Concepts and Principles of the Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (SFST) Texas Association of Counties Galveston, Texas November 15, 2007 J. Frank Woodall,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lab 6: Measuring Intoxication: What Do the Numbers Mean UW Biology of Addiction.
Advertisements

Oklahoma Criminal Defense Lawyers Association 2012 Patrick A. Williams Criminal Defense Institute June 28, 2012.
Testing for Intoxication. 2 Rate of Absorption Depends on: Amount of alcohol consumed The alcohol content of the beverage Time taken to consume it Quantity.
Slide 1 of 15 Alcohol and Automobiles…Don’t Mix Slide 2 of 15 Alcohol and Automobiles Every year In the U.S. thousands of people are killed and critically.
Learning, Instruction and the PADI System
DRINKING, DRUGS, & HEALTH Driver’s Education-Period 4 Mr. Hamill.
Sensitivity and Specificity Part II – Computations and Examples.
Lieutenant Jimmy Jackson Texas Department of Public Safety.
BERG BALANCE SCALE.
Pre-Program Screening and Assessment Debbie Rose, Ph.D. Co-Director, Center for Successful Aging California State University, Fullerton.
Lab 6: Measuring Intoxication
COMPONENTS OF FITNESS Agility Balance SHMD 249 7/3/2013.
Practical Exercise Physiology Fitness Testing Learning Objectives 1. To understand what validity is. 2. To understand what reliability is. 3. To be able.
Traffic Enforcement. Categories of Violations Infractions Misdemeanors Felonies Document Violations Equipment Violations Moving Violations.
Skills Evaluator Orientation Course Revised: October 2011.
Field Sobriety Testing Provided by: Sergeant Steve Baiamonte The Montana Highway Patrol Prepared for: Law and Justice Interim Committee 08 February 2010.
Minnehaha County Sheriff’s Office Explorer Post #11.
Traffic Enforcement Chapter 6. Police Traffic Function Movement Investigation – Taking a report – fill in the blanks – Investigation – causes of collision.
BDI Training. Agenda General Information about BDI Administering the BDI Scoring the BDI Watch BDI on 2 year old – score protocol.
Traffic Enforcement Chapter 8. Categories of Violations Infractions Misdemeanors Felonies Document Violations Equipment Violations Moving Violations.
Lesson 7.3 TRAFFIC LAWS GOVERNING THE USE OF ALCOHOL In all 50 states, a person has to be 21 years of age to purchase or consume alcoholic beverages. All.
Introduction to Field Sobriety Testing Presented by William Maze.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) AS9104/2A Presentation San Diego, CA January 17, 2013 Tim Lee The Boeing Company 1 Other Party.
1 Standard Test Administration Testing Ethics Training PowerPoint Spring 2011 Utah State Office of Education.
What is a DRE? Tony Corroto DRE/SFST Instructor DRE/SFST
DRE 12 Step Process. The Drug Influence Evaluation Systematic and Standardized Process The DEC procedure is a systematic and standardized method of examining.
Drinking, Drugs, & Health Driver’s Education Mr. Vazquez.
The Science & Admissibility of Drug Evaluation and Classification Evidence Drug Recognition Expert.
DWI Detection Phases  Vehicle in Motion Initial observation of vehicle Initial observation of vehicle Observation of stopping sequence Observation of.
Drug Recognition Expert (DRE)  12-Step Standardized and Systematic Process for evaluating persons suspected of being under the influence of drugs.  A.
MAVILLE ALASTRE-DIZON Philippine Normal University
SAT’s Information Parent’s Meeting 10 th February February 2016.
Concepts and Principles of the Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (SFST)
10.4 Notes Field Sobriety Tests. Objectives  Describe commonly employed field sobriety tests to assess alcohol impairment.
Describe the interaction between a law enforcement official and a citizen during a traffic stop Motor Vehicle Stops: Driving Under the Influence.
MANUAL HANDLING AWARENESS TRAINING COURSE FOR STAFF.
May 2016 An Evaluation of Data from Drivers Arrested for Driving Under the Influence in Relation to Per se Limits for Cannabis.
Stages of Intoxication Factors affecting alcohol absorption – Body weight – How much alcohol is consumed – Over what time period – Amount of food in the.
Unit 4: Forensic Toxicology Mr. Ross Brown Brooklyn School for Law and Technology.
3 Hours 20 Minutes Session 8 Concepts and Principles of the Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (SFST)
3 Hours 20 Minutes Session 8 Concepts and Principles of the Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (SFST) Revised: 01/2015 Standardized Field Sobriety Testing.
Introduction and Overview
90 Minutes Session 3 Psychophysical Tests.
50 Minutes Session 23 Curriculum Vitae Preparation and Maintenance.
Session 23 Curriculum Vitae Preparation and Maintenance 50 Minutes
Standardized Field Sobriety Testing Review
3 Hours 20 Minutes Session 8 Concepts and Principles of the Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (SFST)
Standardized Field Sobriety Testing Refresher
DWI Detection and Standardized Field Sobriety Testing
Session 26 Preparing the Narrative Report 50 Minutes
Session 30 Transition to the Certification Phase of Training
105 Minutes Session 12 Alcohol Workshop.
Drug Recognition Expert Course
1 Hour 30 Minutes Session 13 Report Writing Exercise and Moot Court.
2 Hours Session 14-A Video Workshop Second Session.
2 Hours Session 14 “Testing Subjects” Practice: Second Session.
Session 14 “Testing Subjects” Practice: Second Session 2 Hours R 2014
Drug Evaluation and Classification (Prelim)
Drinking and Driving.
Law 5 – Referee Mechanics
120 Minutes Session 5 Alcohol Workshop.
Session 14-A Dry Lab 2 Hours R 2014
105 Minutes Session 8 Demonstrations of the Evaluation Sequence.
90 Minutes Session 27 Practice: Test Administration.
Session 16 Written Examination and Program Conclusion
Session 29 Classifying a Suspect (Role Play) 120 Minutes
Texas Association of Counties Galveston, Texas November 15, 2007
2 Hours Session 11 “Testing Subjects” Practice: First Session.
Doug Beirness Amy Porath D’Arcy Smith Erin Beasley
Law 5 – Referee Mechanics
Presentation transcript:

Concepts and Principles of the Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (SFST) Texas Association of Counties Galveston, Texas November 15, 2007 J. Frank Woodall, Director Education and Training Programs Division Texas Commission on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and Education

Learning Objectives Upon successfully completing this session, the participant will be able to: Discuss the development and validity of the research and the standardized elements, clues and interpretation of the three standardized field sobriety tests. Discuss the different types of nystagmus and their effects on the horizontal gaze nystagmus test. Discuss how to properly administer the three standardized field sobriety tests.

Learning Objectives Upon successfully completing this session, the student will be able to: Discuss the clues of the three standardized field sobriety tests. Describe in a clear and convincing manner and properly record the results of the three standardized field sobriety tests on a standard note taking guide. Discuss the limiting factors of the three standardized field sobriety tests.

Overview: Development and Validation NHTSA Research Began in 1975 in California With Three Final Reports Being Published: 1. California: 1977 (lab study only) 2. California: 1981 (lab/field study) 3. Maryland, Washington, DC, Virginia, North Carolina: 1983 (field study only)

Original Research Objectives To evaluate currently used physical coordination tests to determine their relationship to intoxication and driving impairment. To develop more sensitive tests that would provide more reliable evidence of impairment. To standardize the tests and observations.

Volunteers were Subjected to Six Tests: 1. One-leg stand 2. Finger to nose 3. Finger count 4. Walk and turn 5. Tracing (a paper and pencil exercise) 6. Nystagmus (called alcohol gaze nystagmus in final report)

Laboratory Test Data HGN by itself was 77% accurate. Walk and Turn was 68% accurate. One Leg Stand was 65% accurate. It would be possible to combine the results of HGN and Walk and Turn and be 80% accurate. Results

Third Phase: Field Validation and Standardization To develop standardized, practical and effective procedures for police officers to use in reaching arrest/no arrest decisions. To test the feasibility of the procedures in operational conditions. To secure data to determine if the tests will discriminate in the field, as well as in the laboratory. Objectives:

“Standardized” Elements Standardized Administrative Procedures Standardized Clues Standardized Criteria

Importance of Large Scale Field Validation Study First significant assessment of the workability of the standardized tests under actual enforcement conditions. First time completely objective clues and scoring criteria had been defined for the tests. Results of the study validated the SFSTs.

SFST Field Validation Studies Colorado 1995 Florida 1997 San Diego, California 1998

Colorado Field Validation Study of SFST First full field validation study using SFST experienced law enforcement personnel. 93% correct arrest decision based on three-test battery (HGN, WAT, OLS).

Florida Field Validation Study of SFST 95% correct arrest decision based on three-test battery (HGN, WAT, OLS). Validated SFST’s at 0.08 BAC and above.

San Diego Field Validation Study of SFST 91% correct arrest decision for 0.08 BAC and above using three-test battery (HGN, WAT, OLS). HGN is still most reliable of three-test battery and supports arrest decisions at 0.08 BAC.

Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Involuntary jerking of the eyes occurring as the eyes gaze to the side.

Categories of Nystagmus Vestibular - Rotational - Post-rotational - Caloric - Positional alcohol nystagmus Neural - Optokinetic - Physiological - Gaze Horizontal Vertical Resting Pathological disorders and diseases

Administrative Procedures 1.Eyeglasses 2.Verbal instructions 3. Position object (12-15 inches) (30-38 cm) 4. Pupil size and resting nystagmus 5. Equal tracking

Administrative Procedures 6.Check for lack of smooth pursuit 7.Check for distinct and sustained nystagmus at maximum deviation 8.Check for onset of nystagmus prior to 45 degrees 9.Total the clues 10. Check for Vertical Gaze Nystagmus Check each eye independently beginning with the suspect’s left and compare.

Three Clues of Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Lack of smooth pursuit. Distinct and sustained nystagmus at maximum deviation. Onset of nystagmus prior to 45 degrees.

Clue Number 1 Lack of smooth pursuit

Clue Number 2 Distinct and sustained nystagmus at maximum deviation

Clue Number 3 Onset of nystagmus prior to 45 degrees 45 o

o

Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test Criterion 4 or more clues indicates BAC above 0.10 (77% accurate) 4

Vertical Gaze Nystagmus

Walk and Turn (Divided Attention Test - Mental Task and Physical Task) Instructions Stage Walking Stage

Safety Precautions Keep suspect on left side during demonstrations Never turn back on suspect Be aware of surroundings Left handed officers should demonstrate test at a distance more than arm’s length

Administrative Procedures 1. Verbal Instructions: - Assume heel-toe stance - Arms down at sides - Don’t start until told 2. 9 heel-to-toe Steps, Turn, 9 heel-to-toe Steps 3. Turn Procedures: - Turn around on line - Several small steps 4. While Walking: - Keep watching feet - Arms down at sides - Count steps out loud - Don’t stop during walk

Walk and Turn Test Clues 1. Can’t balance during instructions 2. Starts too soon 3. Stops while walking 4. Doesn’t touch heel-to-toe

Walk and Turn Test Clues 5. Steps off line 6. Uses arms to balance 7. Improper turn (or loses balance on turn) 8. Wrong number of steps Note: If suspect can't do the test, record observed clues and document the reason for not completing the test.

Walk and Turn Test Criterion 2 or more clues indicates BAC above 0.10 (68% accurate) 2

One-Leg Stand (Divided Attention Test - Mental Task and Physical Task) Instructions Stage Balance and Counting Stage

Administrative Procedures Instructions Stage: - Stand straight, feet together - Keep arms at sides - Maintain position until told otherwise

Administrative Procedures Note: It’s important for the officer to time the 30 second count for the test. Balance and Counting Stage: -Raise one leg, either leg -Keep raised foot approximately six inches (15 cm) off ground, foot parallel to the ground -Keep both legs straight -Keep eyes on elevated foot -Count out loud in the following manner: “One thousand and one, one thousand and two, one thousand and three and so on”, until told to stop

One-Leg Stand Test Clues Sways while balancing Uses arms to balance Hops Puts foot down Note: If suspect can't do the test, record observed clues and document the reason for not completing the test.

One-Leg Stand Test Criterion 2 or more clues indicates BAC above 0.10 (65% accurate) 2

Medical Assessment Equal Tracking Equal Pupil Other: YesNo

Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Lack of smooth pursuit Distinct and sustained nystagmus at maximum deviation Onset of nystagmus prior to 45 degrees Left Right

Walk and Turn Instructions Stage Cannot Keep Balance Walking Stage * For scoring purposes, “Wrong number of steps is a validated clue.” Improper Turn (Describe) Cannot Do Test (Explain) Other: Starts Too Soon Walk and Turn Test Describe Turn Cannot Do Test (Explain) Cannot keep balance Starts too soon Stops walking Misses heel-toe Steps off line Raises arms Actual steps taken 1st Nine 2nd Nine

One-Leg Stand One-Leg Stand: Sways while balancing Uses arms to balance Hopping Puts foot down L R

SFST procedures are taught under ideal conditions SFST is not always administered under ideal conditions Under less than ideal conditions generally valid and useful predictors of impairment

SFST Practitioner Has completed 24 hour NHTSA Practitioners course Demonstrated proficiency in administering SFST Can administer SFST in field environment Can testify to results observed

Emerson v. State 880 S.W.2d 759 (1994) Judicial notice of reliability of both theory underlying HGN and its technique Technique must be properly applied Practitioner certification by state sufficient to qualify witness as an expert Expert status may be established through qualifications and experience

SFST Practitioner Proficiency (1)successful completion of the current National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) approved SFST Practitioner Course as reported by an approved training provider, (2)currently appointed as a peace officer, (3)two years of experience administering SFST, (4)completion of SFST Practitioner Course, SFST Practitioner Update, DRE Update, SFST instructor, or DRE instructor within past 24 months, (5)demonstrated proficiency in administration of SFST before a certified S.F.S.T. Instructor or NHTSA representative, and (6)submission of completed application, in the format currently prescribed by the commission, and any required fee.

Test Your Knowledge Walk-and-Turn is an example of _____ field sobriety test. Divided Attention The Walk-and-Turn requires a real or imaginary line and ____________________ Smooth flat surface with sufficient distance for 9 steps During the _____ stage of the Walk-and-Turn, the suspect is required to count out loud. walking

Test Your Knowledge Per the original research, the Walk-and-Turn can determine whether a suspect’s BAC is above or below 0.10, _____ percent of the time. 68% In the Walk-and-Turn test, a suspect who steps off the line during the first 9 steps and once again during the second 9 steps and who raises arms for balance twice during the second 9 steps has produced _____ distinct clue(s). 2

Test Your Knowledge The Walk-and-Turn may not be valid when administered to persons who are over _____ years of age. 65 During the _____ stage of the One-Leg Stand the suspect must maintain balance for 30 seconds. Balancing and counting The One-Leg Stand requires that the suspect keep the foot elevated for _____ seconds. 30 seconds

Test Your Knowledge Per the original research, the One-Leg Stand can determine whether a suspect’s BAC is above or below 0.10, _____ percent of the time. 65 In the One-Leg Stand test, a suspect who sways has exhibited _____ clue(s). 1 In the One-Leg Stand test, a suspect who raises arms, hops, and puts foot down has exhibited _____ clue(s). 3

Test Your Knowledge The maximum number of clues for Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus that can appear in one eye is_____. 3 Per the original research, the HGN test can determine whether a suspect’s BAC is above 0.10, _____ percent of the time. 77 The third clue of HGN is an onset of nystagmus prior to _____ degrees. 45

Questions

Contact Information J. Frank Woodall, Director Education and Training Programs Texas Commission on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and Education 6330 U.S. Highway 290 East, Suite 200 Austin, Texas