Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop1 L1 Configuration and Future Prospects DCZ cuts and new GLT objects L1 rate diagnosis Can an improved.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

EMCal Jet Trigger Analysis for ALICE* Christopher Anson Creighton University *Supported by the U.S. DOE Office of Science.

Advertisements

Triggering on ISR Events Nicolas Berger BaBar Online/DAQ/Trigger Workshop December 2 nd, 2004.

STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.

UK egamma meeting, Sept 22, 2005M. Wielers, RAL1 Status of Electron Triggers Rates/eff for different triggers Check on physics channels Crack region, comparison.

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop1 Level 1 Trigger: Introduction L1 trigger objects and strategy Implementation features L1 composition.

 Trigger for Run 8 Rates, Yields, Backgrounds… Debasish Das Pibero Djawotho Manuel Calderon de la Barca Analysis Meeting BNL October 16, 2007.

2 photon BaBar Trigger Workshop CalTech – 2 nd Dec 2004 Jamie Boyd.

Current Status on ZHH Analysis ’08 5/31 GLD ZHH-group.

Light Dark Matter Search in B-factory O. Tajima (KEK) for Belle collaboration.

Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University Collaboration Meeting 22 nd February 2005 Update Kmu3 Branching Ratio measurement A. Dabrowski, February

Aras Papadelis, Lund University 8 th Nordic LHC Physics Workshop Nov , Lund 1 The ATLAS B-trigger - exploring a new strategy for J/  (ee) ●

Search for 7-prong  Decays Ruben Ter-Antonyan on behalf of the BaBar Collaboration Tau04 Workshop, Sep 14, 2004, Nara, Japan Outline:  Introduction 

1 Background: Use of TKR Trigger One-Shots individual TKR strip channels “true” when analog shaped pulse is above threshold. strips in a plane are OR’d.

DCZ status & results B A B AR Trigger Workshop, December 2004 Jamie Boyd University of Bristol for the Trigger Upgrade Group.

Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.

Kevin Black Meenakshi Narain Boston University

Daniele Benedetti CMS and University of Perugia Chicago 07/02/2004 High Level Trigger for the ttH channel in fully hadronic decay at LHC with the CMS detector.

TAU-04, NARA 1 First steps to radiative return studies at Belle B.A.Shwartz BINP, Novosibirsk.

Dec 2005Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 Improving MuCal Design o Why we need an improved design o Improvement Principle o Quick Simulation, Analysis & Results.

1 N. Davidson, E. Barberio E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias event Hadronic Calibration Workshop 26 th -27 th April 2007.

1 BaBar Collaboration Randall Sobie Institute for Particle Physics University of Victoria.

Preliminary Measurement of the BF(   → K -  0  ) using the B A B AR Detector Fabrizio Salvatore Royal Holloway University of London for the B A B AR.

STAR J/  Simulations for RUN III Manuel Calderon for the Heavy-Flavor Group Analysis Meeting at BNL October 23, 2002.

Study of e + e  collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar Michel Davier (LAL-Orsay) for the BaBar collaboration TM.

Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University NA48/2 Semileptonics Meeting 22 nd February 2005 Update Kmu3 Branching Ratio measurement A. Dabrowski, February.

February 19th 2009AlbaNova Instrumentation Seminar1 Christian Bohm Instrumentation Physics, SU Upgrading the ATLAS detector Overview Motivation The current.

The SLHC and the Challenges of the CMS Upgrade William Ferguson First year seminar March 2 nd

Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.

Outline: (1) The data sample (2) Some news on the analysis method (3) Efficiency revised (4) Background revised (5) Data: spectrum + “phi-curve”

Progress on H/Abb -> 4b’s channel for the FTK physics case ~ 4jets Trigger w/ and w/o FTK ~ Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK.

Z AND W PHYSICS AT CEPC Haijun Yang, Hengne Li, Qiang Li, Jun Guo, Manqi Ruan, Yusheng Wu, Zhijun Liang 1.

N  for 2012 Zhiyong Wang May, 12,2015 Charmonium group meeting 1.

Studying Very Light Gravitino at ILC Ryo Katayama (Tokyo) Collaborators: Shigeki Matsumoto (IPMU), T. Moroi (Tokyo), K. Fujii (KEK), T. Suehara (ICEPP),T.

Ivan Smiljanić Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia Energy resolution and scale requirements for luminosity measurement.

Anne Dabrowski 26 February Semileptonic Analysis from Low Intensity Run Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University NA48 Collaboration Meeting 26 February.

IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –

1 Lead glass simulations Eliane Epple, TU Munich Kirill Lapidus, INR Moscow Collaboration Meeting XXI March 2010 GSI.

HFT-prototype BUR considerations for Run-13 The main goal of the HFT engineering run will be system verification and correction; this includes the study.

B.G.Cheon Mini-Trigger/DAQ workshop,OCU ECL Trigger overview ByungGu Cheon (SKKU) Outline  ECL calorimeter  ECL trigger scheme & performance.

STAR J/  Trigger in dA Manuel Calderon for the Heavy-Flavor Group Trigger Workshop at BNL October 21, 2002.

Ted Liu, July 5,00, idea on Ztrigger L1 Trigger Strategy L1 Trigger Requirements and Trigger Lines L1 Trigger performance Background Study Improving Performance:

25 Apr 00jpg1 Games with Trigger Tables Sarah Eno.

Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.

1 S, Fedele, Student Presentations, 2004/08/04S Amazing Title Slide Reworking the CES Cluster Reconstruction Algorithm By: Steve Fedele Advisor: Pavel.

Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.

LAV efficiency studies with photons T. Spadaro* *Frascati National Laboratory of INFN.

FCAL Workshop Munich -17 October 2006FCAL Workshop Munchen -17 October 2006 Four-fermion processes as a background in the luminosity calorimeter M.Pandurović.

Photon purity measurement on JF17 Di jet sample using Direct photon working Group ntuple Z.Liang (Academia Sinica,TaiWan) 6/24/20161.

Overview B A B AR L1 DCT Upgrade FDR Masahiro Morii Harvard University Scope of the Project Current Status Schedule  Commissioning.

Analysis Meeting, November 9-11, 2003 Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez Heavy Flavor Working Group Heavy Flavor in ‘04: Prospects for J/ . Heavy.

Direct Photon v 2 Study in 200 GeV AuAu Collisions at RHIC Guoji Lin (Yale) For STAR Collaboration RHIC & AGS Users’ Meeting, BNL, June 5-9.

Electron Trigger in PHENIX Kenta Shigaki (KEK) at PHENIX Heavy Flavor and Light Vector Meson Physics Working Group Meeting on March 9, 2000.

Matteo Negrini Frascati, Jan 19, 2006

Mini-Trigger/DAQ workshop,OCU

Nick Markov, UCONN Valery Kubarovsky, JLAB

Stop->4 bodies signal samples with 2 leptons in final state

PCAL Cosmic Ray Tests Progress Report C. Smith μ U V W MODULE 2

Special edition: Farewell for Valerie Halyo

L1 Trigger Strategy Ted Liu, Lawrence Berkeley Lab

The role of PS/SPD in the LHCb trigger

Special edition: Farewell for Stephen Bailey

Special edition: Farewell for Eunil Won

Parasitic Run Physics Simulations

Trigger Background Experience & Predictions

Update on LHCb Level-1 trigger

The Glt Simulation Valerie Halyo.

New Ideas on long-term DCT upgrade: conceptual design for DOCAZ

Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of Chicago

Electron PID & trigger using EMCal

Reconstruction and calibration strategies for the LHCb RICH detector

Presentation transcript:

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop1 L1 Configuration and Future Prospects DCZ cuts and new GLT objects L1 rate diagnosis Can an improved EMT help ? Bhabha veto at Level 1 ? Su Dong

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop2 Perceptions, Questions and Desires We should at least maintain our current physics efficiency while trying to reduce L1 rate. The rate dominating 2 particle triggers are not sustainable by EMT and is mainly carried by DCT. Can we make them pure DCT and even open up kinematics ? (gain kinematically and shave geometrically with DCZ is a favorable trade off). EMT E,G,Y with higher energy cuts are quite robust against background, but what does G serve particularly ? While DCZ is reducing track triggers, what about EMT ? In particular the 3M related triggers ?

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop3 GLT Trigger Object Changes There are 17 GLT trigger objects for forming the trigger lines. The current first attempt in incorporating DCZ: Old DCT: A’,AM,BM,A’M,BMX replaced by New DCZ: Z’, Z, Zt, Zk, EZ The EZ object is E and Z back-back for e.g. ISR events. The match objects are considered expendable as the matching was primarily used as an effective Pt cut (takes 250 MeV Pt to reach EMC). DCZ ZPD objects have controllable Pt cuts in themselves. This is a first attempt. We may well end up deciding on something different. It’s a fairly localized GLT firmware change.

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop4 ZPD single track efficiency from 2-prong events

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop5 ZPD single track efficiency in hadronic events. Fortunately we normally only need 1 or 2 tracks among many. Z cut range at 10-15cm as expected from design simulation.

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop6 L1 Rate with Trial DCZ Config Significant changes: Old New 3A&B* 3B&2A&2Z B*&1A&1A’ B*&1A&1Z’ 2M&1A&1A’ 2M&1A&1Z’ 2BM&2M 2Zt&1A/2 M*&1B/4 M*&1Z 1Z alone is ~10Khz ?

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop7 L1 Trigger Rate with Trial DCZ Config For L1 triggers rejected by L3 ( and not firing L3 Bhabha script )

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop8 Compare with DCZ design simulation study CDR study Sep/01. Simple 1Z cut 2-prong reduction close to expectation, but 3-prong reduction is less in data ?

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop9 EMT Trigger Issues E,G signals and 4M are resilient to background. Can we do something to the 3M related lines ? If we had 3D EMT clusters instead of  strips, would that push some physics 3M to 4M ? A brief look was done sometime ago and surprisingly not that much. 3M is actually taking a wide mixture of physics: hadrons, tau, radiative Bhabha/mu etc. so that anything serious on this needs careful study.

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop10 L1 Bhabha Veto ? The L1 fiducial Bhabha is ~53nb. This is 500Hz at 10 34, 1.5Khz at 3x It’s worth considering once past 1.5-2x A study was done ~ 2 years ago: –Steal EMT G = a  strip Esum>2.4 GeV signal –1-prong veto: nG=1 & nY=1 & 1<=nM<=2 & nA’=1 & nA=1 & nB=1 & nBM=1 –2-prong veto: nG*=1 & nM=2 & nB=2 & nB*>0 & nBM=2 & nAp>0 (can probably do better still with more plays of cuts) - Only apply veto to 2 particle L1 lines There is at least means of firmware this down in GLT decision FPGAs.

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop11 Not too bad but more careful looks for more physics channel. The L3 and Lumi bookkeeping will also be complicated.

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop12 Summary L1 configuration study using DCZ just starting and the ZPD tracks will be the main hope for background reduction. Some work is needed in deciding what can be done to the EMT 3M related triggers. There is a reasonable prospect for vetoing Bhabhas at L1, but only worth doing at very high luminosity. There are other improvements such as TSf lookup table calibration should also be explored.