The neural basis of face recognition? Tim Andrews.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Congenital Prosopagnosia:. Congenital prosopagnosia: Face recognition impairment without any apparent deficits in vision, intelligence or social functioning,
Advertisements

Sensory systems in the brain The visual system. Organization of sensory systems PS 103 Peripheral sensory receptors [ Spinal cord ] Sensory thalamus Primary.
Human Neuropsychology,
Chen, Kao & Tyler (2007, Cerebral Cortex). Faces from the FERET database, filtered in a 4 th -power Gaussian aperture and normalized to the full contrast.
Chapter 4: Cortical Organization
Chapter 44 Visual Perception of Objects Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Are faces special?. Brain damage can produce problems in face recognition - even own reflection (Bodamer, 1947) Prosopagnosia usually results from localized.
Are faces special?.
When the brain remembers, but the patient doesn’t: Converging fMRI and EEG evidence for covert recognition in a case of prosopagnosia Stephane R. Simon,
1 Emotion perception in old age and dementia Louise Phillips, Vasiliki Orgeta & Clare Scott School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen. Acknowledgements:
Psychological and Neural Perspectives on Human Face Recognition.
Theory of Mind Gallagher, H. L., & Frith, C. D. (2003)
A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception
You have a test next week!
Writing Workshop Find the relevant literature –Use the review journals as a first approach e.g. Nature Reviews Neuroscience Trends in Neuroscience Trends.
Searching for the NCC We can measure all sorts of neural correlates of these processes…so we can see the neural correlates of consciousness right? So what’s.
Category specificity in the brain?. INTRODUCTION Category-specific deficits: Category-specific (associative) agnosia Prosopagnosia Word blindness Category.
I. Face Perception II. Visual Imagery. Is Face Recognition Special? Arguments have been made for both functional and neuroanatomical specialization for.
Visual Cognition II Object Perception. Theories of Object Recognition Template matching models Feature matching Models Recognition-by-components Configural.
WHAT, WHERE, & HOW SYSTEMS AGNOSIAS!. What, Where, & How Systems.
Psychophysics of the structure of object memory Cristina Savin.
Mental visual imagery – can a language encoded object generate depictive imagery? Igor Bascandziev Harvard Graduate School of Education.
The visual pathways. Ventral pathway receptive field properties 0 1 TE receptive field V4 receptive field V1 receptive field.
Visual Cognition I basic processes. What is perception good for? We often receive incomplete information through our senses. Information can be highly.
Visual Cognition I basic processes. What is perception good for? We often receive incomplete information through our senses. Information can be highly.
Basic Processes in Visual Perception
Categorization: Scenes & Objects (P) Lavanya Sharan March 16th, 2011.
An aside: peripheral drift illusion illusion of motion is strongest when reading text (such as this) while viewing the image in your periphery. Blinking.
Valentina Moro, Cosimo Urgesi, Simone Pernigo, Paola Lanteri, Mariella Pazzaglia, and Salvatore Maria Aglioti.
Photo, p. 476 Ranulfo Romo. Figure 23.1 Vibration Discrimination Task and Performance.
1 Perception, Illusion and VR HNRS 299, Spring 2008 Lecture 9 Visual Development Thanks to website at University of Calgary:
Prosopagnosia Emotion recognition FFA.
From: Carter R (1998) Mapping the Mind. Seven Dials, London.
Facial identity and expression perception in the human visual system Human Vision and Eye Movement Laboratory Medicine (Neurology) Ophthalmology and visual.
The Ventral Stream and Visual Agnosia David Glenn Clark, MD Department of Neurology, UAB and BVAMC David Glenn Clark, MD Department of Neurology, UAB and.
The changing face of face research Vicki Bruce School of Psychology Newcastle University.

Prosopagnosia:. Prosopagnosia: Defined as a specific inability to recognise familiar faces. (Bodamer 1947). Contrasted with visual agnosia - inability.
Chapter 4: Object Recognition What do various disorders of shape recognition tell us about object recognition? What do various disorders of shape recognition.
Visual Perception, Attention & Action. Anthony J Greene2.
Chapter 5: Perceiving Objects and Scenes. The Puzzle of Object and Scene Perception The stimulus on the receptors is ambiguous. –Inverse projection problem:
Vision. 2 Brodmann Original Calcarine 17 Collateral Sulcus Fusiform Gyrus 18.
Neuroplasticity and Rehabilitation Strategies Robert K. Shin M.D. VA MS Center of Excellence Assistant Professor Departments of Neurology and Ophthalmology.
Are spatial tasks useful for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease.
Agnosia and Perceptual Disturbances March 27, 2006.
Higher Visual Areas 1.Anatomy of higher visual areas 2.Two processing pathways - “ Where ” pathway for motion and depth - “ What ” pathway for form and.
The anatomical basis of face recognition: evidence from studies of intact individuals:
Developmental Prosopagnosia:. Developmental prosopagnosia: Face recognition impairment without any apparent deficits in vision, intelligence or social.
Copyright © 2007 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Neuroscience: Exploring the Brain, 3e
Face perception is modulated by sexual preference Kranz, F. & Ishai, A. Institute of Neuroradiology University of Zurich Zurich, Switzerland Institute.
Visual Agnosias Specification: Theories of perceptual organisation
Face Recognition in the Brain Arash Afraz.
Object and face recognition
JHS AP Psychology Unit 4: Sensation, Perception Essential Task 4-2 :Describe the sensory process of vision including the specific nature of energy transduction.
The visual system eye thalamus lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) visual cortex The visual system s.
Chapter 4: Cortical Organization
Agnosia and Perceptual Disturbances March 17, 2008.
The distributed human neural system for face perception
Visual Computation and Learning Lab
Neural mechanisms underlying repetition suppression in occipitotemporal cortex Michael Ewbank MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK.
Categorisation in human brain
Perceptual Development
Prosopagnosia.
INTERVIEWING WITNESSES
Institute of Neural Information Processing (Prof. Heiko Neumann •
علم النفس المعرفي (نفس 367)
Bayesian Methods in Brain Imaging
Distributed Neural Systems for the Generation of Visual Images
Bruce & Young’s model of face recognition (1986)
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Presentation transcript:

The neural basis of face recognition? Tim Andrews

Familiar Unfamiliar Hancock, Bruce and Burton (2000) Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4: Jenkins, White, Van Monfort, Burton (2011) Cognition 121:

Outline 1.Which areas of the brain respond to images of faces? 2.Are these regions selective for the identity of the face? 3.Which aspects of the face are important for representing facial identity? 4.Is an image-invariant neural code used to represent information about identity? 5.Are face-selective regions sufficient for face recognition?

Face localiser scan

fMRI analysis - modelling the data

Face-selective regions FFA: fusiform face area OFA: occipital face area STS: superior temporal sulcus zscore OFA STS FFA Haxby, Hoffman & Gobbini, TICS 4: (2000) Bruce & Young (1986) Br. J. Psychology 77: Calder & Young, Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6: (2005)

Outline 1.Which areas of the brain respond to images of faces? 2.Are these regions selective for the identity of the face? 3.Which aspects of the face are important for representing facial identity? 4.Is an image-invariant neural code used to represent information about identity? 5.Are face-selective regions sufficient for face recognition?

fMR-adaptation Grill-Spector, Henson & Martin (2006) Trends Cog Sci 10: Krekelberg, Boynton and van Wezel (2006) Trends Neurosci 29:

fMR-adaptation Grill-Spector et al (1999) Neuron 24: Henson et al. (2000) Science 287: Andrews & Ewbank, Neuroimage 23: (2004) Grill-Spector, Henson & Martin (2006) Trends Cog Sci 10: 14-23

Andrews, Clarke, Pell, Hartley (2010) Neuroimage 49: fMR- adaptation to intact, but not scrambled faces

Andrews, Clarke, Pell, Hartley (2010) Neuroimage 49: No adaptation to images of places

Outline 1.Which areas of the brain respond to images of faces? 2.Are these regions selective for the identity of the face? 3.Which aspects of the face are important for representing facial identity? 4.Is an image-invariant neural code used to represent information about identity? 5.Are face-selective regions sufficient for face recognition?

Internal and external features

fMR-adaptation to internal and external features of familiar faces Andrews, Davies-Thompson, Kingstone & Young (2010) J. Neuroscience 30:

Adaptation to internal and external features of unfamiliar faces FFAOFASTS Andrews, Davies-Thompson, Kingstone & Young (2010) J. Neuroscience 30:

Composite face images

Adaptation to composite familiar faces same internal, same external same internal, diff. external diff. internal, same external diff. internal, diff. external Andrews, Davies-Thompson, Kingstone & Young (2010) J. Neuroscience 30:

Adaptation to composite unfamiliar faces same internal, same external same internal, diff. external diff. internal, same external diff. internal, diff. external Andrews, Davies-Thompson, Kingstone & Young (2010) J. Neuroscience 30:

The Illusion! The Presidential Illusion! FFAOFASTS Sinha and Poggio (1996) Nature 384:404 Sinha and Poggio (2002) Perception 31:131

Face to Face Coalition! FFAOFASTS Andrews and Thompson (2010) iPerception 1: 28-30

Outline 1.Which areas of the brain respond to images of faces? 2.Are these regions selective for the identity of the face? 3.Which aspects of the face are important for representing facial identity? 4.Is an image-invariant neural code used to represent information about identity? 5.Are face-selective regions sufficient for face recognition?

Familiar Unfamiliar

Experiment 1: same identity FFA Image invariant adaptation Davies-Thompson, Newling and Andrews (2012) Cerebral Cortex in press

Experiment 2: different identity FFA Image invariant adaptation Davies-Thompson, Newling and Andrews (2012) Cerebral Cortex in press

Experiment 1: same identity FFA Image invariant adaptation Davies-Thompson, Newling and Andrews (2012) Cerebral Cortex in press

Experiment 2: different identity FFA Image invariant adaptation Davies-Thompson, Newling and Andrews (2012) Cerebral Cortex in press

Experiment 1 Image invariant adaptation Experiment 2

Outline 1.Which areas of the brain respond to images of faces? 2.Are these regions selective for the identity of the face? 3.Which aspects of the face are important for representing facial identity? 4.Is an image-invariant neural code used to represent information about identity? 5.Are face-selective regions sufficient for face recognition?

Case Study - JJ  17 year old male  Complete loss of vision following head trauma  Visual acuity recovered after 5 days, but he retained a specific deficit in colour and face perception  10 days after injury, battery of visual tests revealed normal acuity, stereopsis, motion discrimination, contrast sensitivity, object/place recognition, but still had abnormal colour vision and remained densely prosopagnosic.  After 4 months he showed a complete recovery of colour and face perception.

Structural MRI revealed no obvious lesion

1

Normal functional responses in face-selective regions FFA STS OFAFFA Pre-recoveryPost-recoveryControls

Normal adaptation to faces in prosopagnosic patient! same different

Conclusions

Thanks to… Jodie Davies-Thompson Andy Young Heidi Baseler Andre Gouws Simon Hickman Alan Kingstone Tony Morland Peter Thompson Wellcome Trust ESRC

JJ – face perception % correct27/0204/0314/0321/0328/0304/0422/06 Benton Face Recognition Test90.7 Cambridge Face Memory Test85.0 Emotion Recognition Test Eye Gaze Sensitivity Test Sex Discrimination Test Unfamiliar Face Matching Test Familiar Face Recognition Test Forced Choice Face Recognition Test Famous Caricature Test Visual Imagery Test100 Face Texture Test100 Face Size Test100 Face Shape Test

JJ – non-face object perception % correct27/0204/0314/0321/0328/0304/0422/06 National Adult Reading Test (NART)23/5017/50 Warrington Recognition Memory Test100 Famous Buildings Test85.0 Name Recognition Test Car Recognition Test Famous London Landmarks Test88.8 Common Objects Test100