Principled Teaching for Deep Progress - Improving mathematical learning beyond methods and materials An NCETM research study module.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Learning at Lanyon High B Davies. Groups Previously students were seated around the classroom and were not participating well in the lesson. The structure.
Advertisements

Key Stage 3 National Strategy
© Myra Young Assessment All rights reserved. Provided for the use of participants in AM circles in North Lanarkshire Council.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
1. Principles Learning Assessment Technology 3 Teaching Assessment Technology Principles The principles describe particular features of high-quality.
Designing the whole curriculum linking subjects, PLTS, Dimensions.
Maths Counts Insights into Lesson Study 1. Gemma O’Dwyer, Patricia Lewis, Jenny Donohoe Second Year Array model and quadratic factorisation 2.
Arngask Primary and Nursery Scho ol Writing Policy.
West Virginia Achieves Professional Development Series Volume VII System-Wide Standards-Based Mathematics Model.
Looking at Student work to Improve Learning
LECTURER OF THE 2010 FIRST-YEAR STUDENT: How can the lecturer help? February 2010.
INTEGRATED LEARNING: STAGE 4 (SECONDARY COGS) Principles and process.
Dr. MaLinda Hill Advanced English C1-A Designing Essays, Research Papers, Business Reports and Reflective Statements.
Curriculum for Excellence Numeracy and Mathematics 18th September 2010
Thinking Actively in a Social Context T A S C.
1 A proposed skills framework for all 11- to 19-year-olds.
Curriculum for Excellence Aberdeenshire November 2008.
Home, school & community partnerships Leadership & co-ordination Strategies & targets Monitoring & assessment Classroom teaching strategies Professional.
Primary and Secondary National Strategies © Crown copyright 2006 Renewing the frameworks – Day 3 0.
A big picture for Outstanding Citizenship. Three key questions 3 How well are we achieving our aims? 1 What are we trying to achieve? 2 How do we organise.
Understanding Primary Music Session 4: Lesson planning and AfL Overcoming barriers to learning Developing composition skills.
GRADE LEVEL MEETINGS OCTOBER 13, 2011 GRADE 8. WHY ARE WE LOOKING AT ELA DATA?
A product of Project CENTRAL, 2004 Understanding the Action Research Process Sponsored by Project CENTRAL A Project of the Florida Department of Education.
Aims of Workshop Introduce more effective school/University partnerships for the initial training of teachers through developing mentorship training Encourage.
Chapter 8 Assessing Active Science Learning
REQUIRED ELEMENTS. Standards are the centerpiece of a strong academic program. They are your roadmap and provide the what as teachers build curriculum,
A free-to-share educational resource designed and presented by Stephen Nalder.
Raising standards, improving lives The use of assessment to improve learning: the evidence 15 September Jacqueline White HMI National Adviser for Assessment.
Making our curriculum world class Looking after learners, today and tomorrow Mike Rumble Curriculum Adviser.
Pupil talk and critical thinking in science and citizenship.
21 st Century Learning Environments at All Saints. Initial steps towards Personalised Learning in the Grade 5/6 Level.
Programming the New Syllabuses (incorporating the Australian Curriculum)
A big picture of the curriculum. Adapted with thanks to colleagues at the Council for Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) Working draft July.
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.
EngageNY.org Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules Session 1A, February 2014 NTI.
Making the most of booster classes October 2002 National Strategy for Key Stage 3.
Common Core State Standards Introduction and Exploration.
Improving Student Achievement Three of the most effective strategies that have been found to have most success are: Sharing learning intentions with students.
Developing web-based CPD for group work and argumentation in science Session 2: Developing Argumentation 12/01/12.
Tuning in to children’s thinking and learning
Differentiation What is meant by differences between learners?
Differentiating Instruction Dr. Laura McLaughlin Taddei.
PLMLC Leadership Series Thunder Bay Region Day 1 Brian Harrison, YRDSB Connie Quadrini, YCDSB Thursday February 3 rd, 2011.
Deep Progress in Mathematics: making a difference Anne Watson Stirling, March 2007.
Fundamentals of Governance: Parliament and Government Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
Planning Classroom Assessments Identifying Objectives from Curricular Aims…
Advancing teaching: inspiring able learners every day Meeting the Challenge 14 th November 2012.
Understanding Primary Music Self-study materials: Overcoming barriers to learning.
2 Objectives To develop understanding of Functional Skills To explore resources and strategies for building towards functionality in the context of probability.
Principles of planning
Interdisciplinary learning (primary version)
Developing students’ language
Research Lesson Study. How can teachers conduct effective research in the classroom in order to enhance pupil progress?
Warm Up - Sponge Activity Work as a team to put the parts of the Madeline Hunter Lesson Plan in the correct sequence. 5 minutes Objective: After reviewing.
Making the most of booster classes October 2002
Your Health and Wellness
Planning (secondary version)
The curriculum aims to enable all young people to become
Parent Involvement Committee EQAO Presentation
Topic Principles and Theories in Curriculum Development
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
Implementing the Routines
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
Interdisciplinary learning (secondary version)
Introducing the NCETM.
Welcome to the CSBM operational workshop:
© Crown copyright vision © Crown copyright 2006
Designing a teaching session
KS5 Curriculum Map Business Studies
Presentation transcript:

Principled Teaching for Deep Progress - Improving mathematical learning beyond methods and materials An NCETM research study module

This module is based on Watson, A., & De Geest, E. (2005). Watson, A., & De Geest, E. (2005). Principled Teaching for Deep Progress - Improving mathematical learning beyond methods and materials This is an academic paper about the project that was also reported in ‘Watson, A., De Geest, E., & Prestage, S. (2003). Deep Progress in Mathematics: The Improving Attainment in Mathematics Project. Oxford: University of Oxford, Department of Educational Studies.’

What teaching practices support lower attaining secondary to students to make deep progress in mathematics? This study module focuses on a piece of action research, conducted by Anne Watson and Els De Geest in the early 2000s that aimed to improve attainment in mathematics among low attaining secondary students. In this module, you will explore: different views of lower attaining students’ mathematical experiences; strategies used by the teachers involved in the project to enrich their students’ experiences; And by engaging with the study and its findings, begin to consider the impact for your own teaching.

Who are the researchers? Anne Watson is a Professor of Mathematics Education at the Department of Education, University of Oxford. Els de Geest Els is a Research Fellow in the Department of Education, University of Oxford and also Lecturer in Mathematics Education at the Centre for Mathematics Education at the Open University.

Begin by writing down all the different factors that you think prevent the lowest attaining secondary students’ from achieving well in mathematics. If you are working with colleagues, compare what you have written with others and discuss the similarities and differences. Did any common themes emerge? If you were going to work in a sustained way to improve your lower ability students’ experiences such that they would ‘do better’ in mathematics, what would you do? Write them down. Task 1: What influences lower attaining students’ experiences of learning mathematics

Make a list of the improvements you would hope to see in the classroom and, if you are working with others, discuss your lists. Compare your list with the list that the teachers involved in the research project agreed upon (after much discussion).the list Task 1: What influences lower attaining students’ experiences of learning mathematics

Task 2: How do you currently organise the mathematics provision for lower attaining students? How does your school organise the mathematics provision for the lowest attaining students? Do you use any prescribed materials or teaching approaches? Write a short paragraph in response to these questions and/or share this with other colleagues. Read Section 1 and Section 2 of the research paper, which describes the context for the research.

Task 3 (optional): How was the research project organised? if you are interested in reading about how the research project was organised… Anne Watson and Els De Geest designed a two-year research project to create ‘a team of teachers who wanted to work on students’ mathematical thinking as a way to develop their achievement and interest in mathematics within the current curriculum and assessment regimes’. Read Section 6 of the research article to find out how they carried out the project and analysed the research data in order to come to some conclusions about the project teachers’ practices.

Task 4 So what is ‘Deep progress' in mathematics? The research concluded that the researchers and teachers involved in the project shared a goal that they described as ‘deep progress’ with respect to their low attaining students experiences of learning mathematics. What do you think that ‘deep progress’ might mean? Note down some thoughts and, if you are working with colleagues, share your responses.

Task 5: What did the research find out? The students: were more willing to work and more engaged mathematically; showed significant improvement in the use of thinking skills to tackle unfamiliar tasks, or tasks involving some complex organization and adapted knowledge; Were more enthusiastic. Read section 8.1 of the paper to find out about the shared teaching strategies developed by the teachers that achieved these outcomes. Which of these strategies can you identify in your own practice?

Task 5: What did the research find out? (contd) The common principles that underpinned the teachers’ practices were: all have a right of access to a broad mathematics curriculum; all students should develop their reasoning and thinking in and through mathematics; mathematics can be a source of self-esteem; students have to become mathematical learners; adolescents have to develop the ability to exercise rights and responsibilities of citizenship through mathematics; teachers have to take account of reality. Read Section 8.3 to find out about each of these principles in more detail. Which of these principles underpin your practice? Give some examples.

Task 6 Read the full version of Watson and De Geest’s research article. As you are reading, engage actively with the text by highlighting or noting: any salient points, which your own experiences and practice lead you to agree with; other points with which you disagree or would question; terminology within the article that is unfamiliar to you. You will probably want to read the article a couple of times, the first time to gain a sense of Watson and De Geest’s research study, and a second time to engage more fully with its content.

Task 7: So what? If you were to focus on improving the mathematics provision of the lower attaining students in your school, which of the themes from the research would you start with? Choose one or two of the common principles described in Section 8.3 and discuss with colleagues how you might work together to embed them into your classroom practices.

Definitions of improvement being more active in lessons, for example by participating in discussion, asking and answering questions, volunteering for tasks, offering their own methods being more willing to share ideas with others: teachers, peers, whole class showing more interest in mathematics, for example by doing more homework, working on extended tasks, commenting positively in evaluation tasks being more willing and able to tackle routine, non-routine and unfamiliar tasks looking for and expecting to find coherence in tasks; expecting mathematics to make sense doing better than expected, or than comparison groups, on certain types of question in national and in-house tests showing improvements in behaviour and attendance Back to main presentation