2012 CoDR. 2012 CoDR Mission Statements RocketSat 8 shall integrate and validate the Roll Out De-Orbiting Device (RODEO) developed by Composite Technology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Basic Overview of Project Management and Life Cycle ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik January 21, 2003.
Advertisements

RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Minnesota Sound Wreckers Conceptual Design Review University of Minnesota Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine Topel Will Thorson.
Cory Fulkerson (Project Manager) - Mechanical Engineer John Graham - Computer Engineer Clayton Hooks - Electrical Engineer O’Raphael Okoro - Electrical.
Protocol & Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Proposal Analysis Review NMSGC Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Data Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Flight Readiness Review New Mexico Space Grant Consortium University/Institution Team Members Date.
Gary MKIII University of Central Florida Chris Valle, Braden Urban, John Rowe, and Tyler Yoemans.
TEAM kkkkk Conceptual Design Review Saad Alqahtani, Charles MacCraiger, Alexa Warly, Connor Jacobson, Kyle Skjerven, Matt Busby 09/19/11 Fall 2011 Rev.
University of Wyoming Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,
RockSat-C 2011 Final Presentation RockSat-C 2011 Team: RocketSat VII University of Colorado-Boulder June 22, 2011 Kirstyn Johnson Jared Yenzer Andrew Broucek.
GLAST LAT ProjectLAT Engineering Meeting, April 1, 2003 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Darren S. Marsh Stanford Linear Accelerator.
Preliminary Design Review Northwest Nazarene University Advisor: Dr. Lawrence Chad Larson Ben Gordon Seth Leija David Vinson Zach Thomas Drew Johnson.
Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date.
University of Wyoming Charles Galey, Nicholas Roder, Peter J. Jay, William Ryan 10/14/
2012 CoDR Nitric Oxide and Piezo Dust Detector Probe Conceptual Design Review Virginia Tech Presented by Stephen Noel November 18,
Good Vibrations Conceptual Design Review University of Wyoming James Richey, Justin Thornton, Luke Voss, Jake Thatcher, Tony Allais Oct 27, 2008.
Rock Sat-C Conceptual Design Review The New Jersey Space Grant Consortium at Stevens Institute of Technology and Rutgers University Mike Giglia, Ethan.
Teamo Supremo Critical Design Review Ahna Issak Wes Roos Kristen Brenner Kimberley Fornall Barton Tofany Nick Martinez Ahna Issak Wes Roos Kristen Brenner.
Space Cowboys. Mission Overview Objective – Accurately measure flight parameters including ambient and skin temperatures, pressure, acceleration, spin.
UHM CanSat Team Members: Chris Ho: Team master, software Tyson Fukuyama: Hardware.
2012 CoDR CoDR Nomenclature RODEO – Roll Out De-Orbiting Device VACA - Validation Assembly of Communication Antennae DONDE – Attitude Determination.
2011 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
University of Wyoming Dorin Blodgett, Kevin Brown, Heather Choi, Ben Lampe Eric Robinson, Michael Stephens, Patrick Weber October 7,
NORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY CHAD LARSON, BEN GORDON, DAVID VINSON, SETH LEIJA, ZACH THOMAS, DREW JOHNSON NNU Team Conceptual Design Review.
RockSat-C 2011 CoDR Harding Flying Bison ROCKSAT-C Team Conceptual Design Review Harding University Ed Wilson, Mentor, Will Waldron, Student 2, Student.
RockSat-C 2011 CoDR CSU RocketSat-C Conceptual Design Review Colorado State University Isaiah Franka Jordan Rath Abby Wilbourn Mike Yeager 10/1/10 1.
Critical Design Review Riley Pack, Sebastian Seeds, Greg Stahl, Paul Loeb, Nic Zinner, Pierce Edwards October 17, 2006 Project Frankenfine: A Near Space.
Conceptual Design Review Metro State College of Denver Daniel Bass, Matt Hanley
(PDR ) University of Northern Colorado Nathan and Casey 11/14/08.
Critical Design Review Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.
2014 CDR Team Name Critical Design Review CDR CDR Delieverables 1.Mechanical drawings in pdf format 2.Electrical schematics in pdf format 3.Completed.
RamRack Preliminary Design Review Colorado State University Zach Glueckert Christopher Reed Timothy Schneider Brendan Sheridan Christina Watanuki Advisor:
MINNROCK CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW University of Minnesota William Ung Scott Balaban Tom Thoe Bryce Doug Carlson 11/14/2008.
Common PDR Problems ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik March 6, 2003.
RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Zero Tilt Conceptual Design Review Frostburg State University Michael Stevenson, Mayowa Ogundipe, Subhasis Ghosh, Andrew Huntley, Derek.
Team Ramrod Critical Design Review Dan Armel, Michaela Cui, Andrew Grimaldi, Kyle Kemble, Silvia Peckham, Chris Sawyer, & Kelsey Whitesell 2007 October.
High Altitude Imaging and Atmospheric Data Collection Experiment by SABRE (Scientific Aerospace and Balloon Research Engineers) Team Advisor:Atin Sinha.
Space Engineering 2 © Dr. X Wu, Space Engineering 2 Lecture 1.
The BRASS Project University of North Dakota Matthew Voigt Nathan Ambler Ron Fevig John Nordlie Tim Young Nirmal Patel (University of North Florida) Baike.
Team JHK Project TIC Personnel Supreme Commander Jarrod Marsh.
RockSat-C 2012 SITR Full Mission Simulation Report Harding University William Waldron, Joshua Griffith, Drew Cancienne, Edmond Wilson, David Stair 22 April.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
MNROCK CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW University of Minnesota William Ung Scott Balaban Bryce Schaefer Tom Thoe 11/3/2008.
2013 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
Team Name Preliminary Design Review
Section 1: Mission Overview Mission Statement Mission Objectives Expected Results System Modifications Functional Block Diagrams 2.
Colorado State University Paul Scholz, Tyler Faucett, Abby Wilbourn, Michael Somers June
2016 FMSR Team Name Full Mission Simulation Review (FMSR) University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
2014 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
Preliminary Design Review Metro State College of Denver Matthew Hanley, Daniel Bass 14 November 2008.
Tethered Aerostat Program Concept Design Review Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/College Team Members Date.
Tethered Aerostat Program Concept Design Review College of Menominee Nation Conceptual Design Review College of Menominee Nation Marilyn Madosh, Larry.
2016 PDR Team Name Preliminary Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
RamRack Conceptual Design Review Colorado State University Zach Glueckert Christopher Reed Timothy Schneider Brendan Sheridan Christina Watanuki Advisor:
P10203 LV1 MOTOR CONTROLLER FINAL REVIEW MAY 14, 2010 Electrical: Kory Williams, Adam Gillon, Oladipo Tokunboh Mechanical: Louis Shogry, Andrew Krall.
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
Team Name Preliminary Design Review
CanSat Competition Competition Objectives Pre-Launch Launch
PROJECT METEOR: RITSAT1 P08102
Sounding Rocket PDR Team Name
Sounding Rocket CDR Team Name
Eagle Space Flight Team Electronics Team
Mars Rover CDR Team Name
Team Name Conceptual Design Review
Team Name Conceptual Design Review
Launch Readiness Report West Virginia University
<Your Team # > Your Team Name Here
<Your Team # > Your Team Name Here
<Your Team # > Your Team Name Here
Presentation transcript:

2012 CoDR

2012 CoDR Mission Statements RocketSat 8 shall integrate and validate the Roll Out De-Orbiting Device (RODEO) developed by Composite Technology Development (CTD). This shall provide a means to de-orbit future small satellites. RocketSat 8 shall validate an attitude determination system for future RockSat missions

2012 CoDR Theory and Background 23 small satellites (10kg-500kg) launched every year by the United States Growth of small satellites in space exponentially increases the likelihood of collisions The rise in the number of satellites in orbit has led to an increasing need for a cost effective and lightweight means to de- orbit small satellites. The RocketSat VII attitude determination system was successful, but the accuracy of the system couldn’t be verified since there was no known solution for the attitude of the rocket.

2012 CoDR Requirements Project RequirementsParent Requirement O1Shall deploy the RODEO deviceMission Objective O2Shall validate the deployment of the RODEO deviceMission Objective O3Shall validate the ability of RODEO to de-orbit small satellites Mission Objective O4Shall comply with all RockSat-X requirementsMission Objective O5Shall determine the orientation of the payloadMission Objective

2012 CoDR Requirements (cont.) System Requirements Parent Requirement S1Shall deploy the RODEO device on the RTS (RODEO Test Structure)O1 S2Shall capture image of deployed RODEO sailO2 S3Shall detach the RTS from the rocket canisterO3 S4Shall confirm that RTS experiences decelerationO3 S5Shall meet all structural requirements as defined in the RockSat-X user guide O4 S6Shall meet all electrical requirements as defined in the RockSat-X user guide O4 S7Shall determine the orientation of the payload within ten degrees of accuracy O5 S8The orientation of the payload shall be known on all three axisO5

2012 CoDR Requirements (cont.) System Level 2 Requirements Parent Requirement S1.1Shall deploy in a time sufficient for the needs of the missionS1 S2.1Shall capture an image of RODEO while it is in the field of view of the camera S2 S2.2Shall set a image frame rate and quality that confirms RODEO deployment S2 S2.3Shall store the image dataS2 S3.1Shall detach from rocket at the determined timeS3 S3.2Shall detach from rocket without damaging equipmentS3 S3.3Shall generate acceleration upon detachmentS3 S4.1Shall measure deceleration of the RTSS4 S4.2Shall transmit deceleration data from RTS to the rocketS4

2012 CoDR Requirements (cont.) System Level 2 Requirements (continued) Parent Requirement S6.1Shall have sufficient power to perform all required operationsS6 S7.1Shall use attitude sensors that are within five degrees of accuracy S7 S7.2Shall incorporate an attitude determination algorithm that is accurate to within ten degrees of accuracy S7 S8.1Shall employ attitude sensors that can determine the attitude on all three axes S8

2012 CoDR Minimum Success Criteria Mission success depends on the image capture of the deployed RODEO device. Secondary mission success is determined by the validation of the RocketSat8 attitude determination system

2012 CoDR Mission overview: Concept of Operations Continue Telemetry Splash Down End Telemetry Pre-Launch -Begin Telemetry -Begin attitude data collection Deploy RTS RTS data collection Send Data from RTS to payload Apogee Altitude: ≈160 km Initialize Camera Begin Rodeo Deployment Chute Deployment Continue Telemetry

2012 CoDR Mission overview: Expected Results We expect: the RODEO system to be fully extended while attached to the rocket to capture an image of the extended RODEO system the RTS to detatch from the rocket canister to measure deceleration from the RTS to transmit the deceleration data from the RTS We expect to characterize the rockets attitude and verify it with a known solution 10

2012 CoDR 11

2012 CoDR User Guide Compliance: Structures 12

2012 CoDR The structure thus far will be composed of two plates. The bottom plate will include the RTS containing the deployable given to us by Composite Technology Development, as well as the ejection system. The electronics boards and the ADS(Attitude Determination System) will all be utilized on the top plate with the cameras. 13

2012 CoDR 14 Electronics Board Deployable Bottom Plate Camera on bottom of top plate Top Plate Keep Out Zone Ejection System ADS

2012 CoDR RODEO Test Structure (RTS) Layout: rough diagram 15 RTS RODEO Note: Drawing not drawn to scale

2012 CoDR The payload shall conform to the requirements set forth in the 2011 RockSat-X User Guide The system shall successfully deploy the hardware manufactured by Composite Technology Development. The structure will interface with RockSat-X through provided mounting surfaces. 16

2012 CoDR All electronic interfaces will be held in place throughout the duration of the flight with the exception of the deployable. The structure will withstand the forces of launch and protect the scientific and electrical systems. The structure will thermally protect the electronics for as long as reasonable data can be collected. The system shall successfully take at least one photo of the deployable as it leaves the canister, and house the cameras securely during launch. 17

2012 CoDR The ejection system shall be durable enough to survive the forces of launch. The structure shall allow exposure to an open air environment while still protecting electronics and instruments from harm. 18

2012 CoDR Electrical Subsystem Electrical Subsystems: -Power -Memory -Radio Communications (Comm) -Mechatronics -Imaging 19

2012 CoDR Conceptual Electrical Configuration Note: Not actual layout 20 MCU RTS Deploy Power Comm Memory Power Comm Imaging Sail Deploy MCU Main Structure RTS Sensors Power line Digital line Analog Line Charging (before deploy) Radio ADS

2012 CoDR The GSE Controlled power lines shall carry a total current of less than 1.85 A. The Timer Controlled power lines shall carry a total current of less than 3.75 A. All telemetry lines shall operate in the range of 0 – 5 V. All components shall operate at 28 V or less. Higher voltages shall be used only with express written permission. All components shall be conformal coated to protect from the space environment. 21

2012 CoDR State Chart: Software State 1 Pre-Launch State 1 Pre-Launch State 2 Launch State 2 Launch State 3 Apogee State 3 Apogee State 4 Post-Apogee State 4 Post-Apogee State 5 Splash Down State 5 Splash Down Power On G Switch Initial Code Initialize Devices Check G Switch Initial Code Initialize Devices Check G Switch No Main Code Store Data Check Timed Sequence One Main Code Store Data Check Timed Sequence One Yes Telemetry Apogee Code Initialize Camera Delay 30 seconds Apogee Code Initialize Camera Delay 30 seconds Camera Deploy Code Deploy RTS Get Data RTS Deploy Code Deploy RTS Get Data RTS Yes Telemetry RTS Final Code Check Time Sequence Two Stop Recording Final Code Check Time Sequence Two Stop Recording Telemetry

2012 CoDR Design Overview: RockSat-X 2012 User’s Guide Compliance Compliance Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) mass estimate Plates and launcher ~ 10 lbs Rts ~ 2-3 lbs Estimate on payload dimensionsRTS~ 1U cube sat configuration Deployables/booms?Yes-Deployable How many ADC lines?Exact amount not confirmed Asynchronous use?Yes Parallel use?Yes Power lines and timer use?Yes- will need timer for RTS deployment CG requirementUnderstood Are you utilizing high voltage?No

2012 CoDR Management Andrew Broucek Project Manager Wheeler Gans Systems Lead Nate Keyek- Franssen Structures Lead Emma Young Science Lead Andrew Thomas Electrical Lead Ethan Long Software Lead Devin Mackenzie Structures Kameron Medina Structures Eric Lobato Science Aram Podolski Science Shreyank Amartya Electrical Brendan Lee Electrical Long Tat Software

2012 CoDR Preliminary Schedule- Important Dates TaskDate Conceptual Design Review (CoDR) 10/4/11 Online Progress Report 1 Due 10/21/11 Preliminary design Review (PDR) 10/25/11 Online Progress Report 2 Due 11/11/11 Critical Design Review (CDR) 11/29/11 Order Hardware and Begin Fabrication 12/5/11

2012 CoDR Preliminary Schedule- Weekly Schedule DayTime/Description Monday1-3pm Software Team meeting Tuesday2-3pm Structures Team meeting 5-7pm Science Team meeting Wednesday2-3pm Executive Meeting Thursday4-6pm Electrical Team meeting Mon-Fri5-8pm Common working hours

2012 CoDR Budget Source of FundingAmount Composite Technology Development$24,000 UROP (Not Confirmed)~$3,000 EEF(Not Confirmed)~$2,000 Total:$29,000

2012 CoDR Additional Support We will be working in conjunction with Composite Technology Development (CTD). Our main advisors from CTD are still to be determined 28

2012 CoDR Conclusions Mission Statement To integrate and validate the Roll Out De-Orbiting Device (RODEO) developed by Composite Technology Development (CTD) and test the attitude determination system from RocketSat VII Next Steps Prepare for PDR Finalize Design 29

2012 CoDR Questions 30

2012 CoDR Refrences 1 "The Bright Future of Small Satellite Technology :: Via Satellite." Guest Edition :: Satellite Today. Web. 04 Oct Carroll, Shawn, and Chris Koehler. Rocksat-X User Guide. 8 Feb PDF. 31