LARGE DISPLACEMENTS NO FRICTION NO MATERIAL NONLINEARITY Otherwise use SOL 106 with CGAP/PGAP with or without PARAM,LGDISP with or without MATS1 etc.

Additional Information MSC.Nastran V70.5 Release Guide; Section 3.5, download from: http://www.mechsolutions.com/support/documentation/index.html McCullough, John and Proctor, Lance, “LOCAL ANALYSIS OF FASTENER HOLES USING THE LINEAR GAP TECHNOLOGY OF MSC/NASTRAN,” 1999 MSC Aerospace Users’ Conference. Download from: http://www.mechsolutions.com/support/library/auc99/

Conclusion Simple gap contact is available in SOL 101 of MSC.NASTRAN V70.5 or later. Constrained Displacement ITERative technique (CDITER). Simple gaps -- no friction Works with large models Reduces the complexities inherent with SOL 106 (gap stiffness, convergence, etc.) Allows use of GPFORCE (now available in SOL 106 in V2001) Used in instances where non linearity's do not exist, but contact is required.