Protecting Ground Water via Pesticide Registration in New York Presentation to the Cornell Pesticide Users March 29, 2013 Soil & Water Group Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Further Site Investigation Sutton Walls Former Landfill
Advertisements

Metropolitan Council Environmental Services A Clean Water Agency Presented to the Environment Committee November 9, 2010 Information Item Master Water.
Stream Monitoring in Loudoun County David Ward, Water Resources Engineer Department of Building and Development, Department of Building and Development,
Springs Protection Options Septic System Evaluation Program Board of County Commissioners Meeting November 13 th 2012.
Joseph Zachmann, Ph.D. Research Scientist Pesticide & Fertilizer Management Division.
Christopher Guerrero, Steven Pacenka, Tammo Steenhuis Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University (Summer 2011) Acknowledgments.
Michael J. Brayton MD/DE/DC Water Science Center Hydrologic Controls on Nutrient and Pesticide Transport through a Small Agricultural Watershed, Morgan.
Nutrient and Pesticide Accounting in the Chipola River/Floridan Aquifer System By Christy Crandall A New Study Jointly Funded by U.S. Geological Survey.
Applications of Hydrogeologic settings in Groundwater vulnerability mapping in LaGrange County, Indiana, USA Solomon A. Isiorho, PhD Dept. of Geosciences.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Transport of Agricultural Chemicals: Tile Drains to Surface Water Wesley W. Stone.
Please note: this presentation has not received Director’s approval and is subject to revision.
Illinois Drainage Water Management Demonstration Project Don Pitts Agricultural Engineer State Water Quality Specialist Champaign, IL NRCS USDA.
Nitrogen Losses at a Drainage Systems Scale Bruce Montgomery MN Department of Agriculture.
60 Ways to Leave Your Groundwater … Cleaner Audrey Eldridge, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Kevin Fenn, Oregon Department of Agriculture Support.
Sampling of Private Wells for Pesticides, Upstate NY Presentation to the NYS DEC Bureau of Pesticides Management Feb. 24, 2009 Tammo Steenhuis, Brian Richards.
Ground Water Part 2 Steven Pacenka, Cornell Biological and Environmental Engineering for NYS Conservation District Employees' Association 14 March 2008.
The Nevada Department of Agriculture Water Quality Program The Nevada Department of Agriculture has been involved in groundwater protection since 1990.
Why evaluate nitrate losses from watersheds?   Potential health risks to public and private water supplies   Eutrophication   Hypoxia - Deficiency.
Protecting Ground Water via Pesticide Registration in New York Presentation to the Watershed Science and Technical Conference Sep. 16, 2010 Steven Pacenka,
GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM TECHNICAL SERVICES BUREAU WESTERN REGIONS PESTICIDE MEETING MAY 2007.
Sampling of Private Wells for Pesticides, Upstate NY Presentation to the NYS Soil & Water Conservation Committee Oct. 21, 2008 Brian Richards and Steve.
Office of Science & Technology Policy Executive Office of the President The National Climate Assessment Version 3.0 Kathy Jacobs Assistant Director for.
Potentiometric Surface Map - September 2007 Sources of Nitrate and Estimated Groundwater Travel Times to Springs of the Santa Fe River Basin, AMEC.
Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering
INAPPROPRIATELY STORAGED DDT AS A POTENTIAL RISK FOR HUMAN HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT 6th ALPS-ADRIA SCIENTIFIC WORKSHOP 30 April - 5 May, 2007 Obervellach,
Overview of USGS Groundwater Quality Assessment Activities and Related Data in Alabama 2011 Alabama Water Resources Conference September 9, 2011, Perdido.
Roger Miller, Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality Barry Jackson, USGS Arkansas Water Science Center ARKANSAS EXCHANGE NETWORK FOR GROUNDWATER-QUALITY.
Watershed Planning: Current Status and Next Steps
Planning for Groundwater in Lafayette County August 2, 2006.
Basin-scale assessment of transport of water and agricultural chemicals through the unsaturated zone Rick Webb, Randy Bayless, Tracy Hancock, Chuck Fisher,
Loudoun County Water Resources Monitoring Presented to Loudoun Valley High School May 9, 2012 David Ward and Scott Sandberg Loudoun County Department of.
I.Summary of technical guideline II.Reviews III.Recommendations.
“STEWARDSHIP IN FORESTRY” Forestry Projects for Terrestrial Sequestration -- Regulatory and Public Acceptance Issues -- Jim Cathcart, Ph.D. Oregon Department.
Proposed Tools and Approach for Ground-Water Vulnerability Assessment (GWAVA) Using a Geographic Information System and Simulation Modeling Jack Barbash.
Pesticide Spray Drift Conference September 5 and 6, 2001 AgDRIFT® Dave Esterly Environmental Focus, Inc
Salinity and Bulk Water Workshop 27 October 2010 Werribee Irrigation District.
Ground Water Age and Chemistry Data along Flow Paths: Implications for Trends and Transformations of Nutrients and Pesticides Jim Tesoriero,
An Overview of Air, Water & Soil in Agriculture Barbara McCarthy, Ph.D. Environmental Health Department Colorado State University.
Probability of Detecting Atrazine and Elevated Concentrations of Nitrate in Colorado’s Ground Water USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report
Cooperative Agricultural Monitoring on California’s Central Coast: An Integrated, Innovative Approach Karen Worcester, Staff Environmental Scientist Alison.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Assessment of Shallow Ground-Water Quality in Agricultural and Urban Areas Within the Arid and Semiarid.
Trends in Shallow Ground-Water Quality of the Delmarva Peninsula Results from regional and local studies Linda M. Debrewer Judith M. Denver U.S. Department.
Climate Change and Land Management – SEPA’s role Janet Moxley (Senior Scientist – Climate Change) and Lorna Harris (Wetland Ecologist), SEPA.
Ground-Water Quality Trends in the South Platte River Alluvial Aquifer, Colorado Suzanne S. Paschke, Shana L. Mashburn, Jennifer L. Flynn, and Breton Bruce.
Debra Harrington and Haizhi Chen FDEP Groundwater Protection June, 2005 HYDROPORT RETRIEVAL APPLICATION FOR ASSESSMENTS.
Debra Harrington and Haizhi Chen FDEP Groundwater Protection March, 2005 PROTOTYPE FOR SPRING SYSTEM ASSESSMENTS.
Trends in Pesticide Detections and Concentrations in Ground Water of the United States, (Study Results and Lessons Learned) Laura Bexfield U.S.
State of Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management Office of Waste Management Policy Memo Guidelines for the Management of Historically.
Integrating the NAWQA approach to assessments in rivers and streams By Donna Myers, Bill Wilber, Anne Hoos, and Charlie Crawford U.S. Geological Survey,
Groundwater Protection Project Greg Robison Project Manager Ed Sullivan Consulting Engineer June 23, 2008.
Santa Rosa Plain Groundwater Management Situation Assessment Jay Jasperse, Sonoma County Water Agency Gina Bartlett, Center for Collaborative Policy January.
Santa Rosa Plain Groundwater Management Planning Update Fall 2013.
To better understand ground water, it’s important to visualize the rock layers, most of which serve as drinking water aquifers, which exist under Dodge.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Recommendations From the New Jersey Climate Adaptation Alliance Marjorie B. Kaplan, Associate Director Rutgers.
Air Toxics & Public Health Committee Update Heidi Hales Monitoring and Assessment Committee Meeting Troy, NH April 24, 2007.
Assessing baseline groundwater chemistry for the Berea sandstone and Rogersville shale play area, eastern Kentucky Kentucky Geological Survey, University.
Assessing Ground Water Vulnerability through Statistical Methods I NWQMC May 7-11, 2006 San Jose, CA NWQMC May 7-11, 2006 San Jose, CA.
Dodge County Water Monitoring Update
Groundwater Modeling in the South Carolina Coastal Plain
Development and Application of a Groundwater-Flow Model of the Atlantic Coastal Plain aquifers, Aiken County, South Carolina to Support Water Resource.
An Integrated Approach for Source Water Protection and Awareness in
Sustainable Groundwater Management Act
GROUNDWATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF THE PINEY POINT AQUIFER
Local Government Climate Change Support Program 2016
Institute for the Study of Society and Environment
FAQs for Evaluating the Soil-to-Groundwater Pathway
2015 GEI VP Planning Meeting
Greater Kaweah GSA Board Meeting
Greater Kaweah GSA Board Meeting
Protecting Drinking Water via Pesticide Registration in New York
Presentation transcript:

Protecting Ground Water via Pesticide Registration in New York Presentation to the Cornell Pesticide Users March 29, 2013 Soil & Water Group Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering

Outline Overview: Pesticides in groundwater Overview: Pesticides in groundwater Upstate monitoring by county Upstate monitoring by county Vulnerable formations: karst Vulnerable formations: karst New initiatives New initiatives Outreach Outreach

Long Island pesticide data: tracing past contamination Sampling intensity hi low

Pesticide detection patterns in Suffolk County groundwater From data Suffolk County submitted to New York State, Preliminary: Percentage of pesticide analyses reported as above detection limit

Current Pesticide Use in NY Derived from New York Pesticide Sales and Use Reporting system published data.

Mobility & persistence are combined in the Groundwater Ubiquity Score (GUS) factor Low High Very Low Medium Very High * Imazethapyr * Carbofuran * Atrazine * Alachlor * Chlorothalonil * Glyphosate

Pesticide use weighted by GUS

Upstate monitoring strategy Not looking for: Average groundwater concentrations Spills or violations But rather sampling well water in areas deemed vulnerable due to: high pesticide use groundwater (soil/aquifer) characteristics that favor transport

Working premise If well water in vulnerable areas is of good quality, then we can have high confidence that well water in less vulnerable areas is also of good quality Cortland County cornfield that dominates hill above shallow wells

Outline Overview: Pesticides in groundwater Overview: Pesticides in groundwater Upstate monitoring by county Upstate monitoring by county Karst formations Karst formations New initiatives New initiatives Outreach Outreach

County-based sampling Schenectady Orange Cayuga Cortland Genesee Wayne Partnering with local S&WCD’s, WQCC and DOH

Testing for... DEC lab (to 2009): 93 active ingredients DEC lab (to 2009): 93 active ingredients DEC lab since 2010: shorter priority list of 51 AIs and degradates (metabolites) DEC lab since 2010: shorter priority list of 51 AIs and degradates (metabolites) Cornell Soil & Water Laboratory: -- Selected active ingredients using higher resolution ELISA immunoassay methods -- Nitrates, anions (IC)

Findings in six counties... DEC broad-based scans: DEC broad-based scans: One detection of one active ingredient in 240 samples (reporting limits 1 μg/L (1 ppb) or less). Degradation products detected in 5 of 41 wells tested in Wayne County No exceedance of any of 15 NYS ground water standards or guidance levels No exceedance of any of 15 NYS ground water standards or guidance levels

Wayne County wells with detections or high NO 3 -N Land use: CC - corn/grain cash crop rotation O - orchards (apple) M -muckland vegetables W - wooded Depth (ft) Land Use NO 3 -N Metolachlor (µg/L)Alachlor ESA (µg/L) Atrazine (µg/L) (mg/L) OAESA OCC 14 ND < 0.1 ND 40-45CCW ND < 0.1trace<0.1 40CCO <0.5 ND < ND < 0.1ND 42CCO ND 12MCC10.2 ND < 0.1ND 22CCO< ND < 0.1trace <0.1

Cornell ELISA assay results for select AI’s

Nitrates typical for rural NY * * SO 4 interference

Interpretation to date Upstate rural wells – even vulnerable shallow wells surrounded by fields and having elevated nitrate – are in good shape relative to current groundwater pesticide standards. There are frequent low traces of atrazine and some metolachlor in agricultural areas, as found nationally.

Ongoing county-level work Revisiting selected wells in view of: Improved DEC lab reporting limits (0.1 ppb starting with Wayne Co.) Addition of key pesticide degradation products (metabolites) which can have greater mobility and/or toxicity than original AI Time-of-sampling studies – repeated at several month intervals (Orange County)

Questions so far? Overview: Pesticides in groundwater Overview: Pesticides in groundwater Upstate monitoring by county Upstate monitoring by county Karst formations Karst formations New initiatives New initiatives Outreach Outreach

Karst (carbonate) ground water Objective: determine if karst requires special registration consideration Genesee county hydrogeologic setting Interim results

Lots of carbonate in Upstate NY Dark hatching is carbonate; Source: USGS

Karst: Solution conduits in limestone

Carbonate western NY

Genesee karst Flow in limestone; losing reaches

Genesee karst: sampling sites

Genesee karst: sampling depths Onondaga Shale Unconf

Genesee karst: 16 months overall: atrazine 5/22 detects to 0.05 ppb 7/19 detects 0/9 detects Metolachlor similar: 6/13, 5/11, 0/6 respectively

Genesee karst: atrazine seasonality (% of samples) Jun10Jul10Sep10Dec10Sep11 Detect >=0.1 Trace >=0.05 ND <0.05 ppb

Geneva AES limestone?

Questions? Overview: Pesticides in groundwater Overview: Pesticides in groundwater Upstate monitoring by county Upstate monitoring by county Karst formations Karst formations New initiatives New initiatives Outreach Outreach

Looking ahead: New initiatives I - Lakeshore water supplies I - Lakeshore water supplies II - Greenhouse leaching II - Greenhouse leaching III - DEC modeling support III - DEC modeling support

Objective Assess the standard pesticide environmental fate model toolkit used in the NY registration process. Toolkit = leaching models + conservative environmental scenarios Leaching Model Support

Modeling tasks Specify evaluation criteria with DEC DEC staff workshop – walk through current goals, assumptions, & input scenarios Stakeholder roundtable – solicit input on model and design scenarios

Model and scenario evaluation - retrospective cases, new scenarios DEC workshop to walk through and evaluate findings, make draft recommendations Report with new model + scenario packages if merited More modeling tasks

Leaching models 1980’s traditional LEACHP, PRZM

Leaching models improved 1980’s traditional LEACHP, PRZM 2000’s with preferential Flow paths, tile drains, fragipans, i.e. short circuits and lateral losses to streams

Scenarios: conservative case(s) of usage, soil, climate, and depth to ground water. Do we need new upstate scenarios? Long Island (Riverhead) Upstate carbonate (Batavia) Upstate tile drains (Willsboro)

Willsboro Farm: Atrazine measured in tile drains Concentration Versus time

Aldicarb at CU Riverhead – simulated with DEC scenario Recharge Leachate concentration

Atrazine leaching: thin soil at Batavia Atrazine leaching: Long Island Atrazine leaching: Long Island

Questions? Overview: Pesticides in groundwater Overview: Pesticides in groundwater Upstate monitoring by county Upstate monitoring by county Karst formations Karst formations New initiatives New initiatives Outreach Outreach

Publications Ground Water Monitoring & Remediation research articles NY Veg Growers News Events 2011 Empire Farm Days booth Cornell in-service training NY State Soil & Water Conservation Committee September 2012 Northeast Pesticides C&T Meeting Webpage soilandwater.bee.cornell.edu/Research/pesticides/

Thanks to Funding NYS DEC NYS WRI directors Keith Porter & Susan Riha, who delegated to BEE County Partners Cortland, Schenectady, Orange, Cayuga, Genesee, and Wayne County Soil & Water Conservation Districts. Genesee County Health Dept. Many private well owners. Karst partner: Paul Richards, College at Brockport, Dept of Earth Sciences Cornell Pesticide Management Education Program for help using the PSUR database NYS Soil & Water Conservation Committee for early endorsement Cornell students Ian Toevs, Tony Salvucci, Ben Liu, Sophia Garcia, Mike Sinkevich, Ivy Tsoi, Zia Ahmed, Sheila Saia, Austin Merboth, Cedric Mason

Thank You!

Contacts Brian Richards Brian Richards Steve Pacenka Steve Pacenka Tammo Steenhuis Tammo Steenhuis pesticides/‏