Stripping Plans for 2014 and 2015 Laurence Carson (Edinburgh), Stefano Perazzini (Bologna) 2 nd LHCb Computing Workshop, 07.11.13.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Michigan State University 4/15/ Simulation for Level 2 James T. Linnemann Michigan State University NIU Triggering Workshop October 17, 1997.
Advertisements

STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.
1 The ATLAS Missing E T trigger Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University of Oxford On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University.
24 September 2002Paul Dauncey1 Trigger issues for the CALICE beam test Paul Dauncey Imperial College London, UK.
June 6 th, 2011 N. Cartiglia 1 “Measurement of the pp inelastic cross section using pile-up events with the CMS detector” How to use pile-up.
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ Beauty 2005 in Assisi, June 2005 Sascha Caron for the DØ collaboration Tag beauty fast …
ATLAS Analysis Model. Introduction On Feb 11, 2008 the Analysis Model Forum published a report (D. Costanzo, I. Hinchliffe, S. Menke, ATL- GEN-INT )
Large scale data flow in local and GRID environment V.Kolosov, I.Korolko, S.Makarychev ITEP Moscow.
DaVinci status Juan Palacios LHCb Software Week March, 2009.
Introduction to the workshop LHCb Generators Tuning Mini Workshop Bucharest 22 nd & 23 rd November 2012 LHCb Generators Tuning Mini Workshop Bucharest.
Ji Hyun Kim Korea University. Introduction Results of Trigger Study – Event generation – Trigger efficiency Trigger rates and Statistics 25 – 26 Sep.
Mark Thomson Timing, Tungsten and High Energy Jets.
Implementing a dual readout calorimeter in SLIC and testing Geant4 Physics Hans Wenzel Fermilab Friday, 2 nd October 2009 ALCPG 2009.
Level 3 Muon Software Paul Balm Muon Vertical Review May 22, 2000.
David N. Brown Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Representing the BaBar Collaboration The BaBar Mini  BaBar  BaBar’s Data Formats  Design of the Mini 
Event Generator Event Generators Information needed Event Generator Information Event Kinematic Information Generated Event Structure – generated particles.
Event Data History David Adams BNL Atlas Software Week December 2001.
9 February 2000CHEP2000 Paper 3681 CDF Data Handling: Resource Management and Tests E.Buckley-Geer, S.Lammel, F.Ratnikov, T.Watts Hardware and Resources.
Introduction Advantages/ disadvantages Code examples Speed Summary Running on the AOD Analysis Platforms 1/11/2007 Andrew Mehta.
Studies of the jet fragmentation in p+p collisions in STAR Elena Bruna Yale University STAR Collaboration meeting, June
24/06/03 ATLAS WeekAlexandre Solodkov1 Status of TileCal software.
1 T1-T3 in L1 algorithm  Outlook: I) Summary of L1-confirmation II) About the TrgForwardTracking package III) Confirming (preliminary)  L1-confirmation.
Kali Calo progress report Dasha Savrina (ITEP/Moscow), Vanya Belyaev.
Reconstruction Configuration with Python Chris Jones University of Cambridge.
LHCb Lausanne Workshop, 21st March /12 Tracking Software for DC’06 E. Rodrigues, NIKHEF LHCb Tracking and Alignment Workshop  To do list, and done.
LHCb VErtex LOcator & Displaced Vertex Trigger
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
Vertex finding and B-Tagging for the ATLAS Inner Detector A.H. Wildauer Universität Innsbruck CERN ATLAS Computing Group on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
PWG3 Analysis: status, experience, requests Andrea Dainese on behalf of PWG3 ALICE Offline Week, CERN, Andrea Dainese 1.
CaloTopoCluster Based Energy Flow and the Local Hadron Calibration Mark Hodgkinson June 2009 Hadronic Calibration Workshop.
David Adams ATLAS Virtual Data in ATLAS David Adams BNL May 5, 2002 US ATLAS core/grid software meeting.
David Adams ATLAS DIAL: Distributed Interactive Analysis of Large datasets David Adams BNL August 5, 2002 BNL OMEGA talk.
Overlap Removal and Timing Optimization Studies Nicole Carlson, Northwestern University 8/8/07 Supervisor: Tomasz Bold.
1 SICBDST and Brunel Migration status and plans. 2 Migration Step 1: SICBMC/SICBDST split  Last LHCb week: Split done but not tested  Software week.
Cellular Automaton Method for Track Finding (HERA-B, LHCb, CBM) Ivan Kisel Kirchhoff-Institut für Physik, Uni-Heidelberg Second FutureDAQ Workshop, GSI.
LHCbComputing LHCC status report. Operations June 2014 to September m Running jobs by activity o Montecarlo simulation continues as main activity.
STAR J/  Trigger in dA Manuel Calderon for the Heavy-Flavor Group Trigger Workshop at BNL October 21, 2002.
LHCbComputing Resources requests : changes since LHCb-PUB (March 2013) m Assume no further reprocessing of Run I data o (In.
LHCb Software Week, 26th April /23 Tracking in LHCb E. Rodrigues, NIKHEF LHCb Software Week A Status Report.
Workflows and Data Management. Workflow and DM Run3 and after: conditions m LHCb major upgrade is for Run3 (2020 horizon)! o Luminosity x 5 ( )
ATLAS Distributed Computing perspectives for Run-2 Simone Campana CERN-IT/SDC on behalf of ADC.
Predrag Buncic CERN ALICE Status Report LHCC Referee Meeting 01/12/2015.
LHCbDirac and Core Software. LHCbDirac and Core SW Core Software workshop, PhC2 Running Gaudi Applications on the Grid m Application deployment o CVMFS.
LHCbComputing Computing for the LHCb Upgrade. 2 LHCb Upgrade: goal and timescale m LHCb upgrade will be operational after LS2 (~2020) m Increase significantly.
1 Reconstruction tasks R.Shahoyan, 25/06/ Including TRD into track fit (JIRA PWGPP-1))  JIRA PWGPP-2: Code is in the release, need to switch setting.
McFarm Improvements and Re-processing Integration D. Meyer for The UTA Team DØ SAR Workshop Oklahoma University 9/26 - 9/27/2003
Living Long At the LHC G. WATTS (UW/SEATTLE/MARSEILLE) WG3: EXOTIC HIGGS FERMILAB MAY 21, 2015.
Eduardo RodriguesLHCb Collaboration Week, 26th November Studies of Generator-level Selection Eduardo Rodrigues, CERN I. Proposal II. Procedure III.
Kali Calo progress report Dasha Savrina (ITEP/Moscow), Vanya Belyaev.
LHCb Computing activities Philippe Charpentier CERN – LHCb On behalf of the LHCb Computing Group.
Analysis Model Zhengyun You University of California Irvine Mu2e Computing Review March 5-6, 2015 Mu2e-doc-5227.
David Lange Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
LHCb LHCb GRID SOLUTION TM Recent and planned changes to the LHCb computing model Marco Cattaneo, Philippe Charpentier, Peter Clarke, Stefan Roiser.
Monthly video-conference, 18/12/2003 P.Hristov1 Preparation for physics data challenge'04 P.Hristov Alice monthly off-line video-conference December 18,
LHCb Computing 2015 Q3 Report Stefan Roiser LHCC Referees Meeting 1 December 2015.
ATLAS – statements of interest (1) A degree of hierarchy between the different computing facilities, with distinct roles at each level –Event filter Online.
First collisions in LHC
The Generator Phase in Gauss
Developments of the PWG3 muon analysis code
Migration of reconstruction and analysis software to C++
H. Rème, I.Dandouras and A. Barthe IRAP, Toulouse, France
ALICE analysis preservation
LHCb Computing Model and Data Handling Angelo Carbone 5° workshop italiano sulla fisica p-p ad LHC 31st January 2008.
Philippe Charpentier CERN – LHCb On behalf of the LHCb Computing Group
Commissioning of the ALICE HLT, TPC and PHOS systems
Progress with MUON reconstruction
Issues with Simulating High Luminosities in ATLAS
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ
ATLAS DC2 & Continuous production
Presentation transcript:

Stripping Plans for 2014 and 2015 Laurence Carson (Edinburgh), Stefano Perazzini (Bologna) 2 nd LHCb Computing Workshop,

Outline Plans for re-stripping of √s=7,8TeV data in 2014 – New features in stripping framework – Including new algorithm to improve CPU performance Ideas for stripping of √s=13TeV data in 2015 Automating testing of software for stripping releases 2

Plans for Re-stripping in 2014 Current plan is to have a full re-stripping of the 2011 and 2012 pp collision data sometime in late 2014 Schedule is driven by availability of final calibrations for the calorimeters – These calibrations can be applied at the DaVinci level, so there’s no need for a reprocessing (i.e. this will still be Reco14) This stripping will be labelled Stripping21 It will provide a legacy dataset for the 2011 and 2012 data It should merge the lines of the full Stripping20(r1) with the new lines added in Stripping20rXp{1,2,3} incremental re-strippings – Replacing buggy lines with the bug-fixed incremental versions – Should have significantly less bandwidth than the sum of Stripping20 + p1 + p2 +p3, due to removal of buggy lines and increased overlap between lines 3

Developments for Stripping21 Stripping21 will benefit from a number of new features that were not present in Stripping20, allowing further bandwidth gains – Though some are/will be present in some of the incremental restrippings Persistency of flavour tagging information (on both DST and μDST) is implemented since S20rXp2. Allows some lines to move to μDST. Generic MVATool functionality is now ready (in DV v33r8, released last week). Could be tested with S20rXp3 (deadline for p3 is January 19th) Some WGs want to explore removing the raw event info from the full DST. This should shave 20-30% off of the full DST size. Would be good to test this with S20rXp3. Plans to develop MDST.DST, which is a full DST holding all of the events selected by any line on μDST. Allows quick re-generation of μDST, to e.g. add extra info. Will keep a single copy of the MDST.DST on disk. (MDST.DST won’t need to contain all of the raw event info) 4

New Algorithm for Particle Combinations There is a new set of algorithms available from Vanya, called NBodyDecays, which aims to speed up the fitting of multi-particle vertices (compared to CombineParticles). These algorithms have combination cuts for the pairs, triplets etc within the multibody vertex – This allows to kill bad combinations at an early stage The performance of this algorithm is currently being tested by Ben. First results are promising; e.g. the timing of the 4h combination in StrippingB2D0KD2HHHHBeauty2CharmLine, drops from 5.8ms/evt to 2.4ms/evt. Testing will continue, to assess the performance of the new algorithm in different lines. If we decide to use this new algorithm in a future stripping production, we need to think about how to implement the switch- over in the stripping selections at large. 5

Strippings in 2015 Intense work will be needed at the start of 2015 running to understand the performance of the trigger, reco etc at the higher energy and 25ns bunch spacing, and with the split HLT Hence the prompt stripping will initially evolve rapidly to follow the changes in the trigger and reco Also in early running, preference may be given to lines aiming to make measurements based on early 2015 data (cross-sections etc) As more data is gathered, the prompt stripping should become more stable as the trigger and reco stabilises At the end of 2015 running, all the 2015 data will be re-stripped (but not reprocessed), with a stripping that should be similar to the stabilised prompt stripping (cf Stripping19f and Stripping20 in 2012) The prompt stripping will be labelled Stripping22, and the end-of- year re-stripping Stripping23 6

Preparing for 2015 Stripping Since there will be no √s=13TeV min. bias data to test the stripping retention before collisions start, and the multiplicities and momentum/p T distributions will be different from √s=8TeV data, it will be important to have min. bias MC to tune the stripping on – How much do we trust the extrapolations of the multiplicities and p T distributions from Pythia? – Also need to worry about ccbar and bbbar cross-sections Other necessary inputs for tuning the stripping will be the expected output rate of the trigger, and the allowed bandwidth (and timing) out of the stripping. 7

Automating Testing of Stripping Software Would be advantageous, during preparation for a production release, to run tests of bandwidth, timing etc in the nightlies. With new Performance & Regression (PR) framework, the nightlies should be able to cope with long tests such as these. These tests often need a “mix & match” setup, using the head of certain packages but tagged versions of others. Not clear how to take care of this in the nightlies. For the event size tests, the output (μ)DSTs are needed. Can these be persisted anywhere? Probably don’t need to run on all possible platforms/architectures. Other issues?... 8

Summary Plan to re-strip of all 2011 & 2012 pp data in late 2014 – Create legacy dataset, taking advantage of all framework developments since Stripping20 – Possibly using new algorithm for multibody vertices Starting to think about how to handle stripping of 2015 data Would like to automate some of the pre-production stripping tests in the nightlies, if possible. 9

Backup