Shale Gas Drilling County-wide SURFACE DRILLING CONSTRAINTS SPATIAL ANALYSIS EXERCISE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Nicole Carlozo NOAA Coastal Management Fellow June 7, 2013 Integrating Water Quality and Coastal Resources into Marine Spatial Planning in the Chesapeake.
Advertisements

Well Permitting & Approvals
Maps Tell Us About Where We Live
Module 2: Bioretention Area Siting and Design Andy Rowe, PE, LEED AP, QSD Cannon.
State Waters and Stream Buffers
Introduction to Reviewing Development Projects: Case Scenarios Thursday, June 25, 2009 Sullivan County Division of Planning and Environmental Management.
Chesapeake Bay Commission Meeting November 8, 2012 Vienna Community Center Protecting the Nanticoke River: Saving the Landscape Tim Brower Land Acquisition.
Stream Corridors Christine Hall Natural Resources Conservation Service North Jersey RC&D Slides 1-12.
Wetland Critical Areas - Draft Ordinance Overview 18.20: Definitions Many new definitions added for clarity when used in the regulations and several unnecessary.
Paradise Preserved: Springs Protection In Wakulla County.
Stormwater, Wellhead Protection and Drainage Issues Public Hearing.
Draft Kane County 2040 Green Infrastructure Plan Energy and Environment Committee November 14, 2013.
Best Local Land Use Practices A Project of the Ohio Lake Erie Commission The Countryside Program, Levin College of Urban Affairs Kirby Date, AICP Coordinator.
Shale Gas Drilling Deep Creek watershed SURFACE DRILLING CONSTRAINTS SPATIAL ANALYSIS EXERCISE.
State of Water: Minnesota’s Lakes, Rivers and Wetlands John Jaschke Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Nov 13, 2014.
Lecture 3: Vector Data Analysis Jianfei Chen School of Geographical Sciences GuangZhou University GuangZhou, China
Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission ZOS Location Map Feet.
Single Family Development in City of Austin Since Passage of Watershed Regulations Neighborhood Planning and Zoning Department April, 2008.
Every Acre Counts The Newfound Watershed Master Plan Land Conservation Priorities In the Newfound Lake Watershed January 23, 2015 Dan Sundquist GreenFire.
Site Scale Planning for Sustainable Forestland Development Lands for Tomorrow June 29, 2011.
1 Preservation Parcels Investigation Report to the Board of County Commissioners September 19, :30 PM.
Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry How to estimate future forest cover in a watershed.
11-4 How Should We Protect and Sustain Wetlands?
SKAGIT COUNTY SHORELINE REGULATIONS Planning Commission Workshop April 3, 2012.
Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry How to estimate future forest cover in a watershed.
May 5, 2015 Water Resources Meeting Heather Gutherless Jefferson County Planning & Zoning
A Land Preservation Framework for the Cacapon Watershed of West Virginia Michael P. Strager Charles B. Yuill Natural Resource Analysis Center West Virginia.
Coastal Web Atlases in the Chesapeake Bay Region: Examples from Virginia and Maryland Marcia R. Berman Center for Coastal Resources Management Virginia.
The WLP must be consistent with these objectives 1.maintaining or enhancing an economically valuable supply of commercial timber from the woodlot licence.
What is the Water Table? Zone of aeration • pore spaces contain air
Green Infrastructure Network Design Analysis Beaufort County, North Carolina.
ENVIRONMENTAL OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS ARCHAEOLOGICAL - HISTORICAL INVESTIGATIONS PERMITTING FOR UNAVOIDABLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AREA ENDANGERED.
Challenges and Opportunities for Increased Access to On-shore Federal Lands Natural Gas Technologies What’s New & What’s Next Orlando, FL January 30-February.
Watercourse DPA District of North Vancouver Streamside DPA Development Permit Area for the Protection of the Natural Environment: Streamside Areas Public.
Community Development Department FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT SMALL-SCALE LU-MIN & ZONING MAP AMENDMENT RZ-OTH
Conservation Easements: Preserving Agricultural Land and Water
Annexations as a Means to Preserve Open Space October 29, 2009.
The Windham Watershed Protection Group (WWPG)
Home*A*Syst Site Assessment.  Started in 1993  Funded through tonnage fees applied to pesticides and fertilizers sold in Michigan.  Program objective.
Stormwater Overview Board of County Commissioners Planning Conference March 1, 2007.
Planning Zones to Protect People Near Pipelines Chuck Lesniak City of Austin Watershed Protection Department.
Cumberland Park CCB Project Virginia Department of Environmental Quality October 9, 2007.
T28 N R4 W S01 T 5 N R 4 E S 15 T31 N R4 E S20.
Virginia Outdoors Foundation Encouraging the protection of open space in Virginia …
Best Local Land Use Practices A Project of the Ohio Lake Erie Commission The Countryside Program, Levin College of Urban Affairs Kirby Date, AICP Coordinator.
Helping Communities Protect Wildlife Habitat Emily Brunkhurst Wildlife Biologist NH Fish and Game Taking Action for Wildlife.
Lake Raleigh Wetland Creation Feasibility Study NC State Centennial Campus Melanie Carter, Jennifer Burdette, Amanda Jones.
Waterbody Classification Project A project of the Lakes and Watershed Commission, Dane County Department of Planning and Development, and the Dane County.
Island County Planning and Community Development Permitting 101.
Ohio Balanced Growth Program Codes and Ordinances Workshop: Recommendations for Development and Site Layout Kirby Date, AICP, Cleveland State University.
The Public Waterfront Act. Covering the basic questions Why? Purpose of Act and Regulations Where? Geographic Jurisdiction What? Activities Subject to.
Our Public and Federal Lands. The big picture 35% of US is public land 75% of that land is in Alaska.
Figures & Maps Documentation Floodplain (FIRM) Maps Wetland (NWI) Maps Site Maps Conceptual Site Development Plan.
Chapter 21 Water Supply, Use and Management. Groundwater and Streams Groundwater –Water found below the Earth’s surface, within the zone of saturation,
June 6, 2012 Brian Reis, PE.  RPS Espey’s role in the planning process  Key state and federal requirements  Our unique water quantity and water quality.
Ordinance No. 880-B, Revisions to Chapter 9.5 of the City of Southlake Code, Article V – Oil & Gas Well Drilling and Production. Item 6B.
CONSERVATION AND RESOURSE PROTECTION GRANT PROGRAM NEVADA DIVISION OF STATE LANDS Question 1.
GREEN GROWTH TOOLBOX Wildlife & Natural Resource Stewardship in Planning Wildlife & Natural Resource Stewardship in Planning Black-crowned night heron.
OPEN SPACE/ CONSERVATION
GOOSE CREEK WATERSHED LEVEL I STUDY SCOPING MEETING
Environmental Critical Areas Regulations
Environmentally sensitive areas
Hudson Wetlands Protection Bylaw
Water Quality Protection Zones
IMPLEMENTING AMENDMENT 1
LAKE PROTECTION GRANTS Eligible Activities State Stats (3)
Comprehensive Land Use Planning and Zoning
WESt Sammamish park project
Agri-Nature Entrepreneurship
Environmentally sensitive areas
Presentation transcript:

Shale Gas Drilling County-wide SURFACE DRILLING CONSTRAINTS SPATIAL ANALYSIS EXERCISE

Current Regulation – Deep Creek Watershed Zoning Ordinance 2000’ from the high water elevation line of Deep Creek Lake, measured at 2,462 feet above sea level

Proposed Regulation – Appendix A: Location Restrictions and Setbacks Restriction #3: No well pad may be permitted on land with a slope, before grading, of greater than 15 percent. Note: 40.4% of the county has slopes greater than 15%

Proposed Regulation – Appendix A: Location Restrictions and Setbacks Restriction #4: No well pad may be permitted within the watersheds of any of the following reservoirs: a. Broadford Lake b. Piney Reservoir c. Savage Reservoir Delineations provided by MDE and based on the drainage area that serves each reservoir

Proposed Regulation – Appendix A: Location Restrictions and Setbacks Restriction #5b: the edge of disturbance of a well pad shall be at least 450 feet from the edge of an aquatic habitat. Aquatic habitat is listed in Appendix D of the same document as streams, rivers, seeps, springs, wetlands, lakes, ponds, reservoirs and the 100 year floodplain.

Applying the buffer 450 foot buffer on aquatic habitat

Proposed Regulation – Appendix A: Location Restrictions and Setbacks Restriction #5c: The edge of disturbance of a well pad shall be at least 600 feet from special conservation areas Appendix D defines these as wildlands and irreplaceable natural areas (INA) INAs are Tier 1 & 2 areas in the State BioNet Conservation Diversity Map No GIS layer for wildlands but all appear to be in the Savage River watershed and align closely with the tiers

Applying the buffer 600 foot buffer on Tier 1 & Tier 2 areas

What about land in currently in a conservation program? According to DNR/MDE sources these areas will most likely be prohibited from any surface drilling but no setbacks will be applied These lands include lands owned by the Nature Conservancy, Agricultural Preservation easements or MET easements

Applying the restriction Properties are classified as restricted but no setback is applied

Proposed Regulation – Appendix A: Location Restrictions and Setbacks Restriction #5d: The edge of disturbance of a well pad shall be at least 300 feet from a cultural or historic site, State or Federal parks, trails, wildlife management areas, wild scenic rivers and scenic byways. Appendix D lists only those historic sites on the National Registry DNR trails data was mapped Wild scenic rivers were included in the 450 foot setback of aquatic habitat

Applying the buffer 300 foot buffer from state parks and scenic byways

Proposed Regulation – Appendix A: Location Restrictions and Setbacks Restriction #5e: The edge of disturbance of a well pad shall be at least 1000 feet of known caves. Cave data was provided by DNR

Applying the buffer 1000 foot buffer from known caves

Proposed Regulation – Appendix A: Location Restrictions and Setbacks Restriction #5f: The edge of disturbance of a well pad shall be at least 750 feet on the downdip side of a limestone outcrop. Karst data was provided by DNR This cannot be mapped at this time, for though Karst shows where outcrops could be, it doesn’t show where they are.

Proposed Regulation – Appendix A: Location Restrictions and Setbacks Restriction #5g: The edge of disturbance of a well pad shall be at least 1000 feet from any occupied building, school or church. County addresses are assigned to residences and businesses. No structures where people do not live, work or regularly congregate should be assigned an address. Addresses are given to structures and not lots, therefore they are located in the center of building footprints. If the State defines ‘occupied buildings’ to include seasonal or rental homes, all addresses in the county would be included as occupied buildings.

Applying the buffer 1000 feet from occupied buildings, schools and churches

Proposed Regulation – Appendix A: Location Restrictions and Setbacks Restriction #5h: The edge of disturbance of a well pad shall be at least 1000 feet of a wellhead protection area or a source water assessment area for a public water system for which a Source Water Protection Area (SWPA) has been delineated…

Applying the buffer 1000 feet from a SWPA

Proposed Regulation – Appendix A: Location Restrictions and Setbacks Restriction #5k: The edge of disturbance of a well pad shall be at least 2000 feet from a private drinking water well. Since all addresses are located in the building footprint then the assumption is made that their location is close to the location of the well. All addresses not served public water would qualify for this setback.

Applying the buffer 2000 feet from all addresses not served public water

Points of note Did not include historic oil or gas wells, or other features that were unavailable for mapping. Restriction #7 states that the ‘setback restrictions for well pads also apply to all gas development activities that result in permanent surface alteration…’ Restriction #5a calls for all well pads to be 1000 foot from the boundary of the property on which the well is to be drilled. As a consequence the areas left in the map must meet that restriction.