CAN EQUIVALENT CONTINUUM MODELS SIMULATE FLOW AND POLLUTANT TRANSPORT IN FRACTURED LIMESTONE AQUIFER? EGU 2011 HS8.2 - 1407 C. Masciopinto (1) (costantino.masciopinto@ba.irsa.cnr.it)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ali Zafarani Subsurface Processes Group University of California, Irvine.
Advertisements

Geological and Petrophysical Analysis Of Reservoir Cores
A modified Lagrangian-volumes method to simulate nonlinearly and kinetically adsorbing solute transport in heterogeneous media J.-R. de Dreuzy, Ph. Davy,
Features of POLLUSOL Flow model Flow model Homogeneous, Isotropic, Heterogeneous and Anisotropic medium Homogeneous, Isotropic, Heterogeneous and Anisotropic.
2L 2aL s h T Introduction Zach Frye, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Faculty Advisors: Mohamed Elgindi, and John Drost, Department of Mathematics Funded.
Water Movement in Soil and Rocks. Two Principles to Remember:
Ground-Water Flow and Solute Transport for the PHAST Simulator Ken Kipp and David Parkhurst.
Adnan Khan Lahore University of Management Sciences Peter Kramer Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
Peyman Mostaghimi, Martin Blunt, Branko Bijeljic 11 th January 2010, Pore-scale project meeting Direct Numerical Simulation of Transport Phenomena on Pore-space.
Problem Set 2 is based on a problem in the MT3D manual; also discussed in Z&B, p D steady state flow in a confined aquifer We want to predict.
(Z&B) Steps in Transport Modeling Calibration step (calibrate flow model & transport model) Adjust parameter values.
Subsurface Hydrology Unsaturated Zone Hydrology Groundwater Hydrology (Hydrogeology )
Modeling Fluid Flow Through Single Fractures Using Experimental, Stochastic and Simulation Approaches Dicman Alfred Masters Division.
Interdisciplinary Modeling of Aquatic Ecosystems Curriculum Development Workshop July 18, 2005 Groundwater Flow and Transport Modeling Greg Pohll Division.
HYDRUS_1D Sensitivity Analysis Limin Yang Department of Biological Engineering Sciences Washington State University.
Subsurface Hydrology Unsaturated Zone Hydrology Groundwater Hydrology (Hydrogeology )
Advection-Dispersion Equation (ADE) Assumptions 1.Equivalent porous medium (epm) (i.e., a medium with connected pore space or a densely fractured medium.
Direct and iterative sparse linear solvers applied to groundwater flow simulations Matrix Analysis and Applications October 2007.
BIOPLUME II Introduction to Solution Methods and Model Mechanics.
8. Permeability (Das, chapter 7)
Profiling Transmissivity and Contamination in Fractures Intersecting Boreholes USEPA-USGS Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2 14 January 2014 Claire Tiedeman.
Uses of Modeling A model is designed to represent reality in such a way that the modeler can do one of several things: –Quickly estimate certain aspects.
FSA Groundwater Flow and Solute Transport Model Presentation to Scottsdale Citizens Group March 19, 1999.
We greatly appreciate the support from the for this project Interpreting Mechanical Displacements During Hydromechanical Well Tests in Fractured Rock Hydromechanical.
Groundwater Flow and Transport over Larger Volumes of Rock: Cross-Hole Hydraulic and Tracer Testing USEPA-USGS Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2 14.
Problem Set 2 is based on a problem in the MT3D manual; also discussed in Z&B, p D steady state flow in a confined aquifer We want to predict.
Garey A. Fox, Ph.D., P.E., Derek M. Heeren, Michael A. Kizer, Ph.D. Oklahoma State University Evaluation of Alluvial Well Depletion Analytical Solutions.
Modelling Flow through Fractures in Porous Media Holzbecher Ekkehard Wong LiWah Litz Marie-Sophie Georg-August-University Göttingen, Geological Sciences,
Characterization of the Mammoth Cave aquifer Dr Steve Worthington Worthington Groundwater.
(Zheng and Bennett) Steps in Transport Modeling Calibration step (calibrate flow model & transport model) Adjust parameter values Traditional approach.
Dr. James M. Martin-Hayden Associate Professor Dr. James M. Martin-Hayden Associate Professor (419)
 Colloids and contaminants in a porous fractured rock  Processes Considered  Important sites and interested parties Introduction Colloid/Contaminant.
Upscaling of two-phase flow processes in CO 2 geological storage Orlando Silva (1), Insa Neuweiler 2), Marco Dentz (3,4), Jesús Carrera (3,4) and Maarten.
Formulation of the Problem of Upscaling of Solute Transport in Highly Heterogeneous Formations A. FIORI 1, I. JANKOVIC 2, G. DAGAN 3 1Dept. of Civil Engineering,
Hierarchical Modeling Linking to Science-Support Models EXAMPLE Hierarchical Modeling Linking to Science-Support Models Groundwater Modeling System RT3D.
Darcy’s Law and Flow CIVE Darcy allows an estimate of: the velocity or flow rate moving within the aquifer the average time of travel from the head.
Site Characterization Using Physical and Chemical Methodologies Kent Novakowski Queens University Kingston, ON EPA Fractured Bedrock Workshop.
Advection-Dispersion Equation (ADE)
Groundwater Jeopardy What is primary porosity? Porosity between grains
19 Basics of Mass Transport
Constructing student knowledge of mass transport through interpretation of field data x Jodi Ryder Central Michigan University vs x.
Working With Simple Models to Predict Contaminant Migration Matt Small U.S. EPA, Region 9, Underground Storage Tanks Program Office.
Earth Sciences Sector Groundwater Mapping 1 GROUNDWATER MODELLING: FROM GEOLOGY TO HYDROGEOLOGY Alfonso Rivera Chief Hydrogeologist Geological Survey of.
Presented by Tanzina Rahman July 25, 2013 SiViRT Student Meeting Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Texas at San Antonio Modeling.
Tracers for Flow and Mass Transport
FLOW THROUGH GRANULAR BEDS AND PACKED COLUMN
Final Project I. Calibration Drawdown Prediction Particle Tracking
Types of Models Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology.
Abstract The spread of antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB) in environmental systems could lead to significant health concerns. A coastal aquifer in southern.
(Z&B) Steps in Transport Modeling Calibration step (calibrate flow & transport model) Adjust parameter values Design conceptual model Assess uncertainty.
HONR 297 Environmental Models
February 13-15, 2006 Hydromechanical modeling of fractured crystalline reservoirs hydraulically stimulated S. Gentier*, X. Rachez**, A. Blaisonneau*,
DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS SECTION 5.
1 Groundwater Modeling. 2 Introduction 3 Lecture Outline What Is A Model? Modeling Axioms Guiding Thoughts and Protocol Governing Equations Practical.
HONR 297 Environmental Models
Chitsan Lin, Sheng-Yu Chen Department of Marine Environmental Engineering, National Kaohsiung Marine University, Kaohsiung 81157, Taiwan / 05 / 25.
AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY DESIGN CONCEPTS- KEYS TO SUCCESS Thomas M. Missimer, Ph.D. Missimer Groundwater Science, A Schlumberger Company Fort Myers,
Groundwater movement Objective To be able to calculate the hydraulic conductivity of a sample given measurements from a permeameter To be able to evaluate.
Solute transport in sediments Physical properties Transport: Diffusion “Irrigation” Advection.
CHAPTER 2 MASS BALANCE and APPLICATION
A Brief Introduction to Groundwater Modeling
Groundwater movement Objective
Experimental evidences on the scaling behavior of a sandy porous media
Uses of Modeling A model is designed to represent reality in such a way that the modeler can do one of several things: Quickly estimate certain aspects.
Advection-Dispersion Equation (ADE)
Specify domain’s starting fluid composition on the Initial pane
Determining Hydraulic Conductivity
Transport Modeling in Groundwater
Transport Modeling in Groundwater
Characterization of the Mammoth Cave aquifer
Presentation transcript:

CAN EQUIVALENT CONTINUUM MODELS SIMULATE FLOW AND POLLUTANT TRANSPORT IN FRACTURED LIMESTONE AQUIFER? EGU 2011 HS8.2 - 1407 C. Masciopinto (1) (costantino.masciopinto@ba.irsa.cnr.it) and D. Palmiotta (1,2) (domenico.palmiotta@ba.irsa.cnr.it) (1) Water Research Institute of National Research Council, IRSA-CNR , Bari, Italy – (2) Polytechnic University of Bari, Italy INTRODUCTION NAVIER–STOKES SOLUTIONS Pumping tracer test Model predictions of flow and pollutant transport in fractured rocks are subject to uncertainties due to imprecise knowledge of the position, orientation, length, aperture and density of the fractures. These properties are difficult to quantify precisely because fractures are located in depth in subsoil and, generally, tectonic and stratigraphic studies may provide only fracture frequency and their orientation. The use of the “equivalent” continuum models might help hydro-geologists to solve flow and pollutant transport problems in fractured aquifers, when fracture properties are unknown. Test results have shown a delay of velocity estimated using continuum models, with respect to the discrete model, that decreases by increasing the hydraulic conductivity of the limestone aquifer under consideration. Maximum discrepancies have been noted for conductivity (< 10-4 m/s) typically associated with non - karst limestone aquifers. The tortuosity has been then included into the codes in order to address flow velocity calculations in numerical codes, such as MT3DMS (Zheng, C. 2010). The known analytical solutions of the NS equations can be defined in very simplified conceptual models (Figure 2), under laminar flow. The presented (Figure 2) conceptual models assume that matrix blocks are impermeable and, similarly to MT3DMS, contain a dual domain mathematical representation to approximate the effects of a fast system (fractures) and an immobile system (rock matrix). Schematic cross-section in the fractured limestone of the tested area IHS output Calcarenite di Gravina p.c. - 4 m -34 m -54 m (Cretaceous) Calcare di Bari Jurassic fractured dolomite 16.2 m above sea Chlorophyll well #C C/Cmax Modified MT3DMS 72.5 L/s 2.2 m above sea p.c. 0.3 m MT3DMS Injection well #E Tracer: chlorophyll V: 200 L of solution C: 0.5 g/L Time (min) 20 m Figure 5. Tracer breakthrough curve and expected concentrations given by IHS (Masciopinto et al., 2008), MT3DMS and MT3DMS modified codes Figure 3. Stratigraphic section of the study area Figure 4. Study area of the field test in Bari (IRSA-CNR) Figure 2. Conceptual model Case test of the Bari contaminated site (Southern Italy) Apparent pollutant pathways Total phenols (mg/L) Contour heads (m) during winter 2002 Contour heads (m) during winter 2002 in an equivalent porous media IHS Tortuosity: 0.24 These equations provide different water velocities when a set of parallel fractures is modified in an "equivalent" tube model, by reducing size of the tube diameter and increasing the tube number. When the conceptual model of groundwater is not properly selected velocity underestimation will occur. MT3DMS modified 92 m/d Water velocity scale: 3.5 m/d Water velocity scale: MT3DMS Total phenols (26.7 mg/L) during 2004 in the sampled groundwater from well PT1 PT1 35 m/d pz3 0.3 m/d PT1 pz7 Pollution sources Observation Wells Monitored Wells Dispersivity: 10m s19 s19 pz1 pz1 and by USING TORTUOSITY… STUDY AREA Time (d) Figure 6. Apparent contaminant pathways (outputs) using IHS and the particle tracking code. Figure 7. Velocity vectors derived from MODFLOW An improvement of the fissure model has been achieved. By including a tortuosity factor  [-] to define b and δch [L], i.e. the apparent enlarged fissure aperture or tube size, as Figure. 8 Expected (model) outputs and observed concentrations during winter 2004 in well PT1 at the contaminated site with conductivity 0.01 cm/s, porosity 0.003 and tortuosity 0.24. Bari TORTUOSITY/CONDUCTIVITY RELATIONSHIP CONCLUSIONS Conductivities of fractured limestone aquifers (m/s) Tortuosity (-) Walkerton, Ontario (CANADA) Bari (ITALY) gasification site Bari - IRSA West – Central Florida (USA) Barton Springs, Texas (USA) As the best conceptual model must reproduce the fissure geometry (i.e. apertures, number, orientation, etc.) of the real medium as closely as possible, tortuosity must be included in conductive tube models in order to explain groundwater velocities. By using tortuosity in conductive tubes, underestimations of groundwater velocities in an equivalent continuum model (i.e. porous medium) can be eliminated. Successful simulations of flow and pollutant transport have been carried out at the Bari fractured aquifers by using tortuosity. k: permeability n: porosity The tortuosity is a fundamental parameter in describing the complexity of the path-line of water flow propagating within a single fracture or a porous medium. That tortuous paths play an important role in affecting flow in a rough fractures was experienced by Tsang (1984). An improved solution of MT3DMS was obtained by introducing the tortuosity. Calcarenite di Gravina (Lower Pliocene) Calcare di Bari (Cretaceous) Masciopinto, C., La Mantia, R. and C.V. Chrysikopoulos 2008. Fate and transport of pathogens in a fractured aquifer in the Salento area, Italy. Water Resources Research, 44, W01404,doi:10.1029/2006WR005643. Alluvial deposits (sand) REFERENCES Tsang, Y. W. 1984. The effect of tortuosity on fluid flow through a single fracture. Water resources research, 20 (9), 1209-1215. Lame roads railroad Figure 8. Best-fit of  values obtained by comparing the results of tracer tests in some fractured limestone aquifers Zheng, C. 2010. MT3DMS v 5.3: Modular three-dimensional multispecies transport model for simulation of advection, dispersion and chemical reactions of contaminants in groundwater systems Supplemental User’s Guide. Department of Geological Sciences, The University of Alabama Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487, Technical Report, February 2010. Figure 1. Study area