ERDs for the CT extraction in the PS Proposal for a new correction scheme ERDs for the CT extraction in the PS Proposal for a new correction scheme Andrea.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Multi-Turn Extraction / L.Ducimetière / Kicker options for MTE Prepared by L.Ducimetière, L.Sermeus Outline: Reminder : Present MTE dedicated.
Advertisements

SESAME – TAC 2012: M. Attal Maher Attal SESAME Booster Characterization.
Injection and extraction
Main Linac Simulation - Main Linac Alignment Tolerances - From single bunch effect ILC-MDIR Workshop Kiyoshi KUBO References: TESLA TDR ILC-TRC-2.
Author - Title (Footer)1 LINEAR LATTICE ERRORS AT THE ESRF: MODELING AND CORRECTION A. Franchi, L. Farvacque, T. Perron.
ATF2 FB/FF layout Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group FONT meeting January 11, 2007.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 IR Upgrade M. Sullivan 1 PEP-II Interaction Region Upgrade M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory Workshop Hawaii.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
E.Benedetto, 30/05/13, LIU-PSB Meeting, PSB chicane magnets: Inconel chamber PSB H- chicane magnets: Inconel vacuum chamber option & consequences on beam.
Linac4 Beam Commissioning Committee PSB Beam Optics and Painting Schemes 9 th December 2010 Beam Optics and Painting Schemes C. Bracco, C. Carli, B. Goddard,
Sergey Antipov, University of Chicago Fermilab Mentor: Sergei Nagaitsev Injection to IOTA ring.
MG - MTE Workshop 24/09/20101 Measurements’ analysis S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Newman Introduction Techniques, tools Results (selected) Outlook.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
ATF2 Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group 5th ATF2 project meeting, KEK December 19-21, 2007.
1 EPIC SIMULATIONS V.S. Morozov, Y.S. Derbenev Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility A. Afanasev Hampton University R.P. Johnson Muons, Inc. Operated.
EMMA Horizontal and Vertical Corrector Study David Kelliher ASTEC/CCLRC/RAL 14th April, 2007.
Adiabatic eRHIC Extraction June 3, 2015Stephen Brooks, eRHIC meeting1 With emittance growth analysis.
Extraction from the Delivery Ring November 19, 2013 J. Morgan.
“Beam Losses” Christian Carli PSB H - Injection Review, 9 th November 2011 Several topics more or less related to beam losses, a study still somewhat at.
1 st September 2005LHC-LUMI 05 - G.Arduini – CERN/AB Optical requirements for the magnetic lattice of the high energy injectors (SSPS in the SPS tunnel)
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS OF NICA ACCELERATOR COMPLEX Tuzikov A., JINR, Dubna, Russia.
Design of the Turnaround Loops for the Drive Beam Decelerators R. Apsimon, J. Esberg CERN, Switzerland.
MTE vs CT D.Manglunki for BE/OP - pictures from M.Giovannozzi - details in “Fifty years of the CERN Proton Synchrotron (Vol I)” CERN
PS losses during CT extraction, a history about 30 year long... J. Barranco, S. Gilardoni CERN - AB/ABP.
1 EMMA Tracking Studies Shinji Machida ASTeC/CCLRC/RAL 4 January, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Status of ATF Fast Kicker Experiment
E.Benedetto, 1/07/13, LIS Meeting, PSB chicane magnets: Inconel chamber PSB H- chicane magnets: Inconel vacuum chamber option & consequences on beam dynamics.
MG - APC meeting 29/02/20081 MTE commissioning strategy and requirements M. Giovannozzi What is needed to implement MTE ScheduleCommissioning Acknowledgements:
Preliminary Design of Electron Beam line F. Velotti, C. Bracco, B. Goddard and M. Meddahi.
PSB H- injection concept J.Borburgh, C.Bracco, C.Carli, B.Goddard, M.Hourican, B.Mikulec, W.Weterings,
FFAG’ J. Pasternak, IC London/RAL Proton acceleration using FFAGs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.
FFAG’07 GrenobleJ. Pasternak, LPSC Grenoble Medical Spiral FFAG (RACCAM Ring) J. Pasternak, LPSC Grenoble 1.Motivations for medical FFAG. 2.Principle of.
Interaction Region Design and Detector Integration V.S. Morozov for EIC Study Group at JLAB 2 nd Mini-Workshop on MEIC Interaction Region Design JLab,
LER Workshop, Oct 11, 2006Intensity Increase in the LER – T. Sen1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac  Motivation  Slip stacking in the.
14/01/2005M. Giovannozzi - PS-SPS Days1 When can we have a clean Multiturn Extraction from the PS? M. Giovannozzi M. GiovannozziContentIntroduction Summary.
Beam loss and radiation in the SPS for higher intensities and injection energy G. Arduini 20 th November 2007 Acknowledgments: E. Shaposhnikova and all.
F Project X: Recycler 8.9 GeV/c Extraction D. Johnson, E. Prebys, M. Martens, J. Johnstone Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee August 8, 2007 D. Johnson.
Accumulator & Compressor Rings with Flexible Momentum Compaction arccells MAP 2014 Spring Meeting, Fermilab, May 27-31, 2014 Y. Alexahin (FNAL APC)
MTE commissioning status S. Gilardoni, BE/ABP With C. Hernalsteens and M. Giovannozzi.
Beam transfer considerations for LAGUNA Angelina Parfenova, W. Bartmann, L. Ducimetiere, B. Goddard, V.Kain, M.A. Kowalska, M. Meddahi, B. Puccio, F. Velotti.
2nd ATF2 Project Meeting (May 30, 2006)M. Woodley [SLAC]1 ATF2 Layout/Optics (v3.3) nBPM (SLAC) nBPM (KEK) FONT Compton / laserwire ODR Existing ATF Extraction.
HP-PS beam acceleration and machine circumference A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13 On behalf of HP-PS design team.
J-Parc Neutrino Facility Primary Proton Beam Design A. K. Ichikawa(KEK), Y.Iwamoto(KEK) and K.Tanabe(Tokyo) et.al. 7 th Nov. 2003,
PS2 WG Injection and extraction systems Basics and assumptions
CT Hardware Overview and Issues
Options and Recommendations for TL and Dumps
Multi-Turn Extraction studies and PTC
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
PSB-PS instrumentation for LIU
Multiturn extraction for PS2
Beam Injection and Extraction Scheme
Strip-line Kicker R&D at KEK-ATF
CNGS Primary Beam Results 2010
Fast Kicker R&D at ATF T.Naito(KEK) TILC09 18/April/ /11/27.
CNGS Proton beam line: news since NBI2002 OUTLINE 1. Overview
PS2 Injection/Extraction Layout
Multi-Turn Extraction for PS2 Preliminary considerations
Impact of short dipoles on PSB performance (status)
Linear and non-linear PS optics: MAD8, MADX, PTC and pole-face angles
Simulation of the FCC-ee lattice with quadrupole and sextupole misalignments Sergey Sinyatkin.
Optics Measurements in the PSB
Simulation of Multiturn Injection into SIS-18
GROUP 12 CAS – Erice - March 2017 Andrea DE FRANCO
PSB magnetic cycle 900 ms MeV to 2 GeV
Linear beam dynamics simulations for XFEL beam distribution system
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin Y. Nosochkov (SLAC), M-H. Wang
Integration of Detector Solenoid into the JLEIC ion collider ring
Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting Work summary Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting
Presentation transcript:

ERDs for the CT extraction in the PS Proposal for a new correction scheme ERDs for the CT extraction in the PS Proposal for a new correction scheme Andrea Franchi Andrea Franchi G. Arduini, O. E. Berrig, S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Martini G. Arduini, O. E. Berrig, S. Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, M. Martini APC 30 March 2007

Outline 1. Overview and motivations 2. Present correction scheme 3. Principle of the new correction scheme (proposal) 4. Application manual 5. Summary & conclusion

Overview:the CT extraction × Fixed-target experiments × CNGS ×

Overview:the CT extraction × Q x = 6.25 => 90º rot./turn × The el. septum in SS31 shave hor.the beam × Each slice enters in the ma. septum in SS16 & is ejected ×

Overview:the CT extraction × Q x = 6.25 => 90º rot./turn × The el. septum in SS31 shave hor.the beam × Each slice enters in the ma. septum in SS16 & is ejected × [MTE extr ~ CT extr.]

Overview:the CT extraction × Qx =6.25 => 90º rot. × The el. septum in SS31 shave hor.the beam × Each slice enters in the ma. septum in SS16 & is ejected × × The centroids in (X,PX) of the ejected islands are not the same!!! × 3 skew quads in TT10 exchange the transv. emittances × Result: the beamlets are injected in the SPS with a vertical offset × Result: vertical emittance blow up ∝ ∆y 2

Present correction scheme 1. The orbit averaged over the 5 turns is corrected with 3 BHZs

Present correction scheme 1. The orbit averaged over the 5 turns is corrected with 3 BHZs 2. The 2 ERDs (1 pedestal + 1 staircase=turn by turn) can correct the orbit of each beamlet

Present correction scheme Constraints 1. The 2 kickers are next to each other => only the angle PX can be corrected (vertical arrows in the picture) 2. The kicker voltage can be only positive => beamlets with positive angle the entrance of the ERDs cannot be corrected

Present correction scheme Constraints 1. The 2 kickers are next to each other => only the angle PX can be corrected (vertical arrows in the picture) 2. The kicker voltage can be only positive => beamlets with positive angle the entrance of the ERDs cannot be corrected

New correction scheme (principle) 1. The 2 nd kicker (ERD2) has been moved ~ 20 m downstream the ERD1 (~70° phase advance) => correction in angle & position 70° phase advance is a trade off between the best “angle & position” correction (90°) and aperture constraints

New correction scheme (principle) 1. The 2 nd kicker (ERD2) has been moved ~ 20 m downstream the ERD1 (~70° phase advance) => correction in angle & position 2. To overcome the V>0 limit, the beam is displaced with the BHZs => the largest ERD1 is ~ zero ERD1

New correction scheme (principle) 1. The 2 nd kicker (ERD2) has been moved ~ 20 m downstream the ERD1 (~70° phase advance) => correction in momentum & position 2. To overcome the V>0 limit, the beam is displaced with the BHZs => the largest momentum ERD1 is ~ zero 3. The ERD2 impart a turn-by- turn variable kick and reduce the “spread”

New correction scheme (principle) 1. The 2 nd kicker (ERD2) has been moved ~ 20 m downstream the ERD1 (~70° phase advance) => correction in angle & position 2. To overcome the V>0 limit, the beam is displaced with the BHZs => the largest ERD1 is ~ zero 3. The ERD2 impart a turn-by- turn variable kick and reduce the “spread” 4. 3 Bending magnets (BHZ377 & MAL1001s) downstream the ERDs are used to correct the “average” trajectory

New correction scheme (principle) 1. The 2 nd kicker (ERD2) has been moved ~ 20 m downstream the ERD1 (~70° phase advance) => correction in angle & position 2. To overcome the V>0 limit, the beam is displaced with the BHZs => the largest ERD1 is ~ zero 3. The ERD2 impart a turn-by- turn variable kick and reduce the “spread” 4. 3 Bending magnets (BHZ377 & MAL1001s) downstream the ERDs are used to correct the “average” trajectory

Application manual 1. Measure the vertical beamlet positions in the SPS right after the injection (First-Turn option)

Application manual 2. Infer the initial conditions (X,X’) at the beginning of TT2 that best reproduce the measured SPS values

Application manual 3. Launch a routine that, given the TT2-TT10 setting and the initial conditions of the 5 beamlets/slice, find the best corrector setting (BHZs,ERDs,MAL1001) # BEST CORRECTOR SETTING: SUMMARY INITIAL (X,PX) SLICE 1 : E E-05 INITIAL (X,PX) SLICE 2 : E E-03 INITIAL (X,PX) SLICE 3 : E E-04 INITIAL (X,PX) SLICE 4 : E E-04 INITIAL (X,PX) SLICE 5 : E E-03 INITIAL SPREAD [Cour-Sny] : E-03 OFFSET [Cour-Sny] : E-03 ******************* STEERERS ************************* BEST BHZ117 correction [A,mrad] : E-03 BEST BHZ147 correction [A,mrad] : E-03 BEST BHZ167 correction [A,mrad] : E-03 BEST BHZ377 correction [A,mrad] : E-04 BEST MAL correction [mrad] : E-03 ********************* ERD ************************** BEST DFA242 setting [kV,mrad] : E-03 START FROM SLICE # 5 BEST DFA243-1 setting [kV,mrad] : E-03 BEST DFA243-2 setting [kV,mrad] : E-03 BEST DFA243-3 setting [kV,mrad] : E-03 BEST DFA243-4 setting [kV,mrad] : E-03 BEST DFA243-5 setting [kV,mrad] : E-03 ****************************************************** FINAL (X,PX) SLICE : E E-04 FINAL (X,PX) SLICE : E E-04 FINAL (X,PX) SLICE : E E-04 FINAL (X,PX) SLICE : E E-04 FINAL (X,PX) SLICE : E E-04 FINAL SPREAD [Cour-Sny] : E-03 OFFSET [Cour-Sny] : E-04

Application manual 4. Run MADX with the same initial conditions of before and the new setting, and check the vertical offset } ∆y ~ 2mm } ∆y ~ 6mm Emittance blow up reduced by a factor ~(2/6) 2 =1/9 [in absence of TFB]

New correction scheme The correction, even on the paper, cannot be perfect! 1. ERD1 will remain pedestal (constant Vs time) until } } ∆y ~ 6mm ∆y ~ 2mm Emittance blow up reduced by a factor ~(2/6) 2 =1/9 [in absence of TFB]

New correction scheme The correction, even on the paper, cannot be perfect! 1. ERD1 will remain pedestal (constant Vs time) until ERDs staircase: turn by turn the voltage can be either increased or left at the same value (± 10%). 4 th & 5 th turns must have the same voltage (to avoid mismatch of the rise time with the PS kickers)

New correction scheme The correction, even on the paper, cannot be perfect! 1. ERD1 will remain pedestal (constant Vs time) until ERDs staircase: turn by turn the voltage can be either increased or left at the same value (± 10%). 4 th & 5 th turns must have the same voltage 3. The max. offset that the BHZs may create upstream the ERDs is limited by the pipe aperture & by the maximum kicker voltage (30 kV)

The correction, even on the paper, cannot be perfect! 1. ERD1 will remain pedestal (constant Vs time) until ERDs staircase: turn by turn the voltage can be either increased or left at the same value (± 10%) 3. The Pipe aperture and the max kicker voltage (30 kV) limit the maximum offset that the BHZs can create upstream th ERDs New correction scheme Horizontal clearance In this example, the displacement upstream the ERDs leads to a clearance reduction of ~1σ ε x(RMS,unorm)=0.5 μm [CNGS,h.i.]

New correction scheme The correction, even on the paper, cannot be perfect! 1. ERD1 will remain pedestal (constant Vs time) until ERDs staircase: turn by turn the voltage can be either increased or left at the same value (± 10%) 3. The max. offset that the BHZs may create upstream the ERDs is limited by the pipe aperture & by the maximum kicker voltage (30 kV) 4. The routine is model dependent => a by-hand trimming in CCC would be necessary.

New correction scheme OUTLOOK 1. The scheme would be applicable to the MTE too 2. From 2009 the ERD1 will also be staircase => more flexibility.

Summary & conclusion 1. The slice/beamlets extracted with the CT (& MTE) enter in TT2 with a slice-dependent horizontal offset, that leads to a vertical emittance blow up in the SPS if not corrected. 2. The BHZs are used to correct the global trajectory, while two ERD kickers (1 pedestal & 1 staircase) are used to steer the beamlets individually => vertical offset in the SPS ~ 6 mm (measur. 2006) 3. A new correction scheme has been proposed => vertical offset in the SPS ~ 2 mm (simulations), emittance blow up reduced of a factor ~9. 4. This scheme shall be tested during the 2007 run, to check its effectiveness.